95 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
95 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
# Quality Report: Cognitive Imaging Specialist
|
|
|
|
## 1. Source
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
source_path: workbench/raw/认知显影者1.1.md
|
|
audit_mode: CCPE Forge Auditor Mode
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## 2. Quality Assessment
|
|
|
|
| Criterion | Score | Severity | Notes |
|
|
|---|---:|---|---|
|
|
| Purpose Fit | 4 | C | Strong fit as a deep cognitive critique and analysis assistant. |
|
|
| Classification Accuracy | 2 | B | Original file does not distinguish Agent, Model, Skill, and retrieval policy. |
|
|
| Structural Clarity | 3 | B | Four CCPE 2.0 layers are readable, but Appendix carries too much canonical model content. |
|
|
| Boundary Precision | 4 | C | CAS boundary, non-CAS rejection, and falsification boundary are explicit. |
|
|
| Capability Realism | 3 | B | Strong analytic claims are mostly bounded, but "全科科学" and autonomous filter choice need clearer limits. |
|
|
| Context Handling | 3 | B | Input processing exists; source and retrieval provenance need stronger contract. |
|
|
| Model Fidelity | 4 | C | Cognitive Imaging has coherent mechanism, metaphor, stages, and failure boundary. |
|
|
| Skill Reusability | 2 | A | The five-step method is reusable but buried inside the Agent. |
|
|
| Authority Clarity | 3 | B | Decision authority exists, but retrieval/tool authority is informal. |
|
|
| Workflow Coherence | 4 | C | Capture / Darkroom / Enlarger / Exposure / Development is strong and memorable. |
|
|
| State Awareness | 1 | B | No explicit working state, decision log, or resume rule. |
|
|
| Output Usability | 4 | C | Report format is clear and operational. |
|
|
| Evaluation Strength | 3 | B | Falsification and prohibition line are strong; acceptance criteria are not separated. |
|
|
| Human-in-the-Loop Design | 2 | B | Human judgment is implicit, but confirmation gates are not explicitly defined. |
|
|
| Runtime Safety | 2 | B | Standalone use is safe; retrieval and external-effect boundaries need standardization. |
|
|
| Portability | 3 | B | Usable as prompt; less maintainable as a long self-contained artifact. |
|
|
| Maintainability | 2 | A | Model, role, method, and tool policy are tightly coupled. |
|
|
| Intellectual Flavor Preservation | 4 | C | Strong metaphorical structure and conceptual force should be preserved. |
|
|
|
|
## 3. Major Strengths
|
|
|
|
- The core metaphor is structurally meaningful, not decorative: RAW, darkroom, enlarger, exposure, development map cleanly to analysis stages.
|
|
- The model has a clear anti-failure principle: do not confuse correlation with causation, and require a "禁止线".
|
|
- The artifact has strong depth orientation and a distinctive voice: cold, rigorous, anti-comfort, anti-generic.
|
|
- The Appendix is already close to a Model Card seed: scope, assumptions, procedure, and failure boundary are present.
|
|
- Version 1.1 improves retrieval handling by treating external data as raw material rather than truth.
|
|
|
|
## 4. Major Problems
|
|
|
|
### A. Embedded model is trapped inside one Agent
|
|
|
|
The Cognitive Imaging model has independent value and should not remain only as an appendix. This weakens reuse by other Agents, Skills, and Runtimes.
|
|
|
|
### A. Reusable Skill is buried in role instructions
|
|
|
|
The five-step procedure is stable enough to become a CCPE-Skill. Keeping it inside the Agent makes future maintenance and evaluation harder.
|
|
|
|
### B. Hidden chain-of-thought requirement conflicts with current policy
|
|
|
|
The file requires "必须包含内部思考" and labels an `[Internal Thought]` phase. In CCPE System this should be converted into auditable summaries, checks, and visible process sections without requiring hidden chain-of-thought disclosure.
|
|
|
|
### B. Retrieval/tool authority is under-specified
|
|
|
|
The artifact references联网检索 and external cases, but does not fully define:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
tool scope
|
|
allowed actions
|
|
actions requiring confirmation
|
|
forbidden actions
|
|
source attribution
|
|
failure handling
|
|
validation
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### B. Human decision gates are implicit
|
|
|
|
The Agent strongly judges theories and inputs, but does not state when the human must confirm model scope, source interpretation, promotion to canonical model, or major refactor decisions.
|
|
|
|
### B. State handling is missing
|
|
|
|
There is no explicit decision log, working state, source log, or resume rule. This matters if the Agent is used in longer review workflows.
|
|
|
|
## 5. Preservation Requirements
|
|
|
|
Any later refactor should preserve:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
认知显影术
|
|
底片 / 暗房 / 放大 / 曝光 / 显影
|
|
噪点 / 预测误差
|
|
逆熵本质
|
|
算法压缩 / K-复杂度
|
|
干预测试 / Do-Operator
|
|
生成元
|
|
禁止线
|
|
防阴谋论机制
|
|
冷峻、严谨、反直觉的风格
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Do not flatten it into generic "critical thinking assistant" language.
|