# Project Brief status: draft_runtime_boundary date: 2026-06-20 ## One-Sentence Definition `Cognitive-OS-Wantsong` is a lightweight cognitive-processing runtime that uses Wantsong's cognitive models to process complex inputs into internal analysis and reader-facing explanations. ## Restart Basis The old project proved useful file-first model-governance mechanisms, but its operating gravity drifted toward review evidence, selector calibration, regression cases, and lifecycle caution. This project starts from the opposite order: ```text run real cognitive workflow -> inspect output value -> stabilize useful model pieces ``` M0-M1 therefore creates only the boundary and model-management kernel required before any runtime sample. ## Product Layers The project has three layers and one review lane: 1. Model management layer: register, describe, call, combine, retire, and repair model assets. 2. Cognitive-processing runtime layer: intake, QPI, lens orchestration, deep processing, synthesis, calibration, and feedback. 3. Reader translation layer: turn internal model output into understandable reader-facing expression. 4. Milestone quality lane: Local CCRA reviews milestone outputs, not every small edit. ## M0 Acceptance M0 is acceptable when: - the repo has an independent git boundary and remote; - the old project is documented only as reference and seed archive; - forbidden old process artifacts are not present; - v0.1 non-goals are explicit. ## M1 Acceptance M1 is acceptable when: - QPI and Intellectual Archaeology have callable model cards; - `models/model-registry.json` supports future primary/support selection; - model statuses and levels are defined without creating a full lifecycle system; - no full selector, full schema validator, sample run, or regression suite exists. ## Non-Goals For v0.1 Startup - full model library; - 10-model expansion; - complete schema validator; - database; - backend service; - frontend UI; - vector database; - full RAG; - full regression suite; - lifecycle promotion; - before/after selector diff; - Web review bundle by default; - old report migration; - old review-bundle migration; - old Local CCRA history migration; - Round Conductor. ## Failure Signals M0-M1 is drifting if: - QPI becomes the main governance object again; - review artifacts outgrow runtime artifacts before the first sample; - Codex creates `round-*`, `ccra_review_bundle/`, or full regression material; - model management starts requiring perfect evidence matrices before any runtime use; - reader translation is ignored as a product layer.