video-workbench/investigations/2026-06-23-gpt-image-2-advi.../cases.md

3.4 KiB

Cases

Source Principle

The cases are taken from the two user-specified GPT knowledge files. They are not newly invented story scenarios.

Group A: Science Video Storyboard, Weight 55%

V-S01: 被浪拍下水的人

Source: 30_CASE_典型视频分镜案例.md, S-01.

Intent:

  • Opening hook for a science / commentary video.
  • Establish the metaphor that ordinary people are being pushed into the AI wave.
  • Page text will be added outside the generated image.

Prompt risk:

  • AI symbols become literal text.
  • The scene becomes a disaster movie instead of a metaphorical visual essay.
  • The composition leaves no title-safe area.

V-S03: 游泳圈与太平洋

Source: 30_CASE_典型视频分镜案例.md, S-03.

Intent:

  • Governing metaphor: AI float vs the Pacific Ocean.
  • Show scale contrast: tool is light, reality is vast and heavy.

Prompt risk:

  • The ring becomes too cute or too central.
  • Ocean scale does not dominate.
  • The metaphor turns into a travel poster.

V-S05: 逻辑沙堡

Source: 30_CASE_典型视频分镜案例.md, S-05.

Intent:

  • Risk visualization: beautiful AI-generated business logic may collapse under reality.
  • Sandcastle must look precise and fragile; the wave must feel imminent.

Prompt risk:

  • Business-plan elements become readable text.
  • The sandcastle looks like a fairy-tale castle rather than fragile logic.
  • The wave lacks pressure.

V-S07: 防忽悠三板斧

Source: 30_CASE_典型视频分镜案例.md, S-07.

Intent:

  • Practical framework: three brakes before using AI for high-stakes action.
  • Visualize calculation, red-team attack, and stop-loss rule as three gates / brakes.

Prompt risk:

  • The three mechanisms are unclear.
  • Text is rendered into the image.
  • The image becomes a generic car safety ad.

Group B: Training AI PPT, Weight 35%

T-P8: 提示词工程已死?认知工程才刚开始

Source: 31_CASE_典型培训AI_PPT案例.md, P8.

Intent:

  • Training slide contrast: old prompt tricks vs cognitive engineering.
  • Left/right comparison visual; final page text handled by PPT layer.

Prompt risk:

  • The image tries to render the page text.
  • The contrast is too decorative and not teachable.
  • "Cognitive core" becomes a generic sci-fi brain.

T-P12: 从分数评价到成长状态评价

Source: 31_CASE_典型培训AI_PPT案例.md, P12.

Intent:

  • Training slide contrast: result scoring vs growth-state assessment.
  • Explain a move from static score sheets to dynamic learning path / feedback maps.

Prompt risk:

  • The left side becomes unreadable score-sheet text.
  • The right side becomes generic data visualization.
  • The visual loses the teacher / student / AI assessment triangle.

T-P18: AI教育变革的逻辑链

Source: 31_CASE_典型培训AI_PPT案例.md, P18.

Intent:

  • Summary slide: one logic chain from AI ecosystem to cognitive model to CCPE / SPGM to assessment innovation and human-AI education ecology.

Prompt risk:

  • Five nodes lose their sequence.
  • The image renders fake labels.
  • The chain looks like generic "AI transformation" marketing art.

Group C: Character / Makeup Still, Weight 10%

C-01: 人物形象目录边界样本

Intent:

  • Keep one lightweight character sample only to evaluate whether Advisor prompts support the proposed makeup-still/ directory.

Prompt risk:

  • Overgeneralizing character workflow into all video-workbench work.
  • Mistaking character prompt quality for the whole system's quality.