128 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
128 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
# Cases
|
|
|
|
## Source Principle
|
|
|
|
The cases are taken from the two user-specified GPT knowledge files. They are not newly invented story scenarios.
|
|
|
|
## Group A: Science Video Storyboard, Weight 55%
|
|
|
|
### V-S01: 被浪拍下水的人
|
|
|
|
Source: `30_CASE_典型视频分镜案例.md`, S-01.
|
|
|
|
Intent:
|
|
|
|
- Opening hook for a science / commentary video.
|
|
- Establish the metaphor that ordinary people are being pushed into the AI wave.
|
|
- Page text will be added outside the generated image.
|
|
|
|
Prompt risk:
|
|
|
|
- AI symbols become literal text.
|
|
- The scene becomes a disaster movie instead of a metaphorical visual essay.
|
|
- The composition leaves no title-safe area.
|
|
|
|
### V-S03: 游泳圈与太平洋
|
|
|
|
Source: `30_CASE_典型视频分镜案例.md`, S-03.
|
|
|
|
Intent:
|
|
|
|
- Governing metaphor: AI float vs the Pacific Ocean.
|
|
- Show scale contrast: tool is light, reality is vast and heavy.
|
|
|
|
Prompt risk:
|
|
|
|
- The ring becomes too cute or too central.
|
|
- Ocean scale does not dominate.
|
|
- The metaphor turns into a travel poster.
|
|
|
|
### V-S05: 逻辑沙堡
|
|
|
|
Source: `30_CASE_典型视频分镜案例.md`, S-05.
|
|
|
|
Intent:
|
|
|
|
- Risk visualization: beautiful AI-generated business logic may collapse under reality.
|
|
- Sandcastle must look precise and fragile; the wave must feel imminent.
|
|
|
|
Prompt risk:
|
|
|
|
- Business-plan elements become readable text.
|
|
- The sandcastle looks like a fairy-tale castle rather than fragile logic.
|
|
- The wave lacks pressure.
|
|
|
|
### V-S07: 防忽悠三板斧
|
|
|
|
Source: `30_CASE_典型视频分镜案例.md`, S-07.
|
|
|
|
Intent:
|
|
|
|
- Practical framework: three brakes before using AI for high-stakes action.
|
|
- Visualize calculation, red-team attack, and stop-loss rule as three gates / brakes.
|
|
|
|
Prompt risk:
|
|
|
|
- The three mechanisms are unclear.
|
|
- Text is rendered into the image.
|
|
- The image becomes a generic car safety ad.
|
|
|
|
## Group B: Training AI PPT, Weight 35%
|
|
|
|
### T-P8: 提示词工程已死？认知工程才刚开始
|
|
|
|
Source: `31_CASE_典型培训AI_PPT案例.md`, P8.
|
|
|
|
Intent:
|
|
|
|
- Training slide contrast: old prompt tricks vs cognitive engineering.
|
|
- Left/right comparison visual; final page text handled by PPT layer.
|
|
|
|
Prompt risk:
|
|
|
|
- The image tries to render the page text.
|
|
- The contrast is too decorative and not teachable.
|
|
- "Cognitive core" becomes a generic sci-fi brain.
|
|
|
|
### T-P12: 从分数评价到成长状态评价
|
|
|
|
Source: `31_CASE_典型培训AI_PPT案例.md`, P12.
|
|
|
|
Intent:
|
|
|
|
- Training slide contrast: result scoring vs growth-state assessment.
|
|
- Explain a move from static score sheets to dynamic learning path / feedback maps.
|
|
|
|
Prompt risk:
|
|
|
|
- The left side becomes unreadable score-sheet text.
|
|
- The right side becomes generic data visualization.
|
|
- The visual loses the teacher / student / AI assessment triangle.
|
|
|
|
### T-P18: AI教育变革的逻辑链
|
|
|
|
Source: `31_CASE_典型培训AI_PPT案例.md`, P18.
|
|
|
|
Intent:
|
|
|
|
- Summary slide: one logic chain from AI ecosystem to cognitive model to CCPE / SPGM to assessment innovation and human-AI education ecology.
|
|
|
|
Prompt risk:
|
|
|
|
- Five nodes lose their sequence.
|
|
- The image renders fake labels.
|
|
- The chain looks like generic "AI transformation" marketing art.
|
|
|
|
## Group C: Character / Makeup Still, Weight 10%
|
|
|
|
### C-01: 人物形象目录边界样本
|
|
|
|
Intent:
|
|
|
|
- Keep one lightweight character sample only to evaluate whether Advisor prompts support the proposed `makeup-still/` directory.
|
|
|
|
Prompt risk:
|
|
|
|
- Overgeneralizing character workflow into all video-workbench work.
|
|
- Mistaking character prompt quality for the whole system's quality.
|