video-workbench/projects/2026-07-01-为什么是我们/visual-system/visual-system.md

157 lines
5.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Visual System
## Source State
This file adapts the accepted visual base from `2026-06-29-搭上AI这条船` to the new prequel deck `2026-07-01-为什么是我们`.
Status:
- Validation-stage visual system.
- P01 is the cover sample.
- P10 is the first content anchor sample.
Primary source files:
- `../intake/阶段5P1-P22 单页设计骨架.md`
- `../intake/阶段3PPT 总纲 v1.md`
- `../intake/阶段4通用表达与视觉系统.md`
Style continuity references:
- `../../2026-06-29-搭上AI这条船/visual-system/visual-system.md`
- `../../2026-06-29-搭上AI这条船/visual-system/style/style-prompt-master.md`
- accepted old images `s01-v1-image.png` and `s10-v1-image.png`
Backup fact-check source only:
```text
C:\Users\wangq\Documents\Codex\knowledge-vault\work\internal\OPC销售\为什么是我们.md
```
Do not use the backup source to rewrite the deck structure.
## Current Visual Definition
> 深蓝黑商务底 + AI 航线作战图 + 深水区剖面 + 雷达 / 罗盘 / 工具箱 / 工厂 / 模具师 / 销售武器库母题 + 青色与金色信号高亮。
Working visual sentence:
> 这不是一张重新动员大家上船的图,而是一张进入 AI 深水区前的市场判断和销售作战图。
Continuity rule:
> 保留上一套的深蓝黑 AI 航线底板和青金高亮,但情绪从“兴奋上船”切换为“硬判断、深水区、证据链、销售立场”。
## Deck Tone
The tone should hold four feelings:
1. 清醒:承认平台强,也承认普通 AI 开发公司存在。
2. 坚定:我们的定位不是平台、不是外包,而是专家能力工程化。
3. 专业:敢于说简单 AI 客户自己做,复杂专家智能体才是我们的场。
4. 行动:差异最终要沉淀成销售武器库。
Language direction:
> 自己人口吻 + 公司化判断 + 战前校准感。
Avoid turning it into:
- customer-facing proposal;
- founder biography deck;
- AI trend lecture;
- dense internal manual;
- another copy of the previous kickoff deck.
## Format Rules
- Output page: 16:9 full-page visual image.
- Page text may be embedded in the image.
- Minor small-text defects are acceptable for validation, but the page title and core judgment must be readable.
- Each page keeps one big judgment, one core visual model, and three to five short support labels.
- Do not copy long source paragraphs into images.
- If image text fails but the visual base is strong, later PPT assembly may use text overlays.
## Palette
Base:
- deep navy-black;
- dark ocean blue;
- cold slate gray;
- near-black executive background.
Signal:
- cyan / blue-green for AI signals, route lines, radar, active judgment paths;
- restrained gold / warm amber for key commitments, evidence, positioning, and sales confidence;
- white / pale blue for readable titles.
Avoid:
- bright cyberpunk neon;
- government red-gold;
- cheerful training-course pastel;
- clean white SaaS proposal style;
- luxury black-gold with no route-map logic.
## Page Families
| Family | Pages | Function | Primary Motifs |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| A Opening / Problem | P01-P03 | Establish why this deck exists and the three sales questions. | deepwater route, radar targets, question gates |
| B Market Contrast | P04-P07 | Acknowledge platforms and define the first boundary. | toolbox, factory, mold, shallow vs deep water |
| C Our Positioning | P08-P12 | Define expert agents and our role. | digital employee card, expert capability mold, engineering cutaway |
| D Customer Choice | P13-P18 | Explain why customers choose us. | decision compass, three-line crossing, iceberg, validation route, calibration loop |
| E Sober Judgment | P19-P21 | Show the difference is real but must be proved. | evidence chain, lighthouse pillars, maturity dashboard |
| F Sales Arsenal | P22 | Turn positioning into reusable sales tools. | arsenal wall, navigation map, proof layer, action layer |
## Text Rendering Policy
- Prefer short Chinese labels of 2-8 characters.
- Use page title + one core judgment + 3-5 short labels.
- Avoid long sentence clusters inside diagrams.
- Do not overfill P10 with every phrase from the source. P10 must focus on:
- 专家能力;
- 抽取;
- 封装;
- 验证;
- 校准;
- 进入真实流程.
## Forbidden Drift
Avoid:
- platform-bashing;
- developer-company-bashing;
- claiming we can do all AI;
- generic humanoid robots;
- literal cute ships;
- pirate / fantasy ship;
- stock meeting photos;
- customer proposal deck;
- dense dashboard UI;
- unrelated futuristic city;
- large blocks of copied source material.
## Validation Questions
For P01:
1. Does the page feel like the prequel to the previous deck, not a duplicate?
2. Does “AI 深水区 / 为什么是我们” read before decoration?
3. Is the cover harder and more sober than the kickoff deck?
For P10:
1. Does the page make our positioning clear without needing a long explanation?
2. Can sales take away “专家能力工程化” as the first read?
3. Does the visual model show extraction, molding, validation, calibration, and workflow entry?
## Sample Adjustment Rule
- Common base problem: update this file and `visual-system/style/style-prompt-master.md`.
- Page-specific issue: update only the relevant `slides/sNN/sNN-vN-*` artifacts.
- Use append-only versions for repairs.