5.2 KiB
5.2 KiB
| artifact_type | model_name | model_id | aliases | author | version | created | updated | status | source_material | model_type | layer | related_models | related_agents | related_skills | related_runtimes | based_on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| model-card | candidate | CCPE System |
{Model Name}
1. Model Overview
1.1 One-Sentence Definition
1.2 Short Description
1.3 Model Type
Use one or more:
foundational
intermediate
applied
workflow-model
implicit-extracted
candidate
deprecated
1.4 Layer
Use one or more:
L0: Foundational Assumption
L1: Foundational Model
L2: Intermediate Model
L3: Applied Model
L4: Workflow / Procedure Model
L5: Output / Evaluation Lens
2. Source Material
2.1 Primary Source
title:
path:
author:
date:
source_type:
2.2 Secondary Sources
-
-
-
2.3 Extraction Notes
2.4 Confidence
Use one:
high
medium
low
3. Core Problem
3.1 Problem Statement
3.2 Why This Problem Matters
3.3 What Existing Thinking Misses
4. Scope
4.1 Applies To
-
-
-
4.2 Best Used When
-
-
-
4.3 Non-Scope
-
-
-
4.4 Boundary Conditions
5. Core Assumptions
1.
2.
3.
For each assumption, clarify:
assumption:
why it matters:
what would challenge it:
6. Core Mechanism
6.1 Mechanism Summary
6.2 Key Variables
- variable:
meaning:
role in model:
6.3 Causal / Generative Logic
6.4 Model Dynamics
7. Procedure / Operating Logic
7.1 Procedure
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.2 If No Fixed Procedure
7.3 Decision Points
- decision point:
criteria:
possible outcomes:
8. Inputs
8.1 Valid Inputs
-
-
-
8.2 Poor Inputs
-
-
-
8.3 Required Context
-
-
-
9. Outputs
9.1 Output Types
-
-
-
9.2 Output Format
9.3 Good Output Criteria
-
-
-
10. Failure Modes
10.1 Common Failure Modes
1.
2.
3.
10.2 Overuse Risks
10.3 Misuse Risks
10.4 Degeneration Pattern
Example:
A causal model may degenerate into conspiracy-style explanation if it cannot define what would falsify it.
11. Falsification Boundary
11.1 What Would Challenge This Model?
-
-
-
11.2 What Should Not Happen If the Model Is Correct?
-
-
-
11.3 What Is Outside the Model's Explanatory Power?
-
-
-
11.4 Weak Falsification Warning
12. Distinctions
12.1 Different From
- nearby concept:
distinction:
12.2 Not Equivalent To
-
-
-
12.3 Common Confusions
-
-
-
13. Related Models
13.1 Parent Models
-
-
13.2 Child Models
-
-
13.3 Sibling Models
-
-
13.4 Overlapping Models
-
-
13.5 Conflicting Models
-
-
14. Related Agents
- agent_id:
path:
usage:
15. Related Skills
- skill_id:
path:
usage:
16. Runtime Usage
- runtime_id:
path:
usage:
17. Examples
17.1 Example Input
17.2 Model Application
17.3 Example Output
17.4 Failure Example
18. Evaluation Criteria
Use this checklist when judging whether the model was applied well:
Core problem addressed?
Scope respected?
Assumptions made explicit?
Mechanism applied correctly?
Failure modes avoided?
Falsification boundary preserved?
Output useful?
Original conceptual force preserved?
19. Conversion Opportunities
19.1 Possible Skills
-
-
19.2 Possible Agents
-
-
19.3 Possible Runtimes
-
-
20. Version Notes
v0.1:
- Initial candidate Model Card.
21. Review Status
Use one:
needs-source-check
needs-user-confirmation
needs-scope-review
needs-falsification-boundary
needs-merge-review
reviewed
22. Open Questions
1.
2.
3.