86 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
86 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
# Test Cases
|
|
|
|
## Evaluation Question
|
|
|
|
Does the Advisor workflow produce prompts that are more controllable, reusable, and aligned with video-workbench production needs than direct prompting?
|
|
|
|
## Case T01: Character Identity Makeup Still
|
|
|
|
Goal: create a stable identity reference image for a recurring MV protagonist.
|
|
|
|
Input:
|
|
|
|
- 50-year-old East Asian male traveler.
|
|
- Black rectangular glasses, stubble, tired but steady eyes, slightly messy hair.
|
|
- Dark long coat, old backpack strap visible.
|
|
- Not heroic, not fashion, not influencer portrait.
|
|
- Output should become `identity_ref` for later shots.
|
|
|
|
Main risk:
|
|
|
|
- If the prompt over-cinematizes the result, the identity anchor becomes too stylized and hard to reuse.
|
|
- If the prompt under-specifies face and texture, later shots drift.
|
|
|
|
## Case T02: Wardrobe / Body Fullbody Anchor
|
|
|
|
Goal: create a wardrobe and body silhouette reference, not a face reference.
|
|
|
|
Input:
|
|
|
|
- Same traveler system as T01.
|
|
- Full body or nearly full body.
|
|
- Long dark coat length, old backpack, trouser cuffs, muddy boots.
|
|
- Face may be less important; outfit continuity is the goal.
|
|
|
|
Main risk:
|
|
|
|
- Prompt tries to solve face, wardrobe, mood, and scene at once.
|
|
- The result becomes another portrait instead of a silhouette / costume reference.
|
|
|
|
## Case T03: MV Side-Walking Road Shot
|
|
|
|
Goal: make a production still for an MV shot where the character walks along a cold road.
|
|
|
|
Input:
|
|
|
|
- Use identity_ref for face system, wardrobe_ref for outfit, pose_ref for side / three-quarter walking.
|
|
- Environment occupies at least 60%.
|
|
- The character should not look into camera.
|
|
- Vertical 9:16, road-movie mood, restrained fatigue.
|
|
|
|
Main risk:
|
|
|
|
- The identity reference pulls the result back into centered portrait.
|
|
- The road scene loses character consistency.
|
|
|
|
## Case T04: Low-Angle Muddy Boots Detail
|
|
|
|
Goal: make a close detail shot where identity is carried by boots, coat hem, mud, and bodily cost.
|
|
|
|
Input:
|
|
|
|
- Low angle near the ground.
|
|
- Muddy boots stepping through wet road.
|
|
- Coat hem and backpack strap may appear, face is not required.
|
|
- Vertical 9:16, tactile road-movie detail.
|
|
|
|
Main risk:
|
|
|
|
- Overusing the face identity reference harms the shot.
|
|
- The image becomes a generic boot photo without narrative continuity.
|
|
|
|
## Case T05: High-Density Explainer Slide Visual
|
|
|
|
Goal: test a non-character visual common in video-workbench: one dense page explaining a concept.
|
|
|
|
Input:
|
|
|
|
- Topic: why AI image production needs staged visual anchors.
|
|
- Style: clean training slide / explainer page.
|
|
- Output image should be a visual background or slide asset; readable text should be handled outside the generated image.
|
|
|
|
Main risk:
|
|
|
|
- Direct prompt asks the image model to render too much text.
|
|
- The result may be visually attractive but structurally useless for a slide.
|