# Local CCRA Run Notes ## Run Identity - review_round: round-04 - local_pass: pilot-02 - review_run_dir: `local_ccra_reviews/round-04/pilot-02` - runtime_id: ccra-local-review - runtime_version: 0.1.1 - agent_id: ccra-local-reviewer - agent_version: 0.1.1 - pilot_status: setup_in_progress ## Purpose Second historical pilot after CCPE Patch 1. This pilot checks: 1. Whether Patch 1 improves Web-style product diagnosis while preserving local full-file audit. 2. Whether `review_turn` can identify Round 04 issues without using Round 04.1 hindsight evidence. 3. Whether the same child session can continue with `planning_turn`. 4. Whether `planning_turn` can produce next-review requirements and submitted-material guidance. 5. Whether the output improves against pilot-01 and Web CCRA baseline lines 1-214. This pilot is not Round 05 acceptance. ## Source Evidence Scope Primary review-turn evidence: - `ccra_review_bundle/round-04_2026-06-18_blind-input-routing-evaluation/` - `reports/Round04_blind_routing_evaluation_report_2026-06-18.md` - `reports/Round04_blind_input_candidates_2026-06-18.md` - `selector/round04_blind_inputs.json` - `selector/selector_rules.json` - `selector/README.md` - `tests/test_round04_blind_routing.py` Required knowledge base: - `knowledge_assets/` Fair-comparison exclusion: - Round 04.1 post-patch result files are intentionally excluded from `review_turn` evidence. The purpose is to compare with the Web CCRA / GPT initial Round 04 review baseline, `2026-06-18产品交流-GPT.md` lines 1-214, without giving the child reviewer hindsight from the later patch result. ## Helper Commands - `review-context-builder`: exit 0. `review-context.md` and `review-file-manifest.json` generated; no missing source roots; required `knowledge_assets/` included. - `review-bundle-audit`: exit 1. Generic profile reports missing `manifest` and `validation_sidecar`; `BUNDLE_FILE_MANIFEST_04.md` exists but is treated as extra by the generic profile. - `routing-behavior-diff-audit`: skipped for `review_turn`; no before/after patch result is included in the initial Round 04 evidence scope. - `regression-validation-gate-runner --mode dry_run`: exit 0. Three gates declared and skipped as dry run. - `lifecycle-status-guard-scan`: exit 1. Scan reports blocking lifecycle/status candidates; many are broad-scope findings from older review materials and pilot-01 helper outputs, so reviewer must classify confidence/noise rather than treat the helper result as automatic judgment. ## Dispatch Record - carrier_type: codex_thread - invocation_mode: prompt_path_reference - child_session_id: `019edcde-24be-7593-99b2-5cf014467340` - review_turn_status: returned - planning_turn_status: returned - review_turn_duration_ms: 512317 - planning_turn_duration_ms: 342925 ## Return Record - review_report_path: `local_ccra_reviews/round-04/pilot-02/04_LOCAL_CCRA_REVIEW_REPORT.md` - planning_output_path: `local_ccra_reviews/round-04/pilot-02/next-review-requirements.md` - returned_output_path: `local_ccra_reviews/round-04/pilot-02/returned-output.md` - return_status: review_and_planning_returned ## Comparison Plan After both child turns return, compare: 1. Web baseline: `C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\knowledge-vault\work\internal\强哥的思想宇宙\讨论\2026-06-18产品交流-GPT.md` lines 1-214. 2. Local pilot-01: `local_ccra_reviews/round-04/pilot-01/04_LOCAL_CCRA_REVIEW_REPORT.md`. 3. Local pilot-02 review turn: `local_ccra_reviews/round-04/pilot-02/04_LOCAL_CCRA_REVIEW_REPORT.md`. 4. Local pilot-02 planning turn: `local_ccra_reviews/round-04/pilot-02/next-review-requirements.md`. ## Comparison Result - comparison_report_path: `local_ccra_reviews/round-04/pilot-02/05_WEB_LOCAL_CCRA_COMPARISON.md` - comparison_status: completed - readiness_recommendation: `ready_for_formal_local_first_review_with_conditions` - follow_up_ccpe_patch_request: `requirements/ccpe/2026-06-19-ccra-local-reviewer-runtime-patch2.md` - follow_up_patch_type: non-blocking hardening ## Resume Notes For `planning_turn`, continue the same child session recorded above and provide the first-turn report path.