# Cases

## Source Principle

The cases are taken from the two user-specified GPT knowledge files. They are not newly invented story scenarios.

## Group A: Science Video Storyboard, Weight 55%

### V-S01: 被浪拍下水的人

Source: `30_CASE_典型视频分镜案例.md`, S-01.

Intent:

- Opening hook for a science / commentary video.
- Establish the metaphor that ordinary people are being pushed into the AI wave.
- Page text will be added outside the generated image.

Prompt risk:

- AI symbols become literal text.
- The scene becomes a disaster movie instead of a metaphorical visual essay.
- The composition leaves no title-safe area.

### V-S03: 游泳圈与太平洋

Source: `30_CASE_典型视频分镜案例.md`, S-03.

Intent:

- Governing metaphor: AI float vs the Pacific Ocean.
- Show scale contrast: tool is light, reality is vast and heavy.

Prompt risk:

- The ring becomes too cute or too central.
- Ocean scale does not dominate.
- The metaphor turns into a travel poster.

### V-S05: 逻辑沙堡

Source: `30_CASE_典型视频分镜案例.md`, S-05.

Intent:

- Risk visualization: beautiful AI-generated business logic may collapse under reality.
- Sandcastle must look precise and fragile; the wave must feel imminent.

Prompt risk:

- Business-plan elements become readable text.
- The sandcastle looks like a fairy-tale castle rather than fragile logic.
- The wave lacks pressure.

### V-S07: 防忽悠三板斧

Source: `30_CASE_典型视频分镜案例.md`, S-07.

Intent:

- Practical framework: three brakes before using AI for high-stakes action.
- Visualize calculation, red-team attack, and stop-loss rule as three gates / brakes.

Prompt risk:

- The three mechanisms are unclear.
- Text is rendered into the image.
- The image becomes a generic car safety ad.

## Group B: Training AI PPT, Weight 35%

### T-P8: 提示词工程已死？认知工程才刚开始

Source: `31_CASE_典型培训AI_PPT案例.md`, P8.

Intent:

- Training slide contrast: old prompt tricks vs cognitive engineering.
- Left/right comparison visual; final page text handled by PPT layer.

Prompt risk:

- The image tries to render the page text.
- The contrast is too decorative and not teachable.
- "Cognitive core" becomes a generic sci-fi brain.

### T-P12: 从分数评价到成长状态评价

Source: `31_CASE_典型培训AI_PPT案例.md`, P12.

Intent:

- Training slide contrast: result scoring vs growth-state assessment.
- Explain a move from static score sheets to dynamic learning path / feedback maps.

Prompt risk:

- The left side becomes unreadable score-sheet text.
- The right side becomes generic data visualization.
- The visual loses the teacher / student / AI assessment triangle.

### T-P18: AI教育变革的逻辑链

Source: `31_CASE_典型培训AI_PPT案例.md`, P18.

Intent:

- Summary slide: one logic chain from AI ecosystem to cognitive model to CCPE / SPGM to assessment innovation and human-AI education ecology.

Prompt risk:

- Five nodes lose their sequence.
- The image renders fake labels.
- The chain looks like generic "AI transformation" marketing art.

## Group C: Character / Makeup Still, Weight 10%

### C-01: 人物形象目录边界样本

Intent:

- Keep one lightweight character sample only to evaluate whether Advisor prompts support the proposed `makeup-still/` directory.

Prompt risk:

- Overgeneralizing character workflow into all video-workbench work.
- Mistaking character prompt quality for the whole system's quality.