# S14 Reference Comparison And User Review ## Status - Document status: user decision recorded. - Codex local comparison: complete. - User decision: recorded in `summary-and-rule-implications.md`. ## Outputs For Review | Arm | Output | Reference | | --- | --- | --- | | A | `../outputs/s14-anchor-board-reference-v1.png` | master character anchor board | | B | `../outputs/s14-side-crop-reference-v1.png` | side identity crop | ## Codex Comparison | Dimension | Arm A: master board | Arm B: side crop | | --- | --- | --- | | Reference evidence | Pass via visible image context | Pass via visible image context | | Identity preservation | Strong overall identity and outfit preservation | Stronger side-face identity preservation | | Glasses / hair / beard | Preserved | Preserved more tightly in side profile | | Coat / backpack | Very strong | Strong | | S-14 half-profile function | Good, but a little more three-quarter | Better match | | Environment-led MV feel | Slightly better scene balance | Slightly more figure-dominant | | Main risk | Less precise side-face control | Portrait-size pull from crop | ## Codex Ranking For `S-14` specifically: 1. Preferred primary reference: side identity crop. 2. Useful supporting reference: master character anchor board, especially if the tool path supports multiple reference images. If only one reference can be used for `S-14`, Codex recommends the side identity crop. If multiple references can be used, Codex recommends: ```text Primary: character-anchor-v2-side-reference-crop-tight.png Secondary: character-anchor-v2-codex-posture-test.png ``` The side crop should control face / glasses / hair / beard / age. The master board should control coat / backpack / posture / overall character continuity. ## User Decision The user concluded: 1. The successful channel is `gpt-image-2` Advisor prompt generation plus loading the real reference image into context before host `image_gen`. 2. This successful channel should be used now and in future; API/Garden generation should not be the default path. 3. Both the master anchor board and crop reference preserved strong character consistency. 4. Near shots should prioritize crop references; distant shots should prioritize the anchor board. 5. For `在路上`, because most shots are landscape-led, aerial, or distant and only need character consistency, crops derived from the accepted anchor board are sufficient. 6. For future projects with high identity requirements and many close shots, higher-resolution crop references may be generated through image-to-image from the accepted anchor board before production.