254 lines
12 KiB
JSON
254 lines
12 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"blind_input_set_id": "round04_blind_inputs_2026-06-18_v0.1",
|
||
"status": "frozen_for_first_blind_run_after_owner_review",
|
||
"source_document": "reports/Round04_blind_input_candidates_2026-06-18.md",
|
||
"created_date": "2026-06-18",
|
||
"notes": [
|
||
"This file is the frozen Round 04 blind input pool.",
|
||
"It intentionally contains no expected selector behavior and no owner answer key.",
|
||
"Category labels are coverage labels for review, not expected routing labels.",
|
||
"Selector rules must not be modified before the first blind run."
|
||
],
|
||
"constraints": {
|
||
"no_expected_routing": true,
|
||
"do_not_modify_selector_before_first_run": true,
|
||
"do_not_merge_into_calibration_inputs": true,
|
||
"do_not_add_third_model": true,
|
||
"do_not_upgrade_model_status": true,
|
||
"do_not_run_answer_generation": true
|
||
},
|
||
"inputs": [
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-001",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "explicit_no_call_fact_lookup",
|
||
"input_text": "查一下《原则》这本书的作者是谁,只要事实,不要分析。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests whether direct fact lookup stays outside model routing."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-002",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "explicit_no_call_translation",
|
||
"input_text": "把这句话翻译成英文:这个模型还处在草稿阶段。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests pure translation as no-call."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-003",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "explicit_no_call_rewrite",
|
||
"input_text": "请把这段话润色得更顺一点,不要改变意思,也不要解释原因。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests polish-only request with explicit no-analysis boundary."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-004",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "explicit_no_call_formatting",
|
||
"input_text": "把下面这组要点整理成 Markdown 表格,直接给结果。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests formatting / direct execution without cognitive model need."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-005",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "explicit_no_call_direct_execution",
|
||
"input_text": "把这个 JSON 压缩成单行,不用说明:{\"status\":\"draft\",\"level\":\"B\"}",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests direct transformation request."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-006",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "qpi_light_problem_definition",
|
||
"input_text": "我们现在反复开会但没有推进,我想先判断这是缺信息、缺路径,还是缺共识。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests lightweight problem-definition language without asking for depth."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-007",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "qpi_light_problem_definition",
|
||
"input_text": "这个项目卡住了,我不确定到底是问题没定义清楚,还是执行方案不够。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests QPI-like framing without naming QPI."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-008",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "qpi_light_problem_definition",
|
||
"input_text": "我们有一堆材料,但不知道下一步该问什么问题,先帮我定性一下。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests question/problem boundary and data/path scarcity."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-009",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "qpi_light_problem_definition",
|
||
"input_text": "这件事到底算一个简单问题、复杂问题,还是已经变成组织议题?",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests lightweight classification among question / problem / issue."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-010",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "governance_responsibility_consensus",
|
||
"input_text": "每个部门都说支持这个项目,但一到分工就没人愿意承担主责。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests responsibility ambiguity and consensus scarcity."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-011",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "governance_responsibility_consensus",
|
||
"input_text": "老板要创新,财务要控成本,业务要短期业绩,最后方案总是被折中到没有方向。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests cross-stakeholder conflict and governance weight."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-012",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "governance_responsibility_consensus",
|
||
"input_text": "我们不是不知道怎么做,而是每个人都在等别人先表态。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests responsibility / commitment issue where path may already exist."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-013",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "governance_responsibility_consensus",
|
||
"input_text": "这个流程改造牵涉教务、学院和信息化部门,谁都能提意见,但没人能拍板。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests multi-party ownership and decision authority gap."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-014",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "capacity_resource_path",
|
||
"input_text": "团队现在知道目标,也认可方向,但只有两个人能做关键模块,进度一直被产能卡住。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests resource / capacity scarcity rather than data scarcity."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-015",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "capacity_resource_path",
|
||
"input_text": "我们知道要做知识库,也有材料,但不知道从哪条最小路径开始。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests path scarcity with sufficient source material."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-016",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "capacity_resource_path",
|
||
"input_text": "预算不是最大问题,问题是现有系统、权限和审批流程都接不上。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests operational path constraints and institutional friction."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-017",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "capacity_resource_path",
|
||
"input_text": "这件事大家都觉得重要,但每周只能挤出零散时间,所以一直没有稳定产出。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests capacity scarcity mixed with execution continuity."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-018",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "model_extraction_or_depth_modeling",
|
||
"control_case_type": "positive_control",
|
||
"input_text": "请从这篇长文里抽取一个可复用的认知模型,重点看它的核心机制和适用边界。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests model-extraction intent and possible depth-modeling route."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-019",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "model_extraction_or_depth_modeling",
|
||
"input_text": "这套说法背后好像有一个稳定结构,不只是观点总结,帮我判断它能不能沉淀成模型。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests model-mining request without naming Intellectual Archaeology."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-020",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "model_extraction_or_depth_modeling",
|
||
"input_text": "我想把这段讨论拆成原始判断、隐含假设、适用条件和误用边界。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests structured depth analysis intent."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-021",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "qpi_allowed_ia_refused",
|
||
"control_case_type": "model_name_exposed",
|
||
"input_text": "先不要思想考古,只判断这是不是一个 QPI 意义上的问题。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests explicit IA refusal while allowing QPI."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-022",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "qpi_allowed_ia_refused",
|
||
"input_text": "不要展开到底层假设,只帮我看主导稀缺是什么。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests depth-limiting QPI override without naming QPI."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-023",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "qpi_allowed_ia_refused",
|
||
"input_text": "这次先不做深度建模,只做问题定性,看它是缺数据、缺路径还是缺共识。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests QPI-limited intent plus explicit depth refusal."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-024",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "qpi_allowed_ia_refused",
|
||
"input_text": "不要进入思想考古,我只要一个轻量判断:现在应该先问问题、找路径,还是处理责任边界?",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests model-level hard exclusion for IA while preserving QPI-like routing."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-025",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "likely_intellectual_archaeology",
|
||
"control_case_type": "model_name_exposed",
|
||
"input_text": "QPI 已经判断这是中重型课题,现在请继续分析它背后的底层假设、生成机制和长期稳定结构。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests explicit post-QPI depth handoff."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-026",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "likely_intellectual_archaeology",
|
||
"input_text": "这个现象反复出现在不同项目里,我想知道它背后的思想结构是什么,而不是只做问题分类。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests repeated-pattern depth modeling beyond lightweight QPI."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-027",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "likely_intellectual_archaeology",
|
||
"input_text": "请分析这套判断为什么会长期成立,它依赖哪些世界观、因果假设和行动边界。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests deep assumption / mechanism request."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-028",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "ambiguous_low_context",
|
||
"input_text": "这个不太对。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests very low context and likely need for clarification."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-029",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "ambiguous_low_context",
|
||
"input_text": "怎么又卡住了?",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests short ambiguous frustration signal."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-030",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "ambiguous_low_context",
|
||
"input_text": "还是那个老问题。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests prior-context dependency without enough current evidence."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-031",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "explicit_no_call_how_to",
|
||
"input_text": "如何在 Excel 里冻结首行?",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests whether generic how-to stays outside QPI after broad \"如何\" gate was narrowed."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-032",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "explicit_no_call_how_to",
|
||
"input_text": "怎么把 Markdown 文件转成 PDF?",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests tool/how-to request as no-call."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-033",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "explicit_no_call_dictionary_judgment",
|
||
"input_text": "判断一下“alignment”在这句话里是什么意思。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests whether ordinary word-meaning judgment avoids QPI over-selection."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-034",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "direct_execution_with_analysis_override",
|
||
"input_text": "请把下面内容总结成三点,但不要只执行,先判断它背后的问题定义。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests whether explicit analysis override can escape direct-execution no-call."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-035",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "qpi_allowed_depth_limited",
|
||
"input_text": "不要深入分析,只判断这件事的主导稀缺是什么。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests Round 03.2a depth-limiting override without naming QPI or IA."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-036",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "qpi_allowed_depth_limited",
|
||
"input_text": "不要展开到底层理论,只判断现在是缺信息、缺路径还是缺共识。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests QPI-limited routing while rejecting deeper modeling."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-037",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "ambiguous_growth_how_to",
|
||
"input_text": "如何提高这个账号的流量?",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests whether generic growth how-to is routed to QPI, no-call, or low-confidence provisional handling."
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"input_id": "R04-BI-038",
|
||
"category_for_owner_review": "likely_intellectual_archaeology",
|
||
"input_text": "这类失败在不同项目里反复出现,我想抽出它背后稳定的生成机制和可迁移框架。",
|
||
"why_included": "Tests deeper modeling intent without explicit \"思想考古\" or \"底层假设\" wording."
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|