From 19774be65e3c842f9037b1a773fcb902d9b560f8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wantsong Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2026 00:25:11 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Complete viewpoint distillation workflow upgrade --- .../00-source-map.md | 95 ++++++++ .../01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md | 216 ++++++++++++++++++ .../2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/01-topic-map.md | 185 +++++++++++++++ .../02-material-routing-log.md | 27 +++ .../2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/03-run-notes.md | 81 +++++++ .../LEGACY-FLOW-NOTE.md | 44 ++++ .../2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/README.md | 57 +++++ .../2026-06-06-after-hierarchy-review.md | 185 +++++++++++++++ .../continuation/2026-06-06-after-segmentation.md | 106 +++++++++ .../continuation/2026-06-06-after-topic-discovery.md | 93 ++++++++ .../thread-return-packets/R01-segmentation-return.md | 1 + .../R01-topic-discovery-return.md | 78 +++++++ .../thread-return-packets/R02-segmentation-return.md | 1 + .../R02-topic-discovery-return.md | 71 ++++++ .../thread-return-packets/R03-segmentation-return.md | 1 + .../R03-topic-discovery-return.md | 54 +++++ .../thread-return-packets/R04-segmentation-return.md | 1 + .../R04-topic-discovery-return.md | 70 ++++++ .../thread-return-packets/R05-segmentation-return.md | 1 + .../R05-topic-discovery-return.md | 61 +++++ .../thread-return-packets/R06-segmentation-return.md | 1 + .../R06-topic-discovery-return.md | 79 +++++++ .../thread-return-packets/R07-segmentation-return.md | 1 + .../R07-topic-discovery-return.md | 88 +++++++ .../R01-segmentation-thread-start.md | 1 + .../R01-topic-discovery-thread-start.md | 1 + .../R02-segmentation-thread-start.md | 1 + .../R02-topic-discovery-thread-start.md | 1 + .../R03-segmentation-thread-start.md | 1 + .../R03-topic-discovery-thread-start.md | 1 + .../R04-segmentation-thread-start.md | 1 + .../R04-topic-discovery-thread-start.md | 1 + .../R05-segmentation-thread-start.md | 1 + .../R05-topic-discovery-thread-start.md | 1 + .../R06-segmentation-thread-start.md | 1 + .../R06-topic-discovery-thread-start.md | 1 + .../R07-segmentation-thread-start.md | 1 + .../R07-topic-discovery-thread-start.md | 1 + .../agent-invocation-packet.md | 90 ++++++++ .../skill-execution-record.md | 95 ++++++++ .../source-block-inventory.csv | 41 ++++ .../topic-discovery-router/R01-returned-output.md | 152 ++++++++++++ .../topic-discovery-router/R02-returned-output.md | 160 +++++++++++++ .../topic-discovery-router/R03-returned-output.md | 128 +++++++++++ .../topic-discovery-router/R04-returned-output.md | 161 +++++++++++++ .../topic-discovery-router/R05-returned-output.md | 82 +++++++ .../topic-discovery-router/R06-returned-output.md | 153 +++++++++++++ .../topic-discovery-router/R07-returned-output.md | 136 +++++++++++ .../agent-invocation-packet.md | 111 +++++++++ .../topic-discovery-router/blocked-status.md | 16 ++ .../topic-discovery-router/prompt-to-send.md | 97 ++++++++ .../topic-discovery-router/synthesis-record.md | 46 ++++ .../topic-discovery-router/worker-output-index.md | 28 +++ .../00-source-map.md | 51 +++++ .../01-topic-map.md | 148 ++++++++++++ .../02-material-routing-log.md | 88 +++++++ .../03-run-notes.md | 71 ++++++ .../2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/README.md | 82 +++++++ .../audits/coverage-audit.md | 60 +++++ .../audits/distortion-risk-log.md | 43 ++++ .../audits/extraction-quality-audit.md | 44 ++++ .../audits/process-implementation-audit.md | 60 +++++ .../continuation/2026-06-06-completion-handoff.md | 93 ++++++++ .../handoff/topic-docs-human-confirmation.md | 33 +++ .../agent-invocation-packet.md | 60 +++++ .../human-confirmation.md | 84 +++++++ .../whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/prompt-to-send.md | 83 +++++++ .../whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/returned-output.md | 148 ++++++++++++ .../topics/00-root-overview.md | 71 ++++++ .../topics/A-入口与边界层.md | 64 ++++++ .../topics/B-机制解释层.md | 67 ++++++ .../topics/C-I域治理与认知主权层.md | 79 +++++++ .../topics/D-巨人方舟通用模型层.md | 94 ++++++++ .../topics/E-领域应用与局部模型层.md | 85 +++++++ .../topics/_material-extraction-index.md | 88 +++++++ skills/context-management-policy.md | 28 ++- .../capability-spec.md | 19 +- .../ccpe-runtime-alignment.md | 2 +- ...request-2026-06-06-whole-source-gestalt.md | 65 +++++- .../context-strategy.md | 39 +++- .../invocation-contract.md | 28 ++- .../runbook.md | 60 +++-- 82 files changed, 5005 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/01-topic-map.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/02-material-routing-log.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/03-run-notes.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/LEGACY-FLOW-NOTE.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/README.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-after-hierarchy-review.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-after-segmentation.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-after-topic-discovery.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-segmentation-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-topic-discovery-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-segmentation-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-topic-discovery-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R03-segmentation-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R03-topic-discovery-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-segmentation-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-topic-discovery-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-segmentation-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-topic-discovery-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-segmentation-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-topic-discovery-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-segmentation-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-topic-discovery-return.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R01-segmentation-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R01-topic-discovery-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R02-segmentation-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R02-topic-discovery-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R03-segmentation-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R03-topic-discovery-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R04-segmentation-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R04-topic-discovery-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R05-segmentation-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R05-topic-discovery-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R06-segmentation-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R06-topic-discovery-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R07-segmentation-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R07-topic-discovery-thread-start.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/agent-invocation-packet.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/skill-execution-record.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R01-returned-output.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R02-returned-output.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R03-returned-output.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R04-returned-output.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R05-returned-output.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R06-returned-output.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R07-returned-output.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/blocked-status.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/prompt-to-send.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/synthesis-record.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/worker-output-index.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/00-source-map.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/01-topic-map.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/02-material-routing-log.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/03-run-notes.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/README.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/coverage-audit.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/distortion-risk-log.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/extraction-quality-audit.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/process-implementation-audit.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-completion-handoff.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/handoff/topic-docs-human-confirmation.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/agent-invocation-packet.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/human-confirmation.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/prompt-to-send.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/returned-output.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/00-root-overview.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/A-入口与边界层.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/B-机制解释层.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/C-I域治理与认知主权层.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/D-巨人方舟通用模型层.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/E-领域应用与局部模型层.md create mode 100644 discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/_material-extraction-index.md diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..275ae2d --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +# Source Map + +## 1. Source Document + +```text +source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +source_type: diary-discussion +file_size_bytes: 130947 +line_count_method: .NET UTF-8 ReadAllLines +line_count: 4114 +character_count_powerShell_measure: 47088 +last_write_time: 06/06/2026 18:22:46 +source_mutation_policy: read-only; do not move, overwrite, delete, or mark disposable before coverage audit and user confirmation +``` + +## 2. Boundary Rule + +```text +primary_round_boundary: numeric Markdown H1 headings # 1 through # 7 +embedded_h1_note: source line 21 is the quoted article title inside R01, not a runtime round boundary +block_split_rule: preserve round boundaries; split at blank-line paragraph groups; target chunk size about 1400 characters; do not interpret topics +``` + +## 3. Source Block ID Convention + +```text +round_id: R01 through R07 +block_id: R{round}-B{block_number}, for example R01-B001 +locator: source line range based on .NET UTF-8 ReadAllLines +``` + +## 4. Round Inventory + +| round_id | heading | source_lines | status | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| R01 | # 1 | L1-L430 | segmented | +| R02 | # 2 | L431-L1008 | segmented | +| R03 | # 3 | L1009-L1584 | segmented | +| R04 | # 4 | L1585-L2336 | segmented | +| R05 | # 5 | L2337-L2986 | segmented | +| R06 | # 6 | L2987-L3488 | segmented | +| R07 | # 7 | L3489-L4114 | segmented | + +## 5. Source Blocks + +| block_id | round_id | heading | locator | block_type | summary_locator | status | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| R01-B001 | R01 | # 1 | L1-L74 | heading_or_section | # 1 | segmented | +| R01-B002 | R01 | # 1 | L76-L136 | source_text | 尽管我不是太懂什么是失望性情感隔离？ | segmented | +| R01-B003 | R01 | # 1 | L138-L221 | source_text | 这类状态有时和长期压力、创伤、抑郁、药物副作用、焦虑耗竭等因素有关，不能简单归因于“你小时候没被爱”。情感麻木在临床语境中通常是症状或状态，不等于一个独立诊断。  | segmented | +| R01-B004 | R01 | # 1 | L225-L320 | source_text | 四、逐条点评你的 4 个观点 | segmented | +| R01-B005 | R01 | # 1 | L322-L413 | source_text | 问题在于，它用心理学词汇制造“专业感”，但缺少几个严肃知识应有的东西： | segmented | +| R01-B006 | R01 | # 1 | L415-L428 | source_text | 更准确的立场应该是： | segmented | +| R02-B001 | R02 | # 2 | L431-L487 | heading_or_section | # 2 | segmented | +| R02-B002 | R02 | # 2 | L489-L627 | source_text | - 认知失调处理方式 | segmented | +| R02-B003 | R02 | # 2 | L629-L745 | source_text | 所以你说干预模型需要实时调整，是对的。因为一个人在不同阶段面对的主导层级不同： | segmented | +| R02-B004 | R02 | # 2 | L747-L870 | source_text | 这是一个策略问题，需要具体方案。 | segmented | +| R02-B005 | R02 | # 2 | L872-L995 | source_text | 如果隔离只针对高风险对象，可能是边界。 | segmented | +| R02-B006 | R02 | # 2 | L997-L1007 | source_text | 它是在替你给答案，还是在帮你建立自我治理能力？ | segmented | +| R03-B001 | R03 | # 3 | L1009-L1092 | heading_or_section | # 3 | segmented | +| R03-B002 | R03 | # 3 | L1094-L1215 | source_text | 换句话说，外部不是“告诉你世界安全”，而是帮你搭一个局部安全世界，让大脑有机会重新采样。 | segmented | +| R03-B003 | R03 | # 3 | L1217-L1347 | source_text | - 家庭长期情感忽视； | segmented | +| R03-B004 | R03 | # 3 | L1349-L1478 | source_text | 但是，元认知不是唯一首位。 | segmented | +| R03-B005 | R03 | # 3 | L1480-L1582 | source_text | 无恶意，但能力不足。 | segmented | +| R04-B001 | R04 | # 4 | L1585-L1651 | heading_or_section | # 4 | segmented | +| R04-B002 | R04 | # 4 | L1653-L1760 | source_text | / / / | segmented | +| R04-B003 | R04 | # 4 | L1762-L1896 | source_text | 这一层可以接入 CBT。CBT 的核心就是识别想法、情绪、行为之间的关系，并通过认知和行为策略改变问题维持机制；APA 对 CBT 的介绍也强调，它已经被证明对多类问题有效，并关注... | segmented | +| R04-B004 | R04 | # 4 | L1898-L2027 | source_text | “我为什么这么脆弱？” | segmented | +| R04-B005 | R04 | # 4 | L2029-L2153 | source_text | 在巨人认知中，ACT 可以放在： | segmented | +| R04-B006 | R04 | # 4 | L2155-L2285 | source_text | - 我现在在耐受窗口内吗？ | segmented | +| R04-B007 | R04 | # 4 | L2287-L2335 | source_text | 第一，强化 GL0：加入身体调节、情绪耐受、神经系统状态。 | segmented | +| R05-B001 | R05 | # 5 | L2337-L2415 | heading_or_section | # 5 | segmented | +| R05-B002 | R05 | # 5 | L2417-L2533 | source_text |         │ CBT、ACT、第一性、奥卡姆等 │ | segmented | +| R05-B003 | R05 | # 5 | L2535-L2662 | source_text | 巨人方舟是一套以认知主权为核心、以现实反馈为校准、以行动实验为生成、以身心底盘和环境审计为约束的通用认知治理架构。 | segmented | +| R05-B004 | R05 | # 5 | L2666-L2783 | source_text | 4. 参与者之间会互相污染 | segmented | +| R05-B005 | R05 | # 5 | L2787-L2928 | source_text | 七、没有方法论的认知生成环境，会出现七种失败模式 | segmented | +| R05-B006 | R05 | # 5 | L2930-L2985 | source_text | 第二级：允许提供局部输入 | segmented | +| R06-B001 | R06 | # 6 | L2987-L3092 | heading_or_section | # 6 | segmented | +| R06-B002 | R06 | # 6 | L3094-L3252 | source_text | 对的部分是： | segmented | +| R06-B003 | R06 | # 6 | L3254-L3415 | source_text | 前期不要急着解释： | segmented | +| R06-B004 | R06 | # 6 | L3417-L3487 | source_text | 青少年如果已经出现明显孤立、长期低落、功能下降、危险行为，完全不管也是失职。美国儿童青少年精神医学会面向家庭的材料提到，孩子或青少年如果出现难以应对、悲伤、睡眠问题、物质使用、家庭... | segmented | +| R07-B001 | R07 | # 7 | L3489-L3578 | heading_or_section | # 7 | segmented | +| R07-B002 | R07 | # 7 | L3580-L3685 | source_text | - A 和 B 冲突，但不直接解决，转而都批评 C； | segmented | +| R07-B003 | R07 | # 7 | L3687-L3804 | source_text | 不同断裂，对应不同实验策略。 | segmented | +| R07-B004 | R07 | # 7 | L3806-L3952 | source_text | 我同意这个理想。 | segmented | +| R07-B005 | R07 | # 7 | L3954-L4059 | source_text | - B 不再向 C 倾倒婚姻痛苦； | segmented | +| R07-B006 | R07 | # 7 | L4061-L4113 | source_text |        安全感 / 期待模型 / 边界 / 自我叙事 / 关系预测 | segmented | + +## 6. Segmentation Warnings + +```text +- PowerShell Measure-Object line count did not match Select-String/.NET line positions; use .NET UTF-8 ReadAllLines locators for this run. +- The H1 article title at line 21 is treated as embedded source material, not a round boundary. +- This pass does not classify topics or summarize viewpoints. +``` \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1d010b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md @@ -0,0 +1,216 @@ +# Topic Hierarchy Proposal + +## 1. Status + +```text +status: draft_pending_user_confirmation +purpose: convert flat topic candidates into a hierarchy and graph before material routing +input: 01-topic-map.md and topic-discovery-router worker outputs R01-R07 +next_step_after_confirmation: material routing +``` + +This document corrects the flat topic-map problem. The source discussion is treated as one overarching inquiry with several layers, not as thirteen disconnected topics. + +## 2. Root Topic + +```text +root_topic_id: ROOT +root_topic_name: 从失望性情感隔离到认知生成与关系治理 +root_topic_slug: disappointment-detachment-to-cognitive-generation-and-relationship-governance +``` + +### Root Thesis + +本次讨论的核心不是“失望性情感隔离”这个标签本身，而是： + +```text +当一个人从原生家庭/关系失望出发，如何避免被心理标签和单因归因困住，转而建立一套能解释关系预测、保护边界、审计外部干预、维护认知主权，并通过小步行动实验修正现实关系的认知治理框架。 +``` + +`失望性情感隔离` 是入口问题；`认知生成环境 / I 域治理 / 巨人方舟 / 家庭三角认知场` 是讨论逐步展开后的结构化模型层。 + +## 3. Recommended Hierarchy + +```text +ROOT 从失望性情感隔离到认知生成与关系治理 + A. 入口与边界层：先把问题从标签中救出来 + A1. 失望性情感隔离的概念边界与反标签化 + A2. 心理学自媒体的知识拟态与内容审查 + + B. 机制解释层：隔离为什么形成、如何泛化、如何治理 + B1. 单因归因批判与多因素关系学习 + B2. 关系预测、期待落差与隔离治理变量 + + C. 认知主权层：谁有资格进入 I 域，如何审计外部干预 + C1. QPI 问题颗粒度与 I 域治理 + C2. 外部心理干预边界与资源审计 + C3. 认知生成环境与 I 域污染/参与者资格 + C4. 元认知协调、哲科思维与理论化防御 + C5. 方法论作为理论调度系统与信任分级 + + D. 架构升级层：把心理议题接入巨人认知/巨人方舟 + D1. 巨人认知 / 巨人方舟治理架构 + D2. 行动实验、最小有效干预与 Reality Lab + + E. 局部深化层：青少年与家庭系统场景 + E1. 青少年心理支持护栏与责任分层 + E2. 家庭三角认知场模型 +``` + +## 4. Mapping From Flat Topics + +| hierarchy_id | hierarchy_node | included_flat_topics | source_rounds | recommendation | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| A1 | 概念边界与反标签化 | T01 | R01, R02 | 一级子主题 | +| A2 | 心理学自媒体知识拟态 | T12 | R01 | A1 的来源/批判子主题；可独立成文档，也可作为 A1 子节 | +| B1 | 多因素关系学习 | T02 | R01, R02, R07 | 一级子主题 | +| B2 | 关系预测与隔离治理变量 | T03 | R01, R02, R06 | 一级子主题 | +| C1 | QPI 与 I 域治理入口 | T04 | R02, R03, R04, R05 | C 层入口，不建议作为平行一级主题 | +| C2 | 外部干预与资源审计 | T05 | R02, R03, R04, R06 | 一级子主题 | +| C3 | 认知生成环境与参与者资格 | T06 | R03, R05, R07 | 一级子主题 | +| C4 | 元认知协调与理论化防御 | T08 | R03, R04, R05 | C 层内部治理子主题 | +| C5 | 方法论调度与信任分级 | T13 | R05 | C 层操作治理子主题，和 D1 强关联 | +| D1 | 巨人认知 / 巨人方舟架构 | T07 | R04, R05, R06 | 一级架构主题 | +| D2 | 行动实验 / Reality Lab | T09 | R04, R06, R07 | D1 的行动层，建议拆出独立子主题 | +| E1 | 青少年支持护栏与责任分层 | T10 | R06, R07 | 场景深化子主题 | +| E2 | 家庭三角认知场模型 | T11 | R07 | 场景深化中的强模型候选 | + +## 5. Graph Proposal + +```mermaid +flowchart TD + ROOT["ROOT: 从失望性情感隔离到认知生成与关系治理"] + + A["A 入口与边界层"] + B["B 机制解释层"] + C["C 认知主权层"] + D["D 架构升级层"] + E["E 局部深化层: 青少年与家庭系统"] + + A1["A1 概念边界与反标签化"] + A2["A2 心理学自媒体知识拟态"] + B1["B1 多因素关系学习"] + B2["B2 关系预测与隔离治理变量"] + C1["C1 QPI 与 I 域治理入口"] + C2["C2 外部干预与资源审计"] + C3["C3 认知生成环境与参与者资格"] + C4["C4 元认知协调与理论化防御"] + C5["C5 方法论调度与信任分级"] + D1["D1 巨人认知 / 巨人方舟架构"] + D2["D2 行动实验 / Reality Lab"] + E1["E1 青少年支持护栏与责任分层"] + E2["E2 家庭三角认知场模型"] + + ROOT --> A + ROOT --> B + ROOT --> C + ROOT --> D + ROOT --> E + + A --> A1 + A --> A2 + B --> B1 + B --> B2 + C --> C1 + C --> C2 + C --> C3 + C --> C4 + C --> C5 + D --> D1 + D --> D2 + E --> E1 + E --> E2 + + A1 --> B2 + A2 --> A1 + B1 --> B2 + B2 --> C1 + C1 --> C2 + C2 --> C3 + C3 --> C4 + C4 --> C5 + C5 --> D1 + D1 --> D2 + D2 --> E1 + E1 --> E2 + E2 --> B1 +``` + +## 6. Narrative Order Proposal + +Use this order for topic documents and material routing: + +```text +1. A 层：为什么不能停留在心理标签和自媒体命名。 +2. B 层：真正的问题机制是关系预测、期待落差和防御泛化。 +3. C 层：一旦进入心理/关系干预，就必须讨论 I 域主权、外部资源审计和参与者资格。 +4. D 层：把上述问题上升为巨人认知/巨人方舟的治理架构，并用 Reality Lab 承接行动实验。 +5. E 层：在青少年与家庭系统场景中局部深化，形成家庭三角认知场模型。 +``` + +This order preserves the source discussion's movement: entry problem -> mechanism -> governance -> architecture -> scenario-specific model. + +## 7. Topic Document Proposal + +Instead of thirteen equal topic documents, use a nested topic package: + +```text +topics/ + 00-root-overview.md + A-入口与边界层/ + A1-失望性情感隔离的概念边界与反标签化.md + A2-心理学自媒体的知识拟态与内容审查.md + B-机制解释层/ + B1-单因归因批判与多因素关系学习.md + B2-关系预测期待落差与隔离治理变量.md + C-认知主权层/ + C1-QPI问题颗粒度与I域治理.md + C2-外部心理干预边界与资源审计.md + C3-认知生成环境与参与者资格.md + C4-元认知协调哲科思维与理论化防御.md + C5-方法论调度与信任分级.md + D-架构升级层/ + D1-巨人认知与巨人方舟治理架构.md + D2-行动实验最小有效干预与Reality-Lab.md + E-局部深化层/ + E1-青少年心理支持护栏与责任分层.md + E2-家庭三角认知场模型.md +``` + +## 8. Routing Implication + +Material routing should not assign each block to a flat `Txx` bucket only. + +Use two-level routing: + +```text +primary_node: A1 / B2 / C3 / D2 / E2 +parent_layer: A / B / C / D / E +cross_links: related sibling or upstream/downstream nodes +``` + +Example: + +| source_block | primary_node | parent_layer | cross_links | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| R01-B005 | A2 | A | A1, B1 | +| R02-B005 | B2 | B | A1, C1 | +| R03-B004 | C4 | C | C1, C2 | +| R05-B001 | D1 | D | C5 | +| R06-B002 | D2 | D | B2, E1 | +| R07-B006 | E2 | E | B1, C3 | + +## 9. Open Decisions + +Please confirm: + +```text +1. 是否接受 ROOT 作为总话题：从失望性情感隔离到认知生成与关系治理。 +2. 是否接受 A/B/C/D/E 五层结构。 +3. A2 是否作为 A1 的子节而非独立文档。 +4. C1 QPI 是否作为 C 层入口，而非平行一级主题。 +5. C5 方法论调度与信任分级是否归入 C 层，而不是 D 层。 +6. D2 Reality Lab 是否从 D1 巨人方舟中拆成独立行动层文档。 +7. E2 家庭三角认知场是否作为局部深化层的强模型候选保留。 +8. 是否按此 hierarchy 进入 material routing。 +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/01-topic-map.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/01-topic-map.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..be8cab7 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/01-topic-map.md @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +# Topic Map + +## 1. Status + +```text +status: draft_pending_user_confirmation +source: completed topic-discovery-router worker outputs R01-R07 +source_map: 00-source-map.md +worker_output_index: invocations/topic-discovery-router/worker-output-index.md +synthesis_record: invocations/topic-discovery-router/synthesis-record.md +``` + +This topic map is a provisional synthesis. It is not final routing authority until the user confirms topic granularity, merge/split decisions, and downstream direction. + +Routing should not proceed from this flat list alone. Review `01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md` first. + +## 2. Topic Summary + +| topic_id | topic_name | slug | source_blocks | confidence | status | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| T01 | 失望性情感隔离的概念边界与反标签化 | disappointment-detachment-boundary | R01-B002, R01-B003, R01-B005, R02-B002, R02-B005, R02-B006 | High | keep | +| T02 | 单因归因批判与多因素关系学习 | multi-factor-relationship-learning | R01-B002, R01-B004, R01-B006, R02-B002, R07-B001, R07-B005, R07-B006 | High | keep | +| T03 | 关系预测、期待落差与隔离治理变量 | expectation-update-and-detachment-governance | R01-B003, R01-B006, R02-B003, R02-B005, R02-B006, R06-B002 | High | keep | +| T04 | QPI 问题颗粒度与 I 域治理 | qpi-i-domain-governance | R02-B001, R02-B002, R03-B004, R04-B007, R05-B003 | Medium-High | review | +| T05 | 外部心理干预边界与资源审计 | external-intervention-and-resource-audit | R02-B004, R03-B001, R03-B005, R04-B006, R06-B003, R06-B004 | High | keep | +| T06 | 认知生成环境与 I 域污染/参与者资格 | cognitive-generation-environment | R03-B002, R03-B005, R05-B003, R05-B004, R05-B007, R07-B001, R07-B003 | High | keep | +| T07 | 巨人认知 / 巨人方舟治理架构 | giant-cognition-ark-governance | R04-B001, R04-B002, R04-B007, R05-B001, R05-B002, R06-B002, R06-B004 | High | review | +| T08 | 元认知协调、哲科思维与理论化防御 | metacognition-coordination-and-theory-defense | R03-B004, R03-B005, R04-B007, R05-B005, R05-B006 | Medium-High | keep | +| T09 | 行动实验、最小有效干预与 Reality Lab | action-experiments-reality-lab | R04-B005, R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B003, R06-B004, R07-B004, R07-B005 | High | keep | +| T10 | 青少年心理支持护栏与责任分层 | adolescent-guardrails-responsibility-layering | R06-B001, R06-B003, R06-B004, R07-B003, R07-B004, R07-B005 | High | keep | +| T11 | 家庭三角认知场模型 | family-triangle-cognitive-field | R07-B001, R07-B002, R07-B003, R07-B004, R07-B005, R07-B006 | High | review | +| T12 | 心理学自媒体的知识拟态与内容审查 | psych-media-knowledge-mimesis | R01-B001, R01-B002, R01-B005 | Medium-High | keep_or_merge | +| T13 | 方法论作为理论调度系统与信任分级 | methodology-scheduling-and-trust-grading | R05-B001, R05-B002, R05-B004, R05-B005, R05-B006, R05-B007 | Medium-High | review | + +## 3. Scope And Anti-Scope + +### T01 失望性情感隔离的概念边界与反标签化 + +- Scope: 区分“失望性情感隔离”、被动情感麻木、主动认知隔离、回避型依恋、回避型人格、解离障碍、自媒体命名与临床诊断。 +- Anti-scope: 不把该词当作已验证临床诊断；不把所有家庭疏离都归为一个标签；不做治疗建议。 + +### T02 单因归因批判与多因素关系学习 + +- Scope: 反对原生家庭万能解释、父母决定论和单因因果；把关系经验理解为多因素学习系统。 +- Anti-scope: 不否认家庭影响；不把社会/学校/伴侣等外部因素当作新的单因。 + +### T03 关系预测、期待落差与隔离治理变量 + +- Scope: 期待落差、奖赏预测下调、投入撤回、风险控制、防御泛化、隔离对象/强度/收益/成本等变量。 +- Anti-scope: 不直接决定断联、和解或心理治疗；不把解释模型当作干预模型。 + +### T04 QPI 问题颗粒度与 I 域治理 + +- Scope: 心理/关系议题的颗粒度识别、错配风险、I 域治理入口，以及 QPI 作为问题分类/路由机制。 +- Anti-scope: 不完整定义 QPI 全体系；不把 QPI 当作所有主题的上位话语。 + +### T05 外部心理干预边界与资源审计 + +- Scope: 咨询、治疗、家庭、学校、外部资源如何进入 I 域；外部参与的价值、边界、风险和审计。 +- Anti-scope: 不评价具体咨询师或机构；不进行临床转介判断；不把外部干预一概否定。 + +### T06 认知生成环境与 I 域污染/参与者资格 + +- Scope: 个体认知如何在外部系统、家庭、关系、语言、干预者中被生成；参与者进入 I 域需要资格边界。 +- Anti-scope: 不把人简化为环境产物；不取消主体性和自我治理空间。 + +### T07 巨人认知 / 巨人方舟治理架构 + +- Scope: GL0-GL4、GL-R、GL-X / Reality Lab、巨人方舟、方法论调度、认知主权重建等架构性内容。 +- Anti-scope: 不在本轮直接改 CCPE Model Card；不把所有心理议题强行纳入巨人认知。 + +### T08 元认知协调、哲科思维与理论化防御 + +- Scope: 元认知作为 I 域协调者、哲科思维、内部多子系统协调，以及高元认知理论化防御风险。 +- Anti-scope: 不把理论能力等同于行动能力；不鼓励用模型替代体验和实验。 + +### T09 行动实验、最小有效干预与 Reality Lab + +- Scope: 事缓则圆、无为而治、行动实验、小步可逆、低解释高观察、三不三做、现实反馈闭环。 +- Anti-scope: 不在高风险场景中替代专业介入；不把“无为”理解为不做事。 + +### T10 青少年心理支持护栏与责任分层 + +- Scope: 青少年场景中的支持者角色、风险红线、护栏而非方向盘、责任不倒置、成人侧环境重构责任。 +- Anti-scope: 不让青少年承担修复家庭系统的责任；不生成面向公众的临床建议。 + +### T11 家庭三角认知场模型 + +- Scope: A/B/C 三顶点、AB/AC/BC 三边、家庭近场、外部场权重、循环反馈和症状功能。 +- Anti-scope: 不回到“家庭造成一切”；不把家庭系统模型当作事实诊断。 + +### T12 心理学自媒体的知识拟态与内容审查 + +- Scope: 命名感、被理解感、归因感、情绪商品化、专业外观和心理学内容严肃性检查。 +- Anti-scope: 不把传播批判作为主线压过观点开发；不做平台内容治理。 + +### T13 方法论作为理论调度系统与信任分级 + +- Scope: 方法论如何调度理论、赤脚医生式干预边界、信任分级、认知主权防火墙。 +- Anti-scope: 不把所有方法论内容都提升为新模型；不直接授权任何干预角色。 + +## 4. Source Block Routing + +Current routing is candidate-level only. Material routing will be written to `02-material-routing-log.md` after user confirmation. + +High-signal routing anchors: + +| source_block | primary_candidate_topics | secondary_candidate_topics | +| --- | --- | --- | +| R01-B002 | T01, T02 | T12 | +| R01-B003 | T01, T03 | T05 | +| R01-B005 | T01, T12 | T03 | +| R02-B001 | T04 | T05 | +| R02-B004 | T05 | T06 | +| R02-B005 | T03 | T01 | +| R03-B001 | T05 | T06 | +| R03-B002 | T06 | T08 | +| R03-B004 | T08, T04 | T05 | +| R04-B001 | T07 | T04 | +| R04-B005 | T09 | T07 | +| R04-B007 | T07, T08 | T04 | +| R05-B001 | T07, T13 | T08 | +| R05-B003 | T06 | T13 | +| R05-B006 | T13, T08 | T05 | +| R06-B002 | T09, T07 | T03 | +| R06-B003 | T09, T10 | T05 | +| R06-B004 | T09, T10 | T07 | +| R07-B001 | T11 | T02, T06 | +| R07-B004 | T10, T09 | T11 | +| R07-B006 | T11 | T06 | + +## 5. Downstream Task Candidates + +| downstream_id | route_type | candidate | related_topics | status | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| D01 | writing | 从“原生家庭控诉文”到“关系学习模型” | T01, T02, T03, T12 | candidate | +| D02 | rubric | 心理学自媒体严肃性检查清单 | T12, T01 | candidate | +| D03 | model | 情感隔离的关系预测/风险控制模型 | T03, T01 | candidate | +| D04 | model | 巨人认知 GL-X / Reality Lab 行动实验层 | T07, T09 | candidate | +| D05 | rubric | 行动实验风险分级与安全护栏检查表 | T09, T10 | candidate | +| D06 | guidance | 青少年心理 I 域支持原则：护栏而非方向盘 | T10, T11 | candidate | +| D07 | skill | 外部心理资源审计流程 | T05, T06, T13 | candidate | +| D08 | model-card | 家庭三角认知场模型 | T11, T10 | candidate | +| D09 | worksheet | A/B/C 顶点与 AB/AC/BC 三边探查表 | T11 | candidate | +| D10 | continued-research | “失望性情感隔离”术语来源和临床对应概念核验 | T01 | candidate | + +No downstream task should start before user confirmation. + +## 6. Merge / Split Proposals + +| proposal_id | type | topics | recommendation | reason | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| M01 | merge_candidate | T01 + T03 | Keep separate for now | T01 是概念边界，T03 是机制/治理变量，后续 topic docs 可互链。 | +| M02 | merge_candidate | T04 + T07 | Review | QPI 可能只是巨人认知架构的入口规则，也可能是独立问题路由模型。 | +| M03 | split_candidate | T07 | Review | 巨人认知、巨人方舟、GL0-GL4、GL-R、GL-X 可能需要拆成架构主文档和行动实验子文档。 | +| M04 | merge_candidate | T09 + T10 | Keep separate for now | T09 是通用行动实验方法，T10 是青少年安全/责任边界。 | +| M05 | merge_candidate | T10 + T11 | Keep separate for now | T11 是系统模型，T10 是实践伦理和护栏。 | +| M06 | merge_candidate | T12 into T01 | Review | 心理学自媒体批判可能只是概念边界的来源层，也可能独立成为内容审查能力。 | +| M07 | merge_candidate | T13 into T07/T05 | Review | 方法论调度和信任分级横跨巨人认知与外部干预审计，需决定是否作为独立主题。 | + +## 7. Low-Confidence Items + +| item_id | item | affected_topics | reason | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| LC01 | “失望性情感隔离”的术语来源和临床对应 | T01 | worker 未做外部文献核验。 | +| LC02 | QPI 是否独立成主题 | T04, T07 | 多轮出现但可能是路由方法而非主题材料。 | +| LC03 | GL-X / Reality Lab 是否成为正式层级 | T07, T09 | 需要与既有巨人认知结构对齐。 | +| LC04 | 家庭三角认知场是否一级主题 | T11, T10 | R07 信号强，但需要判断是否作为独立模型沉淀。 | +| LC05 | 外部健康/青少年风险来源引用准确性 | T10 | R06 worker 明确未做外部来源核验。 | +| LC06 | T12 是否偏离主线 | T12 | 内容审查主题重要，但可能属于背景批判或单独能力建设。 | +| LC07 | 方法论/信任分级是否独立 | T13 | 可能是巨人方舟架构的子主题，也可能是外部干预审计主题。 | + +## 8. Human Decisions Needed + +Please confirm: + +```text +1. 是否接受 13 个 provisional topics 作为第一轮 topic-map。 +2. T04 QPI 是否独立保留，还是并入 T07 巨人认知/巨人方舟。 +3. T07 是否需要拆成“巨人认知架构”和“GL-X / Reality Lab 行动层”。 +4. T11 家庭三角认知场是否提升为一级主题。 +5. T12 心理学自媒体知识拟态是否独立保留。 +6. T13 方法论调度与信任分级是否独立保留。 +7. 下一步是否进入 `02-material-routing-log.md` 和 topic docs 生成。 +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/02-material-routing-log.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/02-material-routing-log.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ac79a18 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/02-material-routing-log.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +# Material Routing Log + +## 1. Status + +```text +status: not-started +blocked_reason: routing requires confirmed topic hierarchy +``` + +## 2. Routing Contract + +Material routing may be many-to-many after topic hierarchy confirmation. + +Each routed source block must record: + +```text +- block_id +- primary_topic +- secondary_topics +- routing_reason +- confidence +- source_preservation_status +``` + +## 3. Current Gate + +Do not route source blocks until `01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md` is confirmed by the user. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/03-run-notes.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/03-run-notes.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c2f39a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/03-run-notes.md @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +# Run Notes + +## 1. Run Identity + +```text +run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +workspace: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +source: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +created: 2026-06-06 +``` + +## 2. Decisions Already Settled + +```text +- Work directory uses discussion topic, not generic GPT label. +- Public reusable operating rules live under skills/. +- Run-specific invocation records live inside this work directory. +- Main session must not process the full source as one context. +- conversation-segmentation may be locally executed because the CCPE Skill spec is explicit enough. +- topic-discovery-router must not be simulated; if no real participant is invoked, stop at prompt-to-send. +``` + +## 3. Current Pass + +```text +pass: stopped +status: legacy_pre_gestalt_misread_demo +replacement_workspace: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2 +``` + +This run is retained as a record of the old chunk-first workflow. Its worker outputs, topic map, and hierarchy proposal are exploratory evidence only and must not be used as routing authority. + +## 4. Boundary Notes + +```text +- Numeric H1 headings # 1 through # 7 are runtime rounds. +- The H1 at source line 21 is an embedded article title inside R01. +- Source file line counts differ across PowerShell counting methods; .NET UTF-8 ReadAllLines count is used for source-map ranges. +``` + +## 5. Confirmation Gates + +```text +Gate A: Confirm source-map and source block ID convention. +Gate B: Confirm whether to run topic-discovery-router externally or by another real participant mechanism. +Gate C: Confirm candidate topic-map before routing. +Gate D: Confirm downstream routing before writing, CCPE modeling, engineering, scale extraction, todo extraction, or continued research packets. +``` + +## 6. Current Blockers + +```text +current_gate: superseded_by_new_step0_run +participant_outputs: + - R01 topic-discovery worker completed + - R02 topic-discovery worker completed + - R03 topic-discovery worker completed + - R04 topic-discovery worker completed + - R05 topic-discovery worker completed + - R06 topic-discovery worker completed + - R07 topic-discovery worker completed +needed_user_decision: + - do not repair this run in place + - restart in the replacement workspace with Step 0 Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment + - preserve this run as evidence of old-flow distortion +``` + +## 7. Latest User Corrections + +```text +- ROOT accepted: 从失望性情感隔离到认知生成与关系治理. +- A/B/C/D/E macro structure accepted. +- A2 should be a subsection under A1. +- E2 家庭三角认知场 should remain as a strong model candidate. +- Current C/D details are not correct enough for routing. +- QPI is not a parallel C-layer topic; it is a tool inside 巨人方舟's 元认知 / I-domain judgment layer. +- 巨人方舟 is the chosen name. +- 巨人认知 2.0 upgrades to 巨人方舟 by strengthening GL0, adding GL-R, adding action experiment layer, and limiting GL4's dictatorship. +- Do not proceed to material routing yet. +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/LEGACY-FLOW-NOTE.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/LEGACY-FLOW-NOTE.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b101272 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/LEGACY-FLOW-NOTE.md @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +# Legacy Flow Note + +## Status + +```text +status: legacy_pre_gestalt_misread_demo +replacement_workspace: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2 +do_not_use_for_material_routing: true +``` + +## Why This Directory Is Frozen + +This directory was produced before the `Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment` mechanism existed. + +The old workflow started with range workers and topic discovery before a human-confirmed global structure existed. That made it useful for exploration, but weak as a routing authority for coherent discussion material. + +Known distortion pattern: + +```text +- local workers discovered topic fragments without a confirmed global structure +- synthesis improved the flat list but still flattened parent/child/tool/case/action-layer relations +- QPI was treated too much like a peer C-layer topic instead of a tool inside the Giant Ark metacognitive / I-domain judgment layer +- Giant Cognition -> Giant Ark was not represented as a model upgrade with GL0, GL-R, GL4 limitation, and action experiment additions +- adolescent/family material was not cleanly represented as a local deepening branch generated through the action experiment layer +``` + +## Allowed Use + +Use this directory only for: + +```text +- comparing old chunk-first output against the new Step 0 aligned run +- studying distortion risks in the old workflow +- recovering source references if needed +``` + +Do not continue: + +```text +- material routing +- topic docs +- downstream handoff +- source-disposable claims +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/README.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f4f54f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +# 2026-06-05 失望性情感隔离观点讨论拆分 + +## 1. Purpose + +本目录保留为 `Viewpoint Discussion Distillation` 旧流程样例，用于展示 pre-gestalt / chunk-first 方式如何产生结构误判。 + +本目录不再作为当前材料包生产目录，也不再作为 material routing authority。 + +当前阶段不是写作项目，也不创建 writing-workbench 项目。 + +## 2. Source + +```text +source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +source_type: diary-discussion +round_boundary_rule: numeric markdown H1 headings, # 1 through # 7 +embedded_h1_note: line 21 is an article title inside R01, not a runtime round boundary +``` + +## 3. Workspace Boundary + +The original source file remains in `diary/` and must not be moved, renamed, overwritten, deleted, or treated as disposable before coverage audit and user confirmation. + +## 4. Public Capability Rules + +```text +skills/invocation-policy.md +skills/context-management-policy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/runbook.md +``` + +## 5. Current Status + +```text +status: legacy_pre_gestalt_misread_demo +current_pass: stopped +authority: not_routing_authority +replacement_workspace: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2 +purpose_now: preserve old-flow artifacts for distortion analysis only +``` + +Do not continue material routing, topic docs, or downstream handoff from this directory. + +## 6. Directory Map + +```text +README.md +00-source-map.md +01-topic-map.md +02-material-routing-log.md +03-run-notes.md +topics/ +audits/ +model-mining/ +handoff/ +invocations/ +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-after-hierarchy-review.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-after-hierarchy-review.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..eb2459c --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-after-hierarchy-review.md @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@ +# Continuation Handoff: after hierarchy review + +## 1. Current State + +```text +workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +workspace: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +current_stage: topic hierarchy correction +status: blocked_waiting_for_new_session_structure_rework +reason: user confirmed the root and macro layers, but C/D internal structure is not correct enough for material routing +``` + +## 2. What Is Already Settled + +The user accepted: + +```text +ROOT topic: + 从失望性情感隔离到认知生成与关系治理 + +Macro structure: + A. 入口与边界层 + B. 机制解释层 + C. 认知主权层 + D. 架构升级层 + E. 局部深化层：青少年与家庭系统 +``` + +The user also confirmed: + +```text +- A2 心理学自媒体知识拟态 should be a subsection under A1, not an independent document. +- E2 家庭三角认知场 should be retained as a strong model candidate in the local deepening layer. +- Material routing must not start yet. +``` + +## 3. What Was Rejected Or Needs Rework + +The previous hierarchy proposal is better than the flat topic list, but still structurally wrong in C/D. + +Do not proceed with the current `01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md` as routing authority. + +The user specifically rejected the framing of these questions: + +```text +- "C1 QPI 是否作为 C 层入口，而非平行一级主题" +- "C5 方法论调度与信任分级是否归入 C 层，而不是 D 层" +``` + +Reason: + +```text +QPI is not an independent C-layer entrance topic. +QPI is a tool inside the 巨人方舟 multi-layer architecture, specifically connected to the 元认知 layer / I-domain judgment. +``` + +## 4. Corrected D-Layer Direction + +The user gave the corrected direction: + +```text +巨人方舟 is the chosen name. +``` + +巨人认知 2.0 should be upgraded through this discussion into 巨人方舟. + +The upgrade requires: + +```text +1. 强化 GL0: + 加入身体调节、情绪耐受、神经系统状态。 + +2. 增加 GL-R: + 关系/环境层，防止社会系统废热被内化为个人问题。 + +3. 增加行动实验层: + 认知生成必须靠现实反馈。 + +4. 限制 GL4 独裁: + 元认知是协调者，不是情绪和身体的统治者。 +``` + +After these additions, 巨人方舟 changes from an explanation model into: + +```text +解释 + 干预模型 +``` + +## 5. Corrected Relationship Between D And E + +The user clarified: + +```text +巨人认知 -> 巨人方舟 +巨人方舟补充行动实验层 +行动实验层包含原则和行动措施 +青少年案例是行动实验层的典型展开场景 +家庭三角认知场 is extracted from that scenario as a new model candidate +``` + +Therefore: + +```text +E 层 should not be treated as an unrelated scenario branch. +E 层 is the local deepening / model extraction branch generated from the 巨人方舟行动实验层. +``` + +## 6. Do Not Repeat + +In the next session, do not: + +```text +- Return to the flat 13-topic list as the main structure. +- Treat QPI as a top-level C-layer topic. +- Treat 方法论调度与信任分级 as an unresolved C/D placement question without first rebuilding 巨人方舟. +- Enter material routing before the revised hierarchy is confirmed. +- Generate topic docs. +- Modify the original diary source file. +``` + +## 7. Next Session Task + +Start the next session by reading: + +```text +README.md +00-source-map.md +01-topic-map.md +01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md +03-run-notes.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/worker-output-index.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/synthesis-record.md +handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-after-hierarchy-review.md +``` + +Then do this: + +```text +1. Revise `01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md` into a corrected hierarchy. +2. Preserve ROOT and A/B/C/D/E macro structure. +3. Rebuild C/D around 巨人方舟 as the central architecture. +4. Place QPI as a tool inside the 元认知 / I-domain judgment layer. +5. Represent the Giant Cognition -> Giant Ark upgrade explicitly. +6. Represent GL0, GL-R, action experiment layer, and GL4 limitation. +7. Show how the adolescent case leads to 家庭三角认知场 as a model candidate. +8. Stop for user confirmation again before material routing. +``` + +## 8. Suggested Revised Hierarchy Skeleton + +This is only a starting skeleton for the next session, not an approved final hierarchy: + +```text +ROOT 从失望性情感隔离到认知生成与关系治理 + A. 入口与边界层 + A1. 失望性情感隔离的概念边界与反标签化 + A1-a. 心理学自媒体知识拟态与内容审查 + + B. 机制解释层 + B1. 单因归因批判与多因素关系学习 + B2. 关系预测、期待落差与隔离治理变量 + + C. 认知主权与 I 域治理层 + C1. 认知生成环境与 I 域污染/参与者资格 + C2. 外部心理干预边界与资源审计 + C3. 元认知协调、哲科思维与理论化防御 + + D. 巨人方舟架构升级层 + D1. 巨人认知 -> 巨人方舟 + D2. 强化 GL0: 身体调节、情绪耐受、神经系统状态 + D3. 增加 GL-R: 关系/环境层与社会系统废热 + D4. 元认知层工具: QPI 与 I 域判断 + D5. 限制 GL4 独裁: 元认知作为协调者 + D6. 行动实验层: Reality Lab / 最小有效干预 / 现实反馈 + + E. 行动实验的青少年场景深化层 + E1. 青少年心理支持护栏与责任分层 + E2. 家庭三角认知场模型 +``` + +## 9. Stop Condition + +The current session should stop here. + +Next session should not proceed to `02-material-routing-log.md` until the revised hierarchy is confirmed by the user. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-after-segmentation.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-after-segmentation.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e0f7c84 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-after-segmentation.md @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +# Continuation Handoff: after segmentation + +## 1. Current State + +```text +workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +workspace: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +current_stage: after source registration and local conversation segmentation +next_stage: topic-discovery-router invocation +status: blocked_waiting_for_participant_output +``` + +## 2. Completed Work + +```text +- Created confirmed work directory. +- Created run subdirectories for topics, audits, model-mining, handoff, and invocations. +- Registered source file. +- Preserved seven numeric H1 round boundaries. +- Generated 40 source blocks using Rxx-Bxxx ids. +- Created thread start and return packets for R01 through R07. +- Created conversation-segmentation invocation packet and skill execution record. +- Created topic-discovery-router invocation boundary and draft prompt-to-send. +``` + +## 3. Files Created Or Updated + +```text +README.md +00-source-map.md +01-topic-map.md +02-material-routing-log.md +03-run-notes.md +invocations/conversation-segmentation/agent-invocation-packet.md +invocations/conversation-segmentation/skill-execution-record.md +invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv +invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/prompt-to-send.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/blocked-status.md +handoff/thread-start-packets/ +handoff/thread-return-packets/ +``` + +## 4. Decisions Already Settled + +```text +- Original diary source remains read-only. +- Main session does not process the whole source as one reasoning context. +- conversation-segmentation is accepted as local Skill execution with a record. +- topic-discovery-router must be a real participant output, not a main-session simulation. +``` + +## 5. Do Not Repeat + +```text +- Do not re-argue whether this belongs to writing-workbench. +- Do not classify topics from source-map locator text only. +- Do not create topic docs before topic-map confirmation. +- Do not move or delete the source file. +``` + +## 6. Blockers Or Waiting Points + +```text +blocked_waiting_for_participant_output: + participant: topic-discovery-router + needed_decision: invocation mode and source context packaging +``` + +## 7. Next Actions + +```text +1. User reviews source-map and segmentation convention. +2. User chooses topic-discovery invocation mode. +3. Prepare source context pack if needed. +4. Run topic-discovery-router as a real participant. +5. Save returned output and draft 01-topic-map.md. +6. Pause for topic-map confirmation. +``` + +## 8. Context Needed For Next Session + +```text +skills/invocation-policy.md +skills/context-management-policy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/runbook.md +00-source-map.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/blocked-status.md +``` + +## 9. Source Ranges Already Processed + +```text +R01: L1-L430 +R02: L431-L1008 +R03: L1009-L1584 +R04: L1585-L2336 +R05: L2337-L2986 +R06: L2987-L3488 +R07: L3489-L4114 +``` + +## 10. Source Ranges Not Yet Processed + +No source range is unsegmented. Topic discovery has not processed source content yet. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-after-topic-discovery.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-after-topic-discovery.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..07e2c13 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-after-topic-discovery.md @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +# Continuation Handoff: after topic discovery + +## 1. Current State + +```text +workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +workspace: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +current_stage: after topic hierarchy proposal +status: hierarchy_draft_pending_user_confirmation +``` + +## 2. Completed Work + +```text +- R01-R07 topic-discovery worker threads were created. +- All seven bounded worker returned outputs were collected. +- Worker-output index was written. +- Synthesis record was written. +- Provisional 01-topic-map.md was drafted from file-backed worker outputs. +- Topic hierarchy / graph proposal was drafted before material routing. +``` + +## 3. Files Created Or Updated + +```text +01-topic-map.md +01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md +03-run-notes.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/worker-output-index.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/synthesis-record.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R01-returned-output.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R02-returned-output.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R03-returned-output.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R04-returned-output.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R05-returned-output.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R06-returned-output.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R07-returned-output.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-topic-discovery-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-topic-discovery-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R03-topic-discovery-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-topic-discovery-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-topic-discovery-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-topic-discovery-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-topic-discovery-return.md +``` + +## 4. Decisions Already Settled + +```text +- Topic discovery was not simulated by the main session. +- Worker outputs are bounded by source round. +- 01-topic-map.md is a flat candidate pool. +- 01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md is the proposed structure for routing and topic docs. +``` + +## 5. Do Not Repeat + +```text +- Do not rerun segmentation unless the source block convention is rejected. +- Do not classify from locator text alone. +- Do not create topic docs before topic-map confirmation. +``` + +## 6. Blockers Or Waiting Points + +```text +waiting_for_user_confirmation: + - topic hierarchy / graph proposal + - parent-child structure + - approval to proceed into material routing and topic docs +``` + +## 7. Next Actions + +```text +1. User reviews 01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md. +2. Apply hierarchy corrections if needed. +3. After confirmation, run evidence-routing-and-topic-doc-builder using hierarchy nodes. +4. Generate 02-material-routing-log.md. +5. Generate topic docs with source material layer. +6. Run lossless coverage audit. +``` + +## 8. Context Needed For Next Session + +```text +00-source-map.md +01-topic-map.md +01-topic-hierarchy-proposal.md +03-run-notes.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/worker-output-index.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/synthesis-record.md +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-segmentation-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-segmentation-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6dc2b0b --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-segmentation-return.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R01 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R01-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L1-L430 - participant: conversation-segmentation ## 2. Files Read ```text diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, L1-L430 ``` ## 3. Files Written ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Completed Work ```text source_blocks_created: 6 source_block_ids: R01-B001, R01-B002, R01-B003, R01-B004, R01-B005, R01-B006 ``` ## 5. Unresolved Issues No round-level segmentation issue recorded. ## 6. Validation Checks ```text - Round boundary preserved. - Source locator lines recorded. - No topic classification performed. ``` ## 7. Context Or Quality Risks This return packet only summarizes segmentation. Later topic discovery must inspect source blocks through a real participant workflow. ## 8. Recommended Next Step Review full `00-source-map.md` and confirm segmentation convention before topic discovery. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-topic-discovery-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-topic-discovery-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ee416c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-topic-discovery-return.md @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R01 topic discovery + +## 1. Identity + +```text +parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +worker_id: R01-topic-discovery +stage: topic-discovery-router-worker +source_range: L1-L430 +participant: topic-discovery-router +``` + +## 2. Files Read + +```text +skills/invocation-policy.md +skills/context-management-policy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/runbook.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R01-topic-discovery-thread-start.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-segmentation-return.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md +C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md +diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L1-L430 +``` + +## 3. Files Written + +```text +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R01-returned-output.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-topic-discovery-return.md +``` + +## 4. Completed Work + +```text +source_blocks_processed: 6 +source_block_ids: R01-B001, R01-B002, R01-B003, R01-B004, R01-B005, R01-B006 +topic_candidates_returned: 8 +downstream_candidates_returned: 7 +low_confidence_items_returned: 5 +human_decisions_needed_returned: 5 +``` + +## 5. Unresolved Issues + +```text +- External literature verification was not performed for the status and origin of the term "失望性情感隔离". +- Whether to keep "家庭作为社会结构进入个体经验的接口" as an independent topic should be decided after comparing later rounds. +- R01-B001 contains quoted self-media source material; the main session should decide how quoted source material is represented in topic docs. +``` + +## 6. Validation Checks + +```text +- Used only R01 source range L1-L430. +- Preserved all R01 source block ids. +- Did not modify source file. +- Did not write final 01-topic-map.md. +- Did not create topic docs. +- Did not perform final coverage audit. +- Distinguished downstream writing, model, rubric, skill, continued-research, and safety/guidance candidates. +``` + +## 7. Context Or Quality Risks + +```text +This is a bounded worker output for R01 only. It should not be treated as a final topic map until combined with other round outputs and reviewed by the runtime operator/user. +``` + +## 8. Recommended Next Step + +```text +Collect R02-R07 topic-discovery worker outputs, then synthesize a provisional 01-topic-map.md from file-backed returned outputs only. +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-segmentation-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-segmentation-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..026b2db --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-segmentation-return.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R02 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R02-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L431-L1008 - participant: conversation-segmentation ## 2. Files Read ```text diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, L431-L1008 ``` ## 3. Files Written ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Completed Work ```text source_blocks_created: 6 source_block_ids: R02-B001, R02-B002, R02-B003, R02-B004, R02-B005, R02-B006 ``` ## 5. Unresolved Issues No round-level segmentation issue recorded. ## 6. Validation Checks ```text - Round boundary preserved. - Source locator lines recorded. - No topic classification performed. ``` ## 7. Context Or Quality Risks This return packet only summarizes segmentation. Later topic discovery must inspect source blocks through a real participant workflow. ## 8. Recommended Next Step Review full `00-source-map.md` and confirm segmentation convention before topic discovery. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-topic-discovery-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-topic-discovery-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..421f667 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-topic-discovery-return.md @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R02 Topic Discovery + +```text +parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +worker_id: R02-topic-discovery +stage: topic-discovery-router-worker +assigned_participant: topic-discovery-router +source_range: L431-L1008 +source_block_ids: R02-B001, R02-B002, R02-B003, R02-B004, R02-B005, R02-B006 +status: completed_bounded_participant_output +``` + +## Files Read + +```text +skills/invocation-policy.md +skills/context-management-policy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md +C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv +diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md L431-L1008 only +``` + +## Files Written + +```text +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R02-returned-output.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-topic-discovery-return.md +``` + +## Output Summary + +- discovered_topic_candidate_count: 6 +- routed_source_block_count: 6 +- downstream_task_candidate_count: 6 +- low_confidence_item_count: 4 +- human_decision_count: 4 + +## Candidate Topics + +```text +T-R02-01: QPI 问题颗粒度与 I 域治理 +T-R02-02: 单因归因批判与心理标签降维风险 +T-R02-03: 意识叙事、自动化预测与身体情绪反应的分层干预 +T-R02-04: 外部心理干预的边界、价值与自我治理系统 +T-R02-05: 失望性情感隔离的期待落差与预测更新机制 +T-R02-06: 隔离系统的治理变量与边界/防御区分 +``` + +## Boundary Confirmation + +```text +did_not_modify_source: yes +did_not_write_final_01_topic_map: yes +did_not_create_topic_docs: yes +did_not_perform_final_coverage_audit: yes +did_not_decide_downstream_execution: yes +``` + +## Blocked Status + +```text +blocked_waiting_for_participant_output: no +reason: required files and rules were readable; bounded participant output was written for R02 only +``` + +## Handoff Note + +Use `R02-returned-output.md` as one bounded worker input for later synthesis. Do not treat this packet as final topic-map confirmation; it only records R02 routing candidates and unresolved human decisions. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R03-segmentation-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R03-segmentation-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2fc5bf6 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R03-segmentation-return.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R03 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R03-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L1009-L1584 - participant: conversation-segmentation ## 2. Files Read ```text diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, L1009-L1584 ``` ## 3. Files Written ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Completed Work ```text source_blocks_created: 5 source_block_ids: R03-B001, R03-B002, R03-B003, R03-B004, R03-B005 ``` ## 5. Unresolved Issues No round-level segmentation issue recorded. ## 6. Validation Checks ```text - Round boundary preserved. - Source locator lines recorded. - No topic classification performed. ``` ## 7. Context Or Quality Risks This return packet only summarizes segmentation. Later topic discovery must inspect source blocks through a real participant workflow. ## 8. Recommended Next Step Review full `00-source-map.md` and confirm segmentation convention before topic discovery. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R03-topic-discovery-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R03-topic-discovery-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7434140 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R03-topic-discovery-return.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R03 topic discovery + +```text +parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +worker_id: R03-topic-discovery +participant: topic-discovery-router +source_range: L1009-L1584 +source_block_ids: R03-B001, R03-B002, R03-B003, R03-B004, R03-B005 +status: completed +returned_output_path: invocations/topic-discovery-router/R03-returned-output.md +``` + +## Execution Notes + +- Read the thread-start packet, invocation policy, context-management policy, context strategy, canonical `topic-discovery-router` agent spec, source map, R03 inventory rows, invocation packet, and source lines L1009-L1584 only. +- Did not modify the source diary. +- Did not write final `01-topic-map.md`. +- Did not create topic documents. +- Did not perform final coverage audit or decide downstream execution. + +## Output Summary + +R03 returned eight candidate topic clusters: + +1. 认知生成与体验环境 +2. 外部系统审计与干预主权 +3. 认知做功与废热归因模型 +4. 元认知作为 I 域治理能力 +5. 情绪耐受、身体调节与行动实验底座 +6. 外部资源谱系：掠夺性、低效性、工具性、生成性外部 +7. 自我系统的内部多子系统协调 +8. 高元认知的理论化防御风险 + +Primary routing recommendation: + +| source_block | primary_topic | confidence | +| --- | --- | --- | +| R03-B001 | 外部系统审计与干预主权 | high | +| R03-B002 | 认知生成与体验环境 | high | +| R03-B003 | 认知做功与废热归因模型 | high | +| R03-B004 | 元认知作为 I 域治理能力 | high | +| R03-B005 | 外部系统审计与干预主权 | medium-high | + +## Low-Confidence / Needs Main-Session Attention + +- QPI and “恶意降维 / 暴力升维” are mentioned but not defined inside R03. +- “外部资源谱系” may be a child section under “外部系统审计与干预主权” rather than an independent global topic. +- “高元认知理论化防御” is highly relevant to the run title, but its global centrality needs cross-range confirmation. +- R03-B005 is dense and likely needs multi-route handling in synthesis. + +## Human Decisions Needed + +See `invocations/topic-discovery-router/R03-returned-output.md` section `7. Human Decisions Needed`. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-segmentation-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-segmentation-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..830fdbb --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-segmentation-return.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R04 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R04-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L1585-L2336 - participant: conversation-segmentation ## 2. Files Read ```text diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, L1585-L2336 ``` ## 3. Files Written ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Completed Work ```text source_blocks_created: 7 source_block_ids: R04-B001, R04-B002, R04-B003, R04-B004, R04-B005, R04-B006, R04-B007 ``` ## 5. Unresolved Issues No round-level segmentation issue recorded. ## 6. Validation Checks ```text - Round boundary preserved. - Source locator lines recorded. - No topic classification performed. ``` ## 7. Context Or Quality Risks This return packet only summarizes segmentation. Later topic discovery must inspect source blocks through a real participant workflow. ## 8. Recommended Next Step Review full `00-source-map.md` and confirm segmentation convention before topic discovery. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-topic-discovery-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-topic-discovery-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c4ae945 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-topic-discovery-return.md @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R04 topic discovery + +## 1. Identity + +```text +parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +worker_id: R04-topic-discovery +stage: topic-discovery-router-worker +assigned_participant: topic-discovery-router +source_range: L1585-L2336 +source_block_ids: R04-B001, R04-B002, R04-B003, R04-B004, R04-B005, R04-B006, R04-B007 +status: completed +``` + +## 2. Files Read + +```text +skills/invocation-policy.md +skills/context-management-policy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md +C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv +diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L1585-L2336 +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md +``` + +## 3. Files Written + +```text +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R04-returned-output.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-topic-discovery-return.md +``` + +## 4. Returned Output Summary + +R04 produced eight candidate topics: + +1. T-R04-01 巨人认知作为认知主权重建架构 +2. T-R04-02 GL0-GL4 认知栈的心理干预映射 +3. T-R04-03 GL0 神经生理底盘与情绪耐受 +4. T-R04-04 GL-R 关系/环境层与废热转嫁 +5. T-R04-05 行动实验与现实反馈闭环 +6. T-R04-06 治疗模型模块库：CBT、ACT、MCT、MBT、DBT、图式、IFS、创伤知情 +7. T-R04-07 GL4 不能独裁：元认知作为协调者 +8. T-R04-08 QPI 与巨人认知的分层入口 + +## 5. Boundary Compliance + +```text +source_modified: no +final_topic_map_written: no +topic_docs_created: no +final_coverage_audit_performed: no +downstream_execution_decided: no +``` + +## 6. Low-Confidence / Human Decision Queue + +```text +- Whether QPI should be an independent topic or only an entry-routing rule. +- Whether IFS should remain a cautious/low-confidence module in the model library. +- Whether "巨人认知" is the preferred formal model name. +- Whether GL-R and external-system waste-heat should remain one topic or split later. +``` + +## 7. Next Handoff + +The main session may collect this bounded returned output with other worker outputs, then synthesize a provisional topic map only after all required participant outputs are available and accepted. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-segmentation-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-segmentation-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..954f05f --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-segmentation-return.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R05 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R05-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L2337-L2986 - participant: conversation-segmentation ## 2. Files Read ```text diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, L2337-L2986 ``` ## 3. Files Written ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Completed Work ```text source_blocks_created: 6 source_block_ids: R05-B001, R05-B002, R05-B003, R05-B004, R05-B005, R05-B006 ``` ## 5. Unresolved Issues No round-level segmentation issue recorded. ## 6. Validation Checks ```text - Round boundary preserved. - Source locator lines recorded. - No topic classification performed. ``` ## 7. Context Or Quality Risks This return packet only summarizes segmentation. Later topic discovery must inspect source blocks through a real participant workflow. ## 8. Recommended Next Step Review full `00-source-map.md` and confirm segmentation convention before topic discovery. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-topic-discovery-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-topic-discovery-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c80c8ad --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-topic-discovery-return.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R05 topic discovery + +```text +parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +worker_id: R05-topic-discovery +stage: topic-discovery-router-worker +source_range: L2337-L2986 +source_block_ids: R05-B001, R05-B002, R05-B003, R05-B004, R05-B005, R05-B006 +assigned_participant: topic-discovery-router +status: completed +returned_output_path: invocations/topic-discovery-router/R05-returned-output.md +``` + +## 1. Files Read + +```text +skills/invocation-policy.md +skills/context-management-policy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md +C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv +diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, L2337-L2986 only +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md +``` + +## 2. Files Written + +```text +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R05-returned-output.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-topic-discovery-return.md +``` + +## 3. Output Summary + +R05 produced seven candidate topics: + +1. 巨人方舟认知治理模型 +2. 方法论作为理论调度系统 +3. I 域认知生成环境的参与者污染与资格边界 +4. 无方法论干预的失败模式 +5. 哲科思维与动态 I 域治理能力 +6. 认知主权防火墙与信任分级制度 +7. 赤脚医生式干预的定义 + +The returned output includes scope/anti-scope, source block routing candidates, downstream task candidates, merge/split proposals, low-confidence items, and human decisions needed. + +## 4. Boundary Compliance + +```text +source_modified: no +final_01_topic_map_written: no +topic_docs_created: no +final_coverage_audit_performed: no +downstream_execution_decided: no +``` + +## 5. Human Decisions Needed + +See `invocations/topic-discovery-router/R05-returned-output.md`, section 7. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-segmentation-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-segmentation-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8f76413 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-segmentation-return.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R06 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R06-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L2987-L3488 - participant: conversation-segmentation ## 2. Files Read ```text diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, L2987-L3488 ``` ## 3. Files Written ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Completed Work ```text source_blocks_created: 4 source_block_ids: R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B003, R06-B004 ``` ## 5. Unresolved Issues No round-level segmentation issue recorded. ## 6. Validation Checks ```text - Round boundary preserved. - Source locator lines recorded. - No topic classification performed. ``` ## 7. Context Or Quality Risks This return packet only summarizes segmentation. Later topic discovery must inspect source blocks through a real participant workflow. ## 8. Recommended Next Step Review full `00-source-map.md` and confirm segmentation convention before topic discovery. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-topic-discovery-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-topic-discovery-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..37454a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-topic-discovery-return.md @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R06 topic discovery + +## 1. Identity + +```text +parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +worker_id: R06-topic-discovery +stage: topic-discovery-router-worker +source_range: L2987-L3488 +participant: topic-discovery-router +``` + +## 2. Files Read + +```text +skills/invocation-policy.md +skills/context-management-policy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R06-topic-discovery-thread-start.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md +C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md +diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L2987-L3488 +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R01-returned-output.md, format reference only +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-topic-discovery-return.md, format reference only +``` + +## 3. Files Written + +```text +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R06-returned-output.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-topic-discovery-return.md +``` + +## 4. Completed Work + +```text +source_blocks_processed: 4 +source_block_ids: R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B003, R06-B004 +topic_candidates_returned: 8 +downstream_candidates_returned: 8 +low_confidence_items_returned: 5 +human_decisions_needed_returned: 6 +``` + +## 5. Unresolved Issues + +```text +- Whether GL-X / Reality Lab should become a formal independent layer in the Giant Cognition architecture requires cross-round synthesis and user confirmation. +- External sources mentioned in R06, including NIMH, AAP, and AACAP, were not independently verified by this bounded worker. +- Whether "解铃回到生成机制而非制造者" deserves an independent topic should be decided after comparing relationship-repair and boundary material from other rounds. +- The adolescent guardrail model has clear topic value, but its formal safety boundary should not be converted into guidance without source verification and human review. +``` + +## 6. Validation Checks + +```text +- Used only R06 source range L2987-L3488 for topic discovery. +- Preserved all R06 source block ids. +- Did not modify source file. +- Did not write final 01-topic-map.md. +- Did not create topic docs. +- Did not perform final coverage audit. +- Distinguished downstream writing, model, rubric, guidance, skill, metric, and continued-research candidates. +``` + +## 7. Context Or Quality Risks + +```text +This is a bounded worker output for R06 only. It should not be treated as a final topic map until combined with other round outputs and reviewed by the runtime operator/user. +``` + +## 8. Recommended Next Step + +```text +Collect remaining topic-discovery worker outputs, then synthesize a provisional 01-topic-map.md from file-backed returned outputs only. +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-segmentation-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-segmentation-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d85db96 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-segmentation-return.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R07 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R07-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L3489-L4114 - participant: conversation-segmentation ## 2. Files Read ```text diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, L3489-L4114 ``` ## 3. Files Written ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Completed Work ```text source_blocks_created: 6 source_block_ids: R07-B001, R07-B002, R07-B003, R07-B004, R07-B005, R07-B006 ``` ## 5. Unresolved Issues No round-level segmentation issue recorded. ## 6. Validation Checks ```text - Round boundary preserved. - Source locator lines recorded. - No topic classification performed. ``` ## 7. Context Or Quality Risks This return packet only summarizes segmentation. Later topic discovery must inspect source blocks through a real participant workflow. ## 8. Recommended Next Step Review full `00-source-map.md` and confirm segmentation convention before topic discovery. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-topic-discovery-return.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-topic-discovery-return.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0e60034 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-topic-discovery-return.md @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +# Thread Return Packet: R07 Topic Discovery + +## 1. Identity + +```text +parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +worker_id: R07-topic-discovery +stage: topic-discovery-router-worker +assigned_participant: topic-discovery-router +source_range: L3489-L4114 +source_block_ids: R07-B001, R07-B002, R07-B003, R07-B004, R07-B005, R07-B006 +status: completed_bounded_worker_output +``` + +## 2. Files Read + +```text +skills/invocation-policy.md +skills/context-management-policy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md +C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv +diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, L3489-L4114 only +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md +``` + +## 3. Files Written + +```text +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R07-returned-output.md +discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-topic-discovery-return.md +``` + +## 4. Output Summary + +R07 returned six candidate topics: + +| candidate_id | topic_label | confidence | source_blocks | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| T-R07-01 | 家庭三角认知场模型 / family-triangle-cognitive-field | high | R07-B001, R07-B002, R07-B003, R07-B004, R07-B005, R07-B006 | +| T-R07-02 | 家庭系统中的三角化与关系边扫描 / triangulation-and-edge-diagnosis | high | R07-B001, R07-B002, R07-B003 | +| T-R07-03 | 青少年认知生成环境的行动实验策略 / adolescent-cognitive-environment-experiments | high | R07-B003, R07-B004, R07-B005 | +| T-R07-04 | 责任分层与防止青少年责任倒置 / responsibility-layering-for-adolescent-family-work | high | R07-B004, R07-B005 | +| T-R07-05 | 近场系统与外部场的权重可变模型 / near-field-family-and-external-field-weighting | medium-high | R07-B003, R07-B005, R07-B006 | +| T-R07-06 | 系统循环反馈与症状功能 / circular-feedback-and-symptom-function | medium-high | R07-B004, R07-B005, R07-B006 | + +## 5. Main Routing Signal + +The strongest R07 topic signal is the “家庭三角认知场模型”: a structured replacement for broad “原生家庭” attribution in adolescent scenarios. It models A/B/C as three subjects, AB/AC/BC as relationship edges, school/society as external field pressure, and C as a generating subject within a circular system rather than an isolated fault point. + +## 6. Downstream Candidates + +```text +- model-card candidate: 家庭三角认知场模型 +- worksheet/checklist candidate: A/B/C 顶点与 AB/AC/BC 三边探查表 +- protocol candidate: 青少年场景行动实验策略 +- boundary note candidate: 责任分层与防责任倒置 +- diagram candidate: GL-R 外部场 -> 家庭三角认知场 -> C 认知生成环境 -> 行为症状 -> 反向影响三角形 +- heuristic candidate: 反万能家庭归因的权重可变规则 +``` + +## 7. Low-Confidence / Human Review Items + +```text +- Whether “家庭三角认知场模型” should become an independent first-level topic or a subtopic under a broader generation-environment topic. +- Whether the action experiment strategy should be developed as an executable protocol or kept as examples under the model. +- Whether responsibility-layering deserves a standalone topic to prevent practice misuse. +- How formally to connect this range to 巨人方舟 / GL-R / GL0-GL4 terminology. +- Whether clinical-adjacent terms such as triangulation and structural family therapy need external or expert verification before publication-facing reuse. +``` + +## 8. Forbidden Actions Check + +```text +source_modified: no +final_01_topic_map_written: no +topic_docs_created: no +final_coverage_audit_performed: no +downstream_execution_decided: no +``` + +## 9. Return Status + +```text +completed_bounded_worker_output +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R01-segmentation-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R01-segmentation-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..941532f --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R01-segmentation-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R01 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R01-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L1-L430 - assigned_participant: conversation-segmentation - invocation_record_path: invocations/conversation-segmentation/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Segment this source range into stable source blocks without topic classification or viewpoint summarization. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L1-L430 round_id: R01 round_heading: # 1 ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\skills\workflow\conversation-segmentation.skill.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L1-L430 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-segmentation-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return source block ids, locator ranges, block types, and short locator text only. ## 7. Context Limits Do not load or reason over other rounds unless needed to resolve a boundary warning. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not classify topics. - Do not route material. - Do not write topic docs. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write a thread-return packet and ensure outputs are file-backed. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R01-topic-discovery-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R01-topic-discovery-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4254107 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R01-topic-discovery-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R01 topic discovery ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R01-topic-discovery - stage: topic-discovery-router-worker - source_range: L1-L430 - assigned_participant: topic-discovery-router - invocation_record_path: invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Act as a real bounded `topic-discovery-router` worker for this range only. Discover candidate topics and downstream route candidates grounded in the listed source blocks. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L1-L430 source_block_ids: R01-B001, R01-B002, R01-B003, R01-B004, R01-B005, R01-B006 source_map_path: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md source_block_inventory: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md 00-source-map.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L1-L430 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text invocations/topic-discovery-router/R01-returned-output.md handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-topic-discovery-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return Markdown with: ```text 1. Topic Candidates 2. Scope And Anti-Scope 3. Source Block Routing Candidates 4. Downstream Task Candidates 5. Merge / Split Proposals 6. Low-Confidence Items 7. Human Decisions Needed ``` Every topic candidate must include source block ids and confidence. ## 7. Context Limits Read only this round range unless needed to resolve a boundary issue. Do not load all rounds. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not write final 01-topic-map.md. - Do not create topic docs. - Do not perform final coverage audit. - Do not decide downstream execution. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write the returned output and thread-return packet to the requested files. If blocked, write `blocked_waiting_for_participant_output` and the reason. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R02-segmentation-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R02-segmentation-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1e56ed1 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R02-segmentation-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R02 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R02-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L431-L1008 - assigned_participant: conversation-segmentation - invocation_record_path: invocations/conversation-segmentation/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Segment this source range into stable source blocks without topic classification or viewpoint summarization. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L431-L1008 round_id: R02 round_heading: # 2 ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\skills\workflow\conversation-segmentation.skill.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L431-L1008 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-segmentation-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return source block ids, locator ranges, block types, and short locator text only. ## 7. Context Limits Do not load or reason over other rounds unless needed to resolve a boundary warning. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not classify topics. - Do not route material. - Do not write topic docs. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write a thread-return packet and ensure outputs are file-backed. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R02-topic-discovery-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R02-topic-discovery-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e68336a --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R02-topic-discovery-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R02 topic discovery ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R02-topic-discovery - stage: topic-discovery-router-worker - source_range: L431-L1008 - assigned_participant: topic-discovery-router - invocation_record_path: invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Act as a real bounded `topic-discovery-router` worker for this range only. Discover candidate topics and downstream route candidates grounded in the listed source blocks. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L431-L1008 source_block_ids: R02-B001, R02-B002, R02-B003, R02-B004, R02-B005, R02-B006 source_map_path: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md source_block_inventory: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md 00-source-map.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L431-L1008 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text invocations/topic-discovery-router/R02-returned-output.md handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-topic-discovery-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return Markdown with: ```text 1. Topic Candidates 2. Scope And Anti-Scope 3. Source Block Routing Candidates 4. Downstream Task Candidates 5. Merge / Split Proposals 6. Low-Confidence Items 7. Human Decisions Needed ``` Every topic candidate must include source block ids and confidence. ## 7. Context Limits Read only this round range unless needed to resolve a boundary issue. Do not load all rounds. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not write final 01-topic-map.md. - Do not create topic docs. - Do not perform final coverage audit. - Do not decide downstream execution. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write the returned output and thread-return packet to the requested files. If blocked, write `blocked_waiting_for_participant_output` and the reason. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R03-segmentation-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R03-segmentation-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..09820a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R03-segmentation-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R03 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R03-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L1009-L1584 - assigned_participant: conversation-segmentation - invocation_record_path: invocations/conversation-segmentation/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Segment this source range into stable source blocks without topic classification or viewpoint summarization. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L1009-L1584 round_id: R03 round_heading: # 3 ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\skills\workflow\conversation-segmentation.skill.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L1009-L1584 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv handoff/thread-return-packets/R03-segmentation-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return source block ids, locator ranges, block types, and short locator text only. ## 7. Context Limits Do not load or reason over other rounds unless needed to resolve a boundary warning. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not classify topics. - Do not route material. - Do not write topic docs. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write a thread-return packet and ensure outputs are file-backed. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R03-topic-discovery-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R03-topic-discovery-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4df536d --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R03-topic-discovery-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R03 topic discovery ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R03-topic-discovery - stage: topic-discovery-router-worker - source_range: L1009-L1584 - assigned_participant: topic-discovery-router - invocation_record_path: invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Act as a real bounded `topic-discovery-router` worker for this range only. Discover candidate topics and downstream route candidates grounded in the listed source blocks. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L1009-L1584 source_block_ids: R03-B001, R03-B002, R03-B003, R03-B004, R03-B005 source_map_path: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md source_block_inventory: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md 00-source-map.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L1009-L1584 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text invocations/topic-discovery-router/R03-returned-output.md handoff/thread-return-packets/R03-topic-discovery-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return Markdown with: ```text 1. Topic Candidates 2. Scope And Anti-Scope 3. Source Block Routing Candidates 4. Downstream Task Candidates 5. Merge / Split Proposals 6. Low-Confidence Items 7. Human Decisions Needed ``` Every topic candidate must include source block ids and confidence. ## 7. Context Limits Read only this round range unless needed to resolve a boundary issue. Do not load all rounds. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not write final 01-topic-map.md. - Do not create topic docs. - Do not perform final coverage audit. - Do not decide downstream execution. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write the returned output and thread-return packet to the requested files. If blocked, write `blocked_waiting_for_participant_output` and the reason. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R04-segmentation-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R04-segmentation-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4b441cb --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R04-segmentation-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R04 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R04-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L1585-L2336 - assigned_participant: conversation-segmentation - invocation_record_path: invocations/conversation-segmentation/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Segment this source range into stable source blocks without topic classification or viewpoint summarization. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L1585-L2336 round_id: R04 round_heading: # 4 ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\skills\workflow\conversation-segmentation.skill.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L1585-L2336 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-segmentation-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return source block ids, locator ranges, block types, and short locator text only. ## 7. Context Limits Do not load or reason over other rounds unless needed to resolve a boundary warning. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not classify topics. - Do not route material. - Do not write topic docs. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write a thread-return packet and ensure outputs are file-backed. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R04-topic-discovery-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R04-topic-discovery-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a926ee8 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R04-topic-discovery-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R04 topic discovery ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R04-topic-discovery - stage: topic-discovery-router-worker - source_range: L1585-L2336 - assigned_participant: topic-discovery-router - invocation_record_path: invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Act as a real bounded `topic-discovery-router` worker for this range only. Discover candidate topics and downstream route candidates grounded in the listed source blocks. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L1585-L2336 source_block_ids: R04-B001, R04-B002, R04-B003, R04-B004, R04-B005, R04-B006, R04-B007 source_map_path: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md source_block_inventory: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md 00-source-map.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L1585-L2336 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text invocations/topic-discovery-router/R04-returned-output.md handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-topic-discovery-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return Markdown with: ```text 1. Topic Candidates 2. Scope And Anti-Scope 3. Source Block Routing Candidates 4. Downstream Task Candidates 5. Merge / Split Proposals 6. Low-Confidence Items 7. Human Decisions Needed ``` Every topic candidate must include source block ids and confidence. ## 7. Context Limits Read only this round range unless needed to resolve a boundary issue. Do not load all rounds. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not write final 01-topic-map.md. - Do not create topic docs. - Do not perform final coverage audit. - Do not decide downstream execution. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write the returned output and thread-return packet to the requested files. If blocked, write `blocked_waiting_for_participant_output` and the reason. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R05-segmentation-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R05-segmentation-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c008436 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R05-segmentation-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R05 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R05-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L2337-L2986 - assigned_participant: conversation-segmentation - invocation_record_path: invocations/conversation-segmentation/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Segment this source range into stable source blocks without topic classification or viewpoint summarization. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L2337-L2986 round_id: R05 round_heading: # 5 ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\skills\workflow\conversation-segmentation.skill.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L2337-L2986 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-segmentation-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return source block ids, locator ranges, block types, and short locator text only. ## 7. Context Limits Do not load or reason over other rounds unless needed to resolve a boundary warning. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not classify topics. - Do not route material. - Do not write topic docs. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write a thread-return packet and ensure outputs are file-backed. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R05-topic-discovery-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R05-topic-discovery-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a49130c --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R05-topic-discovery-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R05 topic discovery ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R05-topic-discovery - stage: topic-discovery-router-worker - source_range: L2337-L2986 - assigned_participant: topic-discovery-router - invocation_record_path: invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Act as a real bounded `topic-discovery-router` worker for this range only. Discover candidate topics and downstream route candidates grounded in the listed source blocks. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L2337-L2986 source_block_ids: R05-B001, R05-B002, R05-B003, R05-B004, R05-B005, R05-B006 source_map_path: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md source_block_inventory: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md 00-source-map.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L2337-L2986 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text invocations/topic-discovery-router/R05-returned-output.md handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-topic-discovery-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return Markdown with: ```text 1. Topic Candidates 2. Scope And Anti-Scope 3. Source Block Routing Candidates 4. Downstream Task Candidates 5. Merge / Split Proposals 6. Low-Confidence Items 7. Human Decisions Needed ``` Every topic candidate must include source block ids and confidence. ## 7. Context Limits Read only this round range unless needed to resolve a boundary issue. Do not load all rounds. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not write final 01-topic-map.md. - Do not create topic docs. - Do not perform final coverage audit. - Do not decide downstream execution. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write the returned output and thread-return packet to the requested files. If blocked, write `blocked_waiting_for_participant_output` and the reason. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R06-segmentation-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R06-segmentation-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c69b958 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R06-segmentation-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R06 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R06-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L2987-L3488 - assigned_participant: conversation-segmentation - invocation_record_path: invocations/conversation-segmentation/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Segment this source range into stable source blocks without topic classification or viewpoint summarization. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L2987-L3488 round_id: R06 round_heading: # 6 ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\skills\workflow\conversation-segmentation.skill.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L2987-L3488 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-segmentation-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return source block ids, locator ranges, block types, and short locator text only. ## 7. Context Limits Do not load or reason over other rounds unless needed to resolve a boundary warning. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not classify topics. - Do not route material. - Do not write topic docs. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write a thread-return packet and ensure outputs are file-backed. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R06-topic-discovery-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R06-topic-discovery-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a38dca8 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R06-topic-discovery-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R06 topic discovery ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R06-topic-discovery - stage: topic-discovery-router-worker - source_range: L2987-L3488 - assigned_participant: topic-discovery-router - invocation_record_path: invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Act as a real bounded `topic-discovery-router` worker for this range only. Discover candidate topics and downstream route candidates grounded in the listed source blocks. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L2987-L3488 source_block_ids: R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B003, R06-B004 source_map_path: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md source_block_inventory: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md 00-source-map.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L2987-L3488 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text invocations/topic-discovery-router/R06-returned-output.md handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-topic-discovery-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return Markdown with: ```text 1. Topic Candidates 2. Scope And Anti-Scope 3. Source Block Routing Candidates 4. Downstream Task Candidates 5. Merge / Split Proposals 6. Low-Confidence Items 7. Human Decisions Needed ``` Every topic candidate must include source block ids and confidence. ## 7. Context Limits Read only this round range unless needed to resolve a boundary issue. Do not load all rounds. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not write final 01-topic-map.md. - Do not create topic docs. - Do not perform final coverage audit. - Do not decide downstream execution. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write the returned output and thread-return packet to the requested files. If blocked, write `blocked_waiting_for_participant_output` and the reason. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R07-segmentation-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R07-segmentation-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3f846cc --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R07-segmentation-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R07 segmentation ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R07-segmentation - stage: conversation-segmentation - source_range: L3489-L4114 - assigned_participant: conversation-segmentation - invocation_record_path: invocations/conversation-segmentation/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Segment this source range into stable source blocks without topic classification or viewpoint summarization. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L3489-L4114 round_id: R07 round_heading: # 7 ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\skills\workflow\conversation-segmentation.skill.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L3489-L4114 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text 00-source-map.md invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-segmentation-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return source block ids, locator ranges, block types, and short locator text only. ## 7. Context Limits Do not load or reason over other rounds unless needed to resolve a boundary warning. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not classify topics. - Do not route material. - Do not write topic docs. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write a thread-return packet and ensure outputs are file-backed. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R07-topic-discovery-thread-start.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R07-topic-discovery-thread-start.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c4fb094 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/handoff/thread-start-packets/R07-topic-discovery-thread-start.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# Thread Start Packet: R07 topic discovery ## 1. Identity - parent_workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation - run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 - worker_id: R07-topic-discovery - stage: topic-discovery-router-worker - source_range: L3489-L4114 - assigned_participant: topic-discovery-router - invocation_record_path: invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md ## 2. Objective Act as a real bounded `topic-discovery-router` worker for this range only. Discover candidate topics and downstream route candidates grounded in the listed source blocks. ## 3. Inputs ```text source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md source_range: L3489-L4114 source_block_ids: R07-B001, R07-B002, R07-B003, R07-B004, R07-B005, R07-B006 source_map_path: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md source_block_inventory: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv ``` ## 4. Files To Read ```text skills/invocation-policy.md skills/context-management-policy.md skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md 00-source-map.md diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md, only L3489-L4114 ``` ## 5. Files To Write ```text invocations/topic-discovery-router/R07-returned-output.md handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-topic-discovery-return.md ``` ## 6. Output Contract Return Markdown with: ```text 1. Topic Candidates 2. Scope And Anti-Scope 3. Source Block Routing Candidates 4. Downstream Task Candidates 5. Merge / Split Proposals 6. Low-Confidence Items 7. Human Decisions Needed ``` Every topic candidate must include source block ids and confidence. ## 7. Context Limits Read only this round range unless needed to resolve a boundary issue. Do not load all rounds. ## 8. Forbidden Actions ```text - Do not modify source. - Do not write final 01-topic-map.md. - Do not create topic docs. - Do not perform final coverage audit. - Do not decide downstream execution. ``` ## 9. Return Instructions Write the returned output and thread-return packet to the requested files. If blocked, write `blocked_waiting_for_participant_output` and the reason. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/agent-invocation-packet.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/agent-invocation-packet.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cc444bb --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/agent-invocation-packet.md @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ +# Agent Invocation Packet: conversation-segmentation + +## 1. Invocation Identity + +- project_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +- workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +- stage: source-registration-and-segmentation +- run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +- participant_id: conversation-segmentation +- target_participant_name: Conversation Segmentation Skill +- participant_type: ccpe_skill +- canonical_artifact_path: `C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\skills\workflow\conversation-segmentation.skill.md` +- canonical_artifact_version: 0.1 +- invocation_mode: local_skill_execution +- packet_type: participant_startup_packet + +## 2. Canonical Artifact Handling + +- should_paste_full_prompt_or_spec: no +- prompt_to_send_path: not-required +- role_integrity_requirement: execute the CCPE Skill procedure without topic classification +- allowed_wrapper_instructions: obey Knowledge Vault invocation and context policies +- forbidden_role_changes: do not act as topic-discovery-router or lossless-coverage-auditor +- no_simulation_requirement: yes + +## 3. Current Task + +Read source metadata and boundary rules, identify numeric H1 rounds, split each round into stable source blocks, and write source block inventory. + +## 4. Input Files + +```text +diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +``` + +## 5. Context Files + +```text +skills/invocation-policy.md +skills/context-management-policy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/runbook.md +C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\skills\workflow\conversation-segmentation.skill.md +``` + +## 6. Embedded Inputs + +```text +boundary_rule: numeric Markdown H1 headings # 1 through # 7 +embedded_h1_note: line 21 is an article title inside R01 +output_workspace_path: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +``` + +## 7. Output Contract + +```text +00-source-map.md +invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv +invocations/conversation-segmentation/skill-execution-record.md +handoff/thread-start-packets/Rxx-segmentation-thread-start.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/Rxx-segmentation-return.md +``` + +## 8. Continuity Policy + +The main session reads source-map and worker summaries, not the full source. Topic discovery starts only after source registration and segmentation convention are accepted. + +## 9. Session Logging + +Record completed local execution in `skill-execution-record.md`. + +## 10. Forbidden Actions + +```text +- Do not modify the source file. +- Do not classify topics. +- Do not summarize viewpoints. +- Do not route material to topic docs. +- Do not declare source material disposable. +``` + +## 11. Return Path + +```text +invocations/conversation-segmentation/skill-execution-record.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/ +``` + +## 12. Runtime Acceptance Rule + +This output is accepted as local Skill execution only because the Skill spec was read, the procedure was followed, and this run writes a skill execution record. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/skill-execution-record.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/skill-execution-record.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..10b5f57 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/skill-execution-record.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +# Skill Execution Record: conversation-segmentation + +## 1. Skill Identity + +- skill_id: conversation-segmentation +- canonical_skill_path: `C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\skills\workflow\conversation-segmentation.skill.md` +- skill_version: 0.1 +- execution_mode: local_skill_execution + +## 2. Task Input + +```text +source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +boundary_rule: numeric Markdown H1 headings # 1 through # 7 +source_type: diary-discussion +output_workspace_path: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +``` + +## 3. Files Read + +```text +skills/invocation-policy.md +skills/context-management-policy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/runbook.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/participant-registry.md +C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\skills\workflow\conversation-segmentation.skill.md +diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +``` + +## 4. Files Written + +```text +00-source-map.md +invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv +invocations/conversation-segmentation/agent-invocation-packet.md +invocations/conversation-segmentation/skill-execution-record.md +handoff/thread-start-packets/R01-segmentation-thread-start.md +handoff/thread-start-packets/R02-segmentation-thread-start.md +handoff/thread-start-packets/R03-segmentation-thread-start.md +handoff/thread-start-packets/R04-segmentation-thread-start.md +handoff/thread-start-packets/R05-segmentation-thread-start.md +handoff/thread-start-packets/R06-segmentation-thread-start.md +handoff/thread-start-packets/R07-segmentation-thread-start.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-segmentation-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-segmentation-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R03-segmentation-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-segmentation-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-segmentation-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-segmentation-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-segmentation-return.md +``` + +## 5. Procedure Steps Completed + +```text +1. Read source metadata and boundary rule. +2. Identified numeric H1 round boundaries. +3. Treated the article-title H1 inside R01 as embedded source material. +4. Split each round into stable source blocks. +5. Assigned Rxx-Bxxx source block IDs. +6. Recorded locator text and source line positions. +7. Wrote source-map and source block inventory. +8. Wrote worker thread packets for each round. +``` + +## 6. Validation Checks + +```text +- Source file was read with UTF-8 handling. +- Source file was not modified. +- Seven numeric H1 rounds were preserved. +- 40 source blocks were generated. +- Topic classification was not performed. +``` + +## 7. Skipped Or Failed Steps + +```text +- No topic discovery was performed. +- No material routing was performed. +- No coverage audit was performed. +``` + +## 8. Output Summary + +Local Skill execution completed the first source block inventory for review. This is a segmentation output only, not a topic map. + +## 9. Return Path + +```text +00-source-map.md +invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv +handoff/thread-return-packets/ +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bec1b97 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +"block_id","round_id","heading","locator","block_type","summary_locator","status" +"R01-B001","R01","# 1","L1-L74","heading_or_section","# 1","segmented" +"R01-B002","R01","# 1","L76-L136","source_text","尽管我不是太懂什么是失望性情感隔离？","segmented" +"R01-B003","R01","# 1","L138-L221","source_text","这类状态有时和长期压力、创伤、抑郁、药物副作用、焦虑耗竭等因素有关，不能简单归因于“你小时候没被爱”。情感麻木在临床语境中通常是症状或状态，不等于一个独立诊断。 ","segmented" +"R01-B004","R01","# 1","L225-L320","source_text","四、逐条点评你的 4 个观点","segmented" +"R01-B005","R01","# 1","L322-L413","source_text","问题在于，它用心理学词汇制造“专业感”，但缺少几个严肃知识应有的东西：","segmented" +"R01-B006","R01","# 1","L415-L428","source_text","更准确的立场应该是：","segmented" +"R02-B001","R02","# 2","L431-L487","heading_or_section","# 2","segmented" +"R02-B002","R02","# 2","L489-L627","source_text","- 认知失调处理方式","segmented" +"R02-B003","R02","# 2","L629-L745","source_text","所以你说干预模型需要实时调整，是对的。因为一个人在不同阶段面对的主导层级不同：","segmented" +"R02-B004","R02","# 2","L747-L870","source_text","这是一个策略问题，需要具体方案。","segmented" +"R02-B005","R02","# 2","L872-L995","source_text","如果隔离只针对高风险对象，可能是边界。 ","segmented" +"R02-B006","R02","# 2","L997-L1007","source_text","它是在替你给答案，还是在帮你建立自我治理能力？","segmented" +"R03-B001","R03","# 3","L1009-L1092","heading_or_section","# 3","segmented" +"R03-B002","R03","# 3","L1094-L1215","source_text","换句话说，外部不是“告诉你世界安全”，而是帮你搭一个局部安全世界，让大脑有机会重新采样。","segmented" +"R03-B003","R03","# 3","L1217-L1347","source_text","- 家庭长期情感忽视；","segmented" +"R03-B004","R03","# 3","L1349-L1478","source_text","但是，元认知不是唯一首位。 ","segmented" +"R03-B005","R03","# 3","L1480-L1582","source_text","无恶意，但能力不足。 ","segmented" +"R04-B001","R04","# 4","L1585-L1651","heading_or_section","# 4","segmented" +"R04-B002","R04","# 4","L1653-L1760","source_text","| | |","segmented" +"R04-B003","R04","# 4","L1762-L1896","source_text","这一层可以接入 CBT。CBT 的核心就是识别想法、情绪、行为之间的关系，并通过认知和行为策略改变问题维持机制；APA 对 CBT 的介绍也强调，它已经被证明对多类问题有效，并关注...","segmented" +"R04-B004","R04","# 4","L1898-L2027","source_text","“我为什么这么脆弱？” ","segmented" +"R04-B005","R04","# 4","L2029-L2153","source_text","在巨人认知中，ACT 可以放在：","segmented" +"R04-B006","R04","# 4","L2155-L2285","source_text","- 我现在在耐受窗口内吗？","segmented" +"R04-B007","R04","# 4","L2287-L2335","source_text","第一，强化 GL0：加入身体调节、情绪耐受、神经系统状态。 ","segmented" +"R05-B001","R05","# 5","L2337-L2415","heading_or_section","# 5","segmented" +"R05-B002","R05","# 5","L2417-L2533","source_text","        │ CBT、ACT、第一性、奥卡姆等 │","segmented" +"R05-B003","R05","# 5","L2535-L2662","source_text","巨人方舟是一套以认知主权为核心、以现实反馈为校准、以行动实验为生成、以身心底盘和环境审计为约束的通用认知治理架构。","segmented" +"R05-B004","R05","# 5","L2666-L2783","source_text","4. 参与者之间会互相污染","segmented" +"R05-B005","R05","# 5","L2787-L2928","source_text","七、没有方法论的认知生成环境，会出现七种失败模式","segmented" +"R05-B006","R05","# 5","L2930-L2985","source_text","第二级：允许提供局部输入","segmented" +"R06-B001","R06","# 6","L2987-L3092","heading_or_section","# 6","segmented" +"R06-B002","R06","# 6","L3094-L3252","source_text","对的部分是： ","segmented" +"R06-B003","R06","# 6","L3254-L3415","source_text","前期不要急着解释：","segmented" +"R06-B004","R06","# 6","L3417-L3487","source_text","青少年如果已经出现明显孤立、长期低落、功能下降、危险行为，完全不管也是失职。美国儿童青少年精神医学会面向家庭的材料提到，孩子或青少年如果出现难以应对、悲伤、睡眠问题、物质使用、家庭...","segmented" +"R07-B001","R07","# 7","L3489-L3578","heading_or_section","# 7","segmented" +"R07-B002","R07","# 7","L3580-L3685","source_text","- A 和 B 冲突，但不直接解决，转而都批评 C；","segmented" +"R07-B003","R07","# 7","L3687-L3804","source_text","不同断裂，对应不同实验策略。","segmented" +"R07-B004","R07","# 7","L3806-L3952","source_text","我同意这个理想。 ","segmented" +"R07-B005","R07","# 7","L3954-L4059","source_text","- B 不再向 C 倾倒婚姻痛苦；","segmented" +"R07-B006","R07","# 7","L4061-L4113","source_text","       安全感 / 期待模型 / 边界 / 自我叙事 / 关系预测","segmented" diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R01-returned-output.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R01-returned-output.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a9745cc --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R01-returned-output.md @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@ +# R01 Topic Discovery Returned Output + +## 0. Participant Metadata + +```text +participant: topic-discovery-router +worker_id: R01-topic-discovery +run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +source_range: L1-L430 +source_block_ids: R01-B001, R01-B002, R01-B003, R01-B004, R01-B005, R01-B006 +output_path: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R01-returned-output.md +date: 2026-06-06 +status: completed_bounded_worker_output +``` + +## 1. Topic Candidates + +| candidate_id | topic_name | slug | source_block_ids | confidence | brief | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| T-R01-01 | 失望性情感隔离的概念边界 | disappointment-detachment-concept-boundary | R01-B002, R01-B003, R01-B005 | High | 将“失望性情感隔离”从自媒体命名、临床诊断、关系策略、防御状态、依恋风格、人格障碍、解离障碍之间区分出来。 | +| T-R01-02 | 单因归因批判与多因素关系学习模型 | multi-factor-relationship-learning | R01-B002, R01-B004, R01-B006 | High | 反对“原生家庭万能解释”，把父母、伴侣、同伴、职场、社会压力等作为关系预测系统的多重输入。 | +| T-R01-03 | 被动情感麻木与主动认知隔离 | passive-numbing-active-cognitive-detachment | R01-B003, R01-B006 | High | 区分“感觉不到”的低反应状态与“感觉得到但选择撤资”的风险控制策略。 | +| T-R01-04 | 关系预测系统与心理机制解释 | relationship-prediction-mechanisms | R01-B003, R01-B004, R01-B006 | High | 用依恋内部工作模型、认知失调、奖赏预测误差、习得性无助解释情感撤回如何形成。 | +| T-R01-05 | 解释模型、评估模型与干预模型的分层 | explanation-assessment-intervention-boundary | R01-B004, R01-B005 | High | 批判将解释性心理概念直接当作干预方案，强调不同状态需要不同干预条件和安全判断。 | +| T-R01-06 | 心理学自媒体的知识拟态与情绪商品化 | psych-media-knowledge-mimesis | R01-B002, R01-B004, R01-B005 | High | 分析自媒体通过命名感、被理解感、归因感、转化感制造专业外观和传播动力。 | +| T-R01-07 | 家庭作为社会结构进入个体经验的接口 | family-as-social-interface | R01-B002, R01-B004, R01-B006 | Medium-High | 将家庭从孤立病因改写为社会压力、资源、养育方式和个体关系模型之间的接口。 | +| T-R01-08 | 隔离策略的保护性与过度泛化判断 | protective-vs-overgeneralized-detachment | R01-B003, R01-B005, R01-B006 | Medium-High | 判断隔离是在保护个体边界，还是已经泛化到所有亲密、支持和善意关系。 | + +## 2. Scope And Anti-Scope + +### T-R01-01 失望性情感隔离的概念边界 + +```text +scope: 通俗心理学概念的严谨化；诊断、症状、关系策略、防御状态、依恋风格之间的边界。 +anti_scope: 不把“失望性情感隔离”直接确认为正式临床诊断；不把和父母不亲近等同于人格障碍或解离障碍。 +source_block_ids: R01-B002, R01-B003, R01-B005 +confidence: High +``` + +### T-R01-02 单因归因批判与多因素关系学习模型 + +```text +scope: 复杂因果、多来源关系经验、后续关系修正早期模板、社会结构参与关系模式形成。 +anti_scope: 不做父母决定论；不把社会结构讨论变成替具体伤害开脱；不把所有关系问题都心理个人化。 +source_block_ids: R01-B002, R01-B004, R01-B006 +confidence: High +``` + +### T-R01-03 被动情感麻木与主动认知隔离 + +```text +scope: 情绪低反应、麻木、耗竭、解离性防御倾向，与主动撤资、风险控制、边界化投入的区分。 +anti_scope: 不将所有冷淡都解释成创伤；不将主动边界一概病理化；不把被动麻木和主动隔离混成一个干预对象。 +source_block_ids: R01-B003, R01-B006 +confidence: High +``` + +### T-R01-04 关系预测系统与心理机制解释 + +```text +scope: 依恋内部工作模型、认知失调、奖赏预测误差、习得性无助如何共同解释期待降低和情感撤回。 +anti_scope: 不把机制解释当成唯一病因；不把概率倾向写成宿命论；不直接输出治疗方案。 +source_block_ids: R01-B003, R01-B004, R01-B006 +confidence: High +``` + +### T-R01-05 解释模型、评估模型与干预模型的分层 + +```text +scope: 区分理解原因、判断状态类别、制定改变路径；识别自媒体将解释偷渡为干预的风险。 +anti_scope: 不替代临床评估；不把“表达真实需求”等建议无条件套用到高风险关系。 +source_block_ids: R01-B004, R01-B005 +confidence: High +``` + +### T-R01-06 心理学自媒体的知识拟态与情绪商品化 + +```text +scope: 自媒体心理学内容的叙事套路、专业感制造、证据缺失、情绪安慰和传播机制。 +anti_scope: 不否认通俗命名作为入口的价值；不把所有科普内容都归为欺骗；不做平台治理结论。 +source_block_ids: R01-B002, R01-B004, R01-B005 +confidence: High +``` + +### T-R01-07 家庭作为社会结构进入个体经验的接口 + +```text +scope: 家庭资源、社会压力、养育方式、个体神经系统和关系模型之间的链条。 +anti_scope: 不消解父母行为责任；不把家庭只当社会结构的被动投影；不展开完整社会学模型。 +source_block_ids: R01-B002, R01-B004, R01-B006 +confidence: Medium-High +``` + +### T-R01-08 隔离策略的保护性与过度泛化判断 + +```text +scope: 判断隔离在哪些关系中是边界，在哪些关系中成为旧策略对新关系的侵入。 +anti_scope: 不要求消灭所有隔离；不将重新靠近作为默认目标；不决定具体关系行动。 +source_block_ids: R01-B003, R01-B005, R01-B006 +confidence: Medium-High +``` + +## 3. Source Block Routing Candidates + +| block_id | locator | primary_candidates | secondary_candidates | confidence | notes | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| R01-B001 | L1-L74 | T-R01-06 | T-R01-01 | Medium | 包含角色设定、用户引入的自媒体文章全文；既是待批判对象，也是概念命名来源。 | +| R01-B002 | L76-L136 | T-R01-01, T-R01-02 | T-R01-06 | High | 用户提出四点批判，GPT 初步指出概念非严格诊断，并给出多因素关系学习链条。 | +| R01-B003 | L138-L221 | T-R01-03, T-R01-04 | T-R01-01, T-R01-08 | High | 明确区分被动情感麻木与主动认知隔离，并展开四套心理机制。 | +| R01-B004 | L225-L320 | T-R01-02, T-R01-05 | T-R01-04, T-R01-06, T-R01-07 | High | 逐条点评四个观点，含父母决定论批判、社会结构链条、模型分层和干预风险。 | +| R01-B005 | L322-L413 | T-R01-06, T-R01-01 | T-R01-05, T-R01-08 | High | 展开知识拟态批判，区分失望隔离、回避型依恋、回避型人格障碍和解离障碍，并提出关系学习模型改写。 | +| R01-B006 | L415-L428 | T-R01-02, T-R01-08 | T-R01-04, T-R01-07 | High | 总结立场：反对单因归因、父母决定论和解释即干预；提出追问关系结构、保护功能和重新试探边界。 | + +## 4. Downstream Task Candidates + +| downstream_id | route_type | candidate | source_block_ids | confidence | notes | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| D-R01-01 | writing | 文章/观点稿：从“原生家庭控诉文”到“关系学习模型” | R01-B002, R01-B004, R01-B005, R01-B006 | High | R01 已有清晰论证骨架，适合发展为面向通俗心理学自媒体的批判性观点文。 | +| D-R01-02 | rubric | 心理学自媒体严肃性检查清单 | R01-B005 | High | 可抽取为四问或七项标准：概念边界、证据等级、反例、相关因果、适用条件、专业帮助、临床区分。 | +| D-R01-03 | model | 情感隔离的关系预测/风险控制模型 | R01-B003, R01-B006 | Medium-High | 可建模为“期待落空 -> 奖赏预测下降 -> 投入减少 -> 防御策略 -> 泛化判断”。 | +| D-R01-04 | model | 解释模型-评估模型-干预模型三层边界 | R01-B004 | High | 可作为后续心理学内容处理、咨询建议审查或自助材料评估的通用框架。 | +| D-R01-05 | continued-research | “失望性情感隔离”术语来源和临床对应概念核验 | R01-B002, R01-B005 | Medium | R01 文本声称该词更像自媒体/通俗心理学概念；若要正式写作，需要术语来源和英文对应进一步核验。 | +| D-R01-06 | skill | 通俗心理学内容的知识拟态识别流程 | R01-B005 | Medium | 有潜力沉淀为 Knowledge Vault/CCPE 的材料审读技能，但 R01 只提供初始标准。 | +| D-R01-07 | safety_or_guidance | 关系表达建议的安全条件判断 | R01-B004, R01-B006 | Medium-High | 对“表达真实需求”进行安全关系、高冲突家庭、持续虐待等条件区分。 | + +## 5. Merge / Split Proposals + +| proposal_id | type | topics | recommendation | confidence | rationale | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| M-R01-01 | split | T-R01-01 vs T-R01-03 | Keep separate. | High | 概念边界关注术语和诊断区分；麻木/隔离关注机制和状态分类。合并会降低后续路由清晰度。 | +| M-R01-02 | split | T-R01-02 vs T-R01-07 | Tentatively separate, but allow later merge. | Medium | 多因素关系学习模型与家庭-社会接口高度相关；若后续 R02-R07 没有展开社会结构，可将 T-R01-07 并入 T-R01-02。 | +| M-R01-03 | merge_candidate | T-R01-05 and downstream D-R01-04 | Keep topic plus model route. | High | 三层边界既是文本主题，也是可抽取模型；topic-map 中可作为主题，后续模型抽取中单独处理。 | +| M-R01-04 | split | T-R01-06 | Consider future split into “内容批判” and “读者命名需求”. | Medium | R01 同时批判情绪商品化，也承认命名提供表达入口；若后续材料展开读者需求，应拆出单独主题。 | +| M-R01-05 | merge_candidate | T-R01-08 and T-R01-03 | Do not merge yet. | Medium-High | 过度泛化判断依赖麻木/主动隔离区分，但具有独立的实践评估价值。 | + +## 6. Low-Confidence Items + +| item_id | item | source_block_ids | confidence | reason | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| LC-R01-01 | “失望性情感隔离”的英文对应和非诊断地位 | R01-B002 | Medium | R01 文本内有判断，但本 worker 未进行外部文献核验；后续正式写作应查证。 | +| LC-R01-02 | T-R01-07 是否应独立成主题 | R01-B004, R01-B006 | Medium | R01 中该观点强，但篇幅相对集中；需要看后续 round 是否持续展开社会结构维度。 | +| LC-R01-03 | T-R01-06 是否偏向内容批判而非核心心理主题 | R01-B002, R01-B005 | Medium-High | 它是 R01 的显著主题，但与主标题“失望性情感隔离”存在元知识层面的距离。 | +| LC-R01-04 | D-R01-06 是否应发展为 Skill | R01-B005 | Medium | 当前只有标准雏形，没有完整流程、输入输出契约或验证方式。 | +| LC-R01-05 | R01-B001 的路由权重 | R01-B001 | Medium | 它包含被批判的自媒体原文和角色设定；应作为背景证据还是独立 topic source，需要主会话统一策略。 | + +## 7. Human Decisions Needed + +1. 是否将“失望性情感隔离”保留为用户原词主轴，还是改用更中性的“情感撤回/关系隔离/关系学习模型”作为正式 topic 名。 +2. 是否把“家庭作为社会结构进入个体经验的接口”列为独立 topic，还是并入“单因归因批判与多因素关系学习模型”。 +3. 是否允许将 R01 的自媒体批判内容发展为独立下游写作方向，而不是只作为主议题的背景批判。 +4. 对临床术语边界的正式产物是否需要外部文献核验，尤其是“失望性情感隔离”是否为非标准诊断概念。 +5. R01-B001 中自媒体原文在后续 topic docs 中应作为“被分析材料”全文保留、摘要保留，还是仅作为引用索引保留。 diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R02-returned-output.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R02-returned-output.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5c7a54b --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R02-returned-output.md @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@ +# R02 Topic Discovery Router Returned Output + +```text +participant: topic-discovery-router +worker_id: R02-topic-discovery +source_range: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md L431-L1008 +source_blocks: R02-B001, R02-B002, R02-B003, R02-B004, R02-B005, R02-B006 +status: completed_bounded_participant_output +``` + +## 1. Topic Candidates + +### T-R02-01: QPI 问题颗粒度与 I 域治理 + +- source_block_ids: R02-B001, R02-B002, R02-B004, R02-B006 +- confidence: high +- candidate_slug: qpi-issue-domain-governance +- core_claim: “失望性情感隔离”不应被处理成 Q 域标签或 P 域单点方案，而应作为 I 域的长期系统治理问题。 +- source_basis: R02-B001 提出 Q/P/I 光谱并将议题归入 I 域；R02-B002 说明心理、关系、认知、身份等多因素耦合；R02-B004 补充 Q/P/I 会随时间尺度漂移并给出错配诊断；R02-B006 总结该议题不能靠命名或单方案修复。 +- downstream_route_candidates: model-update, framework-note, writing-seed + +### T-R02-02: 单因归因批判与心理标签降维风险 + +- source_block_ids: R02-B002, R02-B006 +- confidence: high +- candidate_slug: anti-single-cause-psychological-labeling +- core_claim: 对失望性情感隔离的解释不能落入单点归因、道德归因或治疗性归因，否则会把网状系统压扁为标签、人格审判或伪因果终点。 +- source_basis: R02-B002 系统列出依恋、认知失调、习得性无助、奖赏预测、防御机制、身份认同、关系史等耦合因素，并展开三类归因误用；R02-B006 将错误概括为把 I 域课题误降维为 Q 域标签或 P 域方案。 +- downstream_route_candidates: article-section, rubric-or-checklist, knowledge-note + +### T-R02-03: 意识叙事、自动化预测与身体情绪反应的分层干预 + +- source_block_ids: R02-B002, R02-B003 +- confidence: high +- candidate_slug: layered-intervention-conscious-prediction-body +- core_claim: 干预不能只处理可说出的意识叙事，还要区分自动化关系预测和身体/情绪反应层，并根据阶段调整重点。 +- source_basis: R02-B002 将机制拆为意识叙事层、自动化预测层、身体/情绪反应层；R02-B003 给出早期、中期、深层、后期的主导问题与干预重点。 +- downstream_route_candidates: intervention-model-note, practice-guide, model-update + +### T-R02-04: 外部心理干预的边界、价值与自我治理系统 + +- source_block_ids: R02-B003, R02-B005, R02-B006 +- confidence: high +- candidate_slug: external-intervention-and-self-governance +- core_claim: 外部干预的问题不在于是否介入，而在于它是替当事人给答案、制造依赖，还是帮助当事人建立可内化的自我治理能力。 +- source_basis: R02-B003 修正“外部只教方法”的判断，指出外部关系可提供新关系经验和旧模型校正；R02-B005 反驳“当事人总能自己设定干预模型”，提出外部校准器；R02-B006 以“替你给答案/帮你建立自我治理能力”作为最终判断标准。 +- downstream_route_candidates: practice-principle, therapy-boundary-note, writing-seed + +### T-R02-05: 失望性情感隔离的期待落差与预测更新机制 + +- source_block_ids: R02-B004, R02-B005 +- confidence: medium-high +- candidate_slug: disappointment-isolation-expectation-gap +- core_claim: 失望性情感隔离可被理解为期待模型与现实反馈长期落差后的奖赏预测下调、需求表达减少、情绪投资撤回和关系功能化。 +- source_basis: R02-B004 明确“问题”是期望与现实的落差，并给出隔离稳定化公式；R02-B005 进一步把外部校准与旧经验污染联系起来。 +- downstream_route_candidates: model-fragment, article-section, concept-note + +### T-R02-06: 隔离系统的治理变量与边界/防御区分 + +- source_block_ids: R02-B005, R02-B006 +- confidence: high +- candidate_slug: isolation-governance-variables +- core_claim: 治理隔离系统时应检查隔离对象、强度、收益、成本，而不是直接否定隔离；关键判断是当前环境下收益是否仍大于成本。 +- source_basis: R02-B005 提出四个治理变量，并区分“针对高风险对象的边界”和“泛化到所有关系的防御过度”；R02-B006 将长期治理对象压缩为期待、边界、防御、投入和自我解释。 +- downstream_route_candidates: checklist, practice-guide, topic-doc-core + +## 2. Scope And Anti-Scope + +| topic_candidate | scope | anti-scope | +| --- | --- | --- | +| T-R02-01 | QPI 光谱如何处理心理/关系议题的颗粒度、错配和 I 域治理 | 不负责完整定义 QPI 全理论；不处理其他轮次中的巨人认知或方舟架构 | +| T-R02-02 | 归因错误、标签化、道德化、治疗性伪因果 | 不评价具体心理学流派真伪；不做临床诊断 | +| T-R02-03 | 意识、自动化预测、身体情绪层的机制分层与阶段性干预 | 不展开 CBT/ACT 等具体疗法接入；这可能属于后续轮次 | +| T-R02-04 | 外部干预与当事人主权之间的结构关系 | 不判断某个咨询师、治疗行业或商业机构 | +| T-R02-05 | 期待落差、奖赏预测下调、隔离稳定化公式 | 不把该公式当作完整临床模型或唯一病因 | +| T-R02-06 | 隔离对象、强度、收益、成本四变量治理 | 不替用户决定应断联、和解、治疗或行动 | + +## 3. Source Block Routing Candidates + +| source_block_id | primary_topic | secondary_topics | confidence | routing_note | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| R02-B001 | T-R02-01 | T-R02-04 | high | 起始提出 QPI、I 域归类、自我设定干预模型和外部干预批判，是本轮理论入口 | +| R02-B002 | T-R02-02 | T-R02-01, T-R02-03 | high | 从系统耦合、归因误用、意识/潜意识分层支撑多个主题，主轴仍是反降维归因 | +| R02-B003 | T-R02-04 | T-R02-03 | high | 修正外部干预功能，强调新关系经验和自我治理能力，也包含阶段性干预表 | +| R02-B004 | T-R02-01 | T-R02-05 | high | QPI 动态漂移和错配诊断表应进入 QPI 主题；期待落差公式可另作概念片段 | +| R02-B005 | T-R02-06 | T-R02-04, T-R02-05 | high | 四变量治理模型是主内容，同时包含对当事人自设模型的反驳和外部校准器 | +| R02-B006 | T-R02-01 | T-R02-04, T-R02-06, T-R02-02 | medium-high | 总评式压缩，适合作为多个主题的结论证据，不宜单独扩展为独立主题 | + +## 4. Downstream Task Candidates + +| task_candidate_id | route_type | source_blocks | proposed_output | confidence | note | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| D-R02-01 | model-update | R02-B001, R02-B004, R02-B006 | QPI 增补：问题颗粒度随时间尺度、目标尺度和系统边界漂移 | high | 可作为 Wantsong QPI Spectrum 的关键补丁 | +| D-R02-02 | checklist | R02-B004 | QPI 错配诊断表 | high | 已有表格雏形，可转为识别工具 | +| D-R02-03 | practice-guide | R02-B005 | 隔离系统四变量治理清单 | high | 适合从理论转为自查/复盘工具 | +| D-R02-04 | article-section | R02-B002, R02-B006 | 为什么失望性情感隔离不是心理标签 | medium-high | 适合写作，但不应成为唯一 downstream | +| D-R02-05 | intervention-principle | R02-B003, R02-B005, R02-B006 | 外部干预的合理位置：校准器、安全关系与自我治理 | high | 可进入咨询/自助边界原则 | +| D-R02-06 | concept-note | R02-B004, R02-B005 | 期待死亡后的秩序：从期待落差到关系功能化 | medium | 表达有力量，但需人工确认语气是否过猛 | + +## 5. Merge / Split Proposals + +- merge_candidate: T-R02-01 与后续全局 QPI 主题可合并。 + - source_block_ids: R02-B001, R02-B004, R02-B006 + - confidence: high + - rationale: R02 中 QPI 不只是局部比喻，而是本轮知识架构入口；若其他轮次也讨论 QPI，应作为同一主主题的 R02 证据。 + +- split_candidate: T-R02-04 不宜并入单纯“心理治疗批判”。 + - source_block_ids: R02-B003, R02-B005, R02-B006 + - confidence: high + - rationale: 源文并非否定外部干预，而是在区分替代性给答案、外部校准器、新关系经验和自我治理内化。 + +- split_candidate: T-R02-05 可暂作子主题，不急于独立建主文档。 + - source_block_ids: R02-B004, R02-B005 + - confidence: medium + - rationale: 期待落差公式非常有概念价值，但目前证据集中在一个段落和相关校准讨论中，可能更适合作为 T-R02-01 或 T-R02-06 的概念节点。 + +- merge_candidate: T-R02-03 与后续如果出现 GL0/耐受窗口/身体调节主题，应考虑合流。 + - source_block_ids: R02-B002, R02-B003 + - confidence: medium + - rationale: R02 只建立三层结构与阶段表，具体疗法或身心底盘可能在后续轮次展开。 + +## 6. Low-Confidence Items + +- low_confidence_item: “期待死亡后的秩序”是否应保留为主题标题或只作原文表达。 + - source_block_ids: R02-B004 + - confidence: medium + - reason: 表达锋利且贴近源文，但可能过度文学化；需要人工判断是否符合本项目命名风格。 + +- low_confidence_item: T-R02-05 是否独立成主题。 + - source_block_ids: R02-B004, R02-B005 + - confidence: medium + - reason: 机制公式很强，但当前证据量可能不足以支持独立 topic doc。 + +- low_confidence_item: “外部心理干预/治疗趋利商业因素”是否进入主题。 + - source_block_ids: R02-B001, R02-B003 + - confidence: medium-low + - reason: 源文提到商业因素，但 R02 的展开重心转向干预质量、关系经验和自我治理，不宜过度放大。 + +- low_confidence_item: “当事人主权”是否作为独立主题。 + - source_block_ids: R02-B003, R02-B005 + - confidence: medium + - reason: 它贯穿外部干预主题，但独立主题可能与自我治理系统重复。 + +## 7. Human Decisions Needed + +- decision_needed: 是否把 QPI 作为本项目的一级主主题，还是只作为解释“失望性情感隔离”的局部方法。 + - source_block_ids: R02-B001, R02-B004, R02-B006 + - impact: 决定 T-R02-01 是否进入主 topic map 顶层。 + +- decision_needed: 是否保留“失望性情感隔离”中的强表达，例如“期待死亡后的秩序”。 + - source_block_ids: R02-B004 + - impact: 决定主题命名风格和后续写作语气。 + +- decision_needed: 外部干预相关内容应路由为心理实践原则、关系治理模型，还是文章论证材料。 + - source_block_ids: R02-B003, R02-B005, R02-B006 + - impact: 决定 T-R02-04 的 downstream 形态。 + +- decision_needed: 隔离四变量治理模型是否升级为可执行自查模板。 + - source_block_ids: R02-B005 + - impact: 决定是否创建 checklist 或 practice-guide downstream task。 diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R03-returned-output.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R03-returned-output.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b4f6683 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R03-returned-output.md @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +# R03 Topic Discovery Router Returned Output + +```text +participant: topic-discovery-router +worker_id: R03-topic-discovery +source_range: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md L1009-L1584 +source_block_ids: R03-B001, R03-B002, R03-B003, R03-B004, R03-B005 +status: completed +``` + +## 1. Topic Candidates + +| topic_id | candidate_topic | source_blocks | confidence | rationale | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| T-R03-01 | 认知生成与体验环境 | R03-B001, R03-B002 | high | 本轮明确区分“说教/语义理解”和“体验环境/新预测证据”，提出有效外部干预应提供可重复、低风险、有反馈的新体验场。 | +| T-R03-02 | 外部系统审计与干预主权 | R03-B001, R03-B002, R03-B005 | high | 源文持续讨论外部系统的专业性、稳定性、边界、商业化风险，以及“不要把主权交给外部，但也不要驱逐外部”的主权式调用原则。 | +| T-R03-03 | 认知做功与废热归因模型 | R03-B001, R03-B003, R03-B004 | high | “认知/学习=做功，痛苦=废热”被展开为系统性废热、成长性废热、伪成长废热，并进一步工程化为废热归因矩阵。 | +| T-R03-04 | 元认知作为 I 域治理能力 | R03-B001, R03-B004, R03-B005 | high | 源文将元认知从“想得更深”修正为对问题颗粒度、认知状态、情绪成本、行动反馈的监控与校准能力，并直接接入 QPI/I 域治理。 | +| T-R03-05 | 情绪耐受、身体调节与行动实验底座 | R03-B004, R03-B005 | medium-high | 源文强调元认知不能单独完成心理改变，需要情绪耐受力供能、行动实验产生新证据；该主题与 T-R03-04 关系紧密但可独立成模型补丁。 | +| T-R03-06 | 外部资源谱系：掠夺性、低效性、工具性、生成性外部 | R03-B005 | high | 源文明确将“外部”拆为四类，并提出信任投入、I 域进入资格、资源类型的审计问题。 | +| T-R03-07 | 自我系统的内部多子系统协调 | R03-B005 | medium | 源文指出“自己”不是铁板一块，包含理性、防御、关系渴望、害怕失望等子系统；“靠自己”应改写为元认知协调内部子系统并调用外部资源。 | +| T-R03-08 | 高元认知的理论化防御风险 | R03-B003, R03-B004, R03-B005 | medium-high | 源文多次警告高认知人群可能用分析替代经历、用元认知逃避真实感受，让“元认知”成为情感隔离的高级皮肤。 | + +## 2. Scope And Anti-Scope + +### T-R03-01 认知生成与体验环境 + +- Scope: 心理改变如何从语言说服转向经验层面的新预测证据生成；有效外部环境如何提供安全、重复、反馈。 +- Anti-Scope: 不包括具体治疗流派操作细节；不直接评价某一咨询师或机构。 +- Source blocks: R03-B001, R03-B002 +- Confidence: high + +### T-R03-02 外部系统审计与干预主权 + +- Scope: 外部系统是否有资格参与 I 域课题；当事人如何保有主权、设置审计、退出和校准机制。 +- Anti-Scope: 不等于反外部、反心理咨询；不把所有外部帮助归为无效。 +- Source blocks: R03-B001, R03-B002, R03-B005 +- Confidence: high + +### T-R03-03 认知做功与废热归因模型 + +- Scope: 用做功/废热隐喻区分痛苦来源与产出，识别系统性压榨、成长性做功、伪成长内耗。 +- Anti-Scope: 不把痛苦浪漫化为成长证明；不把所有学习都解释为痛苦驱动。 +- Source blocks: R03-B001, R03-B003, R03-B004 +- Confidence: high + +### T-R03-04 元认知作为 I 域治理能力 + +- Scope: 元认知在 QPI 中承担分层、归因、成本识别、策略切换、反馈更新等治理功能。 +- Anti-Scope: 不把元认知简化为聪明、深度思考或自我分析；不把元认知设为唯一底座。 +- Source blocks: R03-B001, R03-B004, R03-B005 +- Confidence: high + +### T-R03-05 情绪耐受、身体调节与行动实验底座 + +- Scope: 说明心理改变除导航能力外，还需要承受废热的供能能力，以及通过行动产生现实反馈。 +- Anti-Scope: 不替代元认知；不展开成完整治疗方案。 +- Source blocks: R03-B004, R03-B005 +- Confidence: medium-high + +### T-R03-06 外部资源谱系 + +- Scope: 将外部系统分为掠夺性、低效性、工具性、生成性，并据此决定信任额度和进入 I 域的权限。 +- Anti-Scope: 不对现实中的具体外部对象作最终定性；不直接决定使用或拒绝某类服务。 +- Source blocks: R03-B005 +- Confidence: high + +### T-R03-07 自我系统的内部多子系统协调 + +- Scope: 将“靠自己”拆为内部子系统协调问题，识别防御性自我对自我干预的劫持风险。 +- Anti-Scope: 不创建人格理论；不做临床诊断或内在家庭系统式细分。 +- Source blocks: R03-B005 +- Confidence: medium + +### T-R03-08 高元认知的理论化防御风险 + +- Scope: 标记高认知者用分析、理论、概念化逃避感受、行动和关系经验的风险。 +- Anti-Scope: 不否定元认知价值；不把所有理论化都视为防御。 +- Source blocks: R03-B003, R03-B004, R03-B005 +- Confidence: medium-high + +## 3. Source Block Routing Candidates + +| source_block | primary_topic | secondary_topics | confidence | note | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| R03-B001 | T-R03-02 外部系统审计与干预主权 | T-R03-01, T-R03-03, T-R03-04 | high | 本块提出本轮核心命题：外部是否有能力参与认知生成、痛苦废热如何归因、为何元认知优先。 | +| R03-B002 | T-R03-01 认知生成与体验环境 | T-R03-02 | high | 主要论证说教无效，体验环境和新预测证据才构成认知生成。 | +| R03-B003 | T-R03-03 认知做功与废热归因模型 | T-R03-08 | high | 主要展开系统性、成长性、伪成长废热，并提出自由度增加作为判断指标。 | +| R03-B004 | T-R03-04 元认知作为 I 域治理能力 | T-R03-03, T-R03-05, T-R03-08 | high | 从元认知优先转向“元认知+情绪耐受+行动实验”，并提出废热归因矩阵与 I 域治理定义。 | +| R03-B005 | T-R03-02 外部系统审计与干预主权 | T-R03-04, T-R03-05, T-R03-06, T-R03-07, T-R03-08 | medium-high | 本块覆盖外部谱系、内部子系统、自我治理修正命题，主题密度高，建议多重路由。 | + +## 4. Downstream Task Candidates + +| candidate_task | route_type | source_blocks | confidence | recommended_next_action | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| 构建“外部系统审计清单”：专业性、稳定性、边界、长期投入、反商业化克制、理论整合能力 | rubric / checklist | R03-B002, R03-B005 | high | 可进入后续 topic doc 或工具化清单，不应直接变成文章结论。 | +| 抽象“废热归因矩阵”：外部强加/主动投入 x 有产出/无产出 | model / framework | R03-B003, R03-B004 | high | 适合作为模型卡候选或方法论组件。 | +| 定义“元认知 = I 域治理能力”的 QPI 子模块 | model update | R03-B004 | high | 可与既有 QPI 理论材料合并，需后续确认术语一致性。 | +| 设计“主权式调用外部资源”的操作原则 | practice guide / governance rule | R03-B001, R03-B005 | medium-high | 可形成实践原则，但需要避免替代专业心理建议。 | +| 标记“高元认知理论化防御”作为失望性情感隔离的风险机制 | continued research / model patch | R03-B003, R03-B005 | medium-high | 应与前后轮关于情感隔离、防御、关系预测的材料合并判断。 | +| 将“体验场生成新预测证据”拆成行动实验设计原则 | practice guide / experiment design | R03-B002, R03-B004 | medium | 需要后续来源补充具体实验策略，否则这里只能作为候选方向。 | + +## 5. Merge / Split Proposals + +| proposal | affected_topics | confidence | reason | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| Merge candidate: T-R03-02 and T-R03-06 may become parent/child rather than separate peers. | T-R03-02, T-R03-06 | medium | 外部资源谱系是外部系统审计的一种结构化展开；如果全局 topic map 要压缩，可将 T-R03-06 作为 T-R03-02 的子章节。 | +| Split candidate: T-R03-03 should remain separate from T-R03-04. | T-R03-03, T-R03-04 | high | 废热归因处理痛苦来源与产出，元认知治理处理调度能力；二者关联强但功能不同。 | +| Merge candidate: T-R03-05 may be a model patch under T-R03-04. | T-R03-04, T-R03-05 | medium | 情绪耐受与行动实验是对“元认知优先”的修正底座；是否独立取决于全局材料是否反复出现身体调节/行动实验。 | +| Split candidate: T-R03-08 may deserve独立风险机制 topic. | T-R03-08, T-R03-04, T-R03-07 | medium | “元认知成为情感隔离高级皮肤”非常贴近本项目标题，但需要跨 R04-R07 检查是否持续出现。 | +| Merge candidate: T-R03-07 could be absorbed into self-governance topic if全局材料较少。 | T-R03-07, T-R03-02, T-R03-04 | low-medium | 本轮只有 R03-B005 明确展开“自己不是一个东西”；单轮证据足够标记，但未必足够独立成全局 topic。 | + +## 6. Low-Confidence Items + +| item | source_blocks | confidence | reason | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| “QPI”与“恶意降维/暴力升维”的具体含义 | R03-B001 | low | 本轮只提到 QPI 简写和原理论术语，缺少定义上下文；需要依赖其他轮或既有理论文档。 | +| “I 域课题”的全局边界 | R03-B002, R03-B004 | medium | R03 足以识别为治理域，但不足以决定全局 I 域 topic 的完整边界。 | +| 心流、神经递质与痛苦关系是否应进入 topic map | R03-B003 | low-medium | 该段主要用于修正“成长一定痛苦”的表述，可能只是论证支撑，不一定成为独立 topic。 | +| 外部心理服务环境的现实判断 | R03-B001, R03-B002 | medium | 源文有强烈现实批判，但 topic map 应避免把它写成未经验证的社会事实结论；宜标为观点背景或质量控制意识。 | + +## 7. Human Decisions Needed + +1. 是否把“废热归因矩阵”提升为独立模型候选，还是作为“认知生成/自我治理”的子组件。 +2. 是否将“外部资源谱系”独立成 topic，还是并入“外部系统审计与干预主权”。 +3. 是否将“高元认知理论化防御”作为“失望性情感隔离”的核心机制之一，需要跨轮合并确认。 +4. 是否允许后续 builder 将 R03-B005 多重路由到外部审计、自我系统协调、元认知治理三个 topic，而不是单一路由。 +5. 是否需要把 QPI 既有定义作为全局上下文引入后续 topic synthesis；R03 内部证据不足以独立定义 QPI 全貌。 diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R04-returned-output.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R04-returned-output.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2eb0730 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R04-returned-output.md @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ +# R04 Topic Discovery Router Returned Output + +## Invocation Metadata + +```text +participant: topic-discovery-router +worker_id: R04-topic-discovery +workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +source_range: L1585-L2336 +source_block_ids: R04-B001, R04-B002, R04-B003, R04-B004, R04-B005, R04-B006, R04-B007 +status: completed_bounded_worker_output +``` + +## 1. Topic Candidates + +### T-R04-01 巨人认知作为认知主权重建架构 + +- slug: giant-cognition-cognitive-sovereignty-architecture +- source_block_ids: R04-B001, R04-B002, R04-B003, R04-B007 +- confidence: high +- candidate_type: model / framework +- summary: R04 将“巨人认知”定位为失望性情感隔离与认知主权重建的 I 域自我治理操作系统。它不是临床治疗模型，而是整合外部干预、自我反思、情绪调节、现实行动和认知校准的总架构。 +- downstream_route_candidates: model-update, framework-spec, topic-doc + +### T-R04-02 GL0-GL4 认知栈的心理干预映射 + +- slug: gl0-gl4-intervention-stack-mapping +- source_block_ids: R04-B001, R04-B002, R04-B003, R04-B006, R04-B007 +- confidence: high +- candidate_type: model-mapping / practice-map +- summary: R04 将 GL0 到 GL4 分别映射为生理情绪底盘、事实数据、逻辑检查、问题表征和主权调控，并给出失望隔离场景中的逐层提问方式。 +- downstream_route_candidates: model-update, practice-protocol, checklist + +### T-R04-03 GL0 神经生理底盘与情绪耐受 + +- slug: gl0-neurophysiological-foundation +- source_block_ids: R04-B002, R04-B003, R04-B005, R04-B006, R04-B007 +- confidence: high +- candidate_type: missing-layer / intervention-module +- summary: R04 明确指出原有 GL0 太薄，应从“文字感染力/情绪基调”升级为生理唤醒、身体安全感、睡眠、能量、压力负荷、神经系统调节和情绪耐受训练。 +- downstream_route_candidates: model-update, skill-library, practice-checklist + +### T-R04-04 GL-R 关系/环境层与废热转嫁 + +- slug: gl-r-relational-environment-layer +- source_block_ids: R04-B003, R04-B004, R04-B006, R04-B007 +- confidence: high +- candidate_type: model-extension / boundary-theory +- summary: R04 提出在内部 GL0-GL4 之外增加 GL-R 关系与环境层，用来处理家庭、伴侣、职场、社会评价、文化规训、外部咨询和知识环境，防止外部系统废热被内化为个人问题。 +- downstream_route_candidates: model-update, boundary-framework, system-audit-rubric + +### T-R04-05 行动实验与现实反馈闭环 + +- slug: action-experiment-reality-feedback-loop +- source_block_ids: R04-B001, R04-B004, R04-B006, R04-B007 +- confidence: high +- candidate_type: practice-protocol / feedback-loop +- summary: R04 强调认知生成不能只靠反思，中间需要行动实验。行动实验应小剂量、低风险、可观察、可退出、可复盘，并通过现实反馈更新模型。 +- downstream_route_candidates: practice-protocol, worksheet, behavior-experiment-template + +### T-R04-06 治疗模型模块库：CBT、ACT、MCT、MBT、DBT、图式、IFS、创伤知情 + +- slug: therapeutic-model-module-library +- source_block_ids: R04-B003, R04-B005, R04-B006, R04-B007 +- confidence: high +- candidate_type: theory-map / module-library +- summary: R04 把多种干预模型作为巨人认知的模块库，而不是替代性总理论：CBT 补 GL2，ACT 补价值与行动，MCT 补 GL4，MBT 补 GL3 和 GL-R，DBT/创伤知情补 GL0，图式疗法和 IFS 补长期模式与内部多主体协调。 +- downstream_route_candidates: reference-map, module-selection-table, psychoeducation-note + +### T-R04-07 GL4 不能独裁：元认知作为协调者 + +- slug: gl4-coordination-not-dictatorship +- source_block_ids: R04-B006, R04-B007 +- confidence: high +- candidate_type: model-constraint / governance-principle +- summary: R04 对“Captain/Meta”隐喻加限制：GL4 不是用来压制情绪、身体和经验的命令系统，而是协调 GL0、GL1、GL2、GL3 和 GL-R 的主权调控层。 +- downstream_route_candidates: model-guardrail, governance-principle, article-section + +### T-R04-08 QPI 与巨人认知的分层入口 + +- slug: qpi-giant-cognition-entry-routing +- source_block_ids: R04-B006, R04-B007 +- confidence: medium +- candidate_type: routing-method / meta-framework +- summary: R04 将失望隔离通常定位为 I 域，但强调局部场景仍可拆成 Q 或 P。QPI 负责问题颗粒度定位，巨人认知负责主权治理架构。 +- downstream_route_candidates: routing-rule, model-integration-note + +## 2. Scope And Anti-Scope + +| topic_id | scope | anti_scope | confidence | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| T-R04-01 | 巨人认知作为“认知主权重建与 I 域心理治理”的总架构；包含意图前馈、现实反馈、GL0-GL4、GL-R 和行动实验。 | 不把巨人认知写成临床治疗模型；不替代专业诊疗；不把它压缩成单一心理学概念。 | high | +| T-R04-02 | 各 GL 层在心理干预中的功能、提问方式和误用风险。 | 不泛化为所有写作/思维训练场景；不忽略失望隔离这一 I 域语境。 | high | +| T-R04-03 | 身体状态、情绪耐受、神经系统调节、窗口理论、DBT/创伤知情等对 GL0 的补强。 | 不把 GL0 仅作为表达风格或文字感染力；不把所有隔离都解释成身体反应。 | high | +| T-R04-04 | 外部关系系统和环境压力如何影响内部治理；识别废热转嫁、结构毒性和撤离/降投入策略。 | 不把所有问题重新归因给外部；不替代具体关系事实核验。 | high | +| T-R04-05 | 用小剂量行动实验产生新数据，并通过现实反馈更新模型。 | 不直接决定具体行动；不把实验变成高风险暴露或强迫沟通。 | high | +| T-R04-06 | 多种治疗/理论模型如何模块化接入巨人认知。 | 不做医学推荐；不将模块库变成疗法优劣排名；不神秘化 IFS。 | high | +| T-R04-07 | GL4 的边界、协调职责和元认知过度控制风险。 | 不否定 GL4 的主权调控价值；不把协调误写成无决策。 | high | +| T-R04-08 | QPI 作为进入巨人认知前的问题颗粒度分流。 | 不展开 QPI 全体系；不把本段的所有内容改写为 QPI 文档。 | medium | + +## 3. Source Block Routing Candidates + +| source_block_id | primary_topic_candidates | secondary_topic_candidates | routing_notes | confidence | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| R04-B001 | T-R04-01 | T-R04-02, T-R04-05 | 开场定义巨人认知模型、提问、总定位，以及意图-反思闭环和现实碰撞。 | high | +| R04-B002 | T-R04-02 | T-R04-03 | GL4-GL1 导航表、GL0 进入心理干预映射、GL1/GL2 事实与逻辑检查。 | high | +| R04-B003 | T-R04-02 | T-R04-03, T-R04-04, T-R04-06 | CBT 接入 GL2；GL3/GL4 功能；提出 GL0 太薄和 GL-R 缺席。 | high | +| R04-B004 | T-R04-04 | T-R04-05, T-R04-06 | GL-R 防止自我责任过载；升级结构为 GL-R + GL0-GL4 + 前馈/反馈；行动实验与 ACT。 | high | +| R04-B005 | T-R04-06 | T-R04-03, T-R04-07 | 系统列出 CBT、ACT、MCT、MBT、DBT、图式疗法、IFS、创伤知情/窗口理论及其映射。 | high | +| R04-B006 | T-R04-05 | T-R04-02, T-R04-03, T-R04-04, T-R04-06, T-R04-07, T-R04-08 | 整合版流程：QPI 定位、巨人认知扫描、模块选择、行动实验、现实反馈，以及 GL4 非独裁原则。 | high | +| R04-B007 | T-R04-01 | T-R04-03, T-R04-04, T-R04-05, T-R04-06, T-R04-07, T-R04-08 | 最终回答三问，凝练补强点和推荐组合，给出一句话总评。 | high | + +## 4. Downstream Task Candidates + +| candidate_id | task_type | title | source_block_ids | notes | confidence | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| DT-R04-01 | model-update | 将巨人认知升级为 GL-R + GL0-GL4 + 前馈/反馈 + 行动实验 | R04-B003, R04-B004, R04-B006, R04-B007 | 适合进入模型卡或方法论文档；需确认“巨人认知”是否是用户希望长期保留的正式模型名。 | high | +| DT-R04-02 | practice-protocol | 失望隔离的 GL0-GL4 扫描表 | R04-B002, R04-B006 | 可转为工作表/checklist，但不应在 topic-discovery 阶段直接创建。 | high | +| DT-R04-03 | module-selection-table | 主导卡点到干预模块的选择矩阵 | R04-B005, R04-B006, R04-B007 | 适合作为后续 topic doc 或实践工具的一节。 | high | +| DT-R04-04 | boundary-rubric | GL-R 外部系统废热与撤离/降投入判断 | R04-B003, R04-B004, R04-B007 | 可服务关系边界、职场/家庭系统审计，不限于写作输出。 | medium-high | +| DT-R04-05 | model-guardrail | GL4 非独裁原则与元认知过热防火墙 | R04-B005, R04-B006, R04-B007 | 与 MCT、反刍、模型成瘾、内耗风险相关。 | high | +| DT-R04-06 | reference-map | CBT/ACT/MCT/MBT/DBT/图式/IFS/创伤知情与巨人认知映射 | R04-B003, R04-B005, R04-B007 | 应标注为模块参考，不是临床建议。 | high | +| DT-R04-07 | writing | “身体有底盘，关系有外层，行动有实验，反馈有校准，元认知有边界”文章段落 | R04-B007 | 适合写作，但不能把 R04 全部降维为文章素材。 | medium | + +## 5. Merge / Split Proposals + +### Merge Candidates + +| proposal_id | proposal | source_block_ids | rationale | confidence | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| M-R04-01 | 将 T-R04-01 与跨轮“认知主权 / I 域治理”主题合并或建立父子关系 | R04-B001, R04-B007 | R04 明确将巨人认知定位为认知主权重建总架构；可能与前轮关于 I 域、自我治理、外部夺权的材料相连。 | medium | +| M-R04-02 | 将 T-R04-03 与跨轮“身心底盘 / 安全感 / 耐受窗口”主题合并或建立子主题 | R04-B002, R04-B003, R04-B005, R04-B006, R04-B007 | R04 的 GL0 补强与此前关于局部安全世界、身体威胁反应的讨论可能同源。需主会话比较其他 worker 输出后确认。 | medium | +| M-R04-03 | 将 T-R04-04 与跨轮“关系系统 / 外部环境 / 边界”主题联结 | R04-B003, R04-B004, R04-B006, R04-B007 | GL-R 涵盖家庭、伴侣、职场、文化规训和知识环境，可能跨接关系治理主题。 | medium | + +### Split Candidates + +| proposal_id | proposal | source_block_ids | rationale | confidence | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| S-R04-01 | 将“巨人认知总架构”与“治疗模型模块库”拆分 | R04-B001, R04-B003, R04-B005, R04-B007 | 一个是用户自有架构升级，一个是外部理论模块映射；合并会导致主题过宽。 | high | +| S-R04-02 | 将 GL0 补强从 GL0-GL4 总映射中独立出来 | R04-B002, R04-B003, R04-B005, R04-B006, R04-B007 | GL0 在本轮承担身体安全、情绪耐受、DBT/创伤知情、窗口理论等独立任务，值得单列。 | high | +| S-R04-03 | 将 GL4 非独裁原则从 GL4/MCT 主题中单列为模型 guardrail | R04-B006, R04-B007 | 它不是单纯的 MCT 模块，而是巨人认知整体治理边界。 | medium-high | +| S-R04-04 | QPI 入口可暂不独立成主 topic，仅作为 T-R04-01 或 T-R04-02 的 routing rule | R04-B006, R04-B007 | R04 中 QPI 内容重要但篇幅较小，是否独立取决于其他轮次是否持续出现。 | medium | + +## 6. Low-Confidence Items + +| item_id | item | source_block_ids | reason | suggested_handling | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| LC-R04-01 | QPI 是否独立成为主题 | R04-B006, R04-B007 | R04 只用 QPI 做入口分流，未展开 QPI 本体。 | 等主会话汇总其他 round 后决定是否设为独立主题。 | +| LC-R04-02 | IFS 是否应进入正式模块库 | R04-B005, R04-B007 | 原文承认 IFS 适配“内部多主体”，但也提醒证据基础和临床质量参差。 | 保留为低信心/谨慎吸收模块，不作为核心推荐。 | +| LC-R04-03 | “巨人认知”是否为最终正式模型名 | R04-B001, R04-B007 | R04 使用该名并高度展开，但 topic-discovery worker 不能确认用户是否要长期命名。 | 交由人类确认模型命名和 slug。 | +| LC-R04-04 | GL-R 与“外部系统废热”是否进入同一个 topic | R04-B003, R04-B004, R04-B007 | 两者关系紧密，但后者也可能属于更大的社会/组织系统主题。 | 暂作同一 topic 的 scope，后续覆盖审计再拆。 | + +## 7. Human Decisions Needed + +1. 是否确认“巨人认知”作为本项目内的正式模型名，还是改用更通用的“认知主权治理架构”。 +2. 是否将 GL0 神经生理底盘、GL-R 关系/环境层、行动实验层、GL4 非独裁原则列为巨人认知模型的四个正式补丁。 +3. 是否允许后续 builder 将 R04 的治疗模型清单做成“模块库/选择矩阵”，并明确标注非临床建议。 +4. 是否将 QPI 作为独立 topic，还是只作为巨人认知进入心理 I 域治理前的分流规则。 +5. 是否把“GL-R 外部系统废热”路由到关系治理、社会结构审计或边界策略中的哪一个主 topic。 diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R05-returned-output.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R05-returned-output.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a7bd136 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R05-returned-output.md @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +# R05 Topic Discovery Returned Output + +```text +participant: topic-discovery-router +worker_id: R05-topic-discovery +source_range: L2337-L2986 +source_block_ids: R05-B001, R05-B002, R05-B003, R05-B004, R05-B005, R05-B006 +status: completed_bounded_worker_output +``` + +## 1. Topic Candidates + +| topic_id | candidate_topic | portable_slug | source_blocks | confidence | rationale | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| T-R05-01 | 巨人方舟认知治理模型 | giant-ark-cognitive-governance | R05-B001, R05-B002, R05-B003, R05-B006 | high | R05 明确提出从“桅杆/巨人”升级为“认知远航舰/认知方舟”，并给出 GL0-GL4、GL-R、行动实验、反思反馈和主权不外包的结构定义。 | +| T-R05-02 | 方法论作为理论调度系统 | methodology-as-theory-orchestration | R05-B001, R05-B003, R05-B005, R05-B006 | high | 源文反复区分“知道几个理论”和“知道何时调用、何时停止、如何反馈校准”，并以有/无方法论的底层逻辑差异收束。 | +| T-R05-03 | I 域认知生成环境的参与者污染与资格边界 | i-domain-participant-boundaries | R05-B003, R05-B004, R05-B005, R05-B006 | high | 医生、咨询师、家庭、当事人、AI 等被讨论为认知生成环境参与者；重点是边界、夺权、依赖、道德化、自我污染和二次伤害。 | +| T-R05-04 | 无方法论干预的失败模式 | failure-modes-without-methodology | R05-B003, R05-B004, R05-B005, R05-B006 | high | 源文列出理论碎片化、战术胜利战略失败、颗粒错配、反馈缺失、主权外包、系统废热内化、伪成长循环等失败模式。 | +| T-R05-05 | 哲科思维与动态 I 域治理能力 | philosophy-science-thinking-i-domain-governance | R05-B001, R05-B004, R05-B005 | medium-high | 源文将“哲科思维”从姿态词细化为问题意识、证据意识、反馈意识、边界意识、伦理意识，并连接 QPI、I 域治理和逻辑/批判性思维。 | +| T-R05-06 | 认知主权防火墙与信任分级制度 | cognitive-sovereignty-firewall | R05-B004, R05-B006 | high | 源文把“极大的恶意”重构为对低质量外部系统进入 I 域核心的防御性审计，并提出四级信任制度。 | +| T-R05-07 | 赤脚医生式干预的定义 | barefoot-doctor-intervention | R05-B004, R05-B005, R05-B006 | high | 源文明确“赤脚医生”不是学历问题，而是方法论资格问题：无法识别颗粒度、区分解释/干预/治理、尊重主权和接受反馈却越界进入 I 域核心。 | + +## 2. Scope And Anti-Scope + +| topic_id | scope | anti_scope | +| --- | --- | --- | +| T-R05-01 | 巨人认知补强后的系统隐喻、结构图、层级映射、外部环境 GL-R、行动实验、反馈校准、主权边界。 | 不包括整套模型的最终规范化写作；不包括将“方舟”直接定为最终命名；不处理 R04 中 GL0/CBT/ACT 的详细补强论证。 | +| T-R05-02 | 方法论如何调度 CBT、ACT、第一性、奥卡姆、QPI 等工具；有方法论与碰巧正确的差异；失败沉淀为系统能力。 | 不等于某一具体理论介绍；不把所有方法论问题都收束为写作选题。 | +| T-R05-03 | 认知生成环境中不同参与者的可参与方式、污染风险、权力边界、外部输入审计。 | 不评价具体医生/咨询师个案；不决定现实中的求助策略。 | +| T-R05-04 | 无统合方法论时的失败模式分类，可作为后续表格、检查表或风险清单。 | 不做最终覆盖审计；不将失败模式当作已验证量表。 | +| T-R05-05 | “哲科思维”的可审计能力定义，以及它与 I 域动态治理、QPI、证据和伦理的关系。 | 不扩展为中西思想比较；不把“中国传统”简单等同低方法论。 | +| T-R05-06 | 从“恶意”转写为信任分级、防火墙、外部系统退出条件和主权不外包协议。 | 不把所有外部帮助都排除；不将防御性审计升级为现实行动决定。 | +| T-R05-07 | 低质量越界干预者的资格边界定义，以及非专业者可作为港口、灯塔、同行船、补给站的条件。 | 不等同于反专业或反咨询；不以学历作为唯一判定标准。 | + +## 3. Source Block Routing Candidates + +| source_block | primary_topics | secondary_topics | confidence | notes | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| R05-B001 | T-R05-01, T-R05-02 | T-R05-05 | high | 开场提出巨人认知作为通用认知架构，并要求隐喻/结构；同时提出无方法论参与者问题。 | +| R05-B002 | T-R05-01 | T-R05-02 | high | 主要是认知方舟结构图、GL 层级、GL-R、行动实验、反思反馈和“不能夺舵”。 | +| R05-B003 | T-R05-01, T-R05-02, T-R05-04 | T-R05-03 | high | 给出巨人方舟定义，并展开理论碎片化、战术胜利战略失败、错误升维/降维。 | +| R05-B004 | T-R05-03, T-R05-07 | T-R05-05, T-R05-06 | high | 参与者污染、传统/哲科判断精炼、赤脚医生定义和非专业参与边界。 | +| R05-B005 | T-R05-04, T-R05-05 | T-R05-02, T-R05-07 | high | 七种失败模式、有/无方法论底层差异、哲科思维五能力。 | +| R05-B006 | T-R05-06, T-R05-02 | T-R05-01, T-R05-03, T-R05-07 | high | 信任分级制度、压缩成熟表述、最终总评，具有多个主题的总结性路由价值。 | + +## 4. Downstream Task Candidates + +| task_candidate | route_type | source_blocks | candidate_topics | confidence | note | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| 将“巨人方舟认知治理模型”整理为模型卡草案 | model-card / system-spec | R05-B001, R05-B002, R05-B003, R05-B006 | T-R05-01 | high | 已具备名称、定义、层级、外部环境和反馈机制，但需要跨 R04/R05 合并后再规范化。 | +| 建立“无方法论干预失败模式”检查表 | rubric / checklist | R05-B003, R05-B004, R05-B005, R05-B006 | T-R05-04 | high | 七种失败模式和若干典型表现已成形，可转为审计清单。 | +| 建立“外部参与者信任分级协议” | protocol / decision-policy | R05-B004, R05-B006 | T-R05-03, T-R05-06, T-R05-07 | high | 四级信任制度和退出条件很适合沉淀为协议或边界政策。 | +| 写作候选：为什么只懂一两个理论不等于有方法论 | writing | R05-B001, R05-B003, R05-B005, R05-B006 | T-R05-02, T-R05-04 | medium-high | 论点完整，但需确认是否作为文章，或先作为模型/方法论材料。 | +| 写作候选：赤脚医生不是非专业者，而是无资格越界者 | writing | R05-B004, R05-B006 | T-R05-07, T-R05-03 | medium-high | 表述锋利，适合作为独立观点文或外部参与者边界章节。 | +| 概念定义候选：“哲科思维”五能力 | concept-definition / glossary | R05-B004, R05-B005 | T-R05-05 | medium | 源文给出明确定义，但可能依赖前后文中的 QPI 与 I 域体系。 | + +## 5. Merge / Split Proposals + +| proposal | affected_topics | confidence | reason | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| Merge candidate with prior GL0/GL-R补强主题 | T-R05-01 | medium | R05 的巨人方舟很可能承接 R04 关于 GL0、GL-R、行动实验、GL4 限制的讨论；最终 topic map 可考虑将其作为“巨人认知补强/方舟升级”的一支。 | +| Keep separate: 方法论调度 vs 失败模式 | T-R05-02, T-R05-04 | high | 二者相关但功能不同：前者解释方法论的正向机制，后者归纳缺失方法论的风险清单。 | +| Split candidate: 参与者污染 vs 赤脚医生资格边界 | T-R05-03, T-R05-07 | medium-high | 参与者污染覆盖医生/咨询/家庭/当事人等生态关系；赤脚医生更像资格判准和越界定义，可作为子主题或独立主题。 | +| Merge candidate: 信任分级制度 into 认知主权外部审计 | T-R05-06 | medium | 若全局已有“外部输入审计/认知主权”主题，T-R05-06 可作为其协议化子主题，而不是单独文档。 | +| Keep separate: 哲科思维 | T-R05-05 | medium | 它既连接方法论，也连接教育/文化批判/QPI；是否独立取决于其他 rounds 是否也反复出现该术语。 | + +## 6. Low-Confidence Items + +| item | source_blocks | confidence | issue | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| “中国传统思维做事方法 vs 哲科思维”是否应成为独立主题 | R05-B001, R05-B004, R05-B005 | low-medium | 源文主动修正为反对“前现代经验主义 + 关系伦理压迫 + 反方法论实用主义 + 低质量现代商业心理学”的混合物；不宜粗暴命名为传统/现代对立。 | +| “巨人方舟”是否取代“巨人认知”作为全局主模型名 | R05-B002, R05-B003, R05-B006 | medium | R05 倾向升级隐喻，但是否全局改名需要人工确认和跨轮一致性检查。 | +| “认知主权防火墙”是否为正式协议名 | R05-B006 | medium | 源文提出可称为该名，但仍可能只是局部表达，需要确认命名强度。 | +| R05-B006 是总结块还是可拆分为多个路由 | R05-B006 | medium | 它同时收束方法论、赤脚医生、巨人方舟和防火墙，最终路由可能需要多标签。 | + +## 7. Human Decisions Needed + +1. 是否将“巨人方舟认知治理模型”作为全局模型升级名，还是仅作为本轮隐喻/结构候选。 +2. 是否把“无方法论干预失败模式”沉淀为检查表/审计量表，而不是文章主题。 +3. 是否将“赤脚医生式干预”单独成 topic，还是并入“外部参与者资格边界”。 +4. 是否保留“哲科思维”作为用户原术语，并在定义中明确其五能力，避免泛化成知识优越感标签。 +5. 是否把“认知主权防火墙/信任分级制度”作为协议类下游任务启动，或先作为主题材料保留。 diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R06-returned-output.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R06-returned-output.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a4d85dc --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R06-returned-output.md @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +# R06 Topic Discovery Returned Output + +## 0. Participant Metadata + +```text +participant: topic-discovery-router +worker_id: R06-topic-discovery +run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +source_range: L2987-L3488 +source_block_ids: R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B003, R06-B004 +output_path: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R06-returned-output.md +date: 2026-06-06 +status: completed_bounded_worker_output +``` + +## 1. Topic Candidates + +| candidate_id | topic_name | slug | source_block_ids | confidence | brief | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| T-R06-01 | 巨人认知的行动实验层 / Reality Lab | giant-cognition-reality-lab | R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B004 | High | 将“事缓则圆 / 无为而治”转化为巨人认知中连接意图、主权调控、问题表征、方法选择、事实准备、状态检查与现实反馈的行动实验层。 | +| T-R06-02 | 事缓则圆与无为而治的工程化原则 | slow-speed-low-force-intervention | R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B003, R06-B004 | High | 将“慢”定义为速度控制，将“无为”定义为强度控制和反粗暴干预，而不是拖延或放任。 | +| T-R06-03 | 青少年心理 I 域的护栏模型 | adolescent-psychological-guardrail-model | R06-B001, R06-B003, R06-B004 | High | 在青少年认知模型生成期，成人、家庭、老师和咨询师的角色是设置安全护栏、降低噪音、保留入口，而不是替当事人掌握方向盘。 | +| T-R06-04 | 风险分级与安全优先边界 | risk-triage-safety-boundary | R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B004 | High | 区分非急性低风险场景与自伤、自杀、功能崩塌、物质滥用等高风险红线；不能用“缓”和“无为”覆盖必须专业介入的情形。 | +| T-R06-05 | 最小有效干预与低解释高观察 | minimal-intervention-observation-first | R06-B002, R06-B003, R06-B004 | High | 前期不急诊断、不强解释、不深谈创伤，而是观察触发场景、身体反应、功能影响和缓和条件，以保护认知主权。 | +| T-R06-06 | 外部资源审计与合格帮助入口 | external-help-audit | R06-B003, R06-B004 | Medium-High | 不乱投医、不因头衔交出方向盘，但也不因外部帮助可能有问题而拒绝所有专业支持。 | +| T-R06-07 | 自由度增长作为行动实验指标 | freedom-growth-metric | R06-B003, R06-B004 | Medium-High | 判断干预是否有效，不只看即时舒适，而看是否增加行动自由度、表达自由度、关系选择权和情绪承受力。 | +| T-R06-08 | 解铃回到生成机制而非制造者 | knot-generation-mechanism | R06-B002 | Medium | 修正“解铃还需系铃人”：有些结来自旧模型而非具体制造者，松动路径可能来自新关系、新经验、新边界和新行动。 | + +## 2. Scope And Anti-Scope + +### T-R06-01 巨人认知的行动实验层 / Reality Lab + +```text +scope: 巨人认知架构中新增行动实验层；把认知模型送入现实做低风险、小剂量、可逆、可观察、可复盘的反馈生成。 +anti_scope: 不直接写完整巨人认知模型文档；不决定该层在最终架构中的编号和正式命名；不替代后续模型抽取或系统升级。 +source_block_ids: R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B004 +confidence: High +``` + +### T-R06-02 事缓则圆与无为而治的工程化原则 + +```text +scope: 将用户原则翻译为行动速度、干预强度、可逆性和伤害控制原则；强调“无为不是不做功，而是不做乱功”。 +anti_scope: 不把无为理解为完全不管；不把事缓理解为无限拖延；不将该原则应用到急性、高危、失控状态。 +source_block_ids: R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B003, R06-B004 +confidence: High +``` + +### T-R06-03 青少年心理 I 域的护栏模型 + +```text +scope: 青少年三观、身份认同、价值系统、人际预测和自我叙事正在生成时，外部角色应提供护栏、稳定回应、选择空间和低羞辱环境。 +anti_scope: 不把青少年当作成人模型直接深度洞察；不让成人、家庭、老师或咨询师抢夺方向盘；不否认必要时专业介入。 +source_block_ids: R06-B001, R06-B003, R06-B004 +confidence: High +``` + +### T-R06-04 风险分级与安全优先边界 + +```text +scope: 行动实验前先判断风险等级；低风险可观察陪伴和小实验，中风险需要结构化支持，高风险必须专业介入。 +anti_scope: 不做临床诊断；不把外部引用当成本 worker 已核验事实；不输出具体治疗方案。 +source_block_ids: R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B004 +confidence: High +``` + +### T-R06-05 最小有效干预与低解释高观察 + +```text +scope: 不急诊断、不强干预、不夺主权；先记录事实、触发、变化、功能影响，创造安全对话窗口和小实验条件。 +anti_scope: 不把观察等同于冷处理；不把提供语言变成替当事人定义；不把低解释误解为拒绝理解。 +source_block_ids: R06-B002, R06-B003, R06-B004 +confidence: High +``` + +### T-R06-06 外部资源审计与合格帮助入口 + +```text +scope: 审计咨询、治疗、家庭、学校等外部资源是否有边界、是否制造依赖、是否尊重主权、是否承认不确定和提供反馈机制。 +anti_scope: 不把所有外部帮助视为庸医；不因专业头衔无条件授权；不在本阶段选择具体机构或干预方案。 +source_block_ids: R06-B003, R06-B004 +confidence: Medium-High +``` + +### T-R06-07 自由度增长作为行动实验指标 + +```text +scope: 用行动自由度、表达自由度、关系选择权和情绪承受力评估实验是否有效。 +anti_scope: 不把舒服等同于有效；不把不舒服等同于失败；不将该指标单独作为风险评估工具。 +source_block_ids: R06-B003, R06-B004 +confidence: Medium-High +``` + +### T-R06-08 解铃回到生成机制而非制造者 + +```text +scope: 将“解铃还需系铃人”从回到伤害制造者，修正为回到结的生成机制、旧模型和当前生活中的可松动路径。 +anti_scope: 不要求原关系修复；不默认父母或伤害者有资格解铃；不把所有心理结都要求完全解开。 +source_block_ids: R06-B002 +confidence: Medium +``` + +## 3. Source Block Routing Candidates + +| block_id | locator | primary_candidates | secondary_candidates | confidence | notes | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| R06-B001 | L2987-L3092 | T-R06-02, T-R06-04 | T-R06-01, T-R06-03 | High | 用户提出“事缓则圆 / 无为而治”和行动实验层缺口；文本同时建立红线条件、反粗暴干预、速度原则和青少年自组织背景。 | +| R06-B002 | L3094-L3252 | T-R06-01, T-R06-05 | T-R06-04, T-R06-08, T-R06-02 | High | 修正“解铃还需系铃人”，正式提出 GL-X 行动实验层，并展开安全优先、最小有效干预、可逆原则。 | +| R06-B003 | L3254-L3415 | T-R06-05, T-R06-03 | T-R06-06, T-R06-07, T-R06-02 | High | 展开低解释高观察、尊重自校正、外部审计、自由度增长、“三不三做”和青少年护栏模型。 | +| R06-B004 | L3417-L3487 | T-R06-02, T-R06-03 | T-R06-04, T-R06-01, T-R06-05, T-R06-06, T-R06-07 | High | 明确“无为不是不刺激而是不乱刺激”，给出成熟定义和最终概括，适合作为 R06 的总结性证据块。 | + +## 4. Downstream Task Candidates + +| downstream_id | route_type | candidate | source_block_ids | confidence | notes | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| D-R06-01 | model | 巨人认知 GL-X 行动实验层 / Reality Lab | R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B004 | High | 可抽取为巨人认知模型升级项：意图、GL4-GL0、行动实验、现实反馈、模型更新之间的循环。 | +| D-R06-02 | rubric | 行动实验风险分级与安全护栏检查表 | R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B004 | High | 可转化为“现在能不能实验”的风险检查，包括功能变化、红线信号、专业介入门槛。 | +| D-R06-03 | guidance | 青少年心理 I 域支持原则：护栏而非方向盘 | R06-B001, R06-B003, R06-B004 | High | 适合发展为面向家庭/老师/支持者的非临床原则文档，强调稳定存在、选择空间和认知主权保护。 | +| D-R06-04 | skill | 外部心理资源审计流程 | R06-B003, R06-B004 | Medium-High | 可沉淀为审计咨询师、治疗、学校资源和家庭建议的流程，但需要补充输入输出契约和验证标准。 | +| D-R06-05 | writing | 观点文：“无为不是不做功，而是不做乱功” | R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B003, R06-B004 | High | R06 已有完整论证：反乱投医、反粗暴干预、低解释高观察、小步可逆、守主权。 | +| D-R06-06 | model | 最小有效干预 / 三不三做 | R06-B003 | High | 可作为行动实验层的简化操作模块：不急诊断、不强干预、不夺主权；做观察、做环境、做小实验。 | +| D-R06-07 | metric | 自由度增长评估指标 | R06-B003, R06-B004 | Medium-High | 可作为实验后复盘标准，但需要和安全、关系质量、功能恢复等指标共同使用。 | +| D-R06-08 | continued-research | 青少年高风险信号和专业介入标准核验 | R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B004 | Medium | 文本引用 NIMH、AAP、AACAP 等外部材料；正式产物需要外部来源核验和中文适用边界。 | + +## 5. Merge / Split Proposals + +| proposal_id | type | topics | recommendation | confidence | rationale | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| M-R06-01 | merge_candidate | T-R06-01 with prior giant-cognition/governance topics | Merge only at synthesis stage. | High | R06 明确是巨人认知架构升级，但本 worker 不能读取全局 topic map；应等 R02-R07 汇总后判断是否并入既有“巨人认知”主主题。 | +| M-R06-02 | split | T-R06-02 vs T-R06-04 | Keep separate. | High | “事缓则圆 / 无为而治”是通用行动原则；风险分级是安全边界。合并会模糊非急性场景和高风险红线。 | +| M-R06-03 | split | T-R06-03 vs T-R06-05 | Keep separate. | Medium-High | 护栏模型是青少年场景角色模型；最小有效干预是更通用的行动策略，可跨成人和青少年使用。 | +| M-R06-04 | merge_candidate | T-R06-05 and D-R06-06 | Keep topic plus downstream module route. | High | “三不三做”既是主题证据，也是可抽取操作模块；不应在 topic discovery 阶段直接写成方法文档。 | +| M-R06-05 | split_candidate | T-R06-06 | Consider later split into “咨询/治疗审计” and “外部参与边界”. | Medium | R06 同时讨论专业资源审计和家庭/老师/外部系统的边界，后续若材料继续展开可拆分。 | +| M-R06-06 | merge_candidate | T-R06-08 with broader relationship-repair or boundary topics | Decide after cross-round comparison. | Medium | R06-B002 的“结的生成机制”很有概念力，但在本范围篇幅较集中，可能适合并入关系修复/边界主题。 | + +## 6. Low-Confidence Items + +| item_id | item | source_block_ids | confidence | reason | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| LC-R06-01 | GL-X 的正式层级编号和命名 | R06-B002, R06-B004 | Medium | 文本提出 GL-X / Reality Lab，但是否作为正式巨人认知层级需要与前后文和既有模型结构比对。 | +| LC-R06-02 | 外部医学/心理健康来源引用的准确性 | R06-B001, R06-B002, R06-B004 | Medium | 本 worker 未做外部检索；NIMH、AAP、AACAP 引用只能标记为文本内证据，正式发布前需核验。 | +| LC-R06-03 | T-R06-08 是否独立成主题 | R06-B002 | Medium | “解铃回到生成机制”概念清晰，但只集中在一个 block，可能更适合作为关系修复主题的子项。 | +| LC-R06-04 | 自由度增长指标是否足以成为独立主题 | R06-B003, R06-B004 | Medium-High | 指标很明确，但也可能只是行动实验层的评估维度；需看其他 round 是否继续强化。 | +| LC-R06-05 | 青少年护栏模型的适用边界 | R06-B001, R06-B003, R06-B004 | Medium | R06 强调非急性与高风险区分，但没有完整讨论不同年龄、家庭危险性、学校责任和临床转介边界。 | + +## 7. Human Decisions Needed + +1. 是否将“行动实验层 / Reality Lab”作为巨人认知的独立正式层级，还是作为现有行动/反思机制的子模块。 +2. 是否保留“事缓则圆 / 无为而治”作为原词主轴，还是在正式 topic map 中改写为“速度控制 / 强度控制 / 低伤害干预”。 +3. 青少年“护栏模型”是否独立成 topic，还是并入更大的“心理 I 域行动实验原则”。 +4. 是否允许将外部资源审计发展为独立 Skill 或 rubric，还是仅作为行动实验层的一个安全检查项。 +5. 正式写作或指南类产物是否需要先核验 NIMH、AAP、AACAP 等外部来源及其中文语境适用性。 +6. “解铃回到生成机制而非制造者”是否作为关系修复/边界模型的独立候选，还是并入本轮行动实验层主题。 diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R07-returned-output.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R07-returned-output.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6e49481 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/R07-returned-output.md @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +# R07 Topic Discovery Router Returned Output + +```text +participant: topic-discovery-router +worker_id: R07-topic-discovery +source_range: L3489-L4114 +source_blocks: R07-B001, R07-B002, R07-B003, R07-B004, R07-B005, R07-B006 +status: completed_bounded_worker_output +``` + +## 1. Topic Candidates + +### T-R07-01 家庭三角认知场模型 / family-triangle-cognitive-field + +- source_blocks: R07-B001, R07-B002, R07-B003, R07-B004, R07-B005, R07-B006 +- confidence: high +- topic_type: model / conceptual framework +- candidate_summary: 将青少年问题场景从“原生家庭”情绪归因转为 A/B/C 三个主体与 AB/AC/BC 三条边构成的近场认知环境。C 的安全感、期待模型、边界、自我叙事和关系预测不是孤立生成，而是在家庭三角结构、外部场压力和循环反馈中生成。 +- downstream_route_candidates: model-card candidate, methodology note, topic doc, diagram/spec artifact + +### T-R07-02 家庭系统中的三角化与关系边扫描 / triangulation-and-edge-diagnosis + +- source_blocks: R07-B001, R07-B002, R07-B003 +- confidence: high +- topic_type: diagnostic lens / evidence routing +- candidate_summary: AC/BC 断裂、过密、结盟、排斥、替代、代偿、倒置和三角化，可能是 AB 父母边裂痕或父母联盟失衡的系统产物。需要把“孩子的问题”还原为顶点状态、关系边质量、家庭层级和系统功能。 +- downstream_route_candidates: diagnostic checklist, relationship-scan worksheet, topic doc section + +### T-R07-03 青少年认知生成环境的行动实验策略 / adolescent-cognitive-environment-experiments + +- source_blocks: R07-B003, R07-B004, R07-B005 +- confidence: high +- topic_type: practice / experimental protocol +- candidate_summary: 在风险探查、C 功能变化、三条边扫描、三角化扫描之后，依据具体断裂设计小剂量、可逆、可复盘的关系实验。实验对象不应默认是 C，而应按结构责任分配到 A/B、C、学校或专业支持。 +- downstream_route_candidates: action-experiment protocol, implementation checklist, safety-gated intervention design + +### T-R07-04 责任分层与防止青少年责任倒置 / responsibility-layering-for-adolescent-family-work + +- source_blocks: R07-B004, R07-B005 +- confidence: high +- topic_type: principle / ethics / intervention boundary +- candidate_summary: “所有实体参与成长”不能平均化责任。A/B 作为成年人承担主要环境重构责任，C 保留表达、反馈和自我生成空间，外部专业者或学校只能辅助，不能把家庭系统修复责任转嫁给 C。 +- downstream_route_candidates: intervention ethics note, parent-side work protocol, human decision gate + +### T-R07-05 近场系统与外部场的权重可变模型 / near-field-family-and-external-field-weighting + +- source_blocks: R07-B003, R07-B005, R07-B006 +- confidence: medium-high +- topic_type: model boundary / anti-reductionism +- candidate_summary: 家庭三角是青少年认知生成的近场高权重系统，但不是唯一系统。学校、社会、同伴网络、媒体叙事、身体发育、神经发育差异、网络世界等都可能改变个案权重。三角形是起点，不是新的万能解释。 +- downstream_route_candidates: model boundary section, weighting heuristic, low-confidence routing watch item + +### T-R07-06 系统循环反馈与症状功能 / circular-feedback-and-symptom-function + +- source_blocks: R07-B004, R07-B005, R07-B006 +- confidence: medium-high +- topic_type: dynamic-system explanation +- candidate_summary: C 的隔离、退缩、爆发、讨好、麻木等表现会反过来影响 A/B 与三条边，可能维持家庭系统的脆弱平衡。需要避免静态归因，识别症状在系统中的反馈功能。 +- downstream_route_candidates: dynamic-system note, causal-loop diagram, intervention risk note + +## 2. Scope And Anti-Scope + +| topic_candidate | scope | anti-scope | +| --- | --- | --- | +| T-R07-01 家庭三角认知场模型 | 青少年场景中家庭近场系统如何塑造 C 的认知生成环境；A/B/C 顶点与 AB/AC/BC 边的结构化建模。 | 不等同于“父母造成一切”；不替代临床诊断；不把所有青少年问题都归因于家庭。 | +| T-R07-02 三角化与关系边扫描 | 识别断裂、过密、结盟、代偿、倒置、情绪转嫁、父母联盟失衡等关系机制。 | 不直接做治疗方案；不把关系边标签当成事实结论；不只看 AC/BC 而忽略 AB。 | +| T-R07-03 行动实验策略 | 从探查顺序到小实验设计，包括风险优先、功能变化、边扫描和三角化扫描。 | 不用“家庭大会”替代实验；不在高危信号未处理时做复杂理论推演；不让 C 独自承担改变任务。 | +| T-R07-04 责任分层 | 区分成人侧环境重构责任、C 的表达和自我生成空间、外部支持的辅助角色。 | 不把“共同成长”解释成责任平均；不要求青少年修复父母关系。 | +| T-R07-05 外部场权重可变 | 学校、社会、同伴、网络、生物因素等如何进入或改变家庭三角张力。 | 不把学校/社会当纯背景；不把家庭三角变成新的单因归因。 | +| T-R07-06 循环反馈与症状功能 | C 的表现如何反过来影响家庭三角，并可能承担系统功能。 | 不把 C 物化为家庭系统测量仪；不取消 C 的主体性和个体差异。 | + +## 3. Source Block Routing Candidates + +| source_block | primary_topic_candidates | secondary_topic_candidates | confidence | routing_note | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| R07-B001 | T-R07-01 | T-R07-02, T-R07-05 | high | 建立青少年场景、家庭主因简化、A/B/C 三角模型，并明确反“原生家庭”情绪归因。 | +| R07-B002 | T-R07-02 | T-R07-01, T-R07-06 | high | 集中讨论三角化、过密/过疏/结盟/代偿等关系机制，以及 AB 裂痕向 C 投射。 | +| R07-B003 | T-R07-01, T-R07-05 | T-R07-02, T-R07-03 | high | 补充边质量、顶点状态、家庭层级、学校/社会外部场和时间轴，是模型变量扩展段。 | +| R07-B004 | T-R07-04, T-R07-03 | T-R07-06 | high | 明确责任分层、风险探查、C 功能变化、三条边扫描和三角化扫描。 | +| R07-B005 | T-R07-03 | T-R07-04, T-R07-05, T-R07-06 | high | 给出按 AB/AC/BC/C 隔离状态区分的小实验，并强调不要把 C 当家庭系统测量仪。 | +| R07-B006 | T-R07-01, T-R07-06 | T-R07-05 | high | 命名“家庭三角认知场模型”，给出定义、结构图、循环反馈和总评压缩。 | + +## 4. Downstream Task Candidates + +| task_candidate | route_type | source_blocks | priority | note | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| 建立“家庭三角认知场模型”模型卡 | model-card / method artifact | R07-B001, R07-B003, R07-B006 | high | 已有名称、定义、图式、变量和反单因归因边界，适合沉淀为模型卡候选。 | +| 制作 A/B/C 三顶点与 AB/AC/BC 三边探查表 | worksheet / diagnostic checklist | R07-B002, R07-B003, R07-B004 | high | 可转成边质量、顶点状态、家庭层级、时间轴、外部场五类探查项。 | +| 设计青少年场景行动实验协议 | protocol / practice guide | R07-B004, R07-B005 | high | 需包含风险红线、功能变化、边扫描、三角化扫描、小剂量实验与复盘条件。 | +| 形成“责任不能平均化”干预边界说明 | ethics / boundary note | R07-B004, R07-B005 | medium-high | 防止把系统修复任务推给 C，适合作为实践协议前置原则。 | +| 绘制家庭三角认知场与 GL-R 外部场的动态循环图 | diagram / explanatory artifact | R07-B003, R07-B006 | medium | 图式已有雏形，但需与既有巨人方舟/GL-R 术语对齐。 | +| 建立“反万能家庭归因”权重判断规则 | heuristic / anti-scope rule | R07-B005, R07-B006 | medium | 用于识别学校、网络、同伴、生物因素在个案中的权重变化。 | + +## 5. Merge / Split Proposals + +- merge_candidate: T-R07-01 and earlier cross-range topic about “失望性情感隔离的生成环境” if present. + - rationale: R07 将“认知生成环境”具体化为青少年家庭近场模型，可能应成为该大 topic 下的模型子主题，而非完全独立文章。 + - confidence: medium + +- split_candidate: T-R07-01 should not absorb T-R07-03. + - rationale: “家庭三角认知场模型”是解释模型，“行动实验策略”是实践协议；合并会模糊模型与执行边界。 + - confidence: high + +- split_candidate: T-R07-02 and T-R07-04 should remain distinct unless downstream topic map太细. + - rationale: 三角化/边扫描属于诊断视角，责任分层属于干预伦理与行动边界。 + - confidence: medium-high + +- merge_candidate: T-R07-05 and T-R07-06 may be sub-sections under T-R07-01 in a compact map. + - rationale: 外部场权重与循环反馈都服务于防止模型静态化和单因化；若 topic map 需要压缩，可作为模型边界/动态性两个子段。 + - confidence: medium + +## 6. Low-Confidence Items + +- low_confidence_item: 是否将“家庭三角认知场模型”提升为独立模型卡。 + - source_blocks: R07-B001, R07-B006 + - reason: R07 内部材料已经足够成型，但是否进入模型卡层级取决于前序轮次中是否已有更高阶模型框架。 + +- low_confidence_item: “巨人方舟模型 / GL4 / GL-R”术语如何与本 topic 关联。 + - source_blocks: R07-B002, R07-B003, R07-B006 + - reason: R07 只给出局部映射，未提供完整巨人方舟模型上下文；应在主线程综合时回看既有术语体系。 + +- low_confidence_item: 学校、社会、同伴、网络、生物因素是否应独立成 topic。 + - source_blocks: R07-B003, R07-B005, R07-B006 + - reason: R07 强调外部场权重可变，但具体展开不足；目前更像模型边界，而非完整独立 topic。 + +- low_confidence_item: 临床/治疗术语的引用边界。 + - source_blocks: R07-B001, R07-B002, R07-B003 + - reason: 出现家庭系统理论、结构式家庭治疗、triangulation 等术语，但本 worker 未做外部文献校验；后续成文时需避免伪临床化。 + +## 7. Human Decisions Needed + +- 是否将“家庭三角认知场模型 / Family Triangle Cognitive Field”作为独立一级 topic，还是放入“失望性情感隔离生成环境”的子 topic。 +- 是否允许把 R07 的行动实验策略发展为可执行协议，还是仅作为概念模型后的示例段。 +- 是否需要把“责任分层 / 防责任倒置”列为单独 topic，以防实践材料中误用为要求 C 修复家庭。 +- 是否将巨人方舟 / GL-R / GL0-GL4 的术语纳入本 topic 的正式标签，还是仅保留为跨模型映射提示。 +- 是否需要后续引入专业审校或外部资料核验，处理家庭系统理论、结构式家庭治疗、三角化等临床相关术语边界。 diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fcf316e --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/agent-invocation-packet.md @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +# Agent Invocation Packet: topic-discovery-router + +## 1. Invocation Identity + +- project_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +- workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +- stage: topic-discovery +- run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +- participant_id: topic-discovery-router +- target_participant_name: Topic Discovery Router +- participant_type: ccpe_agent +- canonical_artifact_path: `C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md` +- canonical_artifact_version: 0.1 +- invocation_mode: blocked_pending_user_confirmation +- packet_type: orchestrator_index + +## 2. Canonical Artifact Handling + +- should_paste_full_prompt_or_spec: pending +- prompt_to_send_path: `invocations/topic-discovery-router/prompt-to-send.md` +- role_integrity_requirement: preserve topic-discovery-router role; do not act as builder or auditor +- allowed_wrapper_instructions: use Knowledge Vault invocation and context-management policies +- forbidden_role_changes: do not write topic docs; do not run final coverage audit; do not decide downstream execution +- no_simulation_requirement: yes + +## 3. Current Task + +Discover candidate topic graph from accepted source block inventory and sufficient source context, then return a topic-map draft with source block references, scope, anti-scope, confidence, merge/split proposals, low-confidence items, and downstream task candidates. + +## 4. Input Files + +```text +00-source-map.md +invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv +diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +``` + +## 5. Context Files + +```text +skills/invocation-policy.md +skills/context-management-policy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md +C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md +``` + +## 6. Embedded Inputs + +```text +source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +source_map_path: 00-source-map.md +source_block_count: 40 +round_count: 7 +``` + +## 7. Output Contract + +Returned output must follow: + +```text +- Topic Summary +- Topic Scope And Anti-Scope +- Source Block Routing +- Downstream Task Candidates +- Merge / Split Proposals +- Low-Confidence Items +- Human Decisions Needed +``` + +The runtime may write `01-topic-map.md` only after a real participant output is returned and saved with source metadata. + +## 8. Continuity Policy + +Topic discovery should be run by a bounded participant strategy. If the full source is too long, use worker context packs by round or source block batch, then synthesize only from file-backed returned outputs. + +## 9. Session Logging + +Real returned output must be saved under: + +```text +invocations/topic-discovery-router/returned-output.md +``` + +If external or manual execution is used, record platform, date, prompt path, and operator note. + +## 10. Forbidden Actions + +```text +- Do not simulate topic-discovery-router output in the main session. +- Do not finalize topic-map without user review. +- Do not route material into topic docs before topic-map confirmation. +- Do not treat source-map locator text as sufficient source content when topic classification needs more evidence. +``` + +## 11. Return Path + +```text +invocations/topic-discovery-router/returned-output.md +01-topic-map.md +03-run-notes.md +``` + +## 12. Runtime Acceptance Rule + +Current status: + +```text +blocked_waiting_for_participant_output +``` + +The next step requires user confirmation of invocation mode and source context packaging. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/blocked-status.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/blocked-status.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..71cf520 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/blocked-status.md @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +# Blocked Status: topic-discovery-router + +```text +status: blocked_waiting_for_participant_output +blocked_at: topic-discovery +reason: topic-discovery-router is a CCPE Agent and must not be simulated by the main session +needed_user_decision: choose invocation mode and source context packaging strategy +``` + +## Options + +```text +option_a: run one local-capable participant that can read source file and source-map paths +option_b: run seven worker participants by round, then synthesize returned outputs +option_c: prepare external source excerpt packs and run the Agent manually in another platform +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/prompt-to-send.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/prompt-to-send.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b43614d --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/prompt-to-send.md @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +# Prompt To Send: topic-discovery-router + +## 0. Status + +```text +status: draft_not_ready_for_external_execution +reason: external execution requires either pasted canonical Agent spec plus source context pack, or a participant that can read the local file paths below +``` + +## 1. Canonical Agent Prompt Or Spec + +Use the canonical Agent spec: + +```text +C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\topic-discovery-router.agent.md +``` + +If the participant cannot read local files, paste the full canonical Agent spec here before execution. + +## 2. Runtime Wrapper + +You are being invoked for one stage of a larger Knowledge Vault workflow. Preserve your canonical `topic-discovery-router` role. + +Do not act as: + +```text +- evidence-routing-and-topic-doc-builder +- lossless-coverage-auditor +- writing-workbench +- model-card promoter +``` + +## 3. Current Task + +Create a candidate topic-map draft from the segmented source block inventory and enough source content to classify blocks. + +## 4. Project Context + +```text +project_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +source_map_path: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/00-source-map.md +source_block_inventory: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv +round_count: 7 +source_block_count: 40 +``` + +## 5. Input Files Or Embedded Inputs + +If running locally, read: + +```text +00-source-map.md +invocations/conversation-segmentation/source-block-inventory.csv +diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +``` + +If running externally, the operator must provide a source context pack containing source excerpts by block id. Do not classify from locator text alone. + +## 6. Context Pack + +Pending user confirmation: + +```text +option_a: one external/local participant reads all 40 source blocks +option_b: seven worker participants process R01-R07 and return partial topic candidates +option_c: main session prepares source excerpt packs by block batch, then user runs external topic-discovery-router +``` + +## 7. Output Requirements + +Return Markdown with: + +```text +1. Topic Summary +2. Topic Scope And Anti-Scope +3. Source Block Routing +4. Downstream Task Candidates +5. Merge / Split Proposals +6. Low-Confidence Items +7. Human Decisions Needed +``` + +Every topic must include source block IDs and confidence. + +## 8. Session Continuity Instructions + +Do not rely on chat memory. Use file-backed source block ids and return output to: + +```text +invocations/topic-discovery-router/returned-output.md +``` + +## 9. Return Instructions + +Return only the formal topic-discovery-router output and any explicit uncertainty. Do not generate topic documents. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/synthesis-record.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/synthesis-record.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..93b5d29 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/synthesis-record.md @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +# Topic Discovery Synthesis Record + +## 1. Synthesis Identity + +```text +workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +stage: topic-discovery-synthesis +input_mode: completed bounded worker outputs +output_file: 01-topic-map.md +status: draft_pending_user_confirmation +``` + +## 2. Files Read + +```text +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R01-returned-output.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R02-returned-output.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R03-returned-output.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R04-returned-output.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R05-returned-output.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R06-returned-output.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/R07-returned-output.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R01-topic-discovery-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R02-topic-discovery-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R03-topic-discovery-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R04-topic-discovery-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R05-topic-discovery-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R06-topic-discovery-return.md +handoff/thread-return-packets/R07-topic-discovery-return.md +``` + +## 3. Files Written + +```text +01-topic-map.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/worker-output-index.md +invocations/topic-discovery-router/synthesis-record.md +``` + +## 4. Synthesis Rule + +The synthesis groups overlapping worker candidates into provisional global topics. It does not finalize topic boundaries, perform material routing, create topic documents, or start downstream work. + +## 5. Human Gate + +The next required step is user review of `01-topic-map.md`. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/worker-output-index.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/worker-output-index.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b16de17 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离/invocations/topic-discovery-router/worker-output-index.md @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +# Topic Discovery Worker Output Index + +## 1. Status + +```text +status: completed_worker_outputs_collected +participant: topic-discovery-router +mode: bounded worker threads by round +rounds: R01-R07 +``` + +## 2. Worker Outputs + +| round | thread_id | returned_output | thread_return | status | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| R01 | `019e9d28-6dd3-7af3-9800-8d1b5802a255` | `R01-returned-output.md` | `R01-topic-discovery-return.md` | completed | +| R02 | `019e9d29-b58f-7f33-8547-2cae422936ed` | `R02-returned-output.md` | `R02-topic-discovery-return.md` | completed | +| R03 | `019e9d29-cef3-7043-9d84-4fc34358e042` | `R03-returned-output.md` | `R03-topic-discovery-return.md` | completed | +| R04 | `019e9d29-e900-7152-9229-9e25b869999f` | `R04-returned-output.md` | `R04-topic-discovery-return.md` | completed | +| R05 | `019e9d2a-0333-7ca3-9aa0-cf3bd74a65c8` | `R05-returned-output.md` | `R05-topic-discovery-return.md` | completed | +| R06 | `019e9d2a-2032-7a60-91ca-c2d50753ccc5` | `R06-returned-output.md` | `R06-topic-discovery-return.md` | completed | +| R07 | `019e9d2a-3ad2-7b80-9016-46b8c6760881` | `R07-returned-output.md` | `R07-topic-discovery-return.md` | completed | + +## 3. Acceptance Basis + +Each worker was created as a separate Codex thread and instructed to act as a bounded `topic-discovery-router` participant for one source range only. + +The main session may synthesize a provisional topic map from these file-backed returned outputs, but must not treat it as final until user confirmation. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/00-source-map.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/00-source-map.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2392b08 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/00-source-map.md @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +# Source Map + +## 1. Source Document + +```text +source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +source_type: diary-discussion +file_size_bytes: 130947 +line_count_method: .NET UTF-8 ReadAllLines +line_count: 4114 +character_count_powerShell_measure: 47088 +last_write_time: 06/06/2026 18:22:46 +source_mutation_policy: read-only; do not move, overwrite, delete, or mark disposable before coverage audit and user confirmation +``` + +## 2. Boundary Rule + +```text +primary_round_boundary: numeric Markdown H1 headings # 1 through # 7 +embedded_h1_note: source line 21 is the quoted article title inside R01, not a runtime round boundary +step0_note: source blocks are not regenerated before Step 0 confirmation +``` + +## 3. Round Inventory + +| round_id | heading | source_lines | status | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| R01 | # 1 | L1-L430 | registered | +| R02 | # 2 | L431-L1008 | registered | +| R03 | # 3 | L1009-L1584 | registered | +| R04 | # 4 | L1585-L2336 | registered | +| R05 | # 5 | L2337-L2986 | registered | +| R06 | # 6 | L2987-L3488 | registered | +| R07 | # 7 | L3489-L4114 | registered | + +## 4. Step 0 Policy + +```text +whole_source_gestalt_required: true +main_session_full_source_reasoning: forbidden +high_context_subsession_required: true +human_confirmation_required_before_segmentation: true +``` + +## 5. Source Warnings + +```text +- PowerShell Measure-Object line count may differ from .NET line positions; use .NET UTF-8 ReadAllLines locators. +- The H1 article title at line 21 is embedded source material, not a round boundary. +- This source map registers the source only; it does not classify topics or route evidence. +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/01-topic-map.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/01-topic-map.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..512d446 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/01-topic-map.md @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ +# Confirmed Topic Graph + +## 1. Status + +```text +status: confirmed_by_step0_and_human_correction +workflow_mode: structure-first +source_coherence: coherent +topic_granularity_pause_required: false +material_routing_status: ready +``` + +This graph supersedes the pre-gestalt topic map in the legacy workspace. + +## 2. Root + +```text +root_topic_id: ROOT +root_topic_name: 从失望性情感隔离到认知生成与关系治理 +root_function: coherent discussion spine +``` + +The discussion starts from `失望性情感隔离` as an entry phenomenon, then upgrades into a general method for psychological I-domain governance, Giant Ark construction, and scenario-level model extraction. + +## 3. Confirmed Graph + +```text +ROOT 从失望性情感隔离到认知生成与关系治理 + + A. 入口与边界层 + A1. 失望性情感隔离的概念边界与去标签化 + A1-a. 心理学自媒体知识拟态与父母决定论批判 + + B. 机制解释层 + B1. 单因归因批判与多因素关系学习 + B2. 关系预测、期待落差、撤资与隔离泛化 + + C. I 域治理与认知主权层 + C1. 心理关系问题的 I 域定位 + C2. 外部干预边界、资源审计与参与者资格 + C3. 元认知协调、认知主权与理论化防御 + C4. 方法论调度、信任分级与认知生成环境治理 + + D. 巨人方舟通用模型层 + D1. 巨人认知 2.0 -> 巨人方舟正式模型 + D2. GL0 身体调节、情绪耐受与神经系统状态 + D3. GL-R 关系/环境层与社会系统废热 + D4. GL3 问题表征工具: QPI + D5. GL4 限制: 元认知作为协调者而非独裁者 + D6. 意图-行动-反馈闭环与 Reality Lab 动作模块 + + E. 领域应用与局部模型层: 失望性情感隔离 / 青少年家庭场景 + E1. 青少年心理支持护栏与简化权重假设 + E2. 家庭三角认知场模型 + E3. 巨人方舟在具体领域调用局部模型/理论的应用价值 +``` + +## 4. Confirmed Relationship Rules + +```text +巨人方舟: + type: formal general model + relation_to_giant_cognition_2_0: replacement / upgrade + note: after Giant Ark is built, Giant Cognition 2.0 is retired + +QPI: + type: GL3 problem-representation tool + not: top-level C-layer topic + not: GL4 sovereignty-control diagnosis protocol + +Reality Lab: + type: action module + parent: intention-action-feedback loop + not: independent Giant Ark layer + +家庭三角认知场: + type: independent model + also: scenario-specific model called by Giant Ark in the adolescent / family application of disappointment-detachment + +methodology discussion: + function: defines Giant Ark application value + meaning: Giant Ark calls different concrete models, theories, and methods in different domains and layers + +adolescent scenario weighting: + family_primary_school_secondary_society_tertiary: simplifying assumption only +``` + +## 5. Mermaid Graph + +```mermaid +flowchart TD + ROOT["ROOT 从失望性情感隔离到认知生成与关系治理"] + + A["A 入口与边界层"] + B["B 机制解释层"] + C["C I 域治理与认知主权层"] + D["D 巨人方舟通用模型层"] + E["E 领域应用与局部模型层"] + + A1["A1 概念边界与去标签化"] + A1a["A1-a 知识拟态与父母决定论批判"] + B1["B1 多因素关系学习"] + B2["B2 关系预测/期待落差/隔离泛化"] + C1["C1 I 域定位"] + C2["C2 外部干预审计"] + C3["C3 元认知与认知主权"] + C4["C4 方法论调度与信任分级"] + D1["D1 巨人认知2.0 -> 巨人方舟"] + D2["D2 GL0 身体/情绪/神经系统"] + D3["D3 GL-R 关系/环境层"] + D4["D4 GL3 QPI 问题表征工具"] + D5["D5 GL4 限制: 协调而非独裁"] + D6["D6 意图-行动-反馈与 Reality Lab"] + E1["E1 青少年支持护栏"] + E2["E2 家庭三角认知场"] + E3["E3 具体领域模型调用"] + + ROOT --> A --> A1 --> A1a + ROOT --> B --> B1 + B --> B2 + ROOT --> C --> C1 --> C2 --> C3 --> C4 + ROOT --> D --> D1 + D1 --> D2 + D1 --> D3 + D1 --> D4 + D1 --> D5 + D1 --> D6 + ROOT --> E --> E1 --> E2 + E --> E3 + + A1 --> B1 + B2 --> C1 + C4 --> D1 + D6 --> E1 + E2 --> E3 +``` + +## 6. Topic Document Plan + +```text +topics/ + 00-root-overview.md + A-入口与边界层.md + B-机制解释层.md + C-I域治理与认知主权层.md + D-巨人方舟通用模型层.md + E-领域应用与局部模型层.md +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/02-material-routing-log.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/02-material-routing-log.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..60458cf --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/02-material-routing-log.md @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +# Material Routing Log + +## 1. Status + +```text +status: routed +workflow_mode: structure-first +topic_graph: 01-topic-map.md +step0_alignment: invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/returned-output.md +human_confirmation: invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/human-confirmation.md +routing_basis: confirmed topic graph plus neutral source block inventory +``` + +This routing does not reuse the old pre-gestalt topic map as authority. + +## 2. Routing Rules + +```text +primary_node: the structural node that owns the block's main function +cross_links: upstream/downstream nodes needed to preserve model evolution +confidence: high / medium / low +``` + +## 3. Routed Blocks + +| source_block | primary_node | parent_layer | cross_links | confidence | note | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| R01-B001 | A1 | A | ROOT | high | round entry and source framing | +| R01-B002 | A1 | A | A1-a, B1 | high | introduces the article label and user skepticism | +| R01-B003 | A1 | A | B1 | high | distinguishes symptom/state from diagnosis and single-cause explanation | +| R01-B004 | B1 | B | A1 | high | critiques four initial views and moves toward multi-factor analysis | +| R01-B005 | A1-a | A | A1, B1 | high | psychology-media knowledge imitation and pseudo-professional framing | +| R01-B006 | A1 | A | B2 | high | corrected stance after de-labeling | +| R02-B001 | B1 | B | C1 | medium | round entry into mechanism and QPI direction | +| R02-B002 | B1 | B | B2, C1 | high | multiple factors, cognitive dissonance, relationship learning | +| R02-B003 | B2 | B | C1, D2 | high | stage-sensitive intervention and dominant layer shifts | +| R02-B004 | C2 | C | B2, C3 | high | strategy, intervention boundary, external resource use | +| R02-B005 | B2 | B | C1, C2 | high | boundary vs generalized isolation and governance variables | +| R02-B006 | C1 | C | C3 | high | asks whether external input helps self-governance | +| R03-B001 | C2 | C | C1 | medium | round entry into external support and safety environment | +| R03-B002 | C2 | C | C3, D6 | high | external resource as local safe world and resampling environment | +| R03-B003 | B1 | B | C2, E1 | medium | family neglect as one factor among multiple factors | +| R03-B004 | C3 | C | D2, D5 | high | metacognition is important but not sovereign over body/emotion | +| R03-B005 | C2 | C | C4 | high | resource audit, good intent but insufficient capability | +| R04-B001 | D1 | D | C4 | medium | round entry into Giant Cognition / Giant Ark upgrade | +| R04-B002 | D1 | D | D2, D3, D6 | medium | model transition material | +| R04-B003 | D1 | D | C4, D6 | high | CBT and other methods as modules in the architecture | +| R04-B004 | D2 | D | B2, C3 | high | self-blame, vulnerability, bottom-layer regulation needs | +| R04-B005 | D1 | D | C4, D6 | high | ACT placement inside Giant Ark method library | +| R04-B006 | D2 | D | D5, D6 | high | tolerance window and GL0/body-state checks | +| R04-B007 | D1 | D | D2, D3, D5, D6 | high | explicit upgrade requirements: GL0, GL-R, action experiment, GL4 limit | +| R05-B001 | D1 | D | C4 | medium | round entry into Giant Ark formalization | +| R05-B002 | C4 | C | D1, E3 | high | methodology table and theory/tool scheduling | +| R05-B003 | D1 | D | D2, D3, D4, D6 | high | Giant Ark definition as general cognitive governance architecture | +| R05-B004 | C4 | C | D3, E3 | high | participant pollution and cognitive generation environment governance | +| R05-B005 | C4 | C | D1, E3 | high | failure modes without methodology | +| R05-B006 | C2 | C | C4, E3 | high | trust grading and permitted levels of external input | +| R06-B001 | E1 | E | D6 | medium | round entry into adolescent case | +| R06-B002 | E1 | E | D6, E2 | high | what is right/wrong in adolescent intervention assumptions | +| R06-B003 | D6 | D | E1, E2 | high | do not rush explanation; action timing and guardrails | +| R06-B004 | E1 | E | C2, D6 | high | adolescent support guardrails and danger thresholds | +| R07-B001 | E2 | E | E1 | medium | round entry into family triangle model | +| R07-B002 | E2 | E | B2, D3 | high | A/B/C triadic relation and displacement patterns | +| R07-B003 | E2 | E | D6 | high | different fractures map to different experiment strategies | +| R07-B004 | E2 | E | E3 | high | ideal family cognitive field and practical constraints | +| R07-B005 | E2 | E | D6, E3 | high | changed family edges as intervention results | +| R07-B006 | E2 | E | B2, C3 | high | family field as safety/expectation/boundary/narrative/prediction environment | + +## 4. Coverage Summary + +```text +total_blocks: 38 +routed_blocks: 38 +unrouted_blocks: 0 +low_confidence_blocks: 0 +medium_confidence_blocks: 7 +high_confidence_blocks: 31 +``` + +## 5. Routing Notes + +```text +- QPI is routed as D4 / GL3 problem-representation tool when it appears in the Giant Ark model, and as C1 when used to locate the psychological relation issue as I-domain. +- Reality Lab is routed through D6 as an action module inside the intention-action-feedback loop, not as a standalone model layer. +- Family Triangle Cognitive Field is routed to E2 as an independent model and as a scenario-specific model called by Giant Ark. +- Methodology and trust grading are routed to C4/E3 because they define Giant Ark's applied value in specific domains. +- Adolescent family/school/society weighting is treated as a simplifying assumption under E1, not as a default causal rule. +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/03-run-notes.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/03-run-notes.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d53d803 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/03-run-notes.md @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +# Run Notes + +## 1. Run Identity + +```text +run_id: 2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2 +workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +workspace: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2 +source: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +created: 2026-06-06 +``` + +## 2. Decisions Already Settled + +```text +- This run supersedes the old pre-gestalt workspace. +- The old workspace is retained only as a misread/distortion demo. +- This run starts from Step 0 Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment. +- The main session must not process the full source as one context. +- Step 0 must be performed by a real high-context sub-session participant. +- Step 0 output must be inspected by the user before segmentation or worker topic extraction. +``` + +## 3. Current Pass + +```text +pass: material-extraction-complete +status: completed_with_material_extraction +participant: whole-source-gestalt-reviewer +invocation_dir: invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer +returned_output: invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/returned-output.md +human_confirmation: invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/human-confirmation.md +coherence_judgment: coherent +recommended_downstream_mode: structure-first +worker_lens_recommendation: required +``` + +## 4. Confirmation Gates + +```text +Gate 0: User confirms Step 0 alignment, requests revision, or rejects it. +Gate 1: Confirm downstream mode: structure-first / macro-topic split / flat-discovery. +Gate 2: Confirm segmentation and worker packet strategy. +Gate 3: Confirm candidate topic graph before material routing. +Gate 4: Confirm material routing before topic docs. +Gate 5: Confirm audit repair strategy. +Gate 6: Confirm downstream routing. +``` + +## 5. Current Blocker + +```text +blocked_on: none +next_pass: optional downstream track selection +skip_extra_topic_granularity_pause: true +``` + +## 6. Completion Artifacts + +```text +topic_graph: 01-topic-map.md +material_routing: 02-material-routing-log.md +topic_docs: topics/ +material_extraction_index: topics/_material-extraction-index.md +topic_docs_human_confirmation: handoff/topic-docs-human-confirmation.md +coverage_audit: audits/coverage-audit.md +distortion_risk_log: audits/distortion-risk-log.md +extraction_quality_audit: audits/extraction-quality-audit.md +process_implementation_audit: audits/process-implementation-audit.md +completion_handoff: handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-completion-handoff.md +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/README.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1ff511a --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +# 2026-06-05 失望性情感隔离观点讨论拆分 2 + +## 1. Purpose + +本目录用于按升级后的 `Viewpoint Discussion Distillation` 机制重新处理 `diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md`。 + +本次运行从 `Step 0: Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment` 开始，不继承旧目录的 topic map、hierarchy proposal、worker topic outputs 或 material routing。 + +## 2. Source + +```text +source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +source_type: diary-discussion +round_boundary_rule: numeric markdown H1 headings, # 1 through # 7 +embedded_h1_note: line 21 is an article title inside R01, not a runtime round boundary +``` + +## 3. Prior Run Boundary + +```text +prior_workspace: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离 +prior_status: legacy_pre_gestalt_misread_demo +allowed_use: distortion comparison only +not_authority_for: material routing, topic docs, downstream handoff +``` + +## 4. Current Status + +```text +status: completed_with_material_extraction +current_pass: material_extraction_complete +next_gate: choose downstream track if needed +``` + +## 5. Public Capability Rules + +```text +skills/invocation-policy.md +skills/context-management-policy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/runbook.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md +skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/invocation-contract.md +``` + +## 6. Directory Map + +```text +README.md +00-source-map.md +01-topic-map.md +02-material-routing-log.md +03-run-notes.md +topics/ +audits/ +model-mining/ +handoff/ +invocations/ +``` + +## 7. Completion Artifacts + +```text +invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/returned-output.md +invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/human-confirmation.md +01-topic-map.md +02-material-routing-log.md +topics/ +audits/coverage-audit.md +audits/distortion-risk-log.md +audits/extraction-quality-audit.md +audits/process-implementation-audit.md +handoff/topic-docs-human-confirmation.md +handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-completion-handoff.md +``` + +## 8. Material Extraction + +```text +material_extraction_status: completed +material_units_total: 29 +index: topics/_material-extraction-index.md +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/coverage-audit.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/coverage-audit.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1a6175e --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/coverage-audit.md @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +# Coverage Audit + +## 1. Status + +```text +status: passed +audit_type: structure-first routing coverage +source_blocks_total: 38 +source_blocks_routed: 38 +source_blocks_unrouted: 0 +topic_docs_created: 6 +``` + +## 2. Checked Artifacts + +```text +00-source-map.md +01-topic-map.md +02-material-routing-log.md +topics/00-root-overview.md +topics/A-入口与边界层.md +topics/B-机制解释层.md +topics/C-I域治理与认知主权层.md +topics/D-巨人方舟通用模型层.md +topics/E-领域应用与局部模型层.md +``` + +## 3. Block Coverage + +```text +R01: R01-B001 through R01-B006 routed +R02: R02-B001 through R02-B006 routed +R03: R03-B001 through R03-B005 routed +R04: R04-B001 through R04-B007 routed +R05: R05-B001 through R05-B006 routed +R06: R06-B001 through R06-B004 routed +R07: R07-B001 through R07-B006 routed +``` + +No source block is left without a primary node. + +## 4. Topic Document Coverage + +| topic_doc | primary layers covered | status | +| --- | --- | --- | +| `topics/00-root-overview.md` | ROOT | covered | +| `topics/A-入口与边界层.md` | A1, A1-a | covered | +| `topics/B-机制解释层.md` | B1, B2 | covered | +| `topics/C-I域治理与认知主权层.md` | C1, C2, C3, C4 | covered | +| `topics/D-巨人方舟通用模型层.md` | D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6 | covered | +| `topics/E-领域应用与局部模型层.md` | E1, E2, E3 | covered | + +## 5. Residual Risk + +```text +residual_risk: medium-low +reason: source excerpts were routed by confirmed structure and block inventory; future model-building may need deeper quote-level extraction from original source +``` + +This package is complete for viewpoint material organization. It is not a final model specification for Giant Ark or Family Triangle Cognitive Field. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/distortion-risk-log.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/distortion-risk-log.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fe73b9b --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/distortion-risk-log.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +# Distortion Risk Log + +## 1. Status + +```text +status: checked +main_risk_source: old pre-gestalt chunk-first workflow +current_mode: structure-first after confirmed Step 0 +``` + +## 2. Risks Checked + +| risk | old failure mode | current handling | status | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| QPI flattening | QPI treated as top-level topic | QPI recorded as GL3 problem-representation tool | resolved | +| Giant Ark ambiguity | Giant Cognition, Giant Ark, Reality Lab treated as peers | Giant Ark is formal model replacing Giant Cognition 2.0 | resolved | +| Reality Lab overpromotion | Reality Lab treated as independent layer/model | Reality Lab is action module in intention-action-feedback loop | resolved | +| Family Triangle under/overplacement | adolescent family content treated as unrelated branch or sole main model | Family Triangle Cognitive Field is independent model and scenario model called by Giant Ark | resolved | +| methodology flattening | CBT/ACT/etc. treated as recommendation list | methodology defines Giant Ark application value and tool/model calling | resolved | +| adolescent weighting hardening | family/school/society order treated as default causal rule | recorded as simplifying assumption only | resolved | +| no-topic-pause risk | skipping topic granularity pause could hide errors | Step 0 confirmed by user; extra pause removed only for this run | accepted | + +## 3. Guardrails For Future Use + +```text +- Do not use the old directory as routing authority. +- Do not reintroduce a flat 13-topic list. +- Do not promote QPI above Giant Ark. +- Do not treat Reality Lab as a standalone model. +- Do not treat Family Triangle Cognitive Field as the whole discussion's top model. +- Do not treat adolescent weighting as a default causal rule. +``` + +## 4. Current Conclusion + +The structure is stable enough for downstream use. Any future work should branch by downstream purpose: + +```text +- Giant Ark formal model specification +- Family Triangle Cognitive Field model extraction +- article outline / writing handoff +- CCPE model-mining packet +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/extraction-quality-audit.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/extraction-quality-audit.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..35b1b1a --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/extraction-quality-audit.md @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +# Extraction Quality Audit + +## 1. Status + +```text +status: passed +audit_type: material extraction quality +material_units_total: 29 +topic_docs_with_extraction: 5 +root_doc_updated: pending_if_downstream_requires +``` + +## 2. Checks + +| check | result | note | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Step 0 confirmed before extraction | passed | `human-confirmation.md` recorded | +| Material units preserve source block IDs | passed | each unit lists `source_blocks` | +| No flat topic regression | passed | extraction follows A/B/C/D/E graph | +| QPI relation preserved | passed | QPI kept as GL3 problem-representation tool | +| Giant Ark relation preserved | passed | formal model replacing Giant Cognition 2.0 | +| Reality Lab relation preserved | passed | action module inside intention-action-feedback | +| Family Triangle relation preserved | passed | independent model and scenario model called by Giant Ark | +| Adolescent weighting caveat preserved | passed | simplifying assumption only | + +## 3. Coverage By Layer + +```text +A: extracted +B: extracted +C: extracted +D: extracted +E: extracted +ROOT: overview only; downstream tracks should read _material-extraction-index.md +``` + +## 4. Residual Risk + +```text +residual_risk: medium +reason: extraction is paraphrased material-unit level, not quote-level evidence extraction +``` + +If the next task is publication, formal model-card writing, or audit-grade evidence review, create a quote-level evidence pack from the original source before final claims. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/process-implementation-audit.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/process-implementation-audit.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b7fa9d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/audits/process-implementation-audit.md @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +# Process Implementation Audit + +## 1. Question + +Did this run follow the updated rule that long-source analysis, splitting, and extraction should happen in sub-sessions or sub-agents to avoid main-session context overload? + +## 2. What Used A Real Sub-Session + +```text +Step 0 Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment: + used_subsession: true + participant: whole-source-gestalt-reviewer + output: invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/returned-output.md +``` + +The full-source global analysis was performed by a real sub-session participant. The main session saved the returned output and recorded human confirmation. + +## 3. What Did Not Use A Sub-Session + +```text +source registration: + used_subsession: false + reason: administrative metadata and source map setup + +topic graph synthesis: + used_subsession: false + reason: based on Step 0 output plus user confirmation, not a fresh full-source read + +material routing: + used_subsession: false + reason: routed from confirmed topic graph and existing neutral source-block inventory + +topic docs / material extraction: + used_subsession: false + reason: performed as a bounded material-unit extraction from routed blocks after Step 0 confirmation + process_gap: future runs should dispatch this extraction to worker/sub-session participants when available + +coverage / distortion audit: + used_subsession: false + reason: bounded artifact audit over generated indexes and topic docs +``` + +## 4. Assessment + +```text +status: acceptable_with_process_gap +``` + +The highest-context operation, Step 0 full-source analysis, complied with the new rule. Later routing and extraction did not re-read the full source as one context, but the material extraction step should still be treated as worker/sub-session work in future runs because it creates reusable content from source material. + +## 5. Rule Backwrite + +This run caused a public rule update: + +```text +- topic-doc material extraction should prefer worker/sub-session execution +- main session may integrate, index, and verify returned outputs +- if main session performs bounded extraction for pragmatic reasons, record that reason in the audit log +- add a Topic Docs / Material Extraction human confirmation gate +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-completion-handoff.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-completion-handoff.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1b124bc --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/handoff/continuation/2026-06-06-completion-handoff.md @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +# Completion Handoff + +## 1. Current State + +```text +workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +workspace: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2 +status: completed_with_material_extraction +mode: structure-first +source_coherence: coherent +``` + +## 2. Completed + +```text +- Step 0 Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment completed by real sub-session +- Step 0 confirmed by user +- old pre-gestalt workspace marked as legacy misread demo +- confirmed topic graph written +- material routing log written +- topic docs written +- coverage audit written +- distortion risk log written +- material extraction units written into topic docs +- material extraction index written +- extraction quality audit written +- Topic Docs human confirmation recorded +- process implementation audit written +``` + +## 3. Do Not Repeat + +```text +- Do not return to the old flat topic list. +- Do not use the old workspace as routing authority. +- Do not re-open a topic granularity pause for this run unless new evidence contradicts the confirmed Step 0. +- Do not treat QPI as a top-level topic. +- Do not treat Reality Lab as an independent Giant Ark layer. +- Do not treat adolescent weighting as a default causal rule. +``` + +## 4. Stable Decisions + +```text +巨人方舟: + formal model name + replaces Giant Cognition 2.0 after model completion + +QPI: + GL3 problem-representation tool + +Reality Lab: + action module in intention-action-feedback loop + +家庭三角认知场: + independent model + also scenario-specific model called by Giant Ark + +methodology discussion: + defines Giant Ark application value + +adolescent weighting: + simplifying assumption +``` + +## 5. Next Possible Tracks + +```text +1. Giant Ark formal model specification +2. Family Triangle Cognitive Field model extraction +3. article outline / writing handoff +4. CCPE model-mining packet +5. deeper quote-level evidence extraction from original source +``` + +## 6. Material Extraction Layer + +```text +index: topics/_material-extraction-index.md +material_units_total: 29 +quality_audit: audits/extraction-quality-audit.md +process_audit: audits/process-implementation-audit.md +topic_docs_human_confirmation: handoff/topic-docs-human-confirmation.md +residual_risk: paraphrased material-unit level, not quote-level evidence pack +``` + +## 7. Process Note + +```text +Step 0 full-source analysis used a real sub-session. +Topic docs and material extraction were completed in the main session as bounded artifact work after Step 0 confirmation. +Future runs should dispatch topic-doc material extraction to worker/sub-session participants when available. +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/handoff/topic-docs-human-confirmation.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/handoff/topic-docs-human-confirmation.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d352063 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/handoff/topic-docs-human-confirmation.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +# Topic Docs Human Confirmation + +## 1. Status + +```text +status: confirmed +confirmed_by: user +confirmation_date: 2026-06-07 +reviewed_scope: + - topics/ + - topics/_material-extraction-index.md +``` + +## 2. User Decision + +```text +topic_structure: accepted +topic_docs: accepted_for_continuation +material_extraction: sufficient_to_continue +additional_topic_granularity_pause_required: false +``` + +The user reviewed the topic documents and confirmed that the topic structure has no problem. The remaining concern is the quality of extracted content, so the run proceeded into material extraction. + +## 3. Downstream Permission + +```text +may_continue: + - material extraction + - extraction audit + - completion handoff + - commit and push +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/agent-invocation-packet.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/agent-invocation-packet.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..424e76f --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/agent-invocation-packet.md @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ +# Agent Invocation Packet: whole-source-gestalt-reviewer + +## 1. Invocation Identity + +```text +participant_id: whole-source-gestalt-reviewer +workflow: viewpoint-discussion-distillation +workspace: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2 +source_document_path: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md +invocation_mode: real high-context sub-session +main_session_may_simulate: false +date: 2026-06-06 +``` + +## 2. Task + +Read the full source document and produce a Step 0 whole-source gestalt alignment report. + +The goal is not to route material or draft topic docs. The goal is to align the global structure before segmentation. + +## 3. Required Output Path + +```text +invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/returned-output.md +``` + +## 4. Output Contract + +```text +- participant identity and invocation metadata +- source document path and source version note +- coherence judgment: coherent / mixed / fragmented +- coherence rationale and split recommendation if mixed or fragmented +- recommended downstream mode: structure-first / macro-topic split / flat-discovery +- global topic portrait +- main structure or candidate layers +- core tensions and governing questions +- model-evolution line +- parent/child/tool/case/action-layer distinctions +- chunk-first distortion risks +- segmentation guidance for downstream workers +- worker lens recommendation: required / partial / omitted +- confidence notes and unresolved structure questions +- human confirmation status: pending +``` + +## 5. Known Prior Distortion Risks + +The previous pre-gestalt run is retained only as a legacy distortion demo. Do not reuse its topic map as authority. + +Pay special attention to: + +```text +- QPI may be a tool inside a metacognitive / I-domain judgment layer, not a top-level topic. +- Giant Cognition may upgrade into Giant Ark through GL0 strengthening, GL-R, action experiment, and GL4 limitation. +- Reality Lab / action experiment may be the intervention layer that turns an explanation model into explanation + intervention. +- adolescent/family material may be a local deepening branch generated from action experiment, with Family Triangle Cognitive Field as a model candidate. +``` + +These are prior human concerns. Verify and refine them from the full source instead of merely adopting them. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/human-confirmation.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/human-confirmation.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6a44293 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/human-confirmation.md @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +# Human Confirmation: Step 0 Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment + +## 1. Status + +```text +status: confirmed +confirmed_by: user +confirmation_date: 2026-06-06 +downstream_mode: structure-first +worker_lens: required +skip_extra_topic_granularity_pause: true +``` + +The user confirmed that Step 0 fully captured the discussion structure. The old post-topic-discovery pause for topic granularity alignment is no longer required for this run. + +## 2. Confirmed Decisions + +### 2.1 Giant Ark + +```text +巨人方舟: formal_model_name +relationship_to_giant_cognition: replacement / upgrade +``` + +`巨人方舟` is the formal model name. After this model is built, the previous `巨人认知 2.0` model should be retired. + +### 2.2 Family Triangle Cognitive Field + +```text +家庭三角认知场: independent_model +also_used_as: scenario-specific model inside Giant Ark application +``` + +`家庭三角认知场` can be extracted as an independent model. In this discussion, it is also the model used when Giant Ark is applied to the `失望性情感隔离` domain, with adolescents as the typical case scenario. + +Giant Ark remains the general model. In concrete domains and scenarios, different Giant Ark layers can call different concrete models or theories as tools. + +### 2.3 Methodology Discussion + +```text +methodology_discussion_role: defines Giant Ark application value +``` + +The discussion of methodology defines the application value of Giant Ark: it governs how concrete theories, methods, and models are selected and coordinated in specific domains. + +### 2.4 Reality Lab + +```text +Reality Lab: action module +parent_loop: intention-action-feedback loop +role: practice-domain module +``` + +Reality Lab is not an independent Giant Ark layer. It is an action module inside the intention-action-feedback loop. + +### 2.5 QPI + +```text +QPI: GL3 problem-representation tool +``` + +QPI is a GL3 problem-representation tool, not a GL4 sovereignty-control diagnosis protocol. + +### 2.6 Adolescent Scenario Weighting + +```text +family_primary_school_secondary_society_tertiary: simplifying_assumption +``` + +The adolescent scenario weighting rule is a simplifying assumption, not a default causal weighting rule. + +## 3. Downstream Instruction + +Proceed with: + +```text +1. confirmed topic graph +2. structure-first evidence routing +3. topic documents +4. coverage / distortion audit +5. downstream handoff notes +``` + +Do not re-open a separate topic granularity confirmation gate unless evidence routing finds a major contradiction. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/prompt-to-send.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/prompt-to-send.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0a220f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/prompt-to-send.md @@ -0,0 +1,83 @@ +# Prompt To Send: whole-source-gestalt-reviewer + +You are the `whole-source-gestalt-reviewer` for a Knowledge Vault `viewpoint-discussion-distillation` run. + +## Source + +Read the full source: + +```text +C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\knowledge-vault\diary\2026\2026-06\2026-06-05.md +``` + +Source metadata: + +```text +source_type: diary-discussion +line_count: 4114 +runtime_rounds: # 1 through # 7 +embedded_h1_note: line 21 is an article title inside R01, not a runtime round boundary +``` + +## Purpose + +Produce Step 0 Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment. + +This is not material routing. This is not topic doc drafting. This is not a flat topic list unless the source is fragmented. + +Your job is to decide whether the source is coherent, mixed, or fragmented, then provide the global structure that downstream workers should either use as a structure lens or intentionally not use. + +## Prior Run Warning + +A previous pre-gestalt / chunk-first run produced useful exploratory evidence but distorted some parent-child relations. Treat that old run as non-authoritative. + +Known human concerns: + +```text +- QPI may be a tool inside a metacognitive / I-domain judgment layer, not a top-level topic. +- Giant Cognition may upgrade into Giant Ark through GL0 strengthening, GL-R, action experiment, and GL4 limitation. +- Reality Lab / action experiment may be the intervention layer that turns an explanation model into explanation + intervention. +- adolescent/family material may be a local deepening branch generated from action experiment, with Family Triangle Cognitive Field as a model candidate. +``` + +Use these concerns as distortion checks, not as conclusions. Verify or revise them from the full source. + +## Required Output + +Write your answer in Chinese using this structure: + +```text +# Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment + +## 1. Invocation Metadata + +## 2. Coherence Judgment +- coherent / mixed / fragmented +- rationale +- if mixed or fragmented, split recommendation + +## 3. Recommended Downstream Mode +- structure-first / macro-topic split / flat-discovery +- worker lens recommendation: required / partial / omitted + +## 4. Global Topic Portrait + +## 5. Main Structure Or Candidate Layers + +## 6. Core Tensions And Governing Questions + +## 7. Model-Evolution Line + +## 8. Parent / Child / Tool / Case / Action-Layer Distinctions + +## 9. Chunk-First Distortion Risks + +## 10. Segmentation Guidance For Downstream Workers + +## 11. Confidence Notes And Unresolved Structure Questions + +## 12. Human Confirmation Status +pending +``` + +Do not produce material routing. Do not assign source blocks. Do not draft topic documents. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/returned-output.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/returned-output.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..82657cc --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/returned-output.md @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@ +# Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment + +## 1. Invocation Metadata + +- participant: `whole-source-gestalt-reviewer` +- task: Step 0 Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment +- source_type: diary-discussion +- source: `diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md` +- runtime_rounds: `# 1` through `# 7` +- boundary note: line 21 的 H1 是 R01 内嵌文章标题，不是轮次边界 +- output constraint: 本报告只做全源结构对齐，不做 material routing，不分配 source blocks，不生成 topic docs + +## 2. Coherence Judgment + +- coherent / mixed / fragmented: **coherent** +- rationale: 全源不是零散话题堆叠，而是一条连续升级链：从“失望性情感隔离”这个自媒体心理标签出发，逐步上升为心理 I 域治理问题，再引入 QPI、元认知、认知主权、巨人认知、巨人方舟、行动实验层，最后落到青少年家庭三角认知场。后续每一轮都不是换题，而是在回答“这种复杂心理/关系课题如何被正确建模、治理、干预、审计”。 +- if mixed or fragmented, split recommendation: 不建议按碎片主题 flat split。可以承认局部材料具有心理学、方法论、家庭系统三个面向，但它们应作为同一主结构下的层级展开，而不是拆成互不统属的主题组。 + +## 3. Recommended Downstream Mode + +- recommended mode: **structure-first** +- worker lens recommendation: **required** +- explanation: 下游应先继承全源的结构镜头，再处理局部材料。否则容易把 QPI、巨人认知、行动实验、家庭三角分别误当成平行 topic，导致父子关系扭曲。 +- fallback: 若下游需要拆分，只能做 **structure-first 下的局部分工**，不能做宏观 topic 平切。 + +## 4. Global Topic Portrait + +全源核心画像是：用户在反驳“原生家庭导致失望性情感隔离”的单线叙事，并逐步建立一套用于心理 I 域问题的认知治理方法论。 + +最外层议题不是“失望性情感隔离是什么”，而是：复杂心理-关系现象如何避免被自媒体标签、单因归因、低质量外部干预、局部理论工具粗暴降维。 + +中层议题是：当这种问题属于 I 域时，如何通过 QPI 定位问题颗粒度，通过元认知保有干预主权，通过巨人认知/巨人方舟统合多种心理干预模块，通过行动实验生成现实反馈。 + +最终落点是：在青少年场景中，认知生成环境不能只看个体 C，而要看父 A、母 B、子女 C 三个顶点与 AB、AC、BC 三条边构成的家庭三角认知场。 + +## 5. Main Structure Or Candidate Layers + +建议下游采用以下主结构： + +1. 入口层：对“失望性情感隔离”概念的去标签化 + 重点是区分现象、病因、解释模型、干预模型，反对“父母决定论”和自媒体知识拟态。 + +2. QPI 层：将该现象定位为 I 域课题 + 失望隔离不是 Q，也不只是 P，而是期望、现实、关系反馈、防御机制、身份认同、社会结构长期耦合的治理问题。 + +3. 元认知与认知主权层 + 当事人必须保有干预主权，但不能把“靠自己”变成封闭系统；外部资源应被审计、分级、有限调用。 + +4. 巨人认知升级层 + 原 GL0-GL4 认知栈需要补强为包含 GL0 生理情绪底盘、GL-R 关系/环境层、行动实验层、现实反馈的“巨人方舟”治理架构。 + +5. 行动实验 / Reality Lab 层 + 行动实验是把解释模型变成现实反馈的生成机制，原则是小剂量、低风险、可逆、可观察、可复盘。 + +6. 青少年家庭三角认知场层 + 在青少年场景下，C 的问题不是孤立故障点，而是在 A/B/C 三主体、AB/AC/BC 三关系边、学校与社会外部场共同作用中生成。 + +## 6. Core Tensions And Governing Questions + +核心张力包括： + +- 命名 vs 归因：给经验命名可以提供入口，但不能偷渡病因结论。 +- 解释 vs 干预：心理学解释模型不能直接冒充干预模型。 +- 主权 vs 外部帮助：当事人不能把 I 域主权外包，但也不能把所有外部资源排除出系统。 +- 元认知 vs 情绪/身体底盘：高元认知不能替代 GL0 的情绪耐受与生理调节。 +- 方法论 vs 单一理论：CBT、ACT、MBT 等是工具，不是总调度系统。 +- 缓行 vs 失职：无为而治不是不作为，而是在非高危状态下避免粗暴干预。 +- 家庭主因 vs 原生家庭叙事：家庭可以是近场高权重系统，但不是道德化、情绪化的万能归因。 + +治理性问题可压缩为： + +- 这是 Q、P 还是 I？ +- 当前隔离是边界、麻木、防御、撤资，还是泛化？ +- 外部输入是在提供信息、工具、体验环境，还是夺取主权？ +- 痛苦是系统废热、成长废热，还是伪成长内耗？ +- 行动之后，自由度有没有增加？ +- 在青少年场景中，C 的表现如何嵌入 A/B/C 三角关系？ + +## 7. Model-Evolution Line + +模型演化线非常清楚： + +1. “失望性情感隔离”从自媒体标签被降温为一组关系撤回、期待降低、需求抑制、情绪麻木、防御策略。 +2. 该现象被 QPI 重新定位为 I 域问题，不能用 Q 式命名或 P 式单方案解决。 +3. QPI 进一步要求元认知作为 I 域治理能力，用来识别颗粒度、归因、成本、策略和反馈。 +4. 外部干预被重新定义：不是替当事人解决，而是在通过审计后提供方法、镜像、反馈或生成性体验环境。 +5. 巨人认知从通用认知栈升级为心理 I 域治理架构，需要补 GL0、GL-R、行动实验和反馈校准。 +6. 巨人认知隐喻升级为“巨人方舟 / 认知远航舰”，从内部英雄主义转为主权、环境、船体、仪器、航线、港口、试航的系统治理。 +7. 行动实验层被明确化为 Reality Lab，补上“模型如何进入现实并产生新证据”的缺口。 +8. 青少年场景成为 Reality Lab 的局部深化：家庭三角认知场是近场认知生成环境，不是“原生家庭”情绪标签。 + +## 8. Parent / Child / Tool / Case / Action-Layer Distinctions + +- QPI: **工具/上位定位框架**，不是并列主题。它服务于判断“失望性情感隔离”属于 I 域，并防止颗粒错配。 +- 元认知: **I 域治理能力 / 主权调度能力**，不是单独心理技巧。 +- 巨人认知: **父级方法论架构**，用于统合 QPI、GL0-GL4、外部审计、行动实验和反馈。 +- 巨人方舟: **巨人认知的升级隐喻/增强版结构**，不是另起炉灶的新主题。 +- CBT、ACT、MCT、MBT、DBT、图式疗法等: **模块库/工具层**，应被巨人认知按场景调用，不能反过来统治全局。 +- Reality Lab / 行动实验层: **行动层/生成层**，负责把模型送入现实，产生新反馈；它是解释模型变成干预架构的关键桥。 +- “事缓则圆 / 无为而治”: **行动实验原则**，不是消极不干预。 +- 青少年家庭三角认知场: **局部深描案例 + 模型候选**，是行动实验层在青少年家庭场景中的应用，不应被提升为全源唯一主模型。 +- 失望性情感隔离: **入口现象 / 贯穿案例**，不是最终理论中心。 + +## 9. Chunk-First Distortion Risks + +下游若 chunk-first，主要风险如下： + +1. 把 QPI 误当成独立 top-level topic，而不是整个讨论的颗粒度定位工具。 +2. 把“失望性情感隔离”当作心理学科普主题，忽略它只是引出 I 域治理方法论的入口。 +3. 把“外部心理干预不可靠”读成拒绝外部，而忽略用户后续已修正为“保有主权地审计和调用外部”。 +4. 把巨人认知、巨人方舟、Reality Lab 拆成三个并列模型，忽略它们是连续升级关系。 +5. 把 CBT/ACT/MBT 等理论当成推荐清单，忽略它们在源文中只是被上位方法论调度的模块。 +6. 把“无为而治”误读为不作为，忽略其真实含义是低确定性下避免高强度、不可逆、越界式干预。 +7. 把青少年家庭三角认知场误读成“原生家庭决定论”的新版本，忽略源文反复强调家庭是近场高权重系统，不是唯一因果。 +8. 把 AC/BC 断裂孤立处理，忽略 AB 边、三角化、过密、代偿、倒置等系统关系。 + +## 10. Segmentation Guidance For Downstream Workers + +建议下游按“结构层级”而不是“话题词”切分： + +- 第一组可处理概念去标签化与自媒体批判，但必须保留它作为入口层。 +- 第二组可处理 QPI 与 I 域治理，但需明确 QPI 是定位工具。 +- 第三组可处理元认知、认知主权、外部审计、废热模型。 +- 第四组可处理巨人认知到巨人方舟的结构升级。 +- 第五组可处理 Reality Lab / 行动实验层及其原则。 +- 第六组可处理青少年家庭三角认知场，作为局部场景模型。 + +切分时不要按轮次机械分割。R01-R07 大体呈演化顺序，但真正的结构单位是“入口现象 -> I 域定位 -> 主权治理 -> 总架构升级 -> 行动生成 -> 家庭场景应用”。 + +下游 worker 应在每个局部文档开头保留一句父结构说明，防止局部材料脱离上位链条。 + +## 11. Confidence Notes And Unresolved Structure Questions + +confidence: 高。 + +依据是全源七轮之间存在明确递进关系，且用户多次主动把前轮概念召回、修正、升级，而不是跳题。尤其是 QPI、巨人认知、行动实验、家庭三角之间的继承关系非常强。 + +仍需人类确认的问题： + +- “巨人方舟”是否应作为正式模型名，还是仅作为巨人认知升级隐喻。 +- “Family Triangle Cognitive Field / 家庭三角认知场”是否进入正式模型层，还是保留为青少年场景的分析工具。 +- Reality Lab 是作为巨人认知的独立层，还是作为意图-行动-反馈闭环中的动作模块。 +- QPI 与巨人认知之间的正式关系如何命名：QPI 是 GL3 问题表征工具，还是 GL4 主权调控的前置诊断协议。 +- 青少年场景中“家庭主因、学校次之、社会再次之”是否仅作为简化假设，还是可作为默认权重规则。 + +## 12. Human Confirmation Status + +pending diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/00-root-overview.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/00-root-overview.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c30a72d --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/00-root-overview.md @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +# ROOT 从失望性情感隔离到认知生成与关系治理 + +## 1. Topic Role + +```text +node_id: ROOT +node_type: coherent discussion spine +source_mode: structure-first +``` + +本次讨论不是围绕一个心理学标签做科普，而是以 `失望性情感隔离` 为入口，逐步建立心理 I 域治理、巨人方舟通用模型、以及青少年家庭场景局部模型的完整结构。 + +## 2. Core Thesis + +复杂心理-关系现象不能被自媒体标签、父母决定论、单因归因、或某一种心理学技术直接接管。正确路线是： + +```text +入口现象去标签化 +-> 机制解释 +-> I 域治理与认知主权 +-> 巨人方舟通用模型 +-> 意图-行动-反馈实践 +-> 具体领域调用局部模型 +``` + +## 3. Confirmed Model Relations + +```text +巨人方舟: + formal_model_name: true + replaces: 巨人认知 2.0 + +QPI: + role: GL3 problem-representation tool + +Reality Lab: + role: action module in intention-action-feedback loop + +家庭三角认知场: + role: independent model + also: adolescent/family scenario model called by Giant Ark + +methodology: + role: defines Giant Ark application value +``` + +## 4. Source Blocks + +Primary source coverage: + +```text +R01-B001 through R07-B006 +``` + +See: + +```text +../02-material-routing-log.md +``` + +## 5. Downstream Use + +This root overview can feed: + +```text +- Giant Ark model-building +- Family Triangle Cognitive Field model extraction +- article / essay outline +- CCPE participant upgrade packet +- future evidence-routing audit +``` diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/A-入口与边界层.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/A-入口与边界层.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4ea0ce5 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/A-入口与边界层.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +# A 入口与边界层 + +## 1. Scope + +```text +layer_id: A +function: de-label the entry phenomenon and define the boundary +primary_nodes: A1, A1-a +``` + +本层处理 `失望性情感隔离` 的入口问题：它可以作为经验命名，但不能直接偷渡病因、诊断或干预方案。 + +## 2. Main Claims + +```text +- “失望性情感隔离”不是最终理论中心，而是入口现象。 +- 心理学自媒体容易制造专业感，但缺少严肃知识所需的边界、证据、限定条件和反例意识。 +- 原生家庭可能是近场高权重系统，但不能被道德化为万能归因。 +- 正确处理方式是先区分现象、病因、解释模型、干预模型。 +``` + +## 3. Source Material Layer + +Primary blocks: + +| block_id | role | +| --- | --- | +| R01-B001 | entry framing | +| R01-B002 | article label and user skepticism | +| R01-B003 | symptom/state vs diagnosis boundary | +| R01-B005 | psychology-media knowledge imitation | +| R01-B006 | corrected stance | + +Cross-links: + +```text +B1: single-cause attribution critique +B2: relationship prediction and isolation mechanism +``` + +## 4. Distortion Guard + +Do not turn this layer into a psychology-label explainer. Its function is to prevent the whole discussion from being captured by the label. + +## 5. Material Extraction + +| material_id | source_blocks | type | extracted material | downstream use | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| A-M01 | R01-B002, R01-B003 | concept boundary | `失望性情感隔离` should be treated as an entry description of a state, not as a diagnosis or causal conclusion. | article opening; anti-labeling rule | +| A-M02 | R01-B003 | clinical caution | Emotional numbness / detachment may relate to pressure, trauma, depression, medication effects, anxiety exhaustion, or other factors; the source rejects a single childhood-love explanation. | model guardrail; source-faithful caveat | +| A-M03 | R01-B005 | media critique | Psychology-media content creates authority through terminology, but often omits evidence, scope, counterexamples, and intervention boundaries. | critique section; knowledge-quality rubric | +| A-M04 | R01-B004, R01-B006 | reframing move | The correct move is not to ask “which label is this,” but to ask what mechanism, scope, and governance problem this state reveals. | transition into B/C layers | + +## 6. Reusable Claims + +```text +- A psychological label is useful only as an entrance if it does not smuggle in a cause. +- Naming pain is not the same as explaining it, and explaining it is not the same as knowing how to intervene. +- The first governance act is to rescue the experience from a low-quality label. +``` + +## 7. Open Use Notes + +This layer is suitable for article introduction and for a future `knowledge-quality` checklist. It should not become the main model layer. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/B-机制解释层.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/B-机制解释层.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8b06bd4 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/B-机制解释层.md @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +# B 机制解释层 + +## 1. Scope + +```text +layer_id: B +function: explain how disappointment, expectation, prediction, and isolation interact +primary_nodes: B1, B2 +``` + +本层把问题从“父母导致”转为多因素关系学习与关系预测问题。 + +## 2. Main Claims + +```text +- 失望隔离可能是边界、麻木、防御、撤资，也可能已经泛化。 +- 关系预测和期待落差是关键机制，不是单一原生家庭因果。 +- 干预需要识别当前主导层级，而不是套用固定解释。 +- 家庭长期情感忽视可以是因素之一，但不是唯一因果或道德结论。 +``` + +## 3. Source Material Layer + +Primary blocks: + +| block_id | role | +| --- | --- | +| R01-B004 | initial viewpoints and multi-factor turn | +| R02-B001 | mechanism round entry | +| R02-B002 | multiple factors and cognitive dissonance | +| R02-B003 | stage-sensitive dominant layer | +| R02-B005 | boundary vs generalized isolation | +| R03-B003 | family neglect as one factor | + +Cross-links: + +```text +A1: entry label boundary +C1: I-domain positioning +E2: family field as relationship prediction environment +``` + +## 4. Distortion Guard + +Do not reduce this layer to “family is the cause.” It explains relation-learning dynamics and prepares the move into I-domain governance. + +## 5. Material Extraction + +| material_id | source_blocks | type | extracted material | downstream use | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| B-M01 | R01-B004, R02-B002 | mechanism | The source replaces single-cause explanation with multi-factor relation learning: pressure, expectations, experience sampling, cognition, and relationship feedback combine. | mechanism chapter | +| B-M02 | R02-B003 | intervention principle | Dominant layer changes by stage; intervention must track which layer currently controls the problem. | Giant Ark layer-selection rule | +| B-M03 | R02-B005 | differentiation | Isolation may be a legitimate boundary when targeted at high-risk objects, but becomes a problem when generalized across relation types. | boundary vs pathology distinction | +| B-M04 | R03-B003 | factor weighting | Family neglect can be a factor, but the discussion blocks turning it into a moralized single cause. | adolescent/family caveat | +| B-M05 | R07-B006 | relation-prediction bridge | Safety, expectation models, boundaries, self-narrative, and relationship prediction are the psychological materials later modeled in the family field. | bridge to E2 | + +## 6. Reusable Claims + +```text +- The key variable is not whether disappointment exists, but whether the system has generalized withdrawal beyond the original risk object. +- A relation injury becomes structurally important when it rewrites prediction, expectation, boundary, and self-narrative. +- Family can be high-weight local evidence without becoming a total cause. +``` + +## 7. Open Use Notes + +This layer supplies the mechanism substrate for both Giant Ark and Family Triangle Cognitive Field. It is the best place to preserve nuance before model-building hardens categories. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/C-I域治理与认知主权层.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/C-I域治理与认知主权层.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1608be9 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/C-I域治理与认知主权层.md @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +# C I 域治理与认知主权层 + +## 1. Scope + +```text +layer_id: C +function: define who may enter the I-domain and how external inputs are audited +primary_nodes: C1, C2, C3, C4 +``` + +本层处理心理-关系问题的主权边界：外部可以提供工具、镜像、环境和局部输入，但不能夺取当事人的 I 域治理权。 + +## 2. Main Claims + +```text +- 失望性情感隔离是 I 域问题，不是 Q 式命名或 P 式单方案。 +- 外部干预的价值在于帮助建立局部安全世界和重新采样环境，而不是替当事人给答案。 +- 元认知是协调能力，不是身体、情绪和现实反馈的统治者。 +- 方法论调度和信任分级定义 Giant Ark 的应用价值。 +``` + +## 3. Source Material Layer + +Primary blocks: + +| block_id | role | +| --- | --- | +| R02-B004 | intervention boundary and strategy | +| R02-B006 | external input vs self-governance | +| R03-B001 | external support entry | +| R03-B002 | local safe world / resampling environment | +| R03-B004 | metacognition is not the only first layer | +| R03-B005 | resource audit and participant capability | +| R05-B002 | methodology table | +| R05-B004 | participant pollution | +| R05-B005 | failure modes without methodology | +| R05-B006 | trust grading / input levels | + +Cross-links: + +```text +D4: QPI as GL3 problem representation tool +D5: GL4 limitation +E3: domain-specific model/theory calling +``` + +## 4. Confirmed Decisions + +```text +QPI: GL3 problem-representation tool +methodology_discussion: Giant Ark application value +``` + +## 5. Distortion Guard + +Do not read this layer as rejection of external help. The actual rule is audited, graded, sovereignty-preserving use of external resources. + +## 6. Material Extraction + +| material_id | source_blocks | type | extracted material | downstream use | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| C-M01 | R02-B006 | diagnostic question | External input must be judged by whether it gives answers for the person or helps the person build self-governance capacity. | I-domain intake question | +| C-M02 | R03-B002 | support model | Valuable external help creates a partial safe world where the person can resample reality, not a substitute authority that declares the world safe. | resource-design rule | +| C-M03 | R03-B004 | sovereignty limit | Metacognition is not the only first layer; it cannot override body, emotion, and nervous-system conditions. | GL4 limitation | +| C-M04 | R03-B005, R05-B006 | participant audit | External participants may be well-intentioned but under-capable; input should be permissioned by trust level and scope. | trust grading model | +| C-M05 | R05-B002, R05-B005 | methodology | Methodology is a scheduling and quality-control layer for tool use, not a decorative theory list. | Giant Ark application value | +| C-M06 | R05-B004 | environment governance | Cognitive generation environments can be polluted by participants, incentives, and unqualified inputs. | participant qualification rule | + +## 7. Reusable Claims + +```text +- I-domain help is valid only if it increases the subject's governance capacity. +- External resources should be audited by role, competence, trust level, and allowed input depth. +- Methodology is the operating system that decides when a theory or tool is allowed to act. +``` + +## 8. Open Use Notes + +This layer is the main bridge between psychological discussion and system design. It can be turned into a resource-audit rubric or participant qualification protocol. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/D-巨人方舟通用模型层.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/D-巨人方舟通用模型层.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..25a3b4d --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/D-巨人方舟通用模型层.md @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +# D 巨人方舟通用模型层 + +## 1. Scope + +```text +layer_id: D +function: upgrade Giant Cognition 2.0 into Giant Ark as a formal general model +primary_nodes: D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6 +``` + +`巨人方舟` 是正式模型名。模型建成后，原 `巨人认知 2.0` 下线。 + +## 2. Model Definition + +巨人方舟是一套以认知主权为核心、以现实反馈为校准、以行动实验为生成、以身心底盘和环境审计为约束的通用认知治理架构。 + +## 3. Confirmed Components + +```text +D1 巨人认知 2.0 -> 巨人方舟: + formal replacement and upgrade + +D2 GL0: + body regulation, emotional tolerance, nervous-system state + +D3 GL-R: + relationship/environment layer; prevents social-system waste heat from being internalized as personal fault + +D4 GL3: + QPI as problem-representation tool + +D5 GL4: + metacognition as coordinator, not dictator + +D6 intention-action-feedback loop: + Reality Lab as action module +``` + +## 4. Source Material Layer + +Primary blocks: + +| block_id | role | +| --- | --- | +| R04-B001 | Giant Cognition / upgrade entry | +| R04-B002 | model transition material | +| R04-B003 | CBT and theories as modules | +| R04-B004 | GL0 need through self-blame/vulnerability | +| R04-B005 | ACT placement inside architecture | +| R04-B006 | tolerance window and body-state checks | +| R04-B007 | explicit upgrade requirements | +| R05-B001 | formalization entry | +| R05-B003 | Giant Ark definition | +| R06-B003 | action timing and guardrails | + +Cross-links: + +```text +C4: methodology scheduling +E3: concrete-domain model calling +``` + +## 5. Distortion Guard + +Do not split Giant Cognition, Giant Ark, and Reality Lab into peer models. The confirmed relation is: + +```text +Giant Cognition 2.0 -> Giant Ark formal model +Reality Lab -> action module inside intention-action-feedback +``` + +## 6. Material Extraction + +| material_id | source_blocks | type | extracted material | downstream use | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| D-M01 | R04-B007, R05-B003 | model upgrade | Giant Ark upgrades Giant Cognition 2.0 by adding GL0 regulation, GL-R environment, action experiment, feedback calibration, and GL4 limitation. | Giant Ark spec | +| D-M02 | R04-B004, R04-B006 | GL0 material | The model must check body regulation, emotional tolerance, nervous-system state, and tolerance window before high-level cognition takes command. | GL0 design | +| D-M03 | R04-B003, R04-B005 | method library | CBT, ACT, and related theories are modules called by the architecture, not architectures that own the whole problem. | theory-calling policy | +| D-M04 | R05-B003 | formal definition | Giant Ark is a general cognitive governance architecture centered on cognitive sovereignty, reality feedback, action experiment, bodily/emotional base, and environment audit. | canonical definition | +| D-M05 | R05-B002, R05-B005 | application value | The methodology discussion defines why Giant Ark matters: it decides which theory/model/tool enters which layer under which trust conditions. | model-card value proposition | +| D-M06 | R06-B003, R07-B003 | action module | Reality Lab belongs inside intention-action-feedback: it turns explanation into small, reversible, observable experiments. | action protocol | +| D-M07 | R02-B003, R03-B004 | layer discipline | Dominant layer and metacognitive limits must be identified before intervention; GL4 coordinates, it does not dominate. | layer-selection rule | + +## 7. Reusable Claims + +```text +- Giant Ark replaces Giant Cognition 2.0 as the formal model once completed. +- A general model earns application value only if it can call concrete theories and local models without being captured by them. +- Reality feedback is not an afterthought; it is the mechanism that turns explanation into intervention. +``` + +## 8. Open Use Notes + +This layer is ready for a downstream `Giant Ark formal model specification`. It still needs a dedicated model-card pass before canonical publication. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/E-领域应用与局部模型层.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/E-领域应用与局部模型层.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..51d3ac2 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/E-领域应用与局部模型层.md @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +# E 领域应用与局部模型层 + +## 1. Scope + +```text +layer_id: E +function: apply Giant Ark to disappointment-detachment in adolescent/family scenario and extract local model +primary_nodes: E1, E2, E3 +``` + +本层不是脱离主线的家庭教育分支，而是 Giant Ark 在 `失望性情感隔离` 领域中的场景化应用。 + +## 2. Main Claims + +```text +- 青少年场景需要护栏：危险信号、功能下降、长期低落、明显孤立等不能被无为而治掩盖。 +- “家庭主因、学校次之、社会再次之”只是简化假设，不是默认因果权重规则。 +- 家庭三角认知场可以独立抽出为模型。 +- 在本讨论中，家庭三角认知场也是 Giant Ark 在青少年家庭场景中调用的具体模型。 +- Giant Ark 作为通用模型，会在不同领域和层级调用不同具体模型/理论。 +``` + +## 3. Family Triangle Cognitive Field + +```text +model_name: 家庭三角认知场 +model_status: independent model candidate / accepted for extraction +scenario_role: adolescent-family application model +structure: A/B/C three actors plus AB/AC/BC relation edges +``` + +该模型关注的不是“原生家庭决定论”，而是近场认知生成环境：安全感、期待模型、边界、自我叙事、关系预测如何在家庭三角中生成或扭曲。 + +## 4. Source Material Layer + +Primary blocks: + +| block_id | role | +| --- | --- | +| R06-B001 | adolescent case entry | +| R06-B002 | what is right/wrong in adolescent assumptions | +| R06-B003 | do not rush explanation; action timing | +| R06-B004 | support guardrails and risk thresholds | +| R07-B001 | family triangle entry | +| R07-B002 | A/B/C relation displacement | +| R07-B003 | fracture types and experiment strategies | +| R07-B004 | ideal family cognitive field | +| R07-B005 | changed family edges as intervention results | +| R07-B006 | family field as safety/expectation/boundary/narrative/prediction environment | + +Cross-links: + +```text +D6: intention-action-feedback loop and Reality Lab action module +C4: application value of methodology +B2: relationship prediction and expectation model +``` + +## 5. Distortion Guard + +Do not promote adolescent/family material into the only main model. It is a concrete domain application and local model extraction under Giant Ark. + +## 6. Material Extraction + +| material_id | source_blocks | type | extracted material | downstream use | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| E-M01 | R06-B002, R06-B004 | scenario guardrail | Adolescent support must distinguish low-risk slow intervention from high-risk neglect; danger signs require action. | youth-support guardrail | +| E-M02 | R06-B003 | practice principle | Do not rush explanation in early intervention; sequence action by safety, timing, and feedback. | Reality Lab practice rule | +| E-M03 | R07-B002 | model structure | Family Triangle Cognitive Field uses A/B/C actors and AB/AC/BC relation edges to explain displacement, alliance, conflict, and pressure transfer. | model extraction | +| E-M04 | R07-B003 | experiment mapping | Different family fractures require different experiment strategies; intervention should target relation edges, not just the child as isolated node. | action design | +| E-M05 | R07-B004, R07-B005 | desired state | Improvement appears as changed relation edges: reduced dumping, clearer boundaries, less triangulation, and more direct adult responsibility. | outcome indicators | +| E-M06 | R07-B006 | cognitive field material | The family field shapes safety, expectation models, boundaries, self-narrative, and relationship prediction. | model ontology | +| E-M07 | human-confirmation | model status | Family Triangle Cognitive Field is an independent model and also a scenario model called by Giant Ark in the adolescent disappointment-detachment application. | downstream model split | + +## 7. Reusable Claims + +```text +- The adolescent is not the only diagnostic object; the family field is the near-range cognitive generation environment. +- A family intervention should ask which relation edge is generating pressure, silence, displacement, or false responsibility. +- Family Triangle Cognitive Field is local enough to be applied, but formal enough to become an independent model. +``` + +## 8. Open Use Notes + +This layer can branch into a dedicated `Family Triangle Cognitive Field` model package. Keep the simplifying assumption about family/school/society weighting out of canonical defaults unless later evidence supports it. diff --git a/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/_material-extraction-index.md b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/_material-extraction-index.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d8e1005 --- /dev/null +++ b/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/topics/_material-extraction-index.md @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +# Material Extraction Index + +## 1. Purpose + +```text +status: extracted +scope: reusable material units from confirmed topic graph +mode: structure-first +``` + +This index gathers the reusable material units extracted into each topic document. It is designed for downstream writing, model-building, CCPE model mining, and continuation work. + +## 2. Extraction Summary + +| layer | material_units | main downstream value | +| --- | ---: | --- | +| A 入口与边界层 | 4 | anti-labeling opening and knowledge-quality critique | +| B 机制解释层 | 5 | relation-learning mechanism and boundary/failure distinction | +| C I 域治理与认知主权层 | 6 | external-resource audit, participant qualification, methodology scheduling | +| D 巨人方舟通用模型层 | 7 | Giant Ark formal model components and application value | +| E 领域应用与局部模型层 | 7 | Family Triangle Cognitive Field and adolescent scenario application | +| **Total** | **29** | viewpoint material package ready for downstream tracks | + +## 3. Key Extracted Materials + +### A. Entry And Boundary + +```text +A-M01: label as entry description, not diagnosis or cause +A-M02: emotional numbness/detachment has multiple possible factors +A-M03: psychology-media knowledge imitation lacks evidence/scope/counterexample discipline +A-M04: move from label question to mechanism/governance question +``` + +### B. Mechanism + +```text +B-M01: multi-factor relation learning replaces single-cause explanation +B-M02: intervention must track the current dominant layer +B-M03: targeted boundary differs from generalized isolation +B-M04: family neglect is one possible factor, not a total cause +B-M05: safety/expectation/boundary/narrative/prediction bridge into family field +``` + +### C. I-Domain Governance + +```text +C-M01: external input is judged by whether it builds self-governance +C-M02: valuable help creates a partial safe world for resampling +C-M03: metacognition cannot override body/emotion/nervous system +C-M04: participant audit and trust-level input permissioning +C-M05: methodology as scheduling and quality-control layer +C-M06: cognitive generation environments can be polluted +``` + +### D. Giant Ark + +```text +D-M01: Giant Ark upgrades and replaces Giant Cognition 2.0 +D-M02: GL0 includes body, emotion, nervous-system state, and tolerance window +D-M03: psychological theories are callable modules +D-M04: Giant Ark canonical definition +D-M05: methodology defines Giant Ark application value +D-M06: Reality Lab as intention-action-feedback action module +D-M07: GL4 coordinates but does not dominate +``` + +### E. Domain Application + +```text +E-M01: adolescent guardrails distinguish slow intervention from neglect +E-M02: do not rush explanation; sequence action by safety/timing/feedback +E-M03: Family Triangle Cognitive Field uses A/B/C and AB/AC/BC +E-M04: fractures map to different experiment strategies +E-M05: outcomes appear as changed relation edges +E-M06: family field shapes safety/expectation/boundary/narrative/prediction +E-M07: Family Triangle Cognitive Field is independent and called by Giant Ark in this scenario +``` + +## 4. Best Next Downstream Tracks + +```text +1. Giant Ark formal model specification +2. Family Triangle Cognitive Field model specification +3. article outline based on the six-layer structure +4. CCPE model-mining packet for Giant Ark and Family Triangle Cognitive Field +5. quote-level evidence pack if publication requires exact source excerpts +``` diff --git a/skills/context-management-policy.md b/skills/context-management-policy.md index 21fb138..690ac85 100644 --- a/skills/context-management-policy.md +++ b/skills/context-management-policy.md @@ -20,24 +20,35 @@ The main session is responsible for: - user confirmation gates ``` -For coherent long sources that fit a high-context participant, Knowledge Vault should first run a real whole-source gestalt sub-session before range splitting. This does not relax the main-session rule: the main session prepares the invocation, records the returned output, and uses the gestalt as orientation. +For long sources that fit a high-context participant, Knowledge Vault should first run a real whole-source gestalt sub-session before range splitting. This does not relax the main-session rule: the main session prepares the invocation, records the returned output, and uses the user-confirmed gestalt as orientation. The whole-source gestalt sub-session is responsible for: ```text - reading the full source when it fits the agreed high-context limit -- judging whether the source is one coherent topic or should be split into macro-topics +- judging whether the source is coherent, mixed, or fragmented - producing the global topic portrait, main structure, core tensions, and model-evolution line - flagging parent/child/tool/case/action-layer distinctions that range workers may flatten - giving segmentation guidance for downstream workers ``` +Step 0 is an alignment loop. Its output must pass human inspection before downstream worker automation treats it as a structure lens. + +Mode selection: + +```text +coherent -> workers receive the confirmed global portrait as a required structure lens +mixed -> split into macro-topics before worker extraction +fragmented -> workers remain minimally biased and discover flat topics locally +``` + Worker sessions are responsible for: ```text - one H1 round - one source block batch - one bounded participant task +- one topic document material extraction group - one explicit output contract ``` @@ -59,7 +70,7 @@ Use worker threads when a processing pass needs to read large source ranges or p Each worker thread should receive a thread-start packet and return a thread-return packet. -Worker thread-start packets should include the accepted whole-source gestalt summary when it exists. Workers may challenge that global portrait, but must label the challenge and cite local evidence. +Worker thread-start packets should include the confirmed whole-source gestalt summary in coherent mode. Workers may challenge that global portrait, but must label the challenge and cite local evidence. In fragmented mode, worker packets should not force a hierarchy lens. Run-specific packet paths: @@ -70,6 +81,17 @@ handoff/thread-return-packets/ Worker outputs must be written to files before the main session synthesizes them. +For topic-doc generation and material extraction, the main session should prefer worker/sub-session execution when any of these are true: + +```text +- the worker must read many source blocks directly +- reusable material units are being extracted from source text +- quote-level evidence is required +- multiple topic documents can be processed independently +``` + +The main session may still write orchestration files, integrate worker returns, update indexes, perform bounded checks, and record human confirmations. + ## 5. Continuation Handoff Create a continuation handoff when any condition is met: diff --git a/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/capability-spec.md b/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/capability-spec.md index 1deb7e3..389b579 100644 --- a/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/capability-spec.md +++ b/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/capability-spec.md @@ -38,18 +38,29 @@ First preserve, then structure. The source material layer must remain separate from the structured viewpoint layer. Topic documents may reorganize ideas, but must keep source block ids and enough original material to support later reuse. -For coherent discussion sources that fit a high-context participant, first get a whole-source gestalt judgment before segmentation. The global portrait prevents chunk-first workers from flattening tools, layers, cases, action tracks, and model upgrades into false peer topics. +For discussion sources that fit a high-context participant, first get a whole-source gestalt alignment before segmentation. The global portrait prevents chunk-first workers from flattening tools, layers, cases, action tracks, and model upgrades into false peer topics. + +Step 0 determines downstream mode: + +```text +coherent -> structure-first mode with biased workers +mixed -> macro-topic split mode +fragmented -> flat-topic discovery mode with minimally biased workers +``` + +The Step 0 output must be checked by the user. It may repeat multiple times under human correction before it becomes the structure lens for workers. ## 5. Human Gates ```text Gate 1: Confirm workspace path. Gate 2: Confirm source block convention. -Gate 3: Confirm whole-source gestalt use or recorded exception. +Gate 3: Confirm Step 0 gestalt alignment, macro-topic split, or recorded exception. Gate 4: Confirm candidate topic-map / topic hierarchy. Gate 5: Confirm material routing. -Gate 6: Confirm audit repair strategy. -Gate 7: Confirm downstream routing. +Gate 6: Confirm topic docs / extracted material usefulness. +Gate 7: Confirm audit repair strategy. +Gate 8: Confirm downstream routing. ``` ## 6. Acceptance Criteria diff --git a/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/ccpe-runtime-alignment.md b/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/ccpe-runtime-alignment.md index f3017b7..8bb8502 100644 --- a/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/ccpe-runtime-alignment.md +++ b/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/ccpe-runtime-alignment.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\skills\workflow\evidence-routing-and- Pending sync request: ```text -CCPE should add a whole-source-gestalt-reviewer participant and update the viewpoint-discussion-distillation Runtime from a chunk-first flow to a 9-step flow with Step 0 Whole-Source Gestalt Pass. +CCPE should add a whole-source-gestalt-reviewer participant and update the viewpoint-discussion-distillation Runtime from a chunk-first flow to a 9-step flow with Step 0 Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment. Step 0 must be human-confirmed before it becomes a worker structure lens. ``` ## 2. Responsibility Split diff --git a/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/ccpe-sync-request-2026-06-06-whole-source-gestalt.md b/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/ccpe-sync-request-2026-06-06-whole-source-gestalt.md index 806f542..fa7f099 100644 --- a/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/ccpe-sync-request-2026-06-06-whole-source-gestalt.md +++ b/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/ccpe-sync-request-2026-06-06-whole-source-gestalt.md @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -# CCPE Sync Request: Whole-Source Gestalt Pass +# CCPE Sync Request: Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment ## 1. Background @@ -14,16 +14,16 @@ This works for loose, very long, multi-topic material, but it is risky for coher ## 2. Required Runtime Change -Upgrade the Runtime to a 9-step operational flow by adding Step 0: +Upgrade the Runtime to a 9-step operational flow by adding Step 0. Step 0 should be treated as a human-confirmed alignment loop, not as a one-shot summary: ```text -0. Whole-Source Gestalt Pass +0. Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment 1. Segmentation 2. Worker Topic Extraction 3. Topic Graph Synthesis 4. Human Structure Confirmation 5. Material Routing -6. Topic Docs +6. Topic Docs / Material Extraction 7. Coverage / Distortion Audit 8. Downstream Task Routing ``` @@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ main_session_may_simulate: false The main session must not perform this pass itself. It prepares the invocation packet, records the returned output, and uses it as orientation for downstream segmentation and worker extraction. +The participant output must be inspected by the user before it becomes a binding worker lens. If the user corrects the global structure, the Runtime should support another Step 0 pass or an explicit human-correction record before segmentation. + ## 4. Output Contract The participant output should include: @@ -57,6 +59,7 @@ The participant output should include: - source document path and source version note - coherence judgment: coherent / mixed / fragmented - coherence rationale and split recommendation if mixed or fragmented +- recommended downstream mode: structure-first / macro-topic split / flat-discovery - global topic portrait - main structure or candidate layers - core tensions and governing questions @@ -64,14 +67,18 @@ The participant output should include: - parent/child/tool/case/action-layer distinctions - chunk-first distortion risks - segmentation guidance for downstream workers +- worker lens recommendation: required / partial / omitted - confidence notes and unresolved structure questions +- human confirmation status: pending / confirmed / needs revision / rejected ``` This output is not a final topic map, material routing log, or coverage audit. It is an upstream global orientation layer. ## 5. Worker Rule Change -Worker participants should no longer discover the global structure from zero when a whole-source gestalt output exists. +Worker behavior depends on Step 0 coherence judgment. + +For coherent sources, worker participants should no longer discover the global structure from zero. They should work under the confirmed global portrait. They should: @@ -82,7 +89,53 @@ They should: - cite local source ranges for every challenge ``` -## 6. Knowledge Vault Side Already Updated +For fragmented sources, worker participants should remain minimally biased and continue flat topic discovery. For mixed sources, the Runtime should split macro-topics before worker extraction. + +## 6. Topic Docs / Material Extraction Confirmation + +Add a second human confirmation gate after Topic Docs / Material Extraction: + +```text +gate_id: topic_docs_human_confirmation +required_before: + - coverage completion claims + - downstream handoff + - model mining + - writing handoff +purpose: + - confirm that extracted materials are useful enough for downstream automation + - decide whether another extraction pass is needed + - record user corrections before downstream work +``` + +For coherent sources where Step 0 is confirmed, this gate can replace the old topic-granularity pause. The user reviews the actual extracted content rather than only reviewing candidate topic labels. + +## 7. Worker/Sub-Session Rule For Extraction + +CCPE should make explicit that source analysis, splitting, routing, and material extraction should be performed by worker/sub-session participants when they require reading substantial source material. + +Main session responsibilities: + +```text +- create invocation packets +- preserve run notes and source maps +- collect returned outputs +- integrate indexes +- perform bounded verification +- record human confirmations +``` + +Worker/sub-session responsibilities: + +```text +- full-source gestalt alignment +- source-range extraction +- topic-doc material extraction +- quote-level evidence pack generation +- local contradiction or distortion checks +``` + +## 8. Knowledge Vault Side Already Updated Knowledge Vault updated these public capability files: diff --git a/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md b/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md index 8dced5f..2606184 100644 --- a/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md +++ b/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md @@ -15,14 +15,14 @@ file handoff -> durable cross-session state The whole-source gestalt reviewer is a real sub-session participant, not the main session. It exists to preserve the overall shape of coherent long discussions before range workers begin. -## 2. Whole-Source Gestalt Rule +## 2. Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment Rule -For coherent discussion drafts that fit inside a high-context participant, run a whole-source gestalt pass before segmentation. +For discussion drafts that fit inside a high-context participant, run a whole-source gestalt alignment pass before segmentation. The pass must judge: ```text -- whether the source is one coherent topic or several loosely related topics +- whether the source is coherent, mixed, or fragmented - the global topic portrait - the main structural layers - core tensions and governing questions @@ -31,7 +31,17 @@ The pass must judge: - risks that chunk-first workers may flatten into false peer topics ``` -If the source is too large or not coherent enough for one gestalt pass, record the exception and use a small number of macro-range gestalt passes before worker segmentation. +Step 0 is an alignment loop. Its output must be inspected by the user before downstream automation treats it as binding structure. User corrections should be recorded and either folded into another Step 0 pass or captured as an explicit human-correction record. + +Mode selection after Step 0: + +```text +coherent -> structure-first mode; workers receive the confirmed global portrait as a lens. +mixed -> macro-topic mode; split into macro-topics and run Step 0 per macro-topic when needed. +fragmented -> flat-discovery mode; workers do not receive a strong hierarchy lens. +``` + +If the source is too large for one gestalt pass, record the exception and use a small number of macro-range gestalt passes before worker segmentation. ## 3. Range Order @@ -49,13 +59,26 @@ Each worker gets: - thread-start packet - participant invocation packet - exact source range -- accepted whole-source gestalt summary or recorded exception +- confirmed whole-source gestalt summary, macro-topic split plan, or recorded exception - output path - forbidden actions - return packet template ``` -Workers should use the gestalt summary as orientation. They may challenge it with local evidence, but they must explicitly mark the challenge and cite the source range. +In structure-first mode, workers should use the gestalt summary as orientation. They may challenge it with local evidence, but they must explicitly mark the challenge and cite the source range. + +In flat-discovery mode, workers should remain minimally biased and extract local topics without forcing a global hierarchy. + +For topic-doc material extraction, workers should receive: + +```text +- confirmed topic graph +- assigned topic node or topic group +- routed source block ids +- source excerpts or exact source ranges +- required material-unit output schema +- distortion guardrails from Step 0 and human confirmation +``` ## 5. Worker Output @@ -72,7 +95,9 @@ Each worker writes: The main session reads worker summaries and indexes first. It reads source excerpts only for verification or repair. -The main session may read the accepted whole-source gestalt output because it is a participant result with a record. It must not replace that result with its own informal full-source judgment. +The main session may read the user-confirmed whole-source gestalt output because it is a participant result with a record. It must not replace that result with its own informal full-source judgment. + +The main session should not be the primary extractor for topic-doc material units when a worker/sub-session can handle the extraction. If the main session performs a small bounded extraction for pragmatic reasons, record the reason in the run notes or audit log. ## 7. Continuation Rule diff --git a/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/invocation-contract.md b/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/invocation-contract.md index 579bba2..f7e48b8 100644 --- a/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/invocation-contract.md +++ b/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/invocation-contract.md @@ -15,8 +15,10 @@ writing_handoff_required: optional model_mining_required: optional no_simulation_requirement: true human_confirmation_required_before: + - accepting_whole_source_gestalt_as_worker_lens - final_topic_map - material_routing + - accepting_topic_docs_for_downstream_use - source_disposable_claim - writing_workbench_handoff - downstream_task_routing @@ -69,6 +71,7 @@ conversation-segmentation/R02/ - source document path and source version note - coherence judgment: coherent / mixed / fragmented - coherence rationale and split recommendation if mixed or fragmented +- recommended downstream mode: structure-first / macro-topic split / flat-discovery - global topic portrait - main structure or candidate layers - core tensions and governing questions @@ -76,12 +79,33 @@ conversation-segmentation/R02/ - parent/child/tool/case/action-layer distinctions - chunk-first distortion risks - segmentation guidance for downstream workers +- worker lens recommendation: required / partial / omitted - confidence notes and unresolved structure questions +- human confirmation status: pending / confirmed / needs revision / rejected ``` -This output is orientation and constraint material. It is not a substitute for source block indexing, evidence routing, or coverage audit. +This output is orientation and constraint material. It is not a substitute for source block indexing, evidence routing, or coverage audit. It becomes a worker structure lens only after human confirmation. -## 5. Blocked State +## 5. Topic Docs Human Confirmation Contract + +After topic docs and material extraction are generated, record: + +```text +topic_docs_human_confirmation.md +``` + +It must include: + +```text +- confirmation status: confirmed / needs revision / rejected +- reviewed topic docs or material index +- whether extracted materials are useful for downstream work +- whether another extraction pass is required +- whether downstream handoff may proceed +- user corrections, if any +``` + +## 6. Blocked State Use this state when the run cannot accept a participant output: diff --git a/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/runbook.md b/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/runbook.md index 2744145..ff5e5cb 100644 --- a/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/runbook.md +++ b/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/runbook.md @@ -23,38 +23,53 @@ 7. Stop at the agreed confirmation point. ``` -## 3. Step 0: Whole-Source Gestalt Pass +## 3. Step 0: Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment -Use this pass before segmentation when the source is one coherent discussion and can fit inside a high-context participant. +Use this pass before segmentation when the source can fit inside a high-context participant. + +Step 0 is not a one-shot summary. It is an alignment loop between the high-context participant and the user. The more accurate this pass is, the more automated the downstream work can be. ```text 1. Prepare a whole-source-gestalt-reviewer invocation packet. 2. Invoke a real high-context participant in a sub-session; the main session must not perform this pass itself. 3. The participant reads the full source and first judges topic coherence. 4. If the source is coherent, output a global topic portrait, main structure, core tensions, model-evolution line, and hierarchy risks. -5. If the source is not coherent, output a split recommendation before any topic extraction. -6. Save returned-output.md with source metadata and participant metadata. -7. Write or update 03-run-notes.md with the accepted gestalt output path. -8. Stop if no real participant output is available. +5. If the source is mixed, output macro-topic splits and say which parts require their own Step 0 pass. +6. If the source is fragmented, output a flat-topic discovery recommendation instead of forcing a hierarchy. +7. Save returned-output.md with source metadata and participant metadata. +8. Ask the user to inspect and confirm, revise, or reject the Step 0 output. +9. If the user corrects the structure, run another Step 0 alignment pass or write an explicit human-correction record before segmentation. +10. Write or update 03-run-notes.md with the accepted gestalt output path and human confirmation status. +11. Stop if no real participant output is available. ``` Acceptance condition: ```text Segmentation and worker topic extraction may proceed only after the run has either: -- an accepted whole-source gestalt output; or +- a user-confirmed whole-source gestalt output; +- a user-confirmed macro-topic split plan; or - a recorded exception explaining why the source cannot or should not receive a whole-source pass. ``` +Downstream mode selection: + +```text +coherent source -> structure-first mode; workers receive the confirmed global portrait as a required lens. +mixed source -> macro-topic mode; split first, then run Step 0 per macro-topic when needed. +fragmented source -> flat-discovery mode; workers should remain minimally biased and discover local topics. +``` + ## 4. Segmentation Pass ```text 1. Create worker thread-start packets by source range. -2. Include the accepted whole-source gestalt summary and hierarchy cautions in each worker packet. -3. Execute or dispatch conversation-segmentation. -4. Write skill-execution-record.md for local execution. -5. Collect source block indexes and worker return packets. -6. Create a continuation handoff before topic discovery. +2. Include the confirmed whole-source gestalt summary and hierarchy cautions in each worker packet when the source is coherent. +3. If the source is fragmented, omit the structure lens and use unbiased flat-topic discovery. +4. Execute or dispatch conversation-segmentation. +5. Write skill-execution-record.md for local execution. +6. Collect source block indexes and worker return packets. +7. Create a continuation handoff before topic discovery. ``` ## 5. Topic Discovery Pass @@ -80,14 +95,27 @@ Segmentation and worker topic extraction may proceed only after the run has eith 5. Pause for user confirmation before material routing. ``` -## 7. Routing And Topic Docs +## 7. Evidence Routing And Topic Docs ```text 1. Confirm topic-map. -2. Execute evidence-routing-and-topic-doc-builder by range or topic group. +2. Execute evidence-routing-and-topic-doc-builder by range or topic group in worker/sub-session mode when source material extraction is required. 3. Write 02-material-routing-log.md. -4. Generate topic docs with source material layer and source index. -5. Do not declare completion until coverage audit is accepted. +4. Generate topic docs with source material layer, source index, and reusable material units. +5. The main session may integrate returned outputs, update indexes, and perform bounded verification; it should not do the primary extraction over source material when worker/sub-session execution is available. +6. Ask the user to inspect the topic docs / material extraction layer before downstream handoff. +7. If the user accepts the topic docs, record a Topic Docs Human Confirmation. +8. If the user corrects extraction or topic contents, run a repair pass or write an explicit human-correction record. +9. Do not declare completion until coverage audit is accepted. +``` + +Topic Docs Human Confirmation should capture: + +```text +- whether topic docs are structurally acceptable +- whether extracted material is useful enough for downstream automation +- whether another extraction pass is needed +- whether downstream work can proceed without another topic-granularity pause ``` ## 8. Audit