knowledge-vault/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离3/invocations/whole-source-gestalt-reviewer/prompt-to-send.md

129 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown

# Prompt To Send: whole-source-gestalt-reviewer
You are the `whole-source-gestalt-reviewer` participant for a Knowledge Vault `viewpoint-discussion-distillation` run.
This is a formal Step 0 participant invocation. Do not simulate another agent. Do not write as the main session.
## Canonical Role
Canonical artifact:
```text
C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system\agents\agent-specs\whole-source-gestalt-reviewer.agent.md
```
If readable, use it as the binding role specification. If not readable, follow the contract below and explicitly record the artifact access limitation in the returned output.
## Source
Read this full source document:
```text
C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\knowledge-vault\diary\2026\2026-06\2026-06-05.md
```
Source metadata:
```yaml
source_type: seven-round ChatGPT discussion draft
source_size_bytes: 130947
source_line_count: 4114
source_sha256: 521EDE539B7242AB524A5F5C12CEFD665E1312F56443CAD3FDA9902DF97E5247
source_version_note: file last modified 2026-06-06 18:22:46 local time
```
## Boundary Rule
Use only numeric Markdown H1 headings `# 1` through `# 7` as discussion round boundaries.
Ignore:
```text
- non-numeric H1 headings
- H1-like strings inside block quotes
```
Registered round ranges:
| range_id | start_line | end_line |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| R01 | 1 | 430 |
| R02 | 431 | 1008 |
| R03 | 1009 | 1584 |
| R04 | 1585 | 2336 |
| R05 | 2337 | 2986 |
| R06 | 2987 | 3488 |
| R07 | 3489 | 4114 |
## Task
Read the full source as a whole and produce a Step 0 gestalt alignment report before any segmentation, topic routing, topic docs, material extraction, or downstream handoff.
The report should help the user decide:
```text
- whether the source is coherent, mixed, or fragmented
- whether downstream mode should be structure-first, macro-topic split, or flat-discovery
- whether later topic organization should be tree-shaped, flat, or a mixed graph
- what worker lens and distortion guardrails should be carried into downstream segmentation and extraction
```
## Required Output File
Write your returned output to:
```text
C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\knowledge-vault\discussions\viewpoint-development\2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离3\invocations\whole-source-gestalt-reviewer\returned-output.md
```
## Required Output Structure
Your `returned-output.md` must include:
```text
1. Participant identity and invocation metadata
2. Source document path and source version note
3. Coherence judgment: coherent / mixed / fragmented
4. Coherence rationale and split recommendation if mixed or fragmented
5. Recommended downstream mode: structure-first / macro-topic split / flat-discovery
6. Topic organization recommendation: tree / flat / mixed graph
7. Global topic portrait
8. Main structure or candidate layers
9. Core tensions and governing questions
10. Model-evolution line
11. Parent / child / tool / case / action-layer distinctions
12. Chunk-first distortion risks
13. Segmentation guidance for downstream workers
14. Worker lens recommendation: required / partial / omitted
15. Confidence notes and unresolved structure questions
16. Human confirmation status: pending
```
## Forbidden Actions
Do not:
```text
- modify the source
- create or finalize `01-topic-map.md`
- create `02-material-routing-log.md`
- write topic documents
- perform evidence routing
- extract material units
- claim coverage audit completion
- create writing-workbench handoff
- treat this Step 0 report as final topic authority
```
## Return Message
After writing the file, reply briefly with:
```text
- output path
- coherence judgment
- recommended downstream mode
- topic organization recommendation
- unresolved questions requiring user confirmation
```