knowledge-vault/skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distil.../ccpe-sync-request-2026-06-0...

3.6 KiB

CCPE Sync Request: Whole-Source Gestalt Pass

1. Background

Knowledge Vault discovered a structural weakness in the current viewpoint-discussion-distillation flow.

The previous flow was too chunk-first / worker-first:

source registration -> segmentation -> worker topic extraction -> synthesis -> routing

This works for loose, very long, multi-topic material, but it is risky for coherent discussion drafts under the high-context limit. Range workers see local evidence and can lose the global shape. The failure mode is that tools, layers, cases, action tracks, and model-upgrade relations get flattened into peer topics.

2. Required Runtime Change

Upgrade the Runtime to a 9-step operational flow by adding Step 0:

0. Whole-Source Gestalt Pass
1. Segmentation
2. Worker Topic Extraction
3. Topic Graph Synthesis
4. Human Structure Confirmation
5. Material Routing
6. Topic Docs
7. Coverage / Distortion Audit
8. Downstream Task Routing

Knowledge Vault still needs source registration before this operational flow so it can create the workspace, source map, run notes, and invocation records. If CCPE keeps source registration inside the canonical Runtime, the practical order should be:

registration -> Step 0 whole-source gestalt -> segmentation -> worker passes

3. New Participant Needed

Add a canonical participant:

participant_id: whole-source-gestalt-reviewer
participant_type: high_context_participant
runtime: viewpoint-discussion-distillation
invocation_mode: real sub-session only
main_session_may_simulate: false

The main session must not perform this pass itself. It prepares the invocation packet, records the returned output, and uses it as orientation for downstream segmentation and worker extraction.

4. Output Contract

The participant output should include:

- participant identity and invocation metadata
- source document path and source version note
- coherence judgment: coherent / mixed / fragmented
- coherence rationale and split recommendation if mixed or fragmented
- global topic portrait
- main structure or candidate layers
- core tensions and governing questions
- model-evolution line
- parent/child/tool/case/action-layer distinctions
- chunk-first distortion risks
- segmentation guidance for downstream workers
- confidence notes and unresolved structure questions

This output is not a final topic map, material routing log, or coverage audit. It is an upstream global orientation layer.

5. Worker Rule Change

Worker participants should no longer discover the global structure from zero when a whole-source gestalt output exists.

They should:

- receive the accepted gestalt summary in their thread-start packet
- extract local evidence, refinements, contradictions, and exceptions
- explicitly mark any challenge to the global portrait
- cite local source ranges for every challenge

6. Knowledge Vault Side Already Updated

Knowledge Vault updated these public capability files:

skills/context-management-policy.md
skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/runbook.md
skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/context-strategy.md
skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/invocation-contract.md
skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/participant-registry.md
skills/knowledge-processing/viewpoint-discussion-distillation/ccpe-runtime-alignment.md

CCPE should synchronize the canonical Runtime, participant registry, and any agent/skill specs needed to make whole-source-gestalt-reviewer invocable as a real participant.