3.3 KiB

Raw Permalink Blame History

S-17 Slide Prompt V1

Status

Prompt saved before generation.
Line: production-light
Review mode: none
Output image: slides/s17/s17-v1-image.png

Based On Brief

slides/s17/s17-v1-brief.md

Reference Inputs

Image 1: projects/2026-07-01-为什么是我们/slides/s01/s01-v1-image.png as style continuity reference, not edit target.
Image 2: projects/2026-07-01-为什么是我们/slides/s10/s10-v1-image.png as style continuity reference, not edit target.
Image 3: projects/2026-06-29-搭上AI这条船/slides/s01/s01-v1-image.png as style continuity reference, not edit target.
Image 4: projects/2026-06-29-搭上AI这条船/slides/s10/s10-v1-image.png as style continuity reference, not edit target.

Operation Notes

Use the loaded reference images only for visual continuity.
Do not call Garden generation scripts.
Backup fact-check source was not opened or used; no factual claim needed verification.

Advisor / Host-Native Record

Skill mode command: node C:\Users\wangq\.agents\skills\gpt-image-2\scripts\check-mode.js --json
Mode result: B-or-C; recommendation: host-or-advisor; Garden disabled; API key absent; effective path: Mode B because host image_gen is available.
Skill/template files read: SKILL.md, prompt-writing.md, visual-report-page.md, dense-explainer-slides.md, educational-diagram-slide.md, and system imagegen/SKILL.md.
Project files actually read: AGENTS.md, project.md, execution-plan.md, slides/slides.md, visual-system/visual-system.md, style-prompt-master.md, motif-registry.md, and the three accepted intake files.

Final Prompt

Create a 16:9 full-page visual slide image for an internal sales-alignment PowerPoint. Use Image 1-4 as style continuity references only: dark navy-black AI maritime operation map, deepwater business cross-section, radar and compass overlays, cyan route glow, restrained gold highlights, serious internal decision tone.

Page: P17 / S-17. Main title in large readable Chinese: "我们先验证智能流，再投入系统建设". Core judgment: "很多 AI 项目失败，是因为太早开发".

Make two horizontal route maps. Upper route is the wrong heavy-development path, muted gray-blue with restrained red risk markers. It starts from "需求" and moves through "页面", "接口", "知识库", "Prompt", "系统", ending at "没人用" near a subtle reef / warning marker. It should look risky but not cartoonish.

Lower route is the correct validation path, brighter cyan and gold, disciplined and professional. It starts with "专家 + AI 工具", then "最小智能流", "试点", "反馈", "校准", "系统化". Show a small probe route validating value before a larger engineering vessel enters deepwater, but keep the visual abstract and business-like.

Bottom judgment bar: "先跑通价值，再投入开发".

Keep text sparse and readable. Avoid project-management Gantt chart style, cute ships, stock people, customer proposal style, logos, watermarks, long paragraphs, and any implication that validation is due to weak development capability.

Negative / Avoid

Do not make this feel like hesitation or inability to develop. Do not use cartoon ships. Do not overload node text.

Output Intent

Copy host-generated image to projects/2026-07-01-为什么是我们/slides/s17/s17-v1-image.png.

3.3 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History