6.2 KiB

Raw Blame History

artifact_type	name	source_artifact	source_path	author	created	status	based_on
ccpe-source-judgment-report						draft	CCPE System

Original Source Judgment Report: {Artifact Name}

1. Source Artifact

Name:
Path:
Version:
Author:
Original Format:
Target Migration:
Current Canonical Lite:

2. Judgment Purpose

Goal:
Why judgment is needed:
Intended reviewer:

3. Current Classification

Primary:
Secondary components:
Operating mode:
Depth vs automation:
Target platform:

4. Findings Summary

Finding	Category	Severity	Recommended Handling

Severity:

S = Blocks migration until source decision is made.
A = Major issue likely to affect output quality or platform safety.
B = Moderate issue; wrapper or source repair may be enough.
C = Minor issue; document or defer.

Categories:

source defect
platform incompatibility
kernel feature
ambiguous finding

5. Finding Details

5.1 {Finding Name}

Category:
Severity:
Evidence:
Why it may be a problem:
Why it may be intentional:
Impact if preserved verbatim:
Impact if repaired in source:
Impact if patched only in wrapper:
Recommended handling:

Repeat this section for every finding in the Findings Summary.

6. Kernel Force Protection

Elements that must not be flattened:
Distinctive terms to preserve:
Useful severity or strangeness:
Original workflow pressure:
Output behavior to preserve:

6A. Migration Boundary

Allowed wrapper patches:
Forbidden source edits before human decision:
Source repair scope if approved:
Refinement lane trigger:

7. Source Decision Options

7.1 Use Source As-Is

When acceptable:
Risks:
Wrapper requirements:

7.2 Patch Only In Wrapper

Conflicts wrapper can resolve:
Risks:
Required wrapper clauses:

7.3 Repair Source First

Recommended source version:
Minimal repair scope:
Forbidden repair actions:
Regression check needed:

7.4 Enter Refinement Lane

Why Fast Migration is insufficient:
Refinement target:
A/B comparison needed:

8. Recommended Decision

Decision:
Rationale:
Human confirmation needed:
Second judgment by original CCPE agent:

8A. Second Judgment Summary

Use this section only after review by the original CCPE agent or another designated reviewer.

Reviewer:
Final recommendation:
Confirmed true source defects:
Confirmed platform incompatibilities:
Confirmed kernel features:
Confirmed ambiguous findings:
Required wrapper defenses:
Approved minimal source repairs:

8B. Alignment After Review Or New Source

Use this section when the user provides Gemini / original-agent feedback, rejects part of the judgment, or supplies a revised source prompt version.

Alignment input:
  Gemini / original-agent review:
  User rejection or correction:
  New source prompt version:

Judgment updates:
  Findings accepted:
  Findings rejected:
  Findings revised:
  New findings added:

Chosen source version for Original Kernel:
  Path:
  Version:
  Source decision:

Impact on original-kernel-minimal-lite:
  Wrapper patches required:
  Source repairs already included:
  Risks still deferred:

8C. Retroactive Migration Artifact Note

Use this section only when the report is being produced after a migration artifact already exists.

Finding:
Evidence:
Category:
Severity:
Why it matters:
Recommended handling:
Current source judgment impact:

8D. Mandatory Next Migration Step

Next required artifact:
  original-kernel-minimal-lite

Target path:
  workbench/upgraded/{artifact-slug}-original-kernel-minimal-lite.prompt.md

Must preserve:
  The chosen source version verbatim under `## Original Kernel`.

Must not do yet:
  Do not create Model Card, Skill, Agent Spec, Runtime, or Model Index updates until the minimal-kernel artifact exists and the user chooses later upgrade layers.

8E. Refined Lite Optimization Decision

Is refined Lite A/B optimization requested now:

Default decision:
  Stop at original-kernel-minimal-lite unless the user chooses to spend A/B budget.

Reason:
  original-kernel-minimal-lite is a kernel-preserving wrapper and high-ROI migration baseline, not a fully optimized refined Lite prompt.

A/B budget if approved:
  Prompt variants:
    - original-ccpe-2
    - original-kernel-minimal-lite
    - refined-lite candidate
  Platforms:
    - ChatGPT / Codex
    - Gemini
  Article types:
    - strong metaphor
    - business analysis
    - logical argument
    - value philosophy
  Expected result files:
    24 per agent family
  Required reports:
    agent-level regression report
    summary report if multiple agent families are tested

Known precedent:
  Cognitive Imaging reached refined Lite after multiple A/B rounds.
  Giant Cognition and Zhang Liao currently intentionally stop at original-kernel-minimal-lite.

9. Prompt For Original CCPE Agent Review

Use this block when sending the judgment report to the original CCPE agent on its native platform.

请你以“{Artifact Name}”的原版标准，审查这份 Original Source Judgment Report。

你的任务不是重写提示词，而是判断这份审判报告中的 findings 是否成立。

请逐项回答：

1. 哪些 findings 是 true source defects，即原版自身应该修复的问题？
2. 哪些 findings 只是 platform incompatibilities，可以由 minimal-lite wrapper 修复？
3. 哪些 findings 其实是 kernel features，必须保留，否则会削弱原版智能体的生产力？
4. 哪些 findings 仍然 ambiguous，需要人工判断？
5. 你建议下一步选择哪一个 source decision：
   - use source as-is
   - patch only in wrapper
   - repair source first
   - enter Refinement Lane

输出要求：

- 不要直接改写原版 prompt。
- 用 evidence-based judgment。
- 给出最终推荐 source decision。
- 如果建议 repair source first，请只列出最小修复范围，不要做完整重写。

10. Final Human Decision

Chosen decision:
Chosen source version:
Allowed wrapper patches:
Source repairs approved:
Refinement required:
Decision date:

6.2 KiB Raw Blame History Unescape Escape