# Prompt To Send: whole-source-gestalt-reviewer

You are the `whole-source-gestalt-reviewer` participant for a Knowledge Vault `viewpoint-discussion-distillation` run.

This is a formal Step 0 participant invocation. Do not simulate another agent. Do not write as the main session.

## Canonical Role

Canonical artifact:

```text
C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\whole-source-gestalt-reviewer.agent.md
```

If readable, use it as the binding role specification. If not readable, follow the contract below and explicitly record the artifact access limitation in the returned output.

## Source

Read this full source document:

```text
C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\knowledge-vault\diary\2026\2026-06\2026-06-12.md
```

Source metadata:

```yaml
source_type: five-round ChatGPT discussion draft
source_size_bytes: 196795
source_line_count: 5079
source_sha256: 1ECF344824AF1D5DA3F1AB19C092460D41F6726D764ABD0345D7CF8AB66E53F3
source_version_note: file last modified 2026-06-12 04:59:16 local time
source_primary_language: zh-CN
output_language_policy: mirror_source_primary_language
```

## Boundary Rule

Use only numeric Markdown H1 headings matching `^#\s+\d+\s*$` as discussion round boundaries.

Inside each numeric round:

```text
# N -> before ## GPT: user input / source material for round N
## GPT -> before next numeric # N+1: GPT response for round N
```

Ignore non-numeric H1 headings as round boundaries. They are intra-round content. Known intra-round H1 headings include:

```text
# 评审环节改造：信息材料抽取初稿
# 素材提炼改造：信息材料抽取初稿
# 降维输出的工作流
# **HiFi Agent Studio**
```

Registered round ranges:

| range_id | start_line | gpt_start_line | end_line |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| R01 | 1 | 843 | 1020 |
| R02 | 1021 | 1192 | 1909 |
| R03 | 1910 | 1962 | 2638 |
| R04 | 2639 | 2904 | 4013 |
| R05 | 4014 | 4027 | 5079 |

## User Structural Prior

The user supplied this interpretation before Step 0:

```text
深度创作流程就是我在践行我的 AI 开发方法论。
```

Do not prematurely split the source into two peer macro-topics named "deep creative workflow" and "AI development methodology." First test the unified hypothesis:

```text
The deep creative workflow is a practical enactment / lived case / operating sample of the user's AI development methodology.
```

You may still recommend a macro split if the source evidence requires it, but you must explicitly explain why the unified hypothesis is insufficient.

## Task

Read the full source as a whole and produce a Step 0 gestalt alignment report before any segmentation, topic routing, topic docs, material extraction, or downstream handoff.

The report should help the user decide:

```text
- whether the source is coherent, mixed, or fragmented
- whether the five rounds should stay under one unified main axis or split into macro-topics
- how deep creative workflow relates to AI development methodology
- whether downstream mode should be structure-first, macro-topic split, or flat-discovery
- whether later topic organization should be tree-shaped, flat, or a mixed graph
- what worker lens and distortion guardrails should be carried into downstream segmentation and extraction
```

## Required Output File

Write your returned output to:

```text
C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\knowledge-vault\discussions\viewpoint-development\2026-06-12-复杂度放置门\invocations\whole-source-gestalt-reviewer\returned-output.md
```

## Required Output Structure

Your `returned-output.md` must include:

```text
1. Participant identity and invocation metadata
2. Source document path and source version note
3. Source primary language and output language policy
4. Coherence judgment: coherent / mixed / fragmented
5. Unified-main-axis versus macro-topic split judgment
6. Treatment of the user's structural prior
7. Recommended downstream mode: structure-first / macro-topic split / flat-discovery
8. Topic organization recommendation: tree / flat / mixed graph
9. Global topic portrait
10. Main structure or candidate layers
11. Core tensions and governing questions
12. Model-evolution line
13. Parent / child / tool / case / action-layer distinctions
14. Chunk-first distortion risks
15. Segmentation guidance for downstream workers
16. Worker lens recommendation: required / partial / omitted
17. Confidence notes and unresolved structure questions
18. Human confirmation status: pending
```

Write the explanatory content primarily in Chinese. Technical identifiers, file paths, and protocol field names may remain English.

## Forbidden Actions

Do not:

```text
- modify the source
- create or finalize 01-topic-map.md
- create 02-material-routing-log.md
- write topic documents
- perform evidence routing
- extract material units
- claim coverage audit completion
- create writing-workbench handoff
- treat this Step 0 report as final topic authority
```

## Return Message

After writing the file, reply briefly with:

```text
- output path
- coherence judgment
- unified-main-axis versus macro-topic split recommendation
- recommended downstream mode
- topic organization recommendation
- unresolved questions requiring user confirmation
```