{
  "model_id": "intellectual_archaeology",
  "model_name": "思想考古学",
  "model_type": "deep_modeling_model",
  "pipeline_position": "deep_analysis",
  "one_sentence_definition": "思想考古学是一种从表层应用逐层下钻到哲学基岩的建模方法，用于发现支撑一个模型或判断的深层假设、核心机理和动态韧性来源。",
  "core_question": "当前问题、方案或模型背后，隐藏了哪些更深层的结构性假设？",
  "core_mechanism": "把待建模对象放入七层深度框架：应用层、领域层、过程层、目的层、核心机理层、人类能力层、哲学基岩层；逐层追问支撑上一层的假设，并以最小充分下潜原则停止，避免为了深刻而深刻。",
  "status": "draft",
  "source_articles": [
    "article_intellectual_archaeology_primary_001",
    "article_cognitive_os_synthesis_001"
  ],
  "source_evidence": [
    "excerpt_ia_primary_definition_001",
    "excerpt_ia_primary_layers_001",
    "excerpt_ia_primary_resilience_001",
    "excerpt_ia_cognitive_os_minimum_depth_001",
    "excerpt_ia_primary_validation_001"
  ],
  "input_types": [
    "复杂问题",
    "系统性议题",
    "反复失败的问题",
    "专家隐性知识",
    "认知模型草稿",
    "产品底层逻辑",
    "需要抽取底层假设的业务方案"
  ],
  "output_types": [
    "层级化问题地图",
    "是否应该调用",
    "进入思想考古的理由",
    "建议最大下潜层级",
    "实际分析层级",
    "停止理由",
    "不继续下潜理由",
    "深层假设清单",
    "最小充分下潜层级",
    "模型稳固性判断",
    "需要验证的薄弱环节",
    "后续建模建议"
  ],
  "call_when": [
    "QPI 判断问题偏课题或中重型难题。",
    "问题具有高复用价值。",
    "用户希望从文章中抽取模型。",
    "当前解释停留在表层工具或症状。",
    "需要把专家隐性知识显性化。",
    "需要为一个模型寻找更稳固的底层结构。",
    "一个问题反复解决但反复失败。"
  ],
  "do_not_call_when": [
    "当前只是缺少一个事实或材料位置，直接检索即可。",
    "问题属于低风险轻量表达，不值得进入深层建模。",
    "继续下钻不再改变判断、路径、验证方式或行动边界。",
    "用户明确只需要短平快执行，不需要模型化解释。",
    "缺少足够领域材料，无法区分真实底层假设和空泛哲学化表达。"
  ],
  "trigger_keywords": [
    "深层结构",
    "底层逻辑",
    "模型稳不稳",
    "为什么反复失败",
    "问题的根在哪里",
    "沉淀成模型",
    "从文章抽取模型",
    "方法论的基岩",
    "隐性知识",
    "哲学基岩"
  ],
  "negative_triggers": [
    "快速回答",
    "不要展开",
    "只查事实",
    "只要执行步骤",
    "不要深入分析",
    "只改文案"
  ],
  "related_models": [
    "qpi"
  ],
  "conflicting_models": [
    "fast_execution_flow"
  ],
  "disciplinary_anchors": [
    "哲学",
    "认识论",
    "系统论",
    "复杂系统",
    "认知心理学",
    "专家知识显性化",
    "因果推理",
    "设计理论"
  ],
  "common_misuses": [
    "把思想考古学误用为文章摘要或概念堆叠。",
    "为了显得深刻而无限下钻。",
    "把所有轻量问题都拖入七层分析。",
    "只做纵向下潜而缺少横向模型竞争。",
    "用哲学基岩替代现实验证。",
    "下潜后没有回到可行动结论。"
  ],
  "failure_modes": [
    "分析很深但不能改变判断或行动。",
    "层级之间没有清楚递进关系。",
    "把所有问题都下钻到哲学层。",
    "输出只有抽象概念而没有模型结构。",
    "没有说明应该在哪一层停止。",
    "没有指出需要证据验证的地方。"
  ],
  "selection_priority": 7,
  "confidence_level": "medium",
  "stability_profile": {
    "stability_level": "B",
    "needs_stabilization": true,
    "main_risks": [
      "七层结构需要进一步稳定。",
      "容易过度下潜。",
      "容易输出抽象概念而缺少行动回路。",
      "需要更多真实案例验证。"
    ],
    "reason": "纵向下潜机制清晰，适合深度建模，但七层结构和停止条件需要进一步稳定。",
    "next_stabilization_action": "补充不同复杂度问题的下潜深度测试，明确最小充分下潜原则。",
    "stabilization_notes": "当前适合作为中重型问题的 draft 深度建模模块。"
  },
  "regression_status": "pending",
  "example_inputs": [
    "我想把过去文章中的认知模型抽取出来，但不知道这些模型到底稳不稳，应该怎么判断？",
    "现代人为什么一边渴望连接，一边又渴望逃离连接？"
  ],
  "example_outputs": [
    "第一个输入适合下潜到核心机理层，判断文章、模型卡、系统调用、回归测试之间的关系。",
    "第二个输入可从应用层、评价层、过程层、目的层和人类能力层分析连接与逃离连接的双重机制。"
  ],
  "output_contract": [
    "should_call: true | false。",
    "entry_reason: 为什么值得进入思想考古；不应调用时说明 no-call 原因。",
    "recommended_max_depth: application | domain | process | purpose | core_mechanism | human_capability | philosophical_bedrock。",
    "layers_to_analyze: 实际需要分析的层级数组。",
    "stop_reason: 为什么停在这一层。",
    "no_deeper_reason: 继续下潜不会改变什么。",
    "assumptions_by_layer: 按七层列出关键假设；未分析层级保留空数组。",
    "validation_needed: 哪些判断需要现实反馈、数据、专家盲审或红队。",
    "action_implication: 下潜结果如何改变下一步行动。"
  ],
  "structured_output_contract": {
    "should_call": "boolean",
    "entry_reason": "string",
    "recommended_max_depth": ["application", "domain", "process", "purpose", "core_mechanism", "human_capability", "philosophical_bedrock"],
    "layers_to_analyze": "array<layer_id>",
    "stop_reason": "string",
    "no_deeper_reason": "string",
    "assumptions_by_layer": {
      "application": "array<string>",
      "domain": "array<string>",
      "process": "array<string>",
      "purpose": "array<string>",
      "core_mechanism": "array<string>",
      "human_capability": "array<string>",
      "philosophical_bedrock": "array<string>"
    },
    "validation_needed": "array<string>",
    "action_implication": "string"
  },
  "depth_control": {
    "principle": "最小充分下潜",
    "stop_conditions": [
      "已经足以改变决策。",
      "继续下潜不会增加解释力。",
      "缺少证据支撑更深推断。",
      "问题不值得重型建模。",
      "用户当前只需要执行层结果。",
      "QPI 未放行中重型难题或课题时，不进入完整思想考古。",
      "如果 recommended_max_depth 低于 philosophical_bedrock，不得自动展开到哲学基岩。"
    ],
    "overuse_warning": "思想考古不是所有问题的默认流程，必须先经过问题价值评估和 QPI 定性。"
  },
  "stabilization_path": [
    "补充轻量、中量、重量问题的边界测试。",
    "补充不同领域的七层下钻案例。",
    "建立停止条件和现实验证的示例库。"
  ],
  "productization_notes": "思想考古适合作为中重度问题的深层建模模块，不应默认全量调用。它应该由 QPI、问题复杂度和复用价值共同触发。",
  "version": "0.1",
  "last_updated": "2026-06-16"
}
