# C I 域治理与认知主权层

## 1. Scope

```text
layer_id: C
function: define who may enter the I-domain and how external inputs are audited
primary_nodes: C1, C2, C3, C4
```

本层处理心理-关系问题的主权边界：外部可以提供工具、镜像、环境和局部输入，但不能夺取当事人的 I 域治理权。

## 2. Main Claims

```text
- 失望性情感隔离是 I 域问题，不是 Q 式命名或 P 式单方案。
- 外部干预的价值在于帮助建立局部安全世界和重新采样环境，而不是替当事人给答案。
- 元认知是协调能力，不是身体、情绪和现实反馈的统治者。
- 方法论调度和信任分级定义 Giant Ark 的应用价值。
```

## 3. Source Material Layer

Primary blocks:

| block_id | role |
| --- | --- |
| R02-B004 | intervention boundary and strategy |
| R02-B006 | external input vs self-governance |
| R03-B001 | external support entry |
| R03-B002 | local safe world / resampling environment |
| R03-B004 | metacognition is not the only first layer |
| R03-B005 | resource audit and participant capability |
| R05-B002 | methodology table |
| R05-B004 | participant pollution |
| R05-B005 | failure modes without methodology |
| R05-B006 | trust grading / input levels |

Cross-links:

```text
D4: QPI as GL3 problem representation tool
D5: GL4 limitation
E3: domain-specific model/theory calling
```

## 4. Confirmed Decisions

```text
QPI: GL3 problem-representation tool
methodology_discussion: Giant Ark application value
```

## 5. Distortion Guard

Do not read this layer as rejection of external help. The actual rule is audited, graded, sovereignty-preserving use of external resources.

## 6. Material Extraction

| material_id | source_blocks | type | extracted material | downstream use |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C-M01 | R02-B006 | diagnostic question | External input must be judged by whether it gives answers for the person or helps the person build self-governance capacity. | I-domain intake question |
| C-M02 | R03-B002 | support model | Valuable external help creates a partial safe world where the person can resample reality, not a substitute authority that declares the world safe. | resource-design rule |
| C-M03 | R03-B004 | sovereignty limit | Metacognition is not the only first layer; it cannot override body, emotion, and nervous-system conditions. | GL4 limitation |
| C-M04 | R03-B005, R05-B006 | participant audit | External participants may be well-intentioned but under-capable; input should be permissioned by trust level and scope. | trust grading model |
| C-M05 | R05-B002, R05-B005 | methodology | Methodology is a scheduling and quality-control layer for tool use, not a decorative theory list. | Giant Ark application value |
| C-M06 | R05-B004 | environment governance | Cognitive generation environments can be polluted by participants, incentives, and unqualified inputs. | participant qualification rule |

## 7. Reusable Claims

```text
- I-domain help is valid only if it increases the subject's governance capacity.
- External resources should be audited by role, competence, trust level, and allowed input depth.
- Methodology is the operating system that decides when a theory or tool is allowed to act.
```

## 8. Open Use Notes

This layer is the main bridge between psychological discussion and system design. It can be turned into a resource-audit rubric or participant qualification protocol.