ccpe-system/workbench/analysis/cognitive-imaging-specialist-quality-report.md

Quality Report: Cognitive Imaging Specialist

1. Source

source_path: workbench/raw/认知显影者1.1.md
audit_mode: CCPE Forge Auditor Mode

2. Quality Assessment

Criterion	Score	Severity	Notes
Purpose Fit	4	C	Strong fit as a deep cognitive critique and analysis assistant.
Classification Accuracy	2	B	Original file does not distinguish Agent, Model, Skill, and retrieval policy.
Structural Clarity	3	B	Four CCPE 2.0 layers are readable, but Appendix carries too much canonical model content.
Boundary Precision	4	C	CAS boundary, non-CAS rejection, and falsification boundary are explicit.
Capability Realism	3	B	Strong analytic claims are mostly bounded, but "全科科学" and autonomous filter choice need clearer limits.
Context Handling	3	B	Input processing exists; source and retrieval provenance need stronger contract.
Model Fidelity	4	C	Cognitive Imaging has coherent mechanism, metaphor, stages, and failure boundary.
Skill Reusability	2	A	The five-step method is reusable but buried inside the Agent.
Authority Clarity	3	B	Decision authority exists, but retrieval/tool authority is informal.
Workflow Coherence	4	C	Capture / Darkroom / Enlarger / Exposure / Development is strong and memorable.
State Awareness	1	B	No explicit working state, decision log, or resume rule.
Output Usability	4	C	Report format is clear and operational.
Evaluation Strength	3	B	Falsification and prohibition line are strong; acceptance criteria are not separated.
Human-in-the-Loop Design	2	B	Human judgment is implicit, but confirmation gates are not explicitly defined.
Runtime Safety	2	B	Standalone use is safe; retrieval and external-effect boundaries need standardization.
Portability	3	B	Usable as prompt; less maintainable as a long self-contained artifact.
Maintainability	2	A	Model, role, method, and tool policy are tightly coupled.
Intellectual Flavor Preservation	4	C	Strong metaphorical structure and conceptual force should be preserved.

3. Major Strengths

• The core metaphor is structurally meaningful, not decorative: RAW, darkroom, enlarger, exposure, development map cleanly to analysis stages.
• The model has a clear anti-failure principle: do not confuse correlation with causation, and require a "禁止线".
• The artifact has strong depth orientation and a distinctive voice: cold, rigorous, anti-comfort, anti-generic.
• The Appendix is already close to a Model Card seed: scope, assumptions, procedure, and failure boundary are present.
• Version 1.1 improves retrieval handling by treating external data as raw material rather than truth.

4. Major Problems

A. Embedded model is trapped inside one Agent

The Cognitive Imaging model has independent value and should not remain only as an appendix. This weakens reuse by other Agents, Skills, and Runtimes.

A. Reusable Skill is buried in role instructions

The five-step procedure is stable enough to become a CCPE-Skill. Keeping it inside the Agent makes future maintenance and evaluation harder.

B. Hidden chain-of-thought requirement conflicts with current policy

The file requires "必须包含内部思考" and labels an [Internal Thought] phase. In CCPE System this should be converted into auditable summaries, checks, and visible process sections without requiring hidden chain-of-thought disclosure.

B. Retrieval/tool authority is under-specified

The artifact references联网检索 and external cases, but does not fully define:

tool scope
allowed actions
actions requiring confirmation
forbidden actions
source attribution
failure handling
validation

B. Human decision gates are implicit

The Agent strongly judges theories and inputs, but does not state when the human must confirm model scope, source interpretation, promotion to canonical model, or major refactor decisions.

B. State handling is missing

There is no explicit decision log, working state, source log, or resume rule. This matters if the Agent is used in longer review workflows.

5. Preservation Requirements

Any later refactor should preserve:

认知显影术
底片 / 暗房 / 放大 / 曝光 / 显影
噪点 / 预测误差
逆熵本质
算法压缩 / K-复杂度
干预测试 / Do-Operator
生成元
禁止线
防阴谋论机制
冷峻、严谨、反直觉的风格

Do not flatten it into generic "critical thinking assistant" language.