knowledge-vault/discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2/handoff/continuation/2026-06-07-third-round-test...

333 lines
8.8 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Third Round Test Handoff
## 1. Purpose
```text
next_round: third_round_test
target_source: diary/2026/2026-06/2026-06-05.md
recommended_new_workspace: discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离3
primary_goal: test the workflow mechanism, not merely reproduce the analysis result
```
本交接文档用于启动第三轮测试。
第一轮证明:没有 Step 0直接分拆讨论稿会导致 worker 摸到局部材料,却拼不出完整思路。
第二轮证明:加入 Step 0 后,全文结构可以被准确捕捉,但后续流程仍有关键漏洞:很多步骤由主会话直接完成,没有严格调用 CCPE 端 Skill / worker / 子会话,因此没有真正完成流程测试。
第三轮要验证的是:
```text
能否严格按照 CCPE / Skills 的真实调用边界完成讨论稿分析。
```
## 2. Second Round Assessment
第二轮产物路径:
```text
discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离2
```
第二轮有效产出:
```text
- Step 0 Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment 方向正确
- source coherence 判断为 coherent
- downstream mode 判断为 structure-first
- topic graph 基本稳定
- 用户确认了关键模型关系
- material extraction 已形成 29 个材料单元
```
第二轮流程缺口:
```text
- Step 0 使用了真实子会话,但没有调用 CCPE 端 canonical Skill / Runtime participant。
- Topic graph synthesis、material routing、topic docs、material extraction 主要由主会话完成。
- 这些步骤虽有产物,但没有验证 CCPE Skill 的真实调用能力。
- Step 0 子会话没有作为持续会话保留;而 Step 0 实际可能需要多轮人机对齐。
```
结论:
```text
第二轮的分析结果可作为参考上下文,但不能视为流程测试通过。
```
## 3. Third Round Non-Negotiable Rules
第三轮必须遵守:
```text
1. 主会话只做编排、记录、验收、用户确认,不模拟 Skill 输出。
2. 分析、分拆、抽取、routing、topic docs 等实质处理必须由真实子会话 / worker / CCPE Skill 完成。
3. 每个 participant 必须有 invocation packet、prompt-to-send 或 skill-execution-record、returned-output。
4. 如果 CCPE 端 Skill 无法真实调用,必须记录 blocked 状态,不能由主会话补写 formal output。
5. Step 0 子会话必须保留会话,不能一次性关闭后丢失上下文。
6. Step 0 可以多轮:子会话输出 -> 用户修正 -> 同一 Step 0 子会话继续对齐 -> 才能确认。
7. 后续 worker 必须接收 Step 0 confirmed lens而不是从零发现结构。
```
## 4. Required Third Round Workspace
建议新建干净目录:
```text
discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离3
```
不要复用第二轮目录作为生产目录。第二轮目录只能作为:
```text
- 已知结构上下文
- 流程缺口审计样例
- 用户确认内容来源
```
第三轮目录至少应包含:
```text
README.md
00-source-map.md
01-topic-map.md
02-material-routing-log.md
03-run-notes.md
topics/
audits/
model-mining/
handoff/
invocations/
```
## 5. Context To Carry Into Third Round
第三轮可以带入以下用户确认,减少重复输入。
### 5.1 Step 0 Confirmed Direction
```text
source_coherence: coherent
downstream_mode: structure-first
worker_lens: required
root_topic: 从失望性情感隔离到认知生成与关系治理
```
### 5.2 Confirmed Model Relations
```text
巨人方舟:
status: formal model name
relation: replaces Giant Cognition 2.0 after model completion
QPI:
status: GL3 problem-representation tool
not: top-level topic
not: GL4 sovereignty-control diagnosis protocol
Reality Lab:
status: action module
parent: intention-action-feedback loop
not: independent Giant Ark layer
家庭三角认知场:
status: independent model
also: scenario-specific model called by Giant Ark in adolescent/family application
methodology discussion:
role: defines Giant Ark application value
meaning: Giant Ark calls concrete models, theories, and tools by domain/layer
adolescent family/school/society weighting:
status: simplifying assumption only
```
### 5.3 Known Distortion Risks
```text
- Do not flatten QPI into a top-level C-layer topic.
- Do not split Giant Cognition, Giant Ark, and Reality Lab into peer models.
- Do not treat Reality Lab as a standalone layer.
- Do not treat Family Triangle Cognitive Field as the whole discussion's top model.
- Do not turn adolescent weighting into a default causal rule.
- Do not continue the old 13-flat-topic structure.
```
## 6. Required Third Round Flow
### 6.1 Source Registration
主会话可执行:
```text
- create workspace
- write README.md
- write 00-source-map.md
- write 03-run-notes.md
- prepare invocation directories
```
主会话不得:
```text
- read the full source and generate analysis
- write formal participant output
- silently replace blocked CCPE Skill output with its own summary
```
### 6.2 Step 0 Whole-Source Gestalt Alignment
必须启动并保留一个真实 Step 0 子会话:
```text
participant_id: whole-source-gestalt-reviewer
session_requirement: persistent until Step 0 confirmed
input:
- full source
- second-round confirmed user context
- known distortion risks
output:
- returned-output.md
- unresolved questions
- human-confirmation.md only after user confirmation
```
如果用户修正 Step 0
```text
send correction back to the same Step 0 sub-session
do not spawn a fresh context unless the old one is irrecoverable
record each alignment turn
```
### 6.3 Segmentation / Source Blocks
第三轮必须调用真实 Skill / worker。
```text
participant: conversation-segmentation
expected_record:
- skill-execution-record.md or returned-output.md
- source-block inventory
```
如果 CCPE Skill 无法真实调用:
```text
status: blocked_waiting_for_participant_output
do_not_simulate: true
```
### 6.4 Topic Discovery / Topic Graph
对于 coherent source
```text
workers receive confirmed Step 0 lens
workers extract local evidence, exceptions, and challenges
workers do not rediscover global structure from zero
```
Topic graph synthesis 应由真实 participant 完成或由多个 worker return 汇总后再由主会话整合。
主会话只可:
```text
- merge returned outputs
- record conflicts
- ask user for confirmation
```
### 6.5 Evidence Routing And Topic Docs
第三轮重点测试:
```text
evidence-routing-and-topic-doc-builder must be real worker/sub-session work
```
要求:
```text
- each topic or topic group has an assigned worker
- worker receives source ranges and confirmed topic graph
- worker writes topic-doc draft or returned-output
- main session integrates only after returned outputs exist
```
不得:
```text
- main session直接写完 topic docs
- main session直接抽取 material units
```
### 6.6 Human Confirmation Gates
第三轮保留两次人参与确认:
```text
Gate 0: Step 0 structure / global lens confirmation
Gate 6: Topic Docs / extracted material usefulness confirmation
```
Gate 0 通过后,可减少旧流程中的 topic-granularity pause。
Gate 6 用于确认:
```text
- topic docs 是否可用
- extracted material 是否足够进入 downstream automation
- 是否需要重新调 worker 修补
```
## 7. What To Reuse From Second Round
可复用:
```text
- 用户确认的模型关系
- known distortion risks
- process-implementation-audit.md 中的流程缺口
- topics/_material-extraction-index.md 作为参考,不作为第三轮正式输出
```
不可直接复用为第三轮正式输出:
```text
- 01-topic-map.md
- 02-material-routing-log.md
- topics/*.md
- audits/*.md
```
这些文件只能作为 expected comparison / reference不是第三轮 participant output。
## 8. Success Criteria
第三轮成功标准不是“再产出一份相似分析”,而是:
```text
- every substantive processing step has a real participant record
- Step 0 sub-session remains persistent through alignment
- CCPE Skill invocation boundaries are tested
- blocked Skill calls are recorded rather than simulated
- topic docs / material extraction are produced by worker/sub-session participants
- two human confirmation gates are recorded
- final package can be traced from source -> participant output -> integration -> audit
```
## 9. Suggested Opening Prompt For Third Round
```text
请从本交接文档开始第三轮测试:
1. 新建 `discussions/viewpoint-development/2026-06-05-失望性情感隔离3`。
2. 只让主会话做编排、记录、验收。
3. Step 0 必须启动并保留同一个 whole-source-gestalt-reviewer 子会话,多轮对齐后再确认。
4. Segmentation、topic discovery、evidence routing、topic docs、material extraction 必须调用真实 Skill / worker / 子会话。
5. 如果 CCPE Skill 无法真实调用,记录 blocked不要由主会话模拟。
6. 带入本文档第 5 节的用户确认上下文,避免用户重复输入。
```