93 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
93 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
# S-01 Slide Design V1
|
|
|
|
## Status
|
|
|
|
- Status: validation design.
|
|
- Source page: P01.
|
|
- Page title: 为什么是我们.
|
|
- Role: cover and shared visual-base validation.
|
|
- Line: validation sample.
|
|
- Write policy: append-only; overwrite allowed: no.
|
|
|
|
## Design Purpose
|
|
|
|
本页验证这套前传 PPT 是否能在继承上一套视觉底盘的同时，切换到更硬、更清醒的销售立场。
|
|
|
|
它要一次性说明：
|
|
|
|
1. 这不是上一套“搭上 AI 这条船”的重复动员；
|
|
2. 这次要回答“客户凭什么选我们”的信心问题；
|
|
3. 画面要从“上船”升级为“进入 AI 深水区”。
|
|
|
|
## Visual Concept
|
|
|
|
画面是一张深蓝黑的 AI 深水区航线作战图。
|
|
|
|
底层延续上一套的数字海面、航线、雷达、罗盘、青色信号线和金色重点光，但这次海面下方要能隐约看到更复杂的业务网络、流程节点、组织判断和专家经验结构。远处仍有灯塔或航线终点，但情绪不再是兴奋出发，而是进入深水前的判断与定位。
|
|
|
|
主标题“为什么是我们”必须是第一视觉。副标题说明问题进入深水区后，需要回答谁来做专家智能体。画面可以保留一条船或航线，但不要让船成为主角；主角是“深水区”和“判断问题”。
|
|
|
|
## Text / Typography Plan
|
|
|
|
Main title:
|
|
|
|
> 为什么是我们
|
|
|
|
Subtitle:
|
|
|
|
> 当客户的问题进入 AI 深水区，谁来做专家智能体？
|
|
|
|
Bottom line:
|
|
|
|
> 简单 AI 工具，客户可以自己做；复杂专家智能体，才是我们该做的事。
|
|
|
|
Small label:
|
|
|
|
> 内部销售认知补充会 / 专家智能体销售立场文件
|
|
|
|
Typography:
|
|
|
|
- bold modern Chinese sans-serif;
|
|
- main title largest, white or pale-blue;
|
|
- `AI 深水区` may use cyan;
|
|
- `专家智能体` or key signal may use restrained gold;
|
|
- avoid decorative calligraphy.
|
|
|
|
## Layout
|
|
|
|
- Main title: center-left or center, occupying the clearest safe area.
|
|
- Subtitle: directly below title, one readable line.
|
|
- Deepwater visual: lower half, showing layered business/process/expert networks.
|
|
- Route/radar: diagonal or curved cyan path from foreground toward distant light.
|
|
- Lighthouse or port light: small, far-distance, warm-gold.
|
|
- Small label: upper-right or upper-left.
|
|
- Bottom line: bottom safe zone, not too small.
|
|
|
|
Visual priority:
|
|
|
|
1. 主标题；
|
|
2. 深水区层次；
|
|
3. 副标题；
|
|
4. 航线 / 雷达；
|
|
5. 底部金句。
|
|
|
|
## Constraints / Avoid
|
|
|
|
Must avoid:
|
|
|
|
- making it look like another kickoff cover;
|
|
- cute ship, literal cruise ship, pirate or fantasy ship;
|
|
- humanoid robots, AI faces, stock meeting people;
|
|
- customer proposal style;
|
|
- government report style;
|
|
- pure gradient background without route / deepwater logic;
|
|
- long text blocks or copied raw-source paragraphs.
|
|
|
|
## Validation Focus
|
|
|
|
User should check:
|
|
|
|
1. Does the cover feel like the prequel to the previous deck?
|
|
2. Is it harder and more sober than the old “上船” deck?
|
|
3. Does the first read clearly answer the deck title and deepwater premise?
|