diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index d0e9406..ef8e377 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -174,8 +174,8 @@ Files intended for GPT / CCRA upload inside a review bundle should include the r
 
 ## 13. Next Steps
 
-1. Submit the Round 03.2 selector negative-gate patch for GPT / CCRA review.
+1. Round 03 is closed after the Round 03.2a CCRA / GPT pass decision.
 2. Keep QPI and Intellectual Archaeology at `draft / B / pending` until Owner / CCRA review accepts stronger status.
-3. Run a QPI blind-test round with new unlabelled inputs only after Round 03.2 passes.
+3. Start Round 04 blind input routing evaluation only after an explicit owner instruction; do not modify selector rules before that evaluation.
 4. Defer any third-model expansion until the current QPI selector and case layer are accepted.
 5. Route missing reusable extraction, inspection, or stability-scoring tools to `requirements/skills-vault/` or `requirements/ccpe/` instead of improvising local platform features.
diff --git a/cards/qpi.md b/cards/qpi.md
index c659c1d..4657e04 100644
--- a/cards/qpi.md
+++ b/cards/qpi.md
@@ -145,6 +145,8 @@ QPI 必须区分：
 - 不要展开
 - 只改错别字
 
+说明：`不要展开` / `不要深入分析` 默认抑制 QPI；但如果同时出现 `只做 QPI`、`只做问题定性`、`只判断主导稀缺` 等限定分析意图，则允许 QPI 做窄范围判断，并拒绝进入思想考古。
+
 ## 相关模型
 
 - `intellectual_archaeology`: 当 QPI 判断问题偏中重型难题或课题时，可进入思想考古做深度建模。
@@ -202,7 +204,7 @@ QPI 的三分结构、核心匮乏物、主体性和动态性有清晰来源支
 - 机制稳定性：中高，扫描匮乏物和匹配处理范式的机制明确。
 - 边界清晰度：中等，混合型问题、多视角分歧和上下文不足场景仍需更多测试。
 - 来源证据质量：较高，主体性和动态性来自 2025 原文，核心匮乏物和误框定规则来自 2026 原文，应用规则来自综合文档。
-- 回归测试表现：pending，当前已有 55 条 QPI 回归用例；其中 Round 03 / 03.1 已纳入 owner-reviewed case layer、selector no-call、multi-perspective 和低上下文 provisional 边界用例，Round 03.2 已纳入普通 how-to / 词义判断 no-call 陷阱。生命周期仍保持 draft。
+- 回归测试表现：pending，当前已有 58 条 QPI 回归用例；其中 Round 03 / 03.1 已纳入 owner-reviewed case layer、selector no-call、multi-perspective 和低上下文 provisional 边界用例，Round 03.2 已纳入普通 how-to / 词义判断 no-call 陷阱，Round 03.2a 已纳入 depth-limiting QPI override 陷阱。生命周期仍保持 draft。
 
 评级理由：三分结构清晰，适合作为入口路由模型，但需要补充大量边界案例，防止过度升维或降维。
 
@@ -212,7 +214,7 @@ QPI 的三分结构、核心匮乏物、主体性和动态性有清晰来源支
 
 `pending`
 
-当前已有 55 条 QPI 回归用例，覆盖 positive、boundary、misuse、no_call、selector_gate 和 pipeline。Round 03 / 03.1 重点新增：
+当前已有 58 条 QPI 回归用例，覆盖 positive、boundary、misuse、no_call、selector_gate 和 pipeline。Round 03 / 03.1 重点新增：
 
 - owner-reviewed flow / disappointment / organizational year-end-review cases；
 - `case_qpi_international_logistics_no_call_001`
@@ -228,6 +230,12 @@ Round 03.2 重点新增：
 - `case_qpi_how_to_markdown_pdf_no_call_001`
 - `case_qpi_dictionary_judgment_no_call_001`
 
+Round 03.2a 重点新增：
+
+- `case_qpi_depth_limited_qpi_only_001`
+- `case_qpi_depth_limited_problem_definition_001`
+- `case_qpi_depth_limited_dominant_scarcity_001`
+
 ## 示例输入
 
 - “我们团队每次都说要长期主义，但一到季度 KPI 就回到短期动作，这到底是什么问题？”
diff --git a/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/00_OPEN_THIS_FIRST_CCRA_REVIEW_BRIEF_03.2a.md b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/00_OPEN_THIS_FIRST_CCRA_REVIEW_BRIEF_03.2a.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7beb167
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/00_OPEN_THIS_FIRST_CCRA_REVIEW_BRIEF_03.2a.md
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# Round 03.2a CCRA Review Brief
+
+Date: 2026-06-17
+
+Repository: `C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong`
+
+Patch title: Depth-Limiting Override For QPI
+
+## Scope
+
+Round 03.2a is a micro-patch after GPT's Round 03.2 `REVISE-light` review.
+
+It fixes one selector precedence issue:
+
+> `不要展开` / `不要深入分析` should remain global no-call by default, but when paired with explicit QPI-limited intent such as `只做 QPI`, `只做问题定性`, or `只判断主导稀缺`, they should allow QPI and reject IA.
+
+This patch does not:
+
+- add a third model;
+- upgrade QPI or Intellectual Archaeology lifecycle status;
+- introduce an LLM selector;
+- introduce RAG, database, frontend, backend, user accounts, or platform features;
+- start Round 04 blind testing.
+
+Current model status remains:
+
+```text
+qpi: draft / B / pending
+intellectual_archaeology: draft / B / pending
+```
+
+## What Changed
+
+1. Added `depth_limiting_no_call_signals`.
+2. Added `qpi_limited_analysis_override_phrases`.
+3. Modified hard no-call precedence so depth-limiting phrases do not globally no-call when QPI-limited intent is explicit.
+4. Suppressed QPI's own depth-limiting negative penalty only in that explicit QPI-limited combination.
+5. Expanded IA hard exclusion triggers to cover QPI-limited judgment phrases.
+6. Added 3 selector regression cases and 5 calibration smoke inputs.
+
+## Suggested Review Order
+
+1. `00_OPEN_THIS_FIRST_CCRA_REVIEW_BRIEF_03.2a.md`
+2. `01_PATCH_MATRIX_03.2a.md`
+3. `02_CURRENT_ASSET_PACK_03.2a.md`
+4. `03_VALIDATION_AND_COMMAND_LOG_03.2a.md`
+5. `04_REVIEW_QUESTIONS_FOR_GPT_03.2a.md`
+6. `optional_raw_changed_files_03.2a.zip` only if exact changed-file inspection is needed
+
+## Primary Review Question
+
+Does Round 03.2a close the depth-limiting override issue enough to close Round 03 and proceed to Round 04 blind input evaluation?
diff --git a/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/01_PATCH_MATRIX_03.2a.md b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/01_PATCH_MATRIX_03.2a.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..62c9d15
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/01_PATCH_MATRIX_03.2a.md
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# Round 03.2a Patch Matrix
+
+## GPT Requirement Mapping
+
+| Requirement | Implementation | Files |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| Add QPI-limited override phrases | Added `qpi_limited_analysis_override_phrases` | `selector/selector_rules.json` |
+| Keep `不要展开` / `不要深入分析` as no-call by default | Added separate `depth_limiting_no_call_signals`; did not remove original hard no-call phrases | `selector/selector_rules.json` |
+| Let QPI-limited depth requests continue scoring | Hard no-call branch now skips global no-call only when depth-limiting and QPI-limited phrases both hit | `scripts/run_selector_demo.py` |
+| Do not let QPI's own negative trigger penalty suppress the override | Suppressed QPI depth-limiting penalty only for explicit QPI-limited combinations | `scripts/run_selector_demo.py` |
+| IA must remain rejected | Added QPI-limited judgment phrases to IA hard exclusion triggers | `selector/selector_rules.json` |
+| Add regression / calibration cases | Added 3 regression cases and 5 calibration inputs | `tests/qpi.regression.json`, `selector/selector_calibration_inputs.json` |
+
+## Added Regression Cases
+
+- `case_qpi_depth_limited_qpi_only_001`
+- `case_qpi_depth_limited_problem_definition_001`
+- `case_qpi_depth_limited_dominant_scarcity_001`
+
+## Added Calibration Inputs
+
+- `selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_qpi_only_001`
+- `selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_problem_definition_001`
+- `selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_problem_definition_002`
+- `selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_problem_or_issue_001`
+- `selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_dominant_scarcity_001`
+
+## Current Counts
+
+| Asset | Round 03.2 | Round 03.2a |
+| --- | ---: | ---: |
+| QPI regression cases | 55 | 58 |
+| IA regression cases | 19 | 19 |
+| Aggregate regression cases | 74 | 77 |
+| Selector calibration inputs | 90 | 95 |
+
+## Non-Goals Preserved
+
+- No new model.
+- No lifecycle upgrade.
+- No LLM selector.
+- No RAG / database / frontend / backend.
+- No Round 04 blind-test execution.
diff --git a/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/02_CURRENT_ASSET_PACK_03.2a.md b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/02_CURRENT_ASSET_PACK_03.2a.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..e592b1d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/02_CURRENT_ASSET_PACK_03.2a.md
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+# Round 03.2a Current Asset Pack
+
+## Canonical Changed Assets
+
+- `selector/selector_rules.json`
+- `selector/selector_calibration_inputs.json`
+- `tests/qpi.regression.json`
+- `tests/regression_cases.json`
+- `tests/regression_index.json`
+- `scripts/run_selector_demo.py`
+
+## Generated / Derived Assets
+
+- `models/model_index.json`
+- `cards/card_index.md`
+- `reports/index_rebuild_report.md`
+- `reports/validation_report.md`
+- `reports/selector_regression_report_v0.2.md`
+- `reports/selector_calibration_smoke_report.md`
+- `reports/model_card_sync_report_v0.2.md`
+
+## Documentation Updated
+
+- `README.md`
+- `docs/DECISIONS.md`
+- `selector/README.md`
+- `cards/qpi.md`
+- `reports/content_review_report_v0.2.md`
+
+## Required Behavior
+
+The following inputs should now select QPI, reject IA, and set `no_call=false`:
+
+```text
+不要展开到思想考古，只做 QPI 复核。
+不要展开到思想考古，只做问题定性。
+不要深入分析，只做问题定性。
+不要深入分析背后的理论，只判断这是问题还是课题。
+不要展开，只判断主导稀缺。
+```
+
+Depth-limiting phrases without explicit QPI-limited intent remain no-call / low-depth signals.
+
+## Current Lifecycle State
+
+No lifecycle upgrade was made.
+
+```text
+qpi: draft / B / pending
+intellectual_archaeology: draft / B / pending
+```
diff --git a/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/03_VALIDATION_AND_COMMAND_LOG_03.2a.md b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/03_VALIDATION_AND_COMMAND_LOG_03.2a.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4c4216d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/03_VALIDATION_AND_COMMAND_LOG_03.2a.md
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# Round 03.2a Validation and Command Log
+
+Date: 2026-06-17
+
+## Red Evidence
+
+After adding the 03.2a traps and before implementation, selector checks failed as expected.
+
+`python scripts\run_selector_regression.py`
+
+- `case_qpi_depth_limited_qpi_only_001`: expected primary QPI, got none.
+- `case_qpi_depth_limited_problem_definition_001`: expected primary QPI, got none.
+- `case_qpi_depth_limited_dominant_scarcity_001`: expected primary QPI, got none.
+
+`python scripts\run_selector_calibration_smoke.py`
+
+- five depth-limiting QPI override inputs failed with expected QPI selection missing.
+
+## Green Verification
+
+The following commands passed after the Round 03.2a patch:
+
+```powershell
+python scripts\rebuild_indexes.py --check
+python -m unittest discover -s tests -p "test*.py" -v
+python scripts\validate_model_library.py
+python scripts\check_card_contract.py
+python scripts\run_selector_demo.py
+python scripts\run_selector_regression.py
+python scripts\run_selector_calibration_smoke.py
+python scripts\check_model_card_sync.py
+```
+
+Results:
+
+- Index check: PASS
+- Unit tests: PASS, 17 tests
+- Model library validation: PASS
+- Card contract: PASS
+- Selector demo: PASS
+- Selector regression: PASS
+- Selector calibration smoke: PASS, 95 inputs, 0 failures, 0 warnings
+- Model/card sync: PASS
+
+## Important Interpretation
+
+Validation pass does not mean model content is stable or owner-approved.
+
+It only means the Round 03.2a selector precedence patch is structurally consistent and passes current local checks.
diff --git a/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/04_REVIEW_QUESTIONS_FOR_GPT_03.2a.md b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/04_REVIEW_QUESTIONS_FOR_GPT_03.2a.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..cfbfe57
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/04_REVIEW_QUESTIONS_FOR_GPT_03.2a.md
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+# Round 03.2a Review Questions for GPT
+
+Please review Round 03.2a only.
+
+Do not expand into Round 04 blind testing yet.
+
+## Questions
+
+1. Does the selector now correctly treat `不要展开 / 不要深入分析 + 只做 QPI / 只做问题定性` as QPI-limited analysis rather than global no-call?
+2. Does IA remain properly rejected in all five depth-limiting override cases?
+3. Is it acceptable that depth-limiting phrases without QPI-limited intent still remain no-call / low-depth signals?
+4. Can Round 03 now be closed with the following conclusion?
+
+```text
+QPI and Intellectual Archaeology remain draft / B / pending.
+QPI is accepted as a draft-callable routing asset at report level.
+Selector v0.2 passes no-call, calibration smoke, model-level exclusion, QPI-before-IA, and depth-limiting override gates.
+Proceed to Round 04 blind input evaluation.
+```
+
+## Suggested Answer Format
+
+Please answer with:
+
+- `pass`, `revise`, or `block`;
+- specific failing cases if `revise` or `block`;
+- whether Round 04 blind input evaluation may start after this patch.
diff --git a/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/BUNDLE_FILE_MANIFEST_03.2a.md b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/BUNDLE_FILE_MANIFEST_03.2a.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0e0702e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/BUNDLE_FILE_MANIFEST_03.2a.md
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Round 03.2a Bundle File Manifest
+
+## Review Files
+
+- `00_OPEN_THIS_FIRST_CCRA_REVIEW_BRIEF_03.2a.md`
+- `01_PATCH_MATRIX_03.2a.md`
+- `02_CURRENT_ASSET_PACK_03.2a.md`
+- `03_VALIDATION_AND_COMMAND_LOG_03.2a.md`
+- `04_REVIEW_QUESTIONS_FOR_GPT_03.2a.md`
+- `BUNDLE_FILE_MANIFEST_03.2a.md`
+- `optional_raw_changed_files_03.2a.zip`
+
+## Optional Raw Changed Files
+
+The zip is optional and should be used only if exact file inspection is needed.
+
+It preserves source-relative paths.
+
+It excludes:
+
+- `knowledge_assets/`
+- `__pycache__/`
+- `*.pyc`
+- previous review bundle zip files
+
+## Source-Relative Files Included in Raw Zip
+
+- `README.md`
+- `cards/qpi.md`
+- `docs/DECISIONS.md`
+- `reports/content_review_report_v0.2.md`
+- `reports/Codex新会话交接文档_Round03.2a评审准备_2026-06-17.md`
+- `reports/index_rebuild_report.md`
+- `reports/model_card_sync_report_v0.2.md`
+- `reports/selector_calibration_smoke_report.md`
+- `reports/selector_regression_report_v0.2.md`
+- `reports/validation_report.md`
+- `scripts/run_selector_demo.py`
+- `selector/README.md`
+- `selector/selector_calibration_inputs.json`
+- `selector/selector_rules.json`
+- `tests/qpi.regression.json`
+- `tests/regression_cases.json`
+- `tests/regression_index.json`
+- `models/model_index.json`
+- `cards/card_index.md`
diff --git a/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/optional_raw_changed_files_03.2a.zip b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/optional_raw_changed_files_03.2a.zip
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dd8630c
Binary files /dev/null and b/ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/optional_raw_changed_files_03.2a.zip differ
diff --git a/docs/DECISIONS.md b/docs/DECISIONS.md
index 0280494..0c1a33a 100644
--- a/docs/DECISIONS.md
+++ b/docs/DECISIONS.md
@@ -181,3 +181,36 @@ The current Round 03.2 implementation keeps this scoped:
 - It does not add an LLM selector, RAG, database, service, frontend, backend, or third model.
 - It preserves QPI explicit-analysis override, but QPI selection does not re-enable IA when IA is explicitly refused.
 - Generic bare QPI gate words such as `如何` and `判断` are removed in favor of compound problem-definition phrases.
+
+## Decision 015: Treat depth-limiting QPI requests as scoped analysis, not global no-call
+
+Status: Accepted
+
+Reason:
+
+Round 03.2 review found that global hard no-call phrases such as `不要展开` and `不要深入分析` could incorrectly block QPI when the user also asked for a limited QPI action such as `只做 QPI`, `只做问题定性`, or `只判断主导稀缺`.
+
+The correct interpretation is scoped depth control:
+
+- `不要展开` or `不要深入分析` alone remains a no-call / low-depth signal.
+- When paired with explicit QPI-limited intent, it means do not enter deeper models such as Intellectual Archaeology.
+- QPI may still be selected for problem definition, problem-type judgment, or dominant-scarcity judgment.
+- IA remains rejected through model-level hard exclusion.
+
+This remains a selector precedence rule only. It does not add a new model, lifecycle upgrade, LLM selector, RAG, database, service, frontend, backend, user system, or Round 04 blind-test behavior.
+
+## Decision 016: Close Round 03 after the Round 03.2a pass decision
+
+Status: Accepted
+
+Reason:
+
+The Round 03.2a review accepted the depth-limiting QPI override patch and confirmed that Round 03 can close.
+
+Closure statement:
+
+- Round 03 is closed.
+- QPI and Intellectual Archaeology remain `draft / B / pending`.
+- QPI is accepted as a draft-callable routing asset at report level only; this does not change JSON model lifecycle status.
+- Selector v0.2 passes no-call, calibration smoke, model-level exclusion, QPI-before-IA, and depth-limiting override gates.
+- Round 04 blind input routing evaluation is the next candidate phase, but it is not started by this closure.
diff --git a/models/model_index.json b/models/model_index.json
index dee950e..4e7be4d 100644
--- a/models/model_index.json
+++ b/models/model_index.json
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
       "card_file": "cards/qpi.md",
       "source_article_count": 3,
       "source_evidence_count": 10,
-      "regression_case_count": 55,
+      "regression_case_count": 58,
       "stability_level": "B",
       "regression_status": "pending",
       "status": "draft",
diff --git a/reports/Codex新会话交接文档_Round03.2a评审准备_2026-06-17.md b/reports/Codex新会话交接文档_Round03.2a评审准备_2026-06-17.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4bb58c0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/reports/Codex新会话交接文档_Round03.2a评审准备_2026-06-17.md
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+# Codex 新会话交接文档：Round 03.2a 评审准备与关闭记录
+
+Date: 2026-06-17
+
+Repository: `C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong`
+
+Current phase: `model_library_mvp`
+
+## 1. 本轮目标
+
+根据 GPT 对 Round 03.2 的 `REVISE-light` 评审意见，完成 03.2a 微修：
+
+```text
+不要展开 / 不要深入分析
++
+只做 QPI / 只做问题定性 / 只判断主导稀缺
+=
+允许 QPI，拒绝 IA，不做全局 no-call
+```
+
+## 2. 已完成
+
+- 新增 `depth_limiting_no_call_signals`。
+- 新增 `qpi_limited_analysis_override_phrases`。
+- 修改 selector hard no-call precedence：
+  - depth-limiting phrase 单独出现时仍可 no-call；
+  - depth-limiting phrase 与 QPI-limited intent 同时出现时继续评分；
+  - QPI 可被选中；
+  - IA 仍通过 hard exclusion 被拒绝。
+- 避免 QPI 自身 negative trigger penalty 在该组合下把 QPI 压到阈值以下。
+- 新增 3 条 QPI regression：
+  - `case_qpi_depth_limited_qpi_only_001`
+  - `case_qpi_depth_limited_problem_definition_001`
+  - `case_qpi_depth_limited_dominant_scarcity_001`
+- 新增 5 条 selector calibration input。
+- 同步 aggregate regression、regression index、model/card index 和 reports。
+- 生成 03.2a 评审包：
+
+```text
+ccra_review_bundle/round-03.2a_2026-06-17_depth-limiting-qpi-override-patch/
+```
+
+## 3. 当前计数
+
+- QPI regression cases: 58
+- Intellectual Archaeology regression cases: 19
+- Aggregate regression cases: 77
+- Selector calibration inputs: 95
+
+模型状态没有升级：
+
+```text
+qpi: draft / B / pending
+intellectual_archaeology: draft / B / pending
+```
+
+## 4. 验证结果
+
+以下命令已通过：
+
+```powershell
+python scripts\rebuild_indexes.py --check
+python -m unittest discover -s tests -p "test*.py" -v
+python scripts\validate_model_library.py
+python scripts\check_card_contract.py
+python scripts\run_selector_demo.py
+python scripts\run_selector_regression.py
+python scripts\run_selector_calibration_smoke.py
+python scripts\check_model_card_sync.py
+```
+
+结果：
+
+- Index check: PASS
+- Unit tests: PASS, 17 tests
+- Model library validation: PASS
+- Card contract: PASS
+- Selector demo: PASS
+- Selector regression: PASS
+- Selector calibration smoke: PASS, 95 inputs, 0 failures, 0 warnings
+- Model/card sync: PASS
+
+## 5. 需要 GPT / Owner 判断
+
+- Round 03.2a 已经由 GPT / CCRA 判断为 `pass`。
+- Round 03 系列可以正式关闭。
+- Round 04 blind input evaluation 可以作为下一候选阶段，但本次关闭动作不进入 Round 04。
+
+## 6. 建议下一步
+
+1. 记录 Round 03 closure。
+2. 提交并同步 Round 03.2a 工程资产、评审包、交接文档和关闭记录。
+3. 仅在后续 Owner 明确要求时启动 Round 04 blind input evaluation；启动前不修改 selector 规则。
+
+## 7. Round 03 关闭结论
+
+```text
+Round 03 closed.
+
+QPI and Intellectual Archaeology remain draft / B / pending.
+QPI is accepted as a draft-callable routing asset at report level.
+Selector v0.2 passes no-call, calibration smoke, model-level exclusion, QPI-before-IA, and depth-limiting override gates.
+Round 04 blind input routing evaluation is not started in this closeout.
+```
+
+注意：`draft-callable` 只能作为评审报告语言，不改变 JSON model lifecycle status。
+
+## 8. 本次关闭修复
+
+- 按评审意见在 `cards/qpi.md` 补充 depth-limiting override 的说明：`不要展开` / `不要深入分析` 默认抑制 QPI，但与 `只做 QPI`、`只做问题定性`、`只判断主导稀缺` 等限定分析意图组合时，允许 QPI 窄范围判断并拒绝思想考古。
+- 在 `docs/DECISIONS.md` 记录 Round 03 关闭决策。
+- 在 `README.md` 更新下一步状态：Round 03 已关闭，Round 04 只作为后续候选阶段，不在本轮启动。
diff --git a/reports/content_review_report_v0.2.md b/reports/content_review_report_v0.2.md
index 52834c0..34c2568 100644
--- a/reports/content_review_report_v0.2.md
+++ b/reports/content_review_report_v0.2.md
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Date: 2026-06-16
 
-Status note: this report is a pre-case-promotion review snapshot. It remains useful for the v0.2 evidence / contract / selector baseline, but its regression counts do not reflect the Round 03 / 03.1 QPI owner-reviewed case promotion or the Round 03.2 selector negative-gate patch. Current regression counts are tracked in `tests/*.regression.json`, `models/model_index.json`, and the latest review bundle.
+Status note: this report is a pre-case-promotion review snapshot. It remains useful for the v0.2 evidence / contract / selector baseline, but its regression counts do not reflect the Round 03 / 03.1 QPI owner-reviewed case promotion, the Round 03.2 selector negative-gate patch, or the Round 03.2a depth-limiting override patch. Current regression counts are tracked in `tests/*.regression.json`, `models/model_index.json`, and the latest review bundle.
 
 ## 1. 本轮修改摘要
 
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ Coverage:
 - 已覆盖误用、防误召回、no-call 和 pipeline gate。
 - 仍需人工审查用例真实性和遗漏边界。
 
-Round 03 / 03.1 / 03.2 update: QPI has since expanded to 55 regression cases after owner-reviewed case promotion, selector/no-call repair, and broad-gate no-call traps. Intellectual Archaeology has expanded to 19 regression cases after Round 03.2 IA hard-exclusion traps. This v0.2 table is retained as a historical baseline, not the current count.
+Round 03 / 03.1 / 03.2 / 03.2a update: QPI has since expanded to 58 regression cases after owner-reviewed case promotion, selector/no-call repair, broad-gate no-call traps, and depth-limiting QPI override traps. Intellectual Archaeology has expanded to 19 regression cases after Round 03.2 IA hard-exclusion traps. This v0.2 table is retained as a historical baseline, not the current count.
 
 ## 6. Selector Regression 结论
 
diff --git a/reports/selector_calibration_smoke_report.md b/reports/selector_calibration_smoke_report.md
index 6a4c630..aca0a0b 100644
--- a/reports/selector_calibration_smoke_report.md
+++ b/reports/selector_calibration_smoke_report.md
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Status: `PASS`
 
 Command: `python scripts/run_selector_calibration_smoke.py`
 
-Calibration inputs checked: 90
+Calibration inputs checked: 95
 Failures: 0
 Warnings: 0
 
@@ -99,4 +99,9 @@ Warnings: 0
 - `selector_calibration_qpi_how_to_excel_no_call_001`: PASS; expected=no_call; selected=[]; no_call=True
 - `selector_calibration_qpi_how_to_markdown_pdf_no_call_001`: PASS; expected=no_call; selected=[]; no_call=True
 - `selector_calibration_qpi_dictionary_judgment_no_call_001`: PASS; expected=no_call; selected=[]; no_call=True
+- `selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_qpi_only_001`: PASS; expected=select_qpi_reject_ia; selected=['qpi']; no_call=False
+- `selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_problem_definition_001`: PASS; expected=select_qpi_reject_ia; selected=['qpi']; no_call=False
+- `selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_problem_definition_002`: PASS; expected=select_qpi_reject_ia; selected=['qpi']; no_call=False
+- `selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_problem_or_issue_001`: PASS; expected=select_qpi_reject_ia; selected=['qpi']; no_call=False
+- `selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_dominant_scarcity_001`: PASS; expected=select_qpi_reject_ia; selected=['qpi']; no_call=False
 - `selector_calibration_analysis_override_should_call_001`: PASS; expected=select_qpi; selected=['qpi']; no_call=False
diff --git a/reports/selector_regression_report_v0.2.md b/reports/selector_regression_report_v0.2.md
index 9ba39dc..c062fe5 100644
--- a/reports/selector_regression_report_v0.2.md
+++ b/reports/selector_regression_report_v0.2.md
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 Status: `PASS`
 
-Cases checked: 18
+Cases checked: 21
 Failures: 0
 
 ## Cases
@@ -24,4 +24,7 @@ Failures: 0
 - `case_qpi_how_to_excel_no_call_001`: PASS; selected=[]; no_call=True
 - `case_qpi_how_to_markdown_pdf_no_call_001`: PASS; selected=[]; no_call=True
 - `case_qpi_dictionary_judgment_no_call_001`: PASS; selected=[]; no_call=True
+- `case_qpi_depth_limited_qpi_only_001`: PASS; selected=['qpi']; no_call=False
+- `case_qpi_depth_limited_problem_definition_001`: PASS; selected=['qpi']; no_call=False
+- `case_qpi_depth_limited_dominant_scarcity_001`: PASS; selected=['qpi']; no_call=False
 - `case_qpi_analysis_override_should_call_001`: PASS; selected=['qpi']; no_call=False
diff --git a/scripts/run_selector_demo.py b/scripts/run_selector_demo.py
index d928003..2c9a0c3 100644
--- a/scripts/run_selector_demo.py
+++ b/scripts/run_selector_demo.py
@@ -33,6 +33,12 @@ def hard_no_call_hits(user_input, global_rules):
     return hit_any(user_input, signals)
 
 
+def depth_limited_qpi_override_hits(user_input, global_rules):
+    depth_hits = hit_any(user_input, global_rules.get("depth_limiting_no_call_signals", []))
+    override_hits = hit_any(user_input, global_rules.get("qpi_limited_analysis_override_phrases", []))
+    return depth_hits, override_hits
+
+
 def model_hard_exclusion_hits(user_input, model_rule):
     return hit_any(user_input, model_rule.get("hard_exclusion_triggers", []))
 
@@ -45,7 +51,9 @@ def score_model(model, model_rule, global_rules, user_input, task_type="", pipel
     penalties = []
 
     negative_hits = hit_any(user_input, model_rule.get("negative_triggers", [])) + hit_any(user_input, model.get("negative_triggers", []))
-    if negative_hits and not has_analysis_override(user_input, global_rules):
+    depth_hits, qpi_limited_hits = depth_limited_qpi_override_hits(user_input, global_rules)
+    suppress_qpi_depth_penalty = model_id == "qpi" and depth_hits and qpi_limited_hits
+    if negative_hits and not has_analysis_override(user_input, global_rules) and not suppress_qpi_depth_penalty:
         penalty_key = "model_negative_penalty_qpi" if model_id == "qpi" else "model_negative_penalty_default"
         score -= weights.get(penalty_key, 0.5)
         penalties.append("negative trigger: " + "、".join(sorted(set(negative_hits))[:4]))
@@ -146,7 +154,14 @@ def recommend(root, user_input, task_type="", pipeline_position="", threshold=No
     threshold = global_rules.get("no_call_threshold", 0.35) if threshold is None else threshold
 
     no_call_hits = hard_no_call_hits(user_input, global_rules)
-    if global_rules.get("hard_no_call_first", True) and no_call_hits and not has_analysis_override(user_input, global_rules):
+    depth_hits, qpi_limited_hits = depth_limited_qpi_override_hits(user_input, global_rules)
+    has_depth_limited_qpi_override = bool(depth_hits and qpi_limited_hits)
+    if (
+        global_rules.get("hard_no_call_first", True)
+        and no_call_hits
+        and not has_analysis_override(user_input, global_rules)
+        and not has_depth_limited_qpi_override
+    ):
         return hard_no_call_result(root, user_input, no_call_hits)
 
     model_rules = rules_by_model(selector_rules)
diff --git a/selector/README.md b/selector/README.md
index 3cb4556..10304b6 100644
--- a/selector/README.md
+++ b/selector/README.md
@@ -25,6 +25,11 @@ Round 03.2 selector rule:
 - A hard exclusion rejects only the named model; it does not globally no-call the request.
 - Generic bare QPI gate words such as `如何` and `判断` should not be used alone. Use compound problem-definition phrases instead.
 
+Round 03.2a selector rule:
+
+- Depth-limiting phrases such as `不要展开` and `不要深入分析` remain global no-call signals by default.
+- If a depth-limiting phrase is paired with explicit QPI-limited intent such as `只做 QPI`, `只做问题定性`, or `只判断主导稀缺`, the selector should continue scoring, allow QPI, and still reject IA.
+
 Current files:
 
 - `selector_rules.json`
diff --git a/selector/selector_calibration_inputs.json b/selector/selector_calibration_inputs.json
index 1f7e5fe..1c788c3 100644
--- a/selector/selector_calibration_inputs.json
+++ b/selector/selector_calibration_inputs.json
@@ -626,6 +626,41 @@
       "expected_selector_behavior": "no_call",
       "expected_notes": "Dictionary meaning request should not be routed to QPI by bare 判断."
     },
+    {
+      "case_id": "selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_qpi_only_001",
+      "category": "round_03_2a_depth_limited_qpi_override",
+      "input": "不要展开到思想考古，只做 QPI 复核。",
+      "expected_selector_behavior": "select_qpi_reject_ia",
+      "expected_notes": "Depth-limiting phrase should not become global no-call when QPI-only intent is explicit."
+    },
+    {
+      "case_id": "selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_problem_definition_001",
+      "category": "round_03_2a_depth_limited_qpi_override",
+      "input": "不要展开到思想考古，只做问题定性。",
+      "expected_selector_behavior": "select_qpi_reject_ia",
+      "expected_notes": "Do not call IA, but still route to QPI for problem definition."
+    },
+    {
+      "case_id": "selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_problem_definition_002",
+      "category": "round_03_2a_depth_limited_qpi_override",
+      "input": "不要深入分析，只做问题定性。",
+      "expected_selector_behavior": "select_qpi_reject_ia",
+      "expected_notes": "Depth-limiting no-call phrase should be overridden by explicit QPI-limited problem definition."
+    },
+    {
+      "case_id": "selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_problem_or_issue_001",
+      "category": "round_03_2a_depth_limited_qpi_override",
+      "input": "不要深入分析背后的理论，只判断这是问题还是课题。",
+      "expected_selector_behavior": "select_qpi_reject_ia",
+      "expected_notes": "Problem-or-issue judgment is QPI-limited analysis, not global no-call."
+    },
+    {
+      "case_id": "selector_calibration_qpi_depth_limited_dominant_scarcity_001",
+      "category": "round_03_2a_depth_limited_qpi_override",
+      "input": "不要展开，只判断主导稀缺。",
+      "expected_selector_behavior": "select_qpi_reject_ia",
+      "expected_notes": "Dominant-scarcity-only judgment should select QPI and reject IA."
+    },
     {
       "case_id": "selector_calibration_analysis_override_should_call_001",
       "category": "round_03_1_analysis_override",
diff --git a/selector/selector_rules.json b/selector/selector_rules.json
index faec365..41068a6 100644
--- a/selector/selector_rules.json
+++ b/selector/selector_rules.json
@@ -35,6 +35,18 @@
       "不用解释",
       "生成图片"
     ],
+    "depth_limiting_no_call_signals": [
+      "不要展开",
+      "不要深入分析"
+    ],
+    "qpi_limited_analysis_override_phrases": [
+      "只做 QPI",
+      "只做问题定性",
+      "只做问题定性复核",
+      "只判断主导稀缺",
+      "只判断这是问题还是课题",
+      "只判断问题类型"
+    ],
     "direct_execution_no_call_signals": [
       "排一下",
       "排床位",
@@ -217,7 +229,11 @@
         "不要调用思想考古",
         "不调用思想考古",
         "只做 QPI",
-        "只做问题定性"
+        "只做问题定性",
+        "只做问题定性复核",
+        "只判断主导稀缺",
+        "只判断这是问题还是课题",
+        "只判断问题类型"
       ],
       "pipeline_position": "modeling_depth_analysis",
       "selection_priority": 7,
diff --git a/tests/qpi.regression.json b/tests/qpi.regression.json
index 4b3a6ba..38a9b79 100644
--- a/tests/qpi.regression.json
+++ b/tests/qpi.regression.json
@@ -1634,6 +1634,93 @@
       "evaluation_mode": "structured",
       "notes": "Round 03.2 no-call trap: dictionary judgment is not QPI."
     },
+    {
+      "case_id": "case_qpi_depth_limited_qpi_only_001",
+      "model_id": "qpi",
+      "case_type": "selector_gate",
+      "input": "不要展开到思想考古，只做 QPI 复核。",
+      "expected_behavior": "应选择 QPI 并拒绝 IA；“不要展开”在此表示限制深度，不是全局 no-call。",
+      "failure_signal": "selector 返回 no_call=true 或选中 IA。",
+      "expected_output_elements": [
+        "selected=qpi",
+        "rejected=intellectual_archaeology",
+        "no_call=false"
+      ],
+      "should_call_model": true,
+      "expected_primary_model": "qpi",
+      "negative_expected_models": [
+        "intellectual_archaeology"
+      ],
+      "expected_classification": "mixed",
+      "expected_dominant_scarcity": "unknown",
+      "expected_max_depth": "not_applicable",
+      "minimum_required_elements": [
+        "depth_limited_qpi_override"
+      ],
+      "forbidden_elements": [
+        "global_no_call"
+      ],
+      "evaluation_mode": "structured",
+      "notes": "Round 03.2a depth-limiting override trap: global no-call phrase plus QPI-only intent."
+    },
+    {
+      "case_id": "case_qpi_depth_limited_problem_definition_001",
+      "model_id": "qpi",
+      "case_type": "selector_gate",
+      "input": "不要深入分析，只做问题定性。",
+      "expected_behavior": "应选择 QPI 并拒绝 IA；“不要深入分析”限制深度，但问题定性仍需要 QPI。",
+      "failure_signal": "selector 返回 no_call=true 或选中 IA。",
+      "expected_output_elements": [
+        "selected=qpi",
+        "rejected=intellectual_archaeology",
+        "no_call=false"
+      ],
+      "should_call_model": true,
+      "expected_primary_model": "qpi",
+      "negative_expected_models": [
+        "intellectual_archaeology"
+      ],
+      "expected_classification": "mixed",
+      "expected_dominant_scarcity": "unknown",
+      "expected_max_depth": "not_applicable",
+      "minimum_required_elements": [
+        "depth_limited_problem_definition"
+      ],
+      "forbidden_elements": [
+        "global_no_call"
+      ],
+      "evaluation_mode": "structured",
+      "notes": "Round 03.2a depth-limiting override trap: limited problem definition should route to QPI."
+    },
+    {
+      "case_id": "case_qpi_depth_limited_dominant_scarcity_001",
+      "model_id": "qpi",
+      "case_type": "selector_gate",
+      "input": "不要展开，只判断主导稀缺。",
+      "expected_behavior": "应选择 QPI 并拒绝 IA；主导稀缺判断属于 QPI 限定分析。",
+      "failure_signal": "selector 返回 no_call=true 或选中 IA。",
+      "expected_output_elements": [
+        "selected=qpi",
+        "rejected=intellectual_archaeology",
+        "no_call=false"
+      ],
+      "should_call_model": true,
+      "expected_primary_model": "qpi",
+      "negative_expected_models": [
+        "intellectual_archaeology"
+      ],
+      "expected_classification": "mixed",
+      "expected_dominant_scarcity": "unknown",
+      "expected_max_depth": "not_applicable",
+      "minimum_required_elements": [
+        "dominant_scarcity_gate"
+      ],
+      "forbidden_elements": [
+        "global_no_call"
+      ],
+      "evaluation_mode": "structured",
+      "notes": "Round 03.2a depth-limiting override trap: dominant-scarcity-only judgment should route to QPI."
+    },
     {
       "case_id": "case_qpi_analysis_override_should_call_001",
       "model_id": "qpi",
diff --git a/tests/regression_cases.json b/tests/regression_cases.json
index dc74827..f3e122a 100644
--- a/tests/regression_cases.json
+++ b/tests/regression_cases.json
@@ -1633,6 +1633,93 @@
       "evaluation_mode": "structured",
       "notes": "Round 03.2 no-call trap: dictionary judgment is not QPI."
     },
+    {
+      "case_id": "case_qpi_depth_limited_qpi_only_001",
+      "model_id": "qpi",
+      "case_type": "selector_gate",
+      "input": "不要展开到思想考古，只做 QPI 复核。",
+      "expected_behavior": "应选择 QPI 并拒绝 IA；“不要展开”在此表示限制深度，不是全局 no-call。",
+      "failure_signal": "selector 返回 no_call=true 或选中 IA。",
+      "expected_output_elements": [
+        "selected=qpi",
+        "rejected=intellectual_archaeology",
+        "no_call=false"
+      ],
+      "should_call_model": true,
+      "expected_primary_model": "qpi",
+      "negative_expected_models": [
+        "intellectual_archaeology"
+      ],
+      "expected_classification": "mixed",
+      "expected_dominant_scarcity": "unknown",
+      "expected_max_depth": "not_applicable",
+      "minimum_required_elements": [
+        "depth_limited_qpi_override"
+      ],
+      "forbidden_elements": [
+        "global_no_call"
+      ],
+      "evaluation_mode": "structured",
+      "notes": "Round 03.2a depth-limiting override trap: global no-call phrase plus QPI-only intent."
+    },
+    {
+      "case_id": "case_qpi_depth_limited_problem_definition_001",
+      "model_id": "qpi",
+      "case_type": "selector_gate",
+      "input": "不要深入分析，只做问题定性。",
+      "expected_behavior": "应选择 QPI 并拒绝 IA；“不要深入分析”限制深度，但问题定性仍需要 QPI。",
+      "failure_signal": "selector 返回 no_call=true 或选中 IA。",
+      "expected_output_elements": [
+        "selected=qpi",
+        "rejected=intellectual_archaeology",
+        "no_call=false"
+      ],
+      "should_call_model": true,
+      "expected_primary_model": "qpi",
+      "negative_expected_models": [
+        "intellectual_archaeology"
+      ],
+      "expected_classification": "mixed",
+      "expected_dominant_scarcity": "unknown",
+      "expected_max_depth": "not_applicable",
+      "minimum_required_elements": [
+        "depth_limited_problem_definition"
+      ],
+      "forbidden_elements": [
+        "global_no_call"
+      ],
+      "evaluation_mode": "structured",
+      "notes": "Round 03.2a depth-limiting override trap: limited problem definition should route to QPI."
+    },
+    {
+      "case_id": "case_qpi_depth_limited_dominant_scarcity_001",
+      "model_id": "qpi",
+      "case_type": "selector_gate",
+      "input": "不要展开，只判断主导稀缺。",
+      "expected_behavior": "应选择 QPI 并拒绝 IA；主导稀缺判断属于 QPI 限定分析。",
+      "failure_signal": "selector 返回 no_call=true 或选中 IA。",
+      "expected_output_elements": [
+        "selected=qpi",
+        "rejected=intellectual_archaeology",
+        "no_call=false"
+      ],
+      "should_call_model": true,
+      "expected_primary_model": "qpi",
+      "negative_expected_models": [
+        "intellectual_archaeology"
+      ],
+      "expected_classification": "mixed",
+      "expected_dominant_scarcity": "unknown",
+      "expected_max_depth": "not_applicable",
+      "minimum_required_elements": [
+        "dominant_scarcity_gate"
+      ],
+      "forbidden_elements": [
+        "global_no_call"
+      ],
+      "evaluation_mode": "structured",
+      "notes": "Round 03.2a depth-limiting override trap: dominant-scarcity-only judgment should route to QPI."
+    },
     {
       "case_id": "case_qpi_analysis_override_should_call_001",
       "model_id": "qpi",
diff --git a/tests/regression_index.json b/tests/regression_index.json
index c1daee7..6334cd3 100644
--- a/tests/regression_index.json
+++ b/tests/regression_index.json
@@ -7,14 +7,14 @@
     {
       "model_id": "qpi",
       "regression_file": "tests/qpi.regression.json",
-      "case_count": 55,
+      "case_count": 58,
       "case_type_counts": {
         "boundary": 13,
         "misuse": 16,
         "no_call": 6,
         "pipeline": 1,
         "positive": 16,
-        "selector_gate": 3
+        "selector_gate": 6
       }
     },
     {