6.4 KiB

Raw Blame History

CCPE Request: Local CCRA Reviewer Agent Runtime

Date: 2026-06-19

Client repository:

C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\work-projects\the-mindscape-of-bro-tsong

Requested supplier repository:

C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\ccpe-system

1. Product Context

The Mindscape of Bro Tsong is building a file-first cognitive model library MVP.

The project already produces CCRA / GPT review bundles under:

ccra_review_bundle/

The owner wants to reduce manual transfer work by adding a first-pass Local CCRA review loop inside the project. Local CCRA review should use a real CCPE Agent Runtime child session, not main-session roleplay.

The first version serves only this repository.

2. Needed Capability

Provide a ccra-local-reviewer capability that can be invoked from this project through CCPE Agent Runtime.

The capability must include:

Agent Spec for ccra-local-reviewer.
Runtime Spec or invocation protocol for creating and continuing a child review session.
File-first input and output contract for local review run directories.
Review report template.
Findings classification rubric.
Lifecycle and scope guard rules.
Guidance for whether companion automation stays CCPE-owned or should be routed to skills-vault.

3. Why This Belongs In CCPE

This request is primarily about expert-agent role definition, review governance, invocation protocol, runtime session continuation, and model lifecycle gate judgment.

Those are CCPE responsibilities.

This repository should only store product-side review runs and supplier requests. It should not become the canonical source for the CCRA Agent definition or runtime protocol.

4. Current Blocked Task

The project can document local_ccra_reviews/ now, but it cannot run official Local CCRA review until CCPE supplies the Agent Spec and Runtime interface.

Concrete blocked action:

Owner asks main Codex session to run Local CCRA review
-> main session creates local_ccra_reviews/<round>/<nn>/
-> main session invokes CCPE Agent Runtime
-> child session writes local review report

The final runtime invocation command or tool contract is intentionally not defined in this repository.

5. Input Files And Source Paths

Relevant project-side paths:

README.md
AGENTS.md
PROJECTS.md
docs/WORKFLOW.md
docs/DECISIONS.md
docs/DATA_CONTRACT.md
docs/HANDOFF_TEMPLATE.md
knowledge_assets/
ccra_review_bundle/
local_ccra_reviews/README.md

Relevant upstream CCRA source material:

C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\knowledge-vault\prompts\GPT\认知科学产品规划架构师\认知科学产品规划架构师.md
C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\knowledge-vault\prompts\GPT\认知科学产品规划架构师\
C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\knowledge-vault\work\internal\强哥的思想宇宙\讨论\2026-06-18产品交流-GPT.md
C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\knowledge-vault\work\internal\强哥的思想宇宙\讨论\Local-Agent\0.1本地的CCRA放在哪儿.md

Reference implementation pattern:

C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\knowledge-vault\skills\knowledge-processing\viewpoint-discussion-distillation

This reference is for the existence of prior CCPE Runtime invocation and session-continuation patterns. Do not copy it into this repository.

6. Expected Output Artifacts

CCPE should produce or register:

ccra-local-reviewer Agent Spec.
CCPE Agent Runtime invocation protocol for this Agent.
Session persistence contract covering child session id, continuation state, and resume behavior.
File-first review run contract compatible with:

local_ccra_reviews/<public-round>/<local-pass>/

Local CCRA report template.
Findings classification rubric, including at least:

blocker
major
minor
calibration
defer

Capability routing decision for companion automation:

keep as Agent-specific CCPE runtime support;
implement locally in this product repository;
or abstract as reusable deterministic automation and route to skills-vault.

7. Required Review Behavior

ccra-local-reviewer must:

Run in a child session or equivalent isolated runtime context.
Read primary evidence from files, not from main-session summaries.
Prioritize review bundle files, reports, tests, selector rules, regression cases, and diffs before Codex explanations.
Output review findings, risks, evidence references, and recommended next actions.
Identify non-target behavior changes.
Identify engineering-pass versus product-judgment gaps.
Identify lifecycle overclaims.
Preserve the distinction between Local CCRA first review, Owner decision, and Web CCRA final review.

8. Prohibited Behavior

ccra-local-reviewer must not:

Modify project files.
Edit selector rules.
Edit model cards.
Edit model JSON.
Edit regression cases.
Create review bundles.
Upgrade model lifecycle status.
Add a third model.
Introduce LLM selector, RAG, database, frontend, backend, user system, or platform behavior.
Treat its own output as Owner approval.
Treat its own output as Web CCRA approval.

9. Companion Capability Candidates

The following needs were discovered while planning Local CCRA. They should not be sent directly to skills-vault from this repository yet. CCPE should first classify them.

Candidates:

Routing behavior diff audit after selector changes.
Review bundle completeness audit.
Lifecycle status guard scan.
Round initialization context builder.
Regression and validation gate runner.

Classification options:

Agent-specific support inside ccra-local-reviewer Runtime.
Product-local deterministic helper.
Reusable deterministic Skill request to skills-vault.

If a candidate becomes a skills-vault request, it should be named by its reusable operation rather than by this project-specific review context.

10. Human Gate

Owner approval is required before:

Treating Local CCRA findings as accepted work.
Copying accepted materials into a formal Web CCRA review bundle.
Including 04_LOCAL_CCRA_REVIEW_REPORT.md in any Web CCRA upload package.
Upgrading model lifecycle status.
Routing any companion capability to skills-vault.

11. Urgency And Dependency

Urgency: high for future review-loop efficiency, but not blocking current model library validation.

Dependency:

Local review run folders can be documented now.
Official Local CCRA execution waits for CCPE Agent Spec and Runtime interface.

6.4 KiB Raw Blame History