# S-17 Slide Prompt V1

## Status

- Prompt saved before generation.
- Line: production-light
- Review mode: none
- Output image: `slides/s17/s17-v1-image.png`

## Based On Brief

`slides/s17/s17-v1-brief.md`

## Reference Inputs

- Image 1: `projects/2026-07-01-为什么是我们/slides/s01/s01-v1-image.png` as style continuity reference, not edit target.
- Image 2: `projects/2026-07-01-为什么是我们/slides/s10/s10-v1-image.png` as style continuity reference, not edit target.
- Image 3: `projects/2026-06-29-搭上AI这条船/slides/s01/s01-v1-image.png` as style continuity reference, not edit target.
- Image 4: `projects/2026-06-29-搭上AI这条船/slides/s10/s10-v1-image.png` as style continuity reference, not edit target.

## Operation Notes

- Use the loaded reference images only for visual continuity.
- Do not call Garden generation scripts.
- Backup fact-check source was not opened or used; no factual claim needed verification.

## Advisor / Host-Native Record

- Skill mode command: `node C:\Users\wangq\.agents\skills\gpt-image-2\scripts\check-mode.js --json`
- Mode result: `B-or-C`; recommendation: `host-or-advisor`; Garden disabled; API key absent; effective path: Mode B because host `image_gen` is available.
- Skill/template files read: `SKILL.md`, `prompt-writing.md`, `visual-report-page.md`, `dense-explainer-slides.md`, `educational-diagram-slide.md`, and system `imagegen/SKILL.md`.
- Project files actually read: `AGENTS.md`, `project.md`, `execution-plan.md`, `slides/slides.md`, `visual-system/visual-system.md`, `style-prompt-master.md`, `motif-registry.md`, and the three accepted intake files.

## Final Prompt

Create a 16:9 full-page visual slide image for an internal sales-alignment PowerPoint. Use Image 1-4 as style continuity references only: dark navy-black AI maritime operation map, deepwater business cross-section, radar and compass overlays, cyan route glow, restrained gold highlights, serious internal decision tone.

Page: P17 / S-17. Main title in large readable Chinese: "我们先验证智能流，再投入系统建设". Core judgment: "很多 AI 项目失败，是因为太早开发".

Make two horizontal route maps. Upper route is the wrong heavy-development path, muted gray-blue with restrained red risk markers. It starts from "需求" and moves through "页面", "接口", "知识库", "Prompt", "系统", ending at "没人用" near a subtle reef / warning marker. It should look risky but not cartoonish.

Lower route is the correct validation path, brighter cyan and gold, disciplined and professional. It starts with "专家 + AI 工具", then "最小智能流", "试点", "反馈", "校准", "系统化". Show a small probe route validating value before a larger engineering vessel enters deepwater, but keep the visual abstract and business-like.

Bottom judgment bar: "先跑通价值，再投入开发".

Keep text sparse and readable. Avoid project-management Gantt chart style, cute ships, stock people, customer proposal style, logos, watermarks, long paragraphs, and any implication that validation is due to weak development capability.

## Negative / Avoid

Do not make this feel like hesitation or inability to develop. Do not use cartoon ships. Do not overload node text.

## Output Intent

Copy host-generated image to `projects/2026-07-01-为什么是我们/slides/s17/s17-v1-image.png`.