84 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
84 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
# 2026-06-23-在路上
|
|
|
|
## Status
|
|
|
|
- Status: execution skeleton initialized from cleaned intake.
|
|
- Medium type: 16:9 MV image/video production package.
|
|
- Current phase: execution-prep asset tests, before full 51-shot production.
|
|
- Planning state: first GPT planning round accepted and closed.
|
|
- Current execution focus: polling-based workflow trial complete; prepare R6 notification/wakeup test and append-only S-16 repair.
|
|
|
|
## Accepted Intake
|
|
|
|
| File | Role | Use |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| `intake/第一轮策划工作总结.md` | planning closeout | Confirms first round is complete and next work should move to asset preparation/testing. |
|
|
| `intake/阶段三-MV 总纲.md` | MV direction | Defines the emotional arc, scene system, motifs, and risk controls. |
|
|
| `intake/阶段四-通用表达与视觉系统设计.md` | visual rules | Defines character system, style system, composition rules, and motif rules. |
|
|
| `intake/阶段四-人物锚点板策划说明.md` | character anchor planning | Defines character board purpose, background strategy, modules, and review criteria. |
|
|
| `intake/阶段四-人物锚点板页面结构建议稿.md` | character anchor layout | Defines the page structure for the character anchor board. |
|
|
| `intake/阶段四-人物锚点板文案标注稿.md` | character annotation rationale | Explains why labels are needed and what they should stabilize. |
|
|
| `intake/阶段四-风格锚点板页面结构建议稿.md` | style anchor layout | Defines the page structure for the style anchor board and A/B/C/D anchors. |
|
|
| `intake/阶段五-镜头清单骨架.md` | shot skeleton | Provides the 51-shot planning table and priority structure. |
|
|
| `intake/阶段五-核心单镜.md` | key-shot expansion | Expands S-10, S-46, and S-51 for later prompt work. |
|
|
|
|
## Core Direction
|
|
|
|
This MV is a landscape-led road documentary / poetic realism piece, not a portrait MV.
|
|
|
|
Core sentence:
|
|
|
|
> World before face; road before pose; the traveler is a small coordinate that keeps moving.
|
|
|
|
The emotional center is not victory. It is continuing.
|
|
|
|
## Accepted Visual Anchors
|
|
|
|
| Anchor | Status | Purpose |
|
|
| --- | --- | --- |
|
|
| A: 风景主导型 | accepted | Main composition: world large, road long, person small. |
|
|
| B: 高位观察型 | accepted | City edge and system pressure. |
|
|
| C: 泥泞里的星空 | accepted repaired sample | Soul image; dark night/pre-dawn muddy puddle with broken starlight. |
|
|
| D: 夜路篝火型 | accepted | Ending warmth and distant fellow travelers. |
|
|
|
|
## Current Assets To Materialize
|
|
|
|
1. Character anchor board.
|
|
2. Transparent character slices for execution reference.
|
|
3. Style anchor board with A/B/C/D samples.
|
|
4. C-anchor retest: dark muddy puddle with visible broken star reflection.
|
|
5. Five-shot test package before full production.
|
|
|
|
## Key Local Execution Files
|
|
|
|
| File | Purpose |
|
|
| --- | --- |
|
|
| `execution-plan.md` | Current execution control and next decision. |
|
|
| `visual-system/visual-system.md` | Accepted visual system and materialization targets. |
|
|
| `slides/slides.md` | Shot/unit execution fact table. |
|
|
| `intake-repair/fix-title-2026-06-23/` | Heading repair reports, fixed copies, and original Markdown backups. |
|
|
|
|
## Next Action
|
|
|
|
Start R6 in a fresh session after committing current work. R6 should test notification/wakeup in place of polling and redo S-16 as an append-only repair.
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
handoff/2026-06-24-character-consistency-r6-notification-s16-handoff.md
|
|
docs/workflows/slide-task-orchestration.md
|
|
docs/workflows/slide-task-templates.md
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
The v2-from-anchor transparent character slice set is accepted. The C repair sample is accepted. The common style anchor board is accepted. The five-shot visual trial is accepted: S-01, S-10, S-46, S-47, and S-51 are generated and accepted by user. The character-consistency workflow test is visually accepted for S-21, S-14, S-25, S-33, S-06, S-07, S-08, S-09, S-11, S-12, and S-13. `S-16/s16-v2` is explicitly not accepted and should be repaired later.
|
|
|
|
Third-round mechanism test result: `session-04` used a clean user-visible Codex child thread (`019ef876-c5b2-7202-b204-774cb5fb95fd`) and internal one-shot SubAgents for `Agent S-33` (`019ef87a-3aa1-75a2-a97c-de8f57e234e1`) and `Agent S-06` (`019ef886-8797-7243-9427-d45065fcfc47`). It produced `s33-v2-image.png` and `s06-v2-image.png`; both were accepted by user. Review files were intentionally absent. Prompt traces record `gpt-image-2` Advisor mode plus style and character references.
|
|
|
|
Fourth-run result: `session-05` used clean child thread `019ef8cf-4ab1-7b41-877b-979dc25b0a76` for `S-02`, then continued the same child thread for `S-03` and `S-04`. User accepted `s02-v2-image.png`, `s03-v2-image.png`, and `s04-v2-image.png`; review files were intentionally absent. `S-02` completed in about 13m55s and the child context was reported by user as about 107K tokens at that point.
|
|
|
|
R4 mechanism finding: image quality route is usable, but the workflow is not a clean mechanism pass. Evidence in worker returns shows `S-02`, `S-03`, and `S-04` brief/packet files were written by their slide Agents rather than prewritten by the visible child session. `S-04` also has a sequencing warning: the worker launched before visible-child brief/packet prewrite confirmation. No overwrite, duplicate worker, or review-file defect was observed in `session-05`.
|
|
|
|
R5 brief-ownership result: `session-06` used clean child thread `019ef907-16b7-7a43-9924-227892aa62d3` for `S-07`, then continued the same child thread for `S-08` and `S-09`. User accepted `s07-v2-image.png`, `s08-v3-image.png`, and `s09-v2-image.png`; review files were intentionally absent. Successful R5 outputs preserved visible-child-owned brief/packet before worker launch. `S-08/s08-v2` is incomplete transport-failure evidence only and was retried append-only as `s08-v3`.
|
|
|
|
Package-size trials continued after R5. `session-07` completed a direct 3-slide package (`S-11`, `S-12`, `S-13`) with user-observed context 157K and elapsed time 30m5s; user accepted all three images. `session-08` completed a user-authorized 4-slide package (`S-15`, `S-16`, `S-17`, `S-18`) with completion gate pass, but user rejected `s16-v2` because it did not achieve `横向大远景，路从画面一侧切向远方，人物极小` and was too similar to `s15`.
|
|
|
|
Broad generation waits for the next user decision after R6. The accepted quality route is `gpt-image-2` Advisor prompt/spec plus active style master, active character registry when needed, and visible reference images loaded before generation. The next production plan can treat child-owned brief/packet before worker launch as the current successful mechanism rule for accepted outputs.
|