--- packet_type: local-ccra-agent-invocation-packet runtime_id: ccra-local-review agent_id: ccra-local-reviewer runtime_version: 0.1.0 agent_version: 0.1.0 review_id: round-04-pilot-01 status: ready_for_dispatch --- # Local CCRA Agent Invocation Packet ## 1. Invocation Metadata ```yaml packet_id: round-04-pilot-01 created_at: 2026-06-19 client_project_root: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong knowledge_base_path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\knowledge_assets review_round: round-04 local_pass: pilot-01 review_run_dir: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\local_ccra_reviews\round-04\pilot-01 invocation_mode: prompt_path_reference carrier_type: codex_thread child_session_id: pending persistent_child_session_required: true simulation_allowed: false ``` ## 2. Canonical Artifacts ```yaml canonical_agent_path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\ccra-local-reviewer.agent.md canonical_runtime_path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\runtimes\hybrid\ccra-local-review.runtime.md runtime_setup_path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\runtimes\hybrid\ccra-local-review-runtime-setup.md report_template_path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\runtimes\hybrid\ccra-local-review-report.template.md integration_registration_path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\integrations\skills-vault\ccra-local-review-helpers.integration.md ``` ## 3. Role Integrity Requirement The invoked participant must act as `ccra-local-reviewer`. The reviewer must: ```text read local evidence directly cite files actually read use helper outputs only as evidence write the report to the requested output contract preserve Owner/Web CCRA authority boundaries avoid project file edits except the required report and returned output avoid lifecycle promotion avoid main-session roleplay ``` If this packet cannot be dispatched to a real child session or equivalent isolated participant context, the valid state is: ```text blocked_waiting_for_participant_output ``` ## 4. Task Context ```yaml primary_question: Does Local CCRA produce Web CCRA-level review quality when it can inspect the full local Round 04 evidence set? scope_statement: Review Round 04 blind routing evaluation evidence as a historical pilot. Focus on invocation authenticity, persistence, report quality, evidence coverage, non-target behavior awareness, lifecycle/scope discipline, and readiness gaps for future Round 05 use. non_goals: - Do not decide Owner approval. - Do not replace Web CCRA final review. - Do not promote lifecycle status. - Do not modify selector rules, model cards, model JSON, regression cases, or review bundles. - Do not treat this pilot as Round 05 acceptance. local_tuning_stage: historical_pilot web_final_review_target: none_for_this_pilot known_prior_rounds: - round-03 - round-03.1 - round-03.2 - round-03.2a - round-04 - round-04.1 owner_supplied_notes: Compare later against Web CCRA feedback supplied by Owner. Pilot should test child-session reality, resumability, and report quality. ``` ## 5. Input Files Required: ```text C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\README.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\AGENTS.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\knowledge_assets\README.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\knowledge_assets\ C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\local_ccra_reviews\round-04\pilot-01\review-context.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\local_ccra_reviews\round-04\pilot-01\review-file-manifest.json ``` Project and round-specific evidence: ```text - path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\PROJECTS.md purpose: project boundary and supplier rules required: true - path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\knowledge_assets purpose: required Local CCRA knowledge base; do not duplicate into run directory required: true - path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\docs\WORKFLOW.md purpose: workflow and review rules required: true - path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\docs\DECISIONS.md purpose: accepted selector and lifecycle decisions required: true - path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\reports\Round04_blind_routing_evaluation_report_2026-06-18.md purpose: Round 04 evaluation report required: true - path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\reports\Round04_1_post_patch_routing_verification_report_2026-06-18.md purpose: post-patch verification context for collateral behavior awareness required: false - path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\selector\round04_blind_inputs.json purpose: full Round 04 blind input set required: true - path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\selector\selector_rules.json purpose: current selector rules required: true - path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\tests\test_round04_blind_routing.py purpose: Round 04 test surface required: false - path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\tests\test_round04_post_patch_verification.py purpose: Round 04.1 post-patch test surface required: false ``` Review bundles: ```text - path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\ccra_review_bundle\round-04_2026-06-18_blind-input-routing-evaluation purpose: primary Round 04 Web CCRA review bundle - path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\ccra_review_bundle\round-04.1_2026-06-18_selector-rule-patch purpose: optional post-patch context for understanding later accepted changes ``` Helper outputs: ```text C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\local_ccra_reviews\round-04\pilot-01\helper-outputs\bundle-audit.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\local_ccra_reviews\round-04\pilot-01\helper-outputs\bundle-audit.json C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\local_ccra_reviews\round-04\pilot-01\helper-outputs\gate-run-report.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\local_ccra_reviews\round-04\pilot-01\helper-outputs\gate-run-report.json C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\local_ccra_reviews\round-04\pilot-01\helper-outputs\lifecycle-status-guard-scan.md C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\local_ccra_reviews\round-04\pilot-01\helper-outputs\lifecycle-status-guard-scan.json ``` Unavailable helper outputs: ```text - routing-behavior-diff-audit: skipped for initial pilot unless before/after routing result files are supplied or identified. ``` ## 6. Output Contract The reviewer must write: ```yaml primary_report_path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\local_ccra_reviews\round-04\pilot-01\04_LOCAL_CCRA_REVIEW_REPORT.md returned_output_path: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\local_ccra_reviews\round-04\pilot-01\returned-output.md required_report_template: C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\runtimes\hybrid\ccra-local-review-report.template.md ``` The report must include: ```text return metadata review scope inputs actually received files actually read automation outputs used executive summary findings non-target behavior changes engineering pass vs product judgment lifecycle and scope guard local tuning recommendations Web final review readiness Owner decision points limits and uncertainty resume instructions ``` ## 7. Continuity Policy ```yaml same_child_session_preferred: true resume_allowed: true resume_requires: - previous report - owner-decision.md when present - new or changed evidence list - unchanged-evidence statement ``` Follow-up review should inspect changed or newly supplied evidence first. Full rerun is required when invocation evidence is invalid, required evidence was missing, or the Owner requests a full rerun. ## 8. Session Logging The project main session must record dispatch method, child session id, helper commands, exit codes, files written, skipped helpers, and manual approvals in: ```text C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong\local_ccra_reviews\round-04\pilot-01\run-notes.md ``` ## 9. No-Simulation Requirement Formal Local CCRA output must not be simulated in the project main session. If a simulated dry run is explicitly requested, label it: ```text simulation-only excluded-from-synthesis not-a-formal-report ``` Simulation-only output cannot be used as the Local CCRA report.