200 lines
12 KiB
JSON
200 lines
12 KiB
JSON
{
|
||
"source_excerpts": [
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_qpi_primary_spectrum_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_qpi_primary_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "qpi",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "definition",
|
||
"summary": "QPI 的核心分类不是难度分级，而是按照核心匮乏物区分提问、难题和课题。",
|
||
"used_for": ["one_sentence_definition", "core_mechanism", "output_types"],
|
||
"quote_status": "exact",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "我们将这三条光谱命名为：提问 (Question)、难题 (Problem) 与 课题 (Issue)。区分它们的关键，不在于其表象的规模大小，而在于其内核中 “核心匮乏物 (Core Scarcity)” 的差异。",
|
||
"source_location": "1. 光谱层：QPI 三元结构，约第 48 行",
|
||
"confidence": "high",
|
||
"notes": "来自 QPI 原文第一章。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_qpi_primary_question_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_qpi_primary_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "qpi",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "taxonomy",
|
||
"summary": "提问对应数据匮乏，应通过搜索、检索、自动化和标准化信息流处理。",
|
||
"used_for": ["core_mechanism", "call_when", "regression_cases"],
|
||
"quote_status": "exact",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "在这一层级，世界是简单或线性因果的。解决“提问”不需要创造新的路径，也不需要协调价值观的冲突，只需要执行搜索或检索的动作。",
|
||
"source_location": "1.1 光谱 A：提问，约第 59 行",
|
||
"confidence": "high",
|
||
"notes": "用于定义 Q 类输入和正例。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_qpi_primary_problem_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_qpi_primary_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "qpi",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "taxonomy",
|
||
"summary": "难题对应路径、方法和资源匮乏；目标清晰但桥梁断裂，理论上可通过工程求解闭环。",
|
||
"used_for": ["core_mechanism", "call_when", "regression_cases"],
|
||
"quote_status": "exact",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "与“提问”不同，“难题”不仅仅是信息的缺失。我们清楚地知道现在的状态（A点），也无比渴望到达理想的状态（B点），但我们发现连接A与B的桥梁断裂了，或者根本不存在现成的道路。",
|
||
"source_location": "1.2 光谱 B：难题，约第 65 行",
|
||
"confidence": "high",
|
||
"notes": "用于定义 P 类输入和正例。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_qpi_primary_issue_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_qpi_primary_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "qpi",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "taxonomy",
|
||
"summary": "课题对应确定性因果与共识匮乏；不追求终结式解决，而追求动态平衡与演化。",
|
||
"used_for": ["core_mechanism", "do_not_call_when", "regression_cases"],
|
||
"quote_status": "exact",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "对于“课题”，我们追求的不是完结，而是系统的动态平衡与演化。",
|
||
"source_location": "1.3 光谱 C：课题，约第 82 行",
|
||
"confidence": "high",
|
||
"notes": "用于定义 I 类输入、误用和边界。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_qpi_primary_pathology_reduction_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_qpi_primary_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "qpi",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "boundary_rule",
|
||
"summary": "暴力降维通常来自权力上位者，将系统性课题压缩成具体执行难题以规避系统责任。",
|
||
"used_for": ["common_misuses", "failure_modes", "regression_cases"],
|
||
"quote_status": "exact",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "这通常来自权力的上位者。当面对一个复杂的、系统性的“课题 (Issue)”时，承认其复杂性意味着承认管理者在系统设计上的无能或失职。",
|
||
"source_location": "3.2 病理学：暴力降维，约第 160 行",
|
||
"confidence": "high",
|
||
"notes": "用于 QPI 误用和防降维测试。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_qpi_primary_pathology_inflation_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_qpi_primary_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "qpi",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "boundary_rule",
|
||
"summary": "恶意升维通常来自执行层，将职责范围内的具体难题放大为不可抗力课题。",
|
||
"used_for": ["common_misuses", "failure_modes", "regression_cases"],
|
||
"quote_status": "exact",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "这通常来自权力的下位者或执行层。当面对一个具体的、属于自己职责范围内的“难题 (Problem)”时，为了掩盖自身的失误或懒惰，执行者会试图将这个 P 恶意放大为一个不可抗力的 I。",
|
||
"source_location": "3.2 病理学：恶意升维，约第 170 行",
|
||
"confidence": "high",
|
||
"notes": "用于 QPI 误用和防升维测试。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_qpi_cognitive_os_application_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_cognitive_os_synthesis_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "qpi",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "application_rule",
|
||
"summary": "QPI 在认知操作系统中位于问题定义阶段，用于先确认问题拥有者、来源和时间尺度，再做三元定性。",
|
||
"used_for": ["pipeline_position", "input_types", "selection_rules"],
|
||
"quote_status": "condensed",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "扫除前置迷雾后，使用 Wantsong QPI 统一理论 对问题进行精准定性，直接决定后续的资源调度与干预范式。",
|
||
"source_location": "2.2 光谱定位：QPI 三元定性，约第 115 行",
|
||
"confidence": "medium",
|
||
"notes": "这是综合文档中的应用层表达，Markdown 标记已压缩，不作为原始定义唯一来源。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_qpi_contextual_subjectivity_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_qpi_contextual_2025_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "qpi",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "boundary_rule",
|
||
"summary": "QPI 定性必须基于上下文场景和认知主体差异，不能把问题当作脱离主体的客观文本实体。",
|
||
"used_for": ["one_sentence_definition", "core_mechanism", "output_contract"],
|
||
"quote_status": "exact",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "基于上下文场景，我们需要明确认识到问题的颗粒度；",
|
||
"source_location": "序，思考列表",
|
||
"confidence": "high",
|
||
"notes": "用于 QPI v0.3 的上下文充足度门。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_qpi_contextual_gap_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_qpi_contextual_2025_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "qpi",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "definition",
|
||
"summary": "问题本质是认知主体期望与现实之间的落差，不同主体会对同一落差形成不同框定。",
|
||
"used_for": ["core_question", "core_mechanism", "structured_output_contract"],
|
||
"quote_status": "exact",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "问题的本质实际上是期望与现实的差距；",
|
||
"source_location": "序，思考列表",
|
||
"confidence": "high",
|
||
"notes": "用于 expectation_reality_gap 字段。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_qpi_contextual_dynamic_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_qpi_contextual_2025_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "qpi",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "mechanism",
|
||
"summary": "问题框架会随时间和新信息演化，Q/P/I 判断应标记动态阶段和可能轨迹。",
|
||
"used_for": ["core_mechanism", "structured_output_contract", "regression_cases"],
|
||
"quote_status": "exact",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "问题的框架不是一个静态事件，而是一个随着时间推移展开的过程，可能遵循具有明显阶段性的生命周期。",
|
||
"source_location": "第四章：时间维度",
|
||
"confidence": "high",
|
||
"notes": "用于 dynamic_stage 和 possible_trajectory 字段。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_ia_primary_definition_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_intellectual_archaeology_primary_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "intellectual_archaeology",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "definition",
|
||
"summary": "思想考古学是一种严谨艰苦的智力活动，要求从表层现象层层下钻到哲学基岩。",
|
||
"used_for": ["one_sentence_definition", "core_question", "core_mechanism"],
|
||
"quote_status": "exact",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "工坊的日常运作是在“炼金”，那么其成功的根基，则深植于一项更为严谨、更为艰苦的智力活动——我们称之为 “思想考古学”（Intellectual Archaeology）。",
|
||
"source_location": "1.3 建模的深度：作为思想考古的多层框架，约第 66 行",
|
||
"confidence": "high",
|
||
"notes": "来自原文 1.3 节开头。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_ia_primary_layers_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_intellectual_archaeology_primary_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "intellectual_archaeology",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "mechanism",
|
||
"summary": "思想考古学以七层同心圆下钻：应用层、领域层、过程层、目的层、核心机理层、人类能力层、哲学基岩层。",
|
||
"used_for": ["core_mechanism", "output_types", "regression_cases"],
|
||
"quote_status": "condensed",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "我们构建的，是一个七层同心圆式的模型：第一层（应用层）...第七层（哲学基岩层）：问题模型。",
|
||
"source_location": "1.3 七层同心圆模型，约第 70-80 行",
|
||
"confidence": "high",
|
||
"notes": "已压缩原文七条列表，因此 quote_status=condensed；完整文本见 source article。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_ia_primary_resilience_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_intellectual_archaeology_primary_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "intellectual_archaeology",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "value_claim",
|
||
"summary": "思想考古的价值在于让模型拥有稳定深刻的内核和灵活适应变化的外壳，从而提升动态韧性。",
|
||
"used_for": ["call_when", "stability_profile", "productization_notes"],
|
||
"quote_status": "exact",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "一个模型的价值，不在于其永不改变，而在于其拥有一个稳定、深刻的“内核”，以及一个能够灵活适应变化的“外壳”。思想考古的深度，直接决定了这个内核的稳固程度。",
|
||
"source_location": "1.3 动态韧性说明，约第 88 行",
|
||
"confidence": "high",
|
||
"notes": "用于说明何时调用思想考古。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_ia_cognitive_os_minimum_depth_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_cognitive_os_synthesis_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "intellectual_archaeology",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "boundary_rule",
|
||
"summary": "思想考古容易过度挖掘，必须遵守最小充分下潜原则：继续下潜不再改变判断和行动时停止。",
|
||
"used_for": ["do_not_call_when", "common_misuses", "failure_modes", "regression_cases"],
|
||
"quote_status": "exact",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "思想考古极易导致过度挖掘。并非所有问题都需要下潜到“哲学基岩”。下潜的唯一停止标准是：是否足以改变判断和行动？",
|
||
"source_location": "3.1 纵向下潜：思想考古与最小充分原则，约第 166 行",
|
||
"confidence": "medium",
|
||
"notes": "来自综合应用文档，作为产品化边界规则。"
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
"excerpt_id": "excerpt_ia_primary_validation_001",
|
||
"source_id": "article_intellectual_archaeology_primary_001",
|
||
"related_model_id": "intellectual_archaeology",
|
||
"excerpt_type": "validation_rule",
|
||
"summary": "思想考古产出的模型必须经过内部有效性、动态压力和外部有效性验证，不能只依靠内部自洽。",
|
||
"used_for": ["regression_status", "failure_modes", "productization_notes"],
|
||
"quote_status": "exact",
|
||
"raw_excerpt": "内部逻辑的自洽，绝不等于外部现实的有效。一枚在无风实验室里指向精准的罗盘，未必能经受住真实海洋中磁暴的考验。",
|
||
"source_location": "第四幕：验证，约第 215 行",
|
||
"confidence": "high",
|
||
"notes": "来自第四幕验证段落。"
|
||
}
|
||
]
|
||
}
|