# Third Round Test Handoff

## 1. Purpose

```text
next_round: third_round_test
target_source: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md
recommended_new_workspace: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离3
primary_goal: test the workflow mechanism, not merely reproduce the analysis result
```

本交接文档用于启动第三轮测试。

第一轮证明：没有 Step 0，直接分拆讨论稿会导致 worker 摸到局部材料，却拼不出完整思路。

第二轮证明：加入 Step 0 后，全文结构可以被准确捕捉，但后续流程仍有关键漏洞：很多步骤由主会话直接完成，没有严格调用 CCPE 端 Skill / worker / 子会话，因此没有真正完成流程测试。

第三轮要验证的是：

```text
能否严格按照 CCPE / Skills 的真实调用边界完成讨论稿分析。
```

## 2. Second Round Assessment

第二轮产物路径：

```text
discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2
```

第二轮有效产出：

```text
- Step 0 Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment 方向正确
- source coherence 判断为 coherent
- downstream mode 判断为 structure-first
- topic graph 基本稳定
- 用户确认了关键模型关系
- material extraction 已形成 29 个材料单元
```

第二轮流程缺口：

```text
- Step 0 使用了真实子会话，但没有调用 CCPE 端 canonical Skill / Runtime participant。
- Topic graph synthesis、material routing、topic docs、material extraction 主要由主会话完成。
- 这些步骤虽有产物，但没有验证 CCPE Skill 的真实调用能力。
- Step 0 子会话没有作为持续会话保留；而 Step 0 实际可能需要多轮人机对齐。
```

结论：

```text
第二轮的分析结果可作为参考上下文，但不能视为流程测试通过。
```

## 3. Third Round Non-Negotiable Rules

第三轮必须遵守：

```text
1. 主会话只做编排、记录、验收、用户确认，不模拟 Skill 输出。
2. 分析、分拆、抽取、routing、topic docs 等实质处理必须由真实子会话 / worker / CCPE Skill 完成。
3. 每个 participant 必须有 invocation packet、prompt-to-send 或 skill-execution-record、returned-output。
4. 如果 CCPE 端 Skill 无法真实调用，必须记录 blocked 状态，不能由主会话补写 formal output。
5. Step 0 子会话必须保留会话，不能一次性关闭后丢失上下文。
6. Step 0 可以多轮：子会话输出 -> 用户修正 -> 同一 Step 0 子会话继续对齐 -> 才能确认。
7. 后续 worker 必须接收 Step 0 confirmed lens，而不是从零发现结构。
```

## 4. Required Third Round Workspace

建议新建干净目录：

```text
discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离3
```

不要复用第二轮目录作为生产目录。第二轮目录只能作为：

```text
- 已知结构上下文
- 流程缺口审计样例
- 用户确认内容来源
```

第三轮目录至少应包含：

```text
README.md
00-source-map.md
01-topic-map.md
02-material-routing-log.md
03-run-notes.md
topics/
audits/
model-mining/
handoff/
invocations/
```

## 5. Context To Carry Into Third Round

第三轮可以带入以下用户确认，减少重复输入。

### 5.1 Step 0 Confirmed Direction

```text
source_coherence: coherent
downstream_mode: structure-first
worker_lens: required
root_topic: 从失望性情感隔离到认知生成与关系治理
```

### 5.2 Confirmed Model Relations

```text
巨人方舟:
  status: formal model name
  relation: replaces Giant Cognition 2.0 after model completion

QPI:
  status: GL3 problem-representation tool
  not: top-level topic
  not: GL4 sovereignty-control diagnosis protocol

Reality Lab:
  status: action module
  parent: intention-action-feedback loop
  not: independent Giant Ark layer

家庭三角认知场:
  status: independent model
  also: scenario-specific model called by Giant Ark in adolescent/family application

methodology discussion:
  role: defines Giant Ark application value
  meaning: Giant Ark calls concrete models, theories, and tools by domain/layer

adolescent family/school/society weighting:
  status: simplifying assumption only
```

### 5.3 Known Distortion Risks

```text
- Do not flatten QPI into a top-level C-layer topic.
- Do not split Giant Cognition, Giant Ark, and Reality Lab into peer models.
- Do not treat Reality Lab as a standalone layer.
- Do not treat Family Triangle Cognitive Field as the whole discussion's top model.
- Do not turn adolescent weighting into a default causal rule.
- Do not continue the old 13-flat-topic structure.
```

## 6. Required Third Round Flow

### 6.1 Source Registration

主会话可执行：

```text
- create workspace
- write README.md
- write 00-source-map.md
- write 03-run-notes.md
- prepare invocation directories
```

主会话不得：

```text
- read the full source and generate analysis
- write formal participant output
- silently replace blocked CCPE Skill output with its own summary
```

### 6.2 Step 0 Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment

必须启动并保留一个真实 Step 0 子会话：

```text
participant_id: whole-source-gestalt-reviewer
session_requirement: persistent until Step 0 confirmed
input:
  - full source
  - second-round confirmed user context
  - known distortion risks
output:
  - returned-output.md
  - unresolved questions
  - human-confirmation.md only after user confirmation
```

如果用户修正 Step 0：

```text
send correction back to the same Step 0 sub-session
do not spawn a fresh context unless the old one is irrecoverable
record each alignment turn
```

### 6.3 Segmentation / Source Blocks

第三轮必须调用真实 Skill / worker。

```text
participant: conversation-segmentation
expected_record:
  - skill-execution-record.md or returned-output.md
  - source-block inventory
```

如果 CCPE Skill 无法真实调用：

```text
status: blocked_waiting_for_participant_output
do_not_simulate: true
```

### 6.4 Topic Discovery / Topic Graph

对于 coherent source：

```text
workers receive confirmed Step 0 lens
workers extract local evidence, exceptions, and challenges
workers do not rediscover global structure from zero
```

Topic graph synthesis 应由真实 participant 完成或由多个 worker return 汇总后再由主会话整合。

主会话只可：

```text
- merge returned outputs
- record conflicts
- ask user for confirmation
```

### 6.5 Evidence Routing And Topic Docs

第三轮重点测试：

```text
evidence-routing-and-topic-doc-builder must be real worker/sub-session work
```

要求：

```text
- each topic or topic group has an assigned worker
- worker receives source ranges and confirmed topic graph
- worker writes topic-doc draft or returned-output
- main session integrates only after returned outputs exist
```

不得：

```text
- main session直接写完 topic docs
- main session直接抽取 material units
```

### 6.6 Human Confirmation Gates

第三轮保留两次人参与确认：

```text
Gate 0: Step 0 structure / global lens confirmation
Gate 6: Topic Docs / extracted material usefulness confirmation
```

Gate 0 通过后，可减少旧流程中的 topic-granularity pause。

Gate 6 用于确认：

```text
- topic docs 是否可用
- extracted material 是否足够进入 downstream automation
- 是否需要重新调 worker 修补
```

## 7. What To Reuse From Second Round

可复用：

```text
- 用户确认的模型关系
- known distortion risks
- process-implementation-audit.md 中的流程缺口
- topics/_material-extraction-index.md 作为参考，不作为第三轮正式输出
```

不可直接复用为第三轮正式输出：

```text
- 01-topic-map.md
- 02-material-routing-log.md
- topics/*.md
- audits/*.md
```

这些文件只能作为 expected comparison / reference，不是第三轮 participant output。

## 8. Success Criteria

第三轮成功标准不是“再产出一份相似分析”，而是：

```text
- every substantive processing step has a real participant record
- Step 0 sub-session remains persistent through alignment
- CCPE Skill invocation boundaries are tested
- blocked Skill calls are recorded rather than simulated
- topic docs / material extraction are produced by worker/sub-session participants
- two human confirmation gates are recorded
- final package can be traced from source -> participant output -> integration -> audit
```

## 9. Suggested Opening Prompt For Third Round

```text
请从本交接文档开始第三轮测试：

1. 新建 `discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离3`。
2. 只让主会话做编排、记录、验收。
3. Step 0 必须启动并保留同一个 whole-source-gestalt-reviewer 子会话，多轮对齐后再确认。
4. Segmentation、topic discovery、evidence routing、topic docs、material extraction 必须调用真实 Skill / worker / 子会话。
5. 如果 CCPE Skill 无法真实调用，记录 blocked，不要由主会话模拟。
6. 带入本文档第 5 节的用户确认上下文，避免用户重复输入。
```