3.1 KiB
3.1 KiB
S-10 Slide Design V1
Status
- Status: validation design.
- Source page: P10.
- Page title: 我们是谁：专家智能体的系统架构师与模具师.
- Role: first content anchor validation.
- Line: validation sample.
- Write policy: append-only; overwrite allowed: no.
Design Purpose
P10 是全套 PPT 的定位核心页。它不能只是漂亮地说“我们很专业”，而要让销售带走一个可复述的判断：
我们帮助企业把人脑里的专家能力，变成组织可复用的智能能力。
本页要验证这套视觉系统能否承载“专家能力工程化”这种硬判断，而不是只会做航线氛围。
Visual Concept
画面是一个“专家能力工程化模具舱”。
左侧是人脑里的专家能力：不是人物肖像，而是抽象的经验云团、隐性判断光点、业务语境片段、案例碎片和组织经验网络。中间是我们的角色：系统架构师与模具师，用精密模具、工程剖面、校准仪表和结构化管线表示。右侧是组织可复用的专家智能体能力：岗位卡、流程接入线、可校准智能体模块、客户业务流程节点。
核心流程必须清楚：
专家经验 → 抽取 → 封装 → 验证 → 校准 → 进入流程
画面要像深蓝黑 AI 航线作战图里的“核心加工舱 / 模具舱”，不是工厂广告，不是程序员写代码，也不是普通系统架构图。
Text / Typography Plan
Title:
我们是谁：专家智能体的系统架构师与模具师
Core judgment:
把人脑里的专家能力，变成组织可复用的智能能力
Positioning label:
专家能力工程化
Pipeline labels:
抽取 / 封装 / 验证 / 校准 / 进入流程
Optional contrast labels:
不是平台 不是外包 不是只写提示词
Typography:
- title at top, large but not crowding;
- core judgment should be the strongest center text;
- pipeline labels short and readable;
- avoid too many long Chinese lines inside the diagram.
Layout
Recommended composition:
- Left third: abstract expert capability cloud and tacit knowledge nodes.
- Center third: precision mold / architecture engine / calibration instrument.
- Right third: reusable expert agent modules connected to business workflow.
- Center line: cyan-gold pipeline from left to right.
- Bottom or central label:
专家能力工程化.
Visual priority:
- core judgment;
- left-to-right engineering pipeline;
- title;
- mold / calibration visual;
- optional contrast tags.
Constraints / Avoid
Must avoid:
- concrete portraits of experts;
- generic humanoid robots;
- code wall / programmer worship;
- platform logo wall;
- ordinary SaaS dashboard;
- treating us as a low-price outsourcing team;
- adding claims not in the accepted skeleton;
- stuffing the raw material into the page.
Validation Focus
User should check:
- Does this page make our positioning clear enough?
- Does it visually explain extraction, encapsulation, validation, calibration, and workflow entry?
- Does it feel continuous with the previous deck while being harder and more analytical?